المؤلفون: Cordero-Rivera, A., Núñez, J. C., Suriel, C.

المصدر: RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert)

مصطلحات موضوعية: Territorialidad, Selección sexual, Guardia precopulatoria, Comportamiento nocturno, Etodiversidad, Damisela, Territoriality, Sexual selection, Precopulatory guarding, Nocturnal behaviour, Ethodiversity, Damselfly

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 2024, Vol. 47, Núm. 1 (2024), p. 19-32; http://www.raco.cat/index.php/ABC/article/view/10.32800-abc.2024.47.0019/521464; http://www.raco.cat/index.php/ABC/article/view/10.32800-abc.2024.47.0019

الاتاحة: http://www.raco.cat/index.php/ABC/article/view/10.32800-abc.2024.47.0019
https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2024.47.0019

المؤلفون: Font, Enrique, Font‐Ferrer, Enrique V.

المصدر: Metode Science Studies Journal; Vol. 0, Núm. 13 (2023); 153–159 ; Metode Science Studies Jornal; Vol. 0, Núm. 13 (2023); 153–159 ; 2174-9221 ; 2174-3487

مصطلحات موضوعية: bellesa, elecció de parella, evolució, psicologia evolucionista, selecció sexual, beauty, mate choice, evolution, evolutionary psychology, sexual selection, belleza, elección de pareja, evolución, psicología evolucionista, selección sexual

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/24205/22291; Bovet, J., & Raymond, M. (2015). Preferred women’s waist-to-hip ratio variation over the last 2,500 years. PLOS ONE, 10 (4), e0123284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123284 Buss, D. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating . Basic Books. Cloud, J. M., & Perilloux, C. (2014). Bodily attractiveness as a window to women’s fertility and reproductive value. In V. A. Weekes-Shackelford & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 135–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0314-6_7 Coetzee, V., Greeff, J. M., Stephen, I. D., & Perrett, D. I. (2014). Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender. PLOS ONE, 9 (7), e99629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099629 Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Wu, C. H., Barbee, A. P., & Druen, P. B. (1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 (2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261 Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex . Murray. Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty . Anchor Books. Font, E., & Carazo, P. (2021). False dichotomies and human sexual size dimorphism: A comment of Dunsworth (2020). Evolution and Human Behavior, 42 (2), 176–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.08.003 Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78 (3), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793102006085 Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A., & Brown, S. (1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (6), 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1166 Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A., & Vaughn, L. S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 27 (1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79 Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature . Vintage. Muller, M. N., Thompson, M. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2006). Male chimpanzees prefer mating with old females. Current Biology, 16 (22), 2234–2238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.042 Singh D., Dixson B. J., Jessop T. S., Morgan B., & Dixson A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31 (3), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.001 Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (2), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.293 Singh, D., & Singh, D. (2011). Shape and significance of feminine beauty: An evolutionary perspective. Sex Roles, 64, 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9938-z Singh, D., Renn, P., & Singh, A. (2007). Did the perils of abdominal obesity affect the depiction of female beauty in the sixteeth to eighteenth century British literature? Exploring the health and beauty link. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 274 (1611), 891–894. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0239 Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24 (3), 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.804899 Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–119). The University of Chicago Press. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971 (pp. 139–179). Aldine Publishing Company.; https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/24205

الاتاحة: https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/24205
https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.24205

المؤلفون: Mendelson, Tamra C., Ryan, Michael J.

المصدر: Metode Science Studies Journal; Vol. 0, Núm. 13 (2023); 145–151 ; Metode Science Studies Jornal; Vol. 0, Núm. 13 (2023); 145–151 ; 2174-9221 ; 2174-3487

مصطلحات موضوعية: bellesa, neuroestètica, fluïdesa perceptiva, biaix sensorial, selecció sexual, beauty, neuroaesthetics, perceptual fluency, sensory bias, sexual selection, belleza, neuroestética, fluidez perceptiva, sesgo sensorial, selección sexual

