يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 206 نتيجة بحث عن '"Susceptibilidad antimicrobiana"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.62s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
  8. 8
    Academic Journal
  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
    Academic Journal
  11. 11
    Academic Journal
  12. 12
    Academic Journal
  13. 13
    Academic Journal
  14. 14
    Academic Journal
  15. 15
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    المساهمون: Cordovéz Martínez, María del Carmen

    وصف الملف: 84p.

    Relation: Mina Vásquez , K y Tanguila Andy, M (2023) (Tesis de Pregrado)Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamaba, Ecuador.; UNACH-FCS-LAB-CLIN; http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/10590

  16. 16
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    المؤلفون: Paredes Loyola, Jéssica Paola

    المساهمون: Flores Flor, Francisco Javier

    Relation: Paredes Loyola, Jéssica Paola¿ (2023). Evaluación de cinco productos comerciales para el control de Ralstonia solanacearum in vitro como alternativa de uso en la producción orgánica. Carrera de Biotecnología. Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE. Matriz Sangolquí.; 058466; http://repositorio.espe.edu.ec/handle/21000/37415

  17. 17
    Academic Journal

    المساهمون: Proyecto ALFA Bacterialnet, Laboratorio de Tuberculosis del Hospital Dr. Antonio Cetrángolo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas —Conicet—, Argentina.

    المصدر: instname:Universidad del Rosario

    Time: estudio de un total de 19 aislamientos clínicos del complejo M. abscessus., The mic for nine antibiotics was determined by cmm and broth microdilution —bmd— for 19 strains of M. abscessus complex., a cim de 9 antibióticos foi determina- da mediante o mmc e microdiluição em caldo —mdc— para 19 cepas do complexo M. abscessus.

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  18. 18
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Journal MVZ Cordoba; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2018): Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 23(2) Mayo-Agosto 2018; 6637-6648 ; Revista MVZ Córdoba; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2018): Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 23(2) Mayo-Agosto 2018; 6637-6648 ; 1909-0544 ; 0122-0268

    وصف الملف: application/pdf; application/epub+zip; text/html; application/xml

    Relation: https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1338/pdf; https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1338/epub; https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1338/html; https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1338/2493; 1. Bortolozzo FP, Menegat MB, Mellagi APG, Bernardi ML, Wentz I. New artificial insemination technologies for swine. Reprod Dom Anim. 2015; 50(Suppl. 2):80-84.; 2. Riesenbeck A. Review on international trade with boar semen. Rep Domestic Anim. 2011; 46(Suppl. 2):1-3.; 3. Morrell JM. Antimicrobials in boar semen extenders – A risk / Benefits analysis. J Antimicrob. 2016; 2(1):107-108.; 4. Althouse GC. Sanitary Procedures for the Production of Extended Semen. Reprod Dom Anim. 2008; 43:374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.x; 5. Althouse GC, Pierdon MS, Lu KG. Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen. Theriogenol. 2008; 70:1317-1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.010; 6. Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Sepúlveda L, Torner E, Pinart E, et al. Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011; 127: 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.07.018; 7. Schultze M, Ammon C, Rudiger K, Jung M, Grobbel M. Analysis of hygienic critical points in boar semen production. Theriogenology. 2015; 83:430-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004; 8. Schulze M, Grobbel M, Muller KM, Junkes C, Dathe M, Rudiger KR, Jung M. Challenges and limits using antimicrobial peptides in boar semen preservation. Reprod Dom Anim. 2015; 50(Suppl 2):5-10.; 9. Grossfeld R, Peralta W, Weitze K, Waberski D. Antibiotic-free hypothermic storage of boar semen in Androstar +5 extender results in similar fertility results compared to semen stored at 17°C in extender with antibiotic content. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016; 169:125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.071; 11. Gaczarzewicz D, Udala J, Piasecka M, Blaszczyk B, Stankiewicz T. Bacterial contamination of boar semen and its relationship to sperm quality preserved in commercial extender containing gentamicin sulfate. Polish J Vet Sci. 2016; 19(3):451–459. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0057; 12. Markey B, Leonard F, Archambault M, Cullinane A, Maguire D. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, 2013; 2 ed. MOSBY Elsevier, p. 27-49; 920 pp.; 13. CLSI. Developtment of In Vitro Susceptibility Testing Criteria and Quality Control Parameters. 5th Ed. CLSI guideline 23. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018.; 14. Althouse GC. Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen. Reprod Dom Anim. 2008; 43:374-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01187.x; 15. Rodriguez AL, Soom AV, Arsenakis I, Maes D. Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen. Porcine Health Management. 2017; 3:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5; 16. Payne BJ, Clark S, Maddox C, Ness A. Achromobacter xylosoxidans in extended semen causes reproductive failure in artificially inseminated sows and gilts. J Swine Health Prod. 2008; 16(6):316-322.; 17. Gary E Ritchie. Water for Pharmaceutical Purposes USP 24/NF. 2000; 30(5):1744. URL available in: http://www.pharmacopeia.cn/v29240/usp29nf24s0_c1231.html; 18. Bresciani C, Cabassi CS, Morini G, Taddei S, Bigliardi E, Di Lanni F, Sabboni A, Parmigiani E. Boar semen bacterial contamination in Italy and antibiotic efficacy in a modified extender. Ital J Anim Sci. 2014; 13:3082. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3082; 19. Tremblay YDN, Hathroubi S, Jacques M. Les biofilms bactériens: leur importance en santé animale et en santé publique. Canadian J Vet Res. 2014; 78(2): 110-116.; 20. Fuster-Valls N, Hernández-Herrero M, Marín-de-Mateo M, Rodríguez-Jerez JJ. Effect of different environmental conditions on the bacteria survival on stainless steel surfaces. Food Cont. 2008; 19:308-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.04.013; 21. Rode TM, Langsrud S, Holck A, Moretro T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 116:372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.017; 22. De Souza EL, Meira QG, Barbosa IM, Athayde AJAA, Conceição ML, Siqueira-Junior JP. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus from food contact surfaces in a meat-based broth and sensitivity to sanitizers. Braz J Microbiol. 2014; 45(1):67-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822014000100010; 23. Úbeda JL, Ausejo R, Dahmani Y, Falceto MV, Usan A, Malo C, Perez-Martinez FC. Adverse effects of members of the Enterobacteriaceae family on boar sperm quality. Theriogenol. 2013; 80:565-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.05.022; 24. Mazurova J, Kukla R, Rozkot M, Lustykova A, Slehova E, Sleha R, Lipensky J, Opletal L. Use of natural substances for boar semen decontamination. Vet Med. 2015; 60:235–247. https://doi.org/10.17221/8175-VETMED; 25. Korpimäki T, Kurittu J, Karp M. Surprisingly fast disappearance of β-lactam selection pressure in cultivation as detected with novel biosensing approaches. J Microbiol Met. 2003; 53(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00213-0; 26. Goldberg AMG, Argenti LE, Faccin JE, Linck L, Santi M, Bernardi ML, Cardoso, MRI; Wentz, I; Bortolozzo, FP. Risk factors for bacterial contamination during boar semen collection. Res Vet Sci. 2013; 95:362–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.06.022; 27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Performance Standard for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; TwentyFourty Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. Wayne, PA, USA; 2014.; https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1338

  19. 19
    Academic Journal
  20. 20
    Academic Journal