يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 198 نتيجة بحث عن '"Sung, Randall S."', وقت الاستعلام: 0.63s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
  7. 7
    Academic Journal
  8. 8
    Academic Journal
  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
    Academic Journal
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Academic Journal
  13. 13
  14. 14
    Academic Journal
  15. 15
    Academic Journal
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
    Academic Journal
  19. 19
    Academic Journal
  20. 20
    Academic Journal

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Williams, Aaron M.; Kumar, Sathish S.; Bhatti, Umar F.; Biesterveld, Ben E.; Kathawate, Ranganath G.; Sung, Randall S.; Woodside, Kenneth J.; Englesbe, Michael J.; Alameddine, Mitchell B.; Waits, Seth A. (2019). "The impact of intraoperative fluid management during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on donor and recipient outcomes." Clinical Transplantation 33(6): n/a-n/a.; https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149691; Clinical Transplantation; Levey AS, Inker LA. GFR evaluation in living kidney donor candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 28 ( 4 ): 1062 ‐ 1071.; Demyttenaere S, Feldman LS, Fried GM. Effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal perfusion and function: a systematic review. Surgical Endosc. 2007; 21 ( 2 ): 152 ‐ 160.; Hazebroek EJ, Gommers D, Schreve MA, et al. Impact of intraoperative donor management on short‐term renal function after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 2002; 236 ( 1 ): 127 ‐ 132.; Wilson CH, Sanni A, Rix DA, Soomro NA. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 11: Cd006124.; Bamboat ZM, Bordeianou L. Perioperative fluid management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2009; 22 ( 1 ): 28 ‐ 33.; Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta‐analysis. Ann Surg. 2008; 247 ( 1 ): 58 ‐ 70.; Handschin AE, Weber M, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg. 2003; 90 ( 11 ): 1323 ‐ 1332.; Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S, et al. Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 2000; 232 ( 3 ): 392 ‐ 400.; Troppmann C, Perez RV, McBride M. Similar long‐term outcomes for laparoscopic versus open live‐donor nephrectomy kidney grafts: an OPTN database analysis of 5532 adult recipients. Transplantation. 2008; 85 ( 6 ): 916 ‐ 919.; Mackinnon S, Aitken E, Ghita R, Clancy M. A comparison of the effects of oral vs. intravenous hydration on subclinical acute kidney injury in living kidney donors: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Nephrol. 2017; 18 ( 1 ): 30.; Bolte SL, Chin LT, Moon TD, et al. Maintaining urine production and early allograft function during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology. 2006; 68 ( 4 ): 747 ‐ 750.; London ET, Ho HS, Neuhaus AM, Wolfe BM, Rudich SM, Perez RV. Effect of intravascular volume expansion on renal function during prolonged CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Ann Surg. 2000; 231 ( 2 ): 195 ‐ 201.; Bergman S, Feldman Ls, Carli F, et al. Intraoperative fluid management in laparoscopic live‐donor nephrectomy: challenging the dogma. Surgical Endosc. 2004; 18 ( 11 ): 1625 ‐ 1630.; Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1999; 67 ( 5 ): 722 ‐ 728.; Chiu AW, Chang LS, Birkett DH, Babayan RK. The impact of pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and gasless laparoscopy on the systemic and renal hemodynamics. J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 181 ( 5 ): 397 ‐ 406.; Junghans T, Bohm B, Grundel K, Schwenk W, Muller JM. Does pneumoperitoneum with different gases, body positions, and intraperitoneal pressures influence renal and hepatic blood flow? Surgery. 1997; 121 ( 2 ): 206 ‐ 211.; McDougall EM, Monk TG, Wolf JS Jr, et al. The effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on renal function in an animal model. J Am Coll Surg. 1996; 182 ( 4 ): 317 ‐ 328.; Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier‐Holgersen R, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor‐blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003; 238 ( 5 ): 641 ‐ 648.; Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89 ( 4 ): 622 ‐ 632.; Waits SA, Hilliard P, Sheetz KH, Sung RS, Englesbe MJ. Building the case for enhanced recovery protocols in living kidney donors. Transplantation. 2015; 99 ( 2 ): 405 ‐ 408.; Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 1997; 226 ( 4 ): 483 ‐ 489. discussion 489‐490.; Holte K, Klarskov B, Christensen DS, et al. Liberal versus restrictive fluid administration to improve recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double‐blind study. Ann Surg. 2004; 240 ( 5 ): 892 ‐ 899.; Doherty M, Buggy DJ. Intraoperative fluids: how much is too much? Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109 ( 1 ): 69 ‐ 79.; Lambert KG, Wakim JH, Lambert NE. Preoperative fluid bolus and reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. AANA J. 2009; 77 ( 2 ): 110 ‐ 114.; Bundgaard‐Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H. ’Liberal’ vs. ’restrictive’ perioperative fluid therapy–a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009; 53 ( 7 ): 843 ‐ 851.; Mertens zur Borg I, Di Biase M, Verbrugge S, IJzermans J, Gommers D. Comparison of three perioperative fluid regimes for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized dose‐finding study. Surgical Endosc. 2008; 22 ( 1 ): 146 ‐ 150.; Mertens zur Borg IR, Kok NF, Lambrou G, et al. Beneficial effects of a new fluid regime on kidney function of donor and recipient during laparoscopic v open donor nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2007; 21 ( 12 ): 1509 ‐ 1515.; Rule AD, Larson TS, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Jacobsen SJ, Cosio FG. Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141 ( 12 ): 929 ‐ 937.