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/24202/22290; https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/downloadSuppFile/24202/11338; Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Research Reviews , 28 (3), 309–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00019-8 Bilger, H. T., Vertosick, E., Vickers, A., Kaczmarek, K., & Prum, R. O. (2021). Higher-order musical temporal structure in bird song. Frontiers in Psychology , 12 , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629456 Changizi, M. A., Zhang, Q., Ye, H., & Shimojo, S. (2006). The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. The American Naturalist , 167 (5), E117–E139. https://doi.org/10.1086/502806 Cummings, M. E., & Endler, J. A. (2018). 25 years of sensory drive: The evidence and its watery bias. Current Zoology , 64 (4), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy043 Dai, X., Brendl, C. M., & Ariely, D. (2010). Wanting, liking, and preference construction. Emotion , 10 (3), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017987 Daniel, M. J., Koffinas, L., & Hughes, K. A. (2019). Habituation underpins preference for mates with novel phenotypes in the guppy. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 286 , 20190435. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0435 Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex . John Murray. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals . John Murray. Dong, S., & Clayton, D. F. (2009). Habituation in songbirds. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory , 92 (2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2008.09.009 Dugatkin, L. A., & Godin, J.-G. J. (1992). Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy ( Poecilia reticulata ). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 249 , 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1992.0101 Hartshorne, C. (1973). Born to sing . Indiana University Press. Hoke, K. L., Ryan, M. J., & Wilczynski, W. (2010). Sexually dimorphic sensory gating drives behavioral differences in túngara frogs. Journal of Experimental Biology , 213 (20), 3463–3472. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.043992 Holzleitner, I. J., Lee, A. J., Hahn, A. C., Kandrik, M., Bovet, J., Renoult, J. P., Simmons, D., Garrod, O., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2019). Comparing theory-driven and data-driven attractiveness models using images of real women’s faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance , 45 (12), 1589–1595. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000685 Houde, A. E. (1997). Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies . Princeton University Press. Hulse, S. V., Renoult, J. P., & Mendelson, T. C. (2020). Sexual signaling pattern correlates with habitat pattern in visually ornamented fishes. Nature Communications , 11 (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16389-0 Lynch, K. S., & Ryan, M. J. (2020). Understanding the role of incentive salience in sexual decision-making. Integrative and Comparative Biology , 60 (3), 712–721. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa054 Maney, D. L. (2013). The incentive salience of courtship vocalizations: Hormone-mediated 'wanting' in the auditory system. Hearing Research , 305 (1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.04.011 Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty: How Darwin’s forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world-and us . Doubleday. Renoult, J. P., Bovet, J., & Raymond, M. (2016). Beauty is in the efficient coding of the beholder. Royal Society Open Science , 3 (3), 160027. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160027 Renoult, J. P., & Mendelson, T. C. (2019). Processing bias: Extending sensory drive to include efficacy and efficiency in information processing. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 286 (1900), 20190165. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0165 Richards, E. (2017). Darwin and the making of sexual selection . University of Chicago Press. Rosenthal, G. G. (2017). Mate choice: The evolution of sexual decision making from microbes to humans . Princeton University Press. Rosenthal, G. G., & Ryan, M. J. (2022). Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin. Science , 375 , eabi6308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6308 Ryan, M. J. (2018). A taste for the beautiful . Princeton University Press. Sibeaux, A., Cole, G. L., & Endler, J. A. (2019). The relative importance of local and global visual contrast in mate choice. Animal Behaviour , 154 , 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.06.020 Street, S. E., Morgan, T. J. H., Thornton, A., Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Cross, C. P. (2018). Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning. Scientific Reports , 8 (1), 1715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8 Von Uexküll, J. (2014). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere . Springer-Verlag. Wilczynski, W., Rand, A. S., & Ryan, M. J. (2001). Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Brain, Behavior and Evolution , 58 (3), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047268; https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/24202

الاتاحة: https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/24202
https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.24202

المؤلفون: Pérez, Juan Ignacio

المصدر: Metode Science Studies Journal; Vol. 0, Núm. 13 (2023); 135–143 ; Metode Science Studies Jornal; Vol. 0, Núm. 13 (2023); 135–143 ; 2174-9221 ; 2174-3487

مصطلحات موضوعية: selecció sexual, bellesa, biologia evolutiva, evolució, sexual selection, beauty, evolutionary biology, evolution, selección sexual, biología, biología evolutiva, evolución

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/24722/22289; Brown, S. (2022). Naturalizing aesthetics. In A. Chatterjee & E. R. Cardillo (2022), Brain, beauty, & art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus (pp. 18–21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513620.003.0004 Buskes, C. (2006). Evolutionair denken: De invloed van Darwin op ons wereldbeeld . Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds. Chatterjee, A., & Cardillo, E. R. (2022). Prologue: Where have we been, and where are we now? In A. Chatterjee & E. R. Cardillo, Brain, beauty, & art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus (pp. XI–XII). Oxford University Press. Darwin, C. (1860, 3 April). Letter to Asa Gray. Darwin Correspondence Project. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2743.xml Darwin, C. (1877). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray. DeAngelis, R. S., & Hofmann, H. A. (2020). Neural and molecular mechanisms underlying female mate choice decisions in vertebrates. Journal of Experimental Biology , 223 (17), jeb207324. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.207324 Deutsch, D. (2011). The beginning of infinity. Explanations that transform the world. Viking. Hoke, K. L., Burmeister, S. S., Fernald, R. D., Rand, A. S., Ryan, M. J., & Wilczynski, W. (2004). Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception. Journal of Neuroscience , 24 (50), 11264–11272. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2079-04.2004 Kandel, E. R. (2016). Reductionism in art and brain science. Bridging the two cultures . Columbia University Press. Keagy, J., Savard, J.-F., & Borgia, G. (2009). Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success. Animal Behaviour , 78 (4), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.011 Keagy, J., Savard, J.-F., & Borgia, G. (2011). Complex relationship between multiple measures of cognitive ability and male mating success in satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus . Animal Behaviour , 81 , 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.018 Li, Q., Gao, K.-Q., Vinther, J., Shawkey, M. D., Clarke, J. A., D’Alba, L., Meng, Q., Briggs, D. E., & Prum, R. O. (2010). Plumage color patterns of an extinct dinosaur. Science , 327 (5971), 1369–1372. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186290 Moreno, J. (2013). Evolución por selección sexual según Darwin. La vigencia de una idea. Síntesis. Nadal, M., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2022). Bringing it all together. Neurological and neuroimaging evidence of the neural underpinnings of visual aesthetics. In A. Chatterjee & E. R. Cardillo, Brain, beauty, & art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus (pp. 8–11). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513620.003.0002 Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review , 83 (4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914 Osuna, A. J. (2017, 17 September). Antropomorfismo [conference session]. Naukas, Bilbao. https://www.eitb.eus/es/divulgacion/naukas-bilbao/videos/detalle/5082718/video-naukas-bilbao-2017-antonio-j-osuna-biotay-antropomorfismo/ Prokop, Z. M., Michalczyk, L., Drobniak, S. M., Herdegen, M., & Radwan, J. (2012). Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than «good genes». Evolution , 66 (9), 2665–2673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01654.x Prum, R. O. (2012). Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin’s really dangerous idea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B , 367 (1600), 2253–2265. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0285 Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty: How Darwin’s forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world – and us . Anchor. Rosenthal, G. G., & Ryan, M. J. (2022). Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin. Science , 375 (6578), eabi6308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6308 Ryan, M. J. (2018). A taste for the beautiful . Princeton University Press. Sainani, K. (2015). Q&A: David Deutsch. Nature , 526 , S16. https://doi.org/10.1038/526S16a Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology , 53 , 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3; https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/24722

الاتاحة: https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/24722
https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.24722

المؤلفون: Castellanos , Ignacio, Urrutia Martínez, Luis Ernesto

المصدر: Herreriana; Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Herreriana; 33-36 ; Herreriana; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2022): Herreriana; 33-36 ; 2683-2135 ; 10.29057/h.v4i1

مصطلحات موضوعية: Sexual cannibalism, intraespecific predation, sexual selection, Canibalismo sexual, depredación intraespecífica, selección sexual

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://repository.uaeh.edu.mx/revistas/index.php/herreriana/article/view/8238/9164; https://repository.uaeh.edu.mx/revistas/index.php/herreriana/article/view/8238

