يعرض 1 - 13 نتائج من 13 نتيجة بحث عن '"bovhyaluronidase azoximer"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.56s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council; № 5 (2023); 72-80 ; Медицинский Совет; № 5 (2023); 72-80 ; 2658-5790 ; 2079-701X

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.med-sovet.pro/jour/article/view/7454/6649; Shen M., Duan H., Chang Y., Lin Q. Prevalence and risk factors of intrauterine adhesions in women with a septate uterus: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44(5):881–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.004.; Радзинский В.Е. (ред.). Перинеология. Эстетическая гинекология. М.: StatusPraesens; 2020. 416 с.; Zou Y., Li S., Ming L., Yang Y., Ye P., Zou J. The Correlation between Chronic Endometritis and Tubal-Factor Infertility. J Clin Med. 2022;12(1):285. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010285.; Хириева П.М., Кузнецова М.В., Быстрицкий А.А., Мартынов С.А., Бурменская О.В., Трофимов Д.Ю., Адамян Л.В. Исследование уровня мРНК генов в ткани эндометрия у женщин репродуктивного возраста с внутриматочными синехиями. Акушерство и гинекология. 2018;(2):56–64. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2018.2.56-64.; Hooker A.B., de Leeuw R.A., Emanuel M.H., Mijatovic V., Brolmann H.A.M., Huirne J.A.F. The link between intrauterine adhesions and impaired reproductive performance: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):837. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05164-2.; Bender R.A., Özcan C., Akar B., Çalışkan E. Comparison of the localization of intrauterine adhesions in pregnant and infertile women. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;19(3):195–200. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.69705.; Fritsch H. Ein Fall von volligen Schwund der Gebaumutterhohle nach Auskratzung. Zentralbl Gynaekol. 1894;18:1337–1342.; Santamaria X., Isaacson K., Simón C. Asherman’s Syndrome: it may not be all our fault. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(8):1374–1380. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey232.; Asherman J.G. Amenorrhoea traumatica (atretica). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1948;55(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1948.tb07045.x.; Baradwan S., Baradwan A., Al-Jaroudi D. The association between menstrual cycle pattern and hysteroscopic march classification with endometrial thickness among infertile women with Asherman syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(27):e11314. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011314.; Hooker A.B., Lemmers M., Thurkow A.L., Heymans M.W., Opmeer B.C., Brölmann H.A. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(2):262–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt045.; Dreisler E., Kjer J.J. Asherman’s syndrome: current perspectives on diagnosis and management. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:191–198. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S165474.; Hooker A.B., Mansvelder F.J., Elbers R.G., Frijmersum Z. Reproductive outcomes in women with mild intrauterine adhesions; a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):6933–6941. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1931103.; Hooker A.B., Aydin H., Brölmann H.A., Huirne J.A. Long-term complications and reproductive outcome after the management of retained products of conception: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.021.; Hooker A.B., de Leeuw R.A., Twisk J.W.R., Brölmann H.A.M., Huirne J.A.F. Reproductive performance of women with and without intrauterine adhesions following recurrent dilatation and curettage for miscarriage: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(1):70–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa289.; Джибладзе Т.А., Зуев В.М., Ищенко А.И., Свидинская Е.А., Хохлова И.Д., Брюнин Д.В. и др. Комплексное лечение маточной формы бесплодия при синдроме Ашермана. Акушерство и гинекология. 2022;(3):165–169. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.3.165-169.; Mahdavinezhad F., Gharaei R., Farmani A.R., Hashemi F., Kouhestani M., Amidi F. The Potential Relationship Between Different Human Female Reproductive Disorders and Sperm Quality in Female Genital Tract. Reprod Sci. 2022;29(3):695–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00520-7.; Nassir M., Levi M., Shaked N.T. Dynamic 3D Modeling for Human Sperm Motility through the Female Cervical Canal and Uterine Cavity to Predict Sperm Chance of Reaching the Oocyte. Cells. 2023;12(1):203. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12010203.; Nassir M., Levi M., Dardikman-Yoffe G., Mirsky S.K., Shaked N.T. Prediction of Sperm Progression in Three Dimensions Using Rapid Optical Imaging and Dynamic Mechanical Modeling. Cells. 2022;11(8):1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11081319.; Ishimoto K., Gaffney E.A. Mechanical tuning of mammalian sperm behaviour by hyperactivation, rheology and substrate adhesion: a numerical exploration. J R Soc Interface. 2016;13(124):20160633. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0633.; Fernandez-Hermida Y., Vincenzoni F., Milardi D., Astorri A.L., Urbani A., Grande G., Azagra R. Light Microscopy and Proteomic Patterns of Ovulation in Cervical Mucus. Life (Basel). 2022;12(11):1815. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12111815.; Giojalas L.C., Guidobaldi H.A. Getting to and away from the egg, an interplay between several sperm transport mechanisms and a complex oviduct physiology. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;518:110954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2020.110954.; Kuijsters N.P.M., Sammali F., Rabotti C., Huang Y., Mischi M., Schoot B.C. Visual inspection of transvaginal ultrasound videos to characterize uterine peristalsis: an inter-observer agreement study. J Ultrasound. 2020;23(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-018-00356-z.; Saint-Dizier M., Mahé C., Reynaud K., Tsikis G., Mermillod P., Druart X. Sperm interactions with the female reproductive tract: A key for successful fertilization in mammals. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;516:110956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2020.110956.; Harada T., Khine Y.M., Kaponis A., Nikellis T., Decavalas G., Taniguchi F. The Impact of Adenomyosis on Women’s Fertility. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71(9):557–568. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000346.; Olawale B.B., Ademola A.O., Gbadebo A.G. Tubal abnormalities in patients with intrauterine adhesion: evaluation using hysterosalpingography. Ann Afr Med. 2014;13(4):179–183. https://doi.org/10.4103/1596-3519.142288.; Lessey B.A., Young S.L. What exactly is endometrial receptivity? Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):611–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.009.; Paulson R.J. Introduction: Endometrial receptivity: evaluation, induction and inhibition. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.029.; Свидинская Е.А., Борцвадзе Ш.Н. Ультразвуковой мониторинг при хирургическом лечении внутриматочных синехий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020;(Прил. 4):190–191. Режим доступа: https://aig-journal.ru/articles/ ultrazvukovoi-monitoring-pri-hirurgicheskom-lechenii-vnutrimatochnyhsinehii.html.; Zhu R., Duan H., Xu W., Wang S., Gan L., Xu Q., Li J. Decision tree model predicts live birth after surgery for moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04375-x.; Cervelló I., Gil-Sanchis C., Santamaría X., Faus A., Vallvé-Juanico J., DíazGimeno P. et al. Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5-positive cells in the endometrial stem cell niche. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):510–519.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.021.; Li S., Ding L. Endometrial Perivascular Progenitor Cells and Uterus Regeneration. J Pers Med. 2021;11(6):477. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11060477.; Lv Q., Wang L., Luo X., Chen X. Adult stem cells in endometrial regeneration: Molecular insights and clinical applications. Mol Reprod Dev. 2021;88(6):379–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23476.; Gargett C.E., Schwab K.E., Deane J.A. Endometrial stem/progenitor cells: the first 10 years. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(2):137–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv051.; Baradwan S., Shafi D., Baradwan A., Bashir M.S., Al-Jaroudi D. The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcome in patients with Asherman’s syndrome post-hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:77–82. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S151283.; Vitale S.G., Riemma G., Carugno J., Perez-Medina T., Alonso Pacheco L., Haimovich S. et al. Postsurgical barrier strategies to avoid the recurrence of intrauterine adhesion formation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(4):487–498.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.09.015.; Tempest N., Hill C.J., Maclean A., Marston K., Powell S.G., Al-Lamee H., Hapangama D.K. Novel microarchitecture of human endometrial glands: implications in endometrial regeneration and pathologies. Hum Reprod Update. 2022;28(2):153–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab039.; Fang R., Cai L., Xiong F., Chen J., Yang W., Zhao X. The effect of endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration on pregnancy outcome in the first fresh IVF/ICSI cycle. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(6):473–476. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2015.1132304.; Kasius A., Smit J.G., Torrance H.L., Eijkemans M.J., Mol B.W., Opmeer B.C., Broekmans F.J. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):530–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu011.; Зуев В.М., Калинина Е.А., Кукушкин В.И., Джибладзе Т.А., Жаров Е.В., Монтанино М.О. Инновационные лазерные технологии в диагностике и лечении «проблемного» эндометрия в репродуктивной медицине. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020;(4):157–165. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.4.157-165.; Есипова И.А., Краснова И.А., Бреусенко В.Г., Аксенова В.Б., Тимофеева Е.Г. Оценка информативности ультразвукового обследования пациенток с внутриматочными синехиями. Акушерство и гинекология. 2022;(1):97–106. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.1.97-106.; Di Guardo F., Palumbo M. Asherman syndrome and insufficient endometrial thickness: A hypothesis of integrated approach to restore the endometrium. Med Hypotheses. 2020;134:109521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109521.; Fei Y., Wen J., Li X., Wang N., Chen M., Jiang X. Uterine adhesion: Is luteal phase prior to follicular phase in uterine adhesiolysis? Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(37):e27194. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027194.; Cen J., Zhang Y., Bai Y., Ma S., Zhang C., Jin L. et al. Research progress of stem cell therapy for endometrial injury. Mater Today Bio. 2022;16:100389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100389.; Evans-Hoeker E.A., Young S.L. Endometrial receptivity and intrauterine adhesive disease. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32(5):392–401. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1376358.; Movilla P., Wang J., Chen T., Morales B., Wang J., Williams A. et al. Endometrial thickness measurements among Asherman syndrome patients prior to embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(12):2746–2754. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa273.; Baradwan S., Baradwan A., Bashir M., Al-Jaroudi D. The birth weight in pregnant women with Asherman syndrome compared to normal intrauterine cavity: A case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(32):e11797. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011797.; Радзинский В.Е. (ред.). Беременность ранних сроков. От прегравидарной подготовки к здоровой гестации. М.: StatusPraesens; 2018. 800 с.; Zhao X., Zhang A., Gao B., Burjoo A., Huang H., Xu D. Cold scissors ploughing technique in hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a comparative study. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(4):50. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.11.136.; Эфендиева З.Н., Аполихина И.А., Калинина Е.А. «Тонкий» эндометрий в аспекте репродуктивных неудач: современная проблема или гипердиагностика? Акушерство и гинекология. 2019;(9):32–39. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.9.32-39.; Девятова Е.А., Цатурова К.А., Вартанян Э.В. Роль оценки перистальтики эндометрия в прогнозировании успеха имплантации. Проблемы репродукции. 2016;22(4):47–51. https://doi.org/10.17116/repro201622447-51.; Georgiou J., Lekkas K., Varnava G., Sophocleous M., Michaelides A., Tanos V. The ElectroUteroGraph: A Novel Tool for Assessing Uterine Contractions of Non-Pregnant Women. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2022;3:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJEMB.2022.3159097.; Liao J., Yang S., Chen K., Chen H., Jiang F., Zhang W., Wu X. A predictive model for first-trimester pregnancy inception after IVF-ET based on multimodal ultrasound evaluation of endometrial receptivity. BMC Med Imaging. 2022;22(1):158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00863-w.; Kuijsters N.P.M., Sammali F., Ye X., Blank C., Xu L., Mischi M. et al. Propagation of spontaneous electrical activity in the ex vivo human uterus. Pflugers Arch. 2020;472(8):1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-020-02426-w.; Donnellan E.M., Lonergan P., Meade K.G., Fair S. An ex-vivo assessment of differential sperm transport in the female reproductive tract between high and low fertility bulls. Theriogenology. 2022;181:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.01.011.; Шнейдерман М.Г., Аполихина И.А., Калинина Е.А., Абубакиров А.Н., Мишиева Н.Г., Алиева К.У. и др. Новое об имплантации эмбриона в эндометрий матки. Акушерство и гинекология. 2013;(11):75–78. Режим доступа: https://aig-journal.ru/articles/Novoe-ob-implantacii-embriona-v-endometriimatki.html.; Kuijsters N.P.M., Methorst W.G., Kortenhorst M.S.Q., Rabotti C., Mischi M., Schoot B.C. Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(1):50–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.019.; Weng X.L., Xie X., Liu C.B., Yi J.S. Postoperative reproductive results of infertile patients with intrauterine adhesions: A retrospective analysis. J Int Med Res. 2022;50(9):3000605221119664. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221119664.; Maltepe E., Fisher S.J. Placenta: the forgotten organ. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2015;31:523–552. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125620.; Feng Q., Gao B., Huang H., Woo J.J., Zou L., Zhao X. et al. Obstetrical outcome in the third trimester after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(4):51. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.09.123.; Zhang L.P., Wang M., Shang X., Zhang Q., Yang B.J., Xu Y. et al. The incidence of placenta related disease after the hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(4):575–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2020.05.018.; Eller A.G., Porter T.F., Soisson P., Silver R.M. Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta. BJOG. 2009;116(5):648–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02037.x.; Jauniaux E., Jurkovic D., Hussein A.M., Burton G.J. New insights into the etiopathology of placenta accreta spectrum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(3):384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.038.; Jauniaux E., Burton G.J. Pathophysiology of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: A Review of Current Findings. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;61(4):743–754. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000392.; Sonan Y., Aoki S., Enomoto K., Seki K., Miyagi E. Placenta Accreta following Hysteroscopic Lysis of Adhesions Caused by Asherman’s Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018:6968382. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6968382.; Kim S.Y., Kong S.K., Lee Y.J. The Management and Outcomes of Placental Adhesion. Perinatology. 2019;30(2):47–53. https://doi.org/10.14734/ PN.2019.30.2.47.; Пономаренко И.В., Полоников А.В., Чурносов М.И. Гиперпластические процессы эндометрия: этиопатогенез, факторы риска, полиморфизм генов-кандидатов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019;(1):13–18. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.1.13-18.; Azlan A., Salamonsen L.A., Hutchison J., Evans J. Endometrial inflammasome activation accompanies menstruation and may have implications for systemic inflammatory events of the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(6):1363–1376. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa065.; Watters M., Martínez-Aguilar R., Maybin J.A. The Menstrual Endometrium: From Physiology to Future Treatments. Front Reprod Health. 2022;3:794352. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2021.794352.; Torres-De La Roche L.A., Campo R., Devassy R., Di Spiezio Sardo A., Hooker A., Koninckx P. et al. Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019;11(2):137–149. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6897521/.; Lin S., Xie X., Guo Y., Zhang H., Liu C., Yi J. et al. Clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of infertile patients with endometriosis and endometrial polyps: A retrospective cohort study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(6):916–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2020.09.020.; March C.M. Management of Asherman’s syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(1):63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.018.; Friedman J.A., Wong J.M.K., Chaudhari A., Tsai S., Milad M.P. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comparison of techniques and review of current evidence in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30(4):243–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000475.; Healy M.W., Schexnayder B., Connell M.T., Terry N., DeCherney A.H., Csokmay J.M. et al. Intrauterine adhesion prevention after hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):267–275.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.001.; Haber K., Hawkins E., Levie M., Chudnoff S. Hysteroscopic morcellation: review of the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(1):110–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.008.; Ciebiera M., Łoziński T., Wojtyła C., Rawski W., Jakiel G. Complications in modern hysteroscopic myomectomy. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(7):398–404. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2018.0068.; Hamerlynck T.W., van Vliet H.A., Beerens A.S., Weyers S., Schoot B.C. Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Loop Resection for Removal of Placental Remnants: A Randomized Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(7):1172–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.828.; Van Wessel S., van Vliet H.A.A.M., Schoot B.C., Weyers S., Hamerlynck T.W.O. Hysteroscopic morcellation versus bipolar resection for removal of type 0 and 1 submucous myomas: A randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;259:32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.050.; Chua K.J.C., McLucas B. Sepsis following hysteroscopic myomectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(4):646–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2020.1864407.; Capmas P., Lobersztajn A., Duminil L., Barral T., Pourcelot A.G., Fernandez H. Operative hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: Efficacy and subsequent fertility. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(3):151–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.12.005.; Litta P., Leggieri C., Conte L., Dalla Toffola A., Multinu F., Angioni S. Monopolar versus bipolar device: safety, feasibility, limits and perioperative complications in performing hysteroscopic myomectomy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(3):335–338. https://doi.org/10.12891/ceog19432014.; Mazzon I., Favilli A., Cocco P., Grasso M., Horvath S., Bini V. et al. Does cold loop hysteroscopic myomectomy reduce intrauterine adhesions? A retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(1):294–298.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.032.; Zhao H., Yang B., Li H., Xu Y., Feng L. Successful Pregnancies in Women with Diffuse Uterine Leiomyomatosis after Hysteroscopic Management Using the Hysteroscopy Endo Operative System. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(5):960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.10.003.; Hsu Y.H., Yeh C.C., Wang P.H. The better way-uterine feeding vessel occlusion to manage postpartum hemorrhage. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;58(2):175–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2019.02.001.; Chao H.T., Wang P.H. Fertility outcomes after uterine artery occlusion in the management of women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2012.10.006.; Jiang J., Wang C., Xue M. High-intensity focused ultrasound versus uterine artery embolization for patients with retained placenta accreta. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.003.; Orlando M., Kollikonda S., Hackett L., Kho R. Non-hysteroscopic Myomectomy and Fertility Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(3):598–618.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.006.; Song D., Liu Y., Xiao Y., Li T.C., Zhou F., Xia E. A matched cohort study comparing the outcome of intrauterine adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome after uterine artery embolization or surgical trauma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(6):1022–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.015.; Кондратович Л.М., Козаченко А.В., Коган Е.А., Файзуллина Н.М., Адамян Л.В. Клинико-морфологические особенности спаечного процесса у пациенток с миомой матки. Акушерство и гинекология. 2014;(8):71–75. Режим доступа: https://aig-journal.ru/articles/Kliniko-morfolo-gicheskieosobennosti-spaechnogo-processa-u-pacientok-s-miomoi-matki.html.; Huang C.Y., Chang W.H., Cheng M., Huang H.Y., Horng H.C., Chen Y.J. et al. Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Gels for the Prevention of Intrauterine Adhesions after a Hysteroscopic Myomectomy in Women with Submucosal Myomas: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Life (Basel). 2020;10(5):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10050067.; Fuchs N., Smorgick N., Ben Ami I., Vaknin Z., Tovbin Y., Halperin R., Pansky M. Intercoat (Oxiplex/AP gel) for preventing intrauterine adhesions after operative hysteroscopy for suspected retained products of conception: double-blind, prospective, randomized pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(1):126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.019.; Bosteels J., Weyers S., Mol B.W., D’Hooghe T. Anti-adhesion barrier gels following operative hysteroscopy for treating female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Surg. 2014;11(2):113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-014-0832-x.; Bosteels J. Antiadhesion barrier gels: time for evidence-informed practice in gynecologic surgery? Fertil Steril. 2017;107(5):1143–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.006.; Zheng F., Xin X., He F., Liu J., Cui Y. Meta-analysis on the use of hyaluronic acid gel to prevent intrauterine adhesion after intrauterine operations. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19(4):2672–2678. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8483.; Доброхотова Ю.Э., Филатова Л.А., Гришин И.И. Результаты применения бовгиалуронидазы азоксимера в комплексной терапии воспалительных заболеваний органов малого таза. РМЖ. Мать и дитя. 2018;26(2-1):19–22. Режим доступа: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/ginekologiya/Rezulytaty_primeneniya_bovgialuronidazy_azoksimera_vkompleksnoy_terapii_vospalitelynyh_zabolevaniy_organov_malogo_taza/.; Царькова М.А., Семенцова Н.А. Новый подход к комплексной терапии пациенток с патологией эндометрия. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2014;14(5):50–53. Режим доступа: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/rossijskij-vestnik-akushera-ginekologa/2014/5/031726-61222014510.; Кравцова Е.И., Куценко И.И., Холина Л.А., Аникина Г.А. Эффективность применения протеолитической терапии в комплексном лечении пациенток с внутриматочными синехиями II степени. Медицинский совет. 2020;(3):170–175. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-3-170-175.; Оразов М.Р., Радзинский В.Е., Хамошина М.Б., Михалева Л.М., Исмаилзаде С.Я. Противоспаечные барьеры в клинической практике: персонификация менеджмента пациенток. Гинекология. 2021;23(6):480–484. https://doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2021.6.201292.; https://www.med-sovet.pro/jour/article/view/7454

  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Academic Journal
  8. 8
    Academic Journal
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
    Academic Journal
  12. 12
  13. 13