الاتاحة: https://repository.uaeh.edu.mx/revistas/index.php/herreriana/article/view/8238
https://doi.org/10.29057/h.v4i1.8238

المؤلفون: Gutiérrez, Germán, Moreno Naranjo, Leonardo, Cruz, Julio Eduardo, Javela, Lady Grey, González, María Isabel, Rodríguez Cajamarca, Javier

المصدر: Revista Colombiana de Psicología; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2022): Revista Colombiana de Psicología; 77-92 ; Revista Colombiana de Psicología; Vol. 31 Núm. 1 (2022): Revista Colombiana de Psicología; 77-92 ; Revista Colombiana de Psicología; v. 31 n. 1 (2022): Revista Colombiana de Psicología; 77-92 ; 2344-8644 ; 0121-5469

مصطلحات موضوعية: lonely-heart ads, mate selection, mate preferences, sexual differences, sexual selection, Psychology, anuncios personales, emparejamiento humano, diferencias sexuales, preferencias sexuales, selección sexual, Psicología

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/89118/82851; Baize, H. R., & Schroeder, J. E. (1995). Personality and mate selection in personal ads: evolutionary preferences in a public mate selection process. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(3), 517-536.; Bruch, E. E., & Newman, M. E. J. (2018). Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets. Science Advances, 4(8), eaap9815. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9815; Burmann, C. G., Peláez, F., & Sánchez, S. (2002). Elección de pareja estable a través de anuncios de periódico [Choosing a stable partner through newspaper ads]. Psicothema, 14(2), 268-273. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72714213.pdf; Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992; Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559; Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033295X.100.2.204; Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 134-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116; Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: the cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x; Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408; Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1): 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104; Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2006). Ley 1090 del 6 de septiembre de 2006 por la cual se reglamenta el ejercicio profesional psicológico, se dicta el código deontológico y bioético [Law 1090 of September 6, 2006, which regulates psychological professional practice, dictates the deontological and bioethical code]. Congreso de la República de Colombia. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=66205; Conroy-Beam D., Buss D.M. (2016) Mate preferences. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1-1; Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (2 vols.). John Murray.; González, M., Javela, L., & Cruz, J. (2014, septiembre). Preferencias de edad en la selección de pareja en la sección punto de encuentro de la revista Cosmopolitan [Age preferences in partner selection in the meeting point section of Cosmopolitan magazine]. In J. Cruz (Coordinator), Desarrollos de la Psicología Evolucionista en Colombia. XVII Biennial Meeting of the International Society for Comparative Psychology, Bogotá. Colombia.; Greenless, I. A., & McGrew, W. C. (1994). Sex and age differences in preference and tactics of mate attraction: analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90017-5; Gutiérrez, S. S., & Carranza, L. O. (2016). Preferencias en la elección de pareja entre estudiantes universitarios: un análisis según sexo [Preferences in choosing a partner among university students: an analysis according to sex]. Revista Tendencias en Psicología, 1(1), 16-27. http://revistas.upagu.edu.pe/index.php/TP/article/view/322; Hamon, R. R., & Ingoldsby, B. B. (Eds.) (2003). Mate selection across cultures. SAGE Publications, Inc.; Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a; Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37(554), 269.; Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). What makes you click? Mate preferences in online dating. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8(4), 393-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-010-9088-6; Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1987). Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.194; Huston, T. L., & Houts, R. M. (1998). The psychological infrastructure of courtship and marriage: the role of personality and compatibility in romantic relationships. In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 114-151). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527814.006; Lee, A. J., Dubbs, S. L., Von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. C., & Zietsch, B. P. (2014). A multivariate approach to human mate preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.01.003; Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the trade-offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947-955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947; Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: a cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 291-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.005; Medina, J. L. V., Fuentes, N. I. G. A. L., Valdez, J. A., Escobar, S. G., Morelato, G., & Ison, M. S. (2008). La elección de pareja real e ideal en dos culturas: México y Argentina. Un análisis por sexo [The choice of a real and ideal partner in two cultures: Mexico and Argentina. An analysis by sex]. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 13(2), 261-277. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/38867; Miller, G. F. (1998). A review of sexual selection and human evolution: how mate choice shaped human nature. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 87-130). Lawrence Erlbaum.; Miller, G. (2011). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Anchor.; Moreno, L., & Gutiérrez, G. (2021). Cómo el sexo moldea la evolución del comportamiento: el caso de las preferencias en la reproducción humana [How sex shapes the evolution of behavior: the case of preferences in human reproduction]. Suma Psicológica, 28(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2021.v28.n1.4; Oda, R. (2001). Sexually dimorphic mate preference in Japan. An analysis of lonely-hearts advertisements. Human Nature, 12(3), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-001-1006-x; Pisanski, K., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in mate preferences for averageness, symmetry, body size, and masculinity. CrossCultural Research, 47(2), 162–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397112471806; Russock, H. I. (2011). An evolutionary interpretation of the effect of gender and sexual orientation on human mate selection preferences, as indicated by an analysis of personal advertisements. Behaviour, 148(3), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579511X556600; Schmitt, D. P. (2014). Evaluating evidence of mate preference adaptations: how do we really know what Homo Sapiens Sapiens really want? In V. Weekes-Shackelford & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 3-39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0314-6_1; Schulz, J., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J., & Henrich, J. (2018). The origins of WEIRD psychology. Available at SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3201031; Sefcek, J. A., Brumbach, B. H., Vasquez, G., & Miller, G. F. (2007). The evolutionary psychology of human mate choice: how ecology, genes, fertility, and fashion influence mating strategies. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 18(2-3), 125-182. https://doi.org/10.1300/j056v18n02_05; Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023; Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x; Thiessen, D., Young, R. K., & Burroughs, R. (1993). Lonely hearts advertisements reflect sexually dimorphic mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90007-5; Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. En B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971, (pp. 136-179). Aldine.; Waynforth, D., & Dunbar, R. I. (1995). Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: evidence from ‘Lonely Hearts’ advertisements. Behaviour, 132(9), 755-779. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853995X00135; Wiederman, M. W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90003-z; Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection — a selection of handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3; Zentner, M., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). A sociocultural framework for understanding partner preferences of women and men: Integration of concepts and evidence. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 328-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1111599; Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012). Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow: nations’ gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences. Psychological Science, 23, 1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612441004; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/89118

الاتاحة: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/89118

المؤلفون: Buschiazzo, Martín, Izquierdo, Graciela

المصدر: ACTA ZOOLÓGICA MEXICANA (N.S.); Vol. 38 (2022); 1-19 ; 2448-8445 ; 0065-1737

مصطلحات موضوعية: courtship, copulatory pattern, sexual selection, Tucu tucu, cortejo, patrón copulatorio, selección sexual, Tucu tuco

وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/xml

Relation: https://azm.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/azm/article/view/2456/2955; https://azm.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/azm/article/view/2456/2980; https://azm.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/azm/article/view/2456

الاتاحة: https://azm.ojs.inecol.mx/index.php/azm/article/view/2456
https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2022.3812456

Thesis Advisors: Milá Valcárcel, Borja (dir.), UAM. Departamento de Biología

مصطلحات موضوعية: Género aviar Junco - Tesis doctorales, Diversificación fenotípica - Tesis doctorales, Selección natural - Tesis doctorales, Selección sexual - Tesis doctorales, Reciente diversificación - Tesis doctorales, Biología y Biomedicina / Biología

URL الوصول: http://hdl.handle.net/10486/681737

Thesis Advisors: Roldán Schuth, Eduardo (dir.), Gomendio, Montserrat (dir.), UAM. Departamento de Biología Molecular, CSIC. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales

مصطلحات موضوعية: Selección sexual en los animales - Tesis doctorales, Espermatozoides - Evolución - Tesis doctorales, Biología y Biomedicina / Biología

URL الوصول: http://hdl.handle.net/10486/669691

Thesis Advisors: Gomendio, Montserrat (dir.), UAM. Departamento de Biología Molecular, CSIC. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales

مصطلحات موضوعية: Selección sexual en los animales - Tesis doctorales, Biología y Biomedicina / Biología

URL الوصول: http://hdl.handle.net/10486/663641

المؤلفون: Friis Montoya, Guillermo Torgeir

Thesis Advisors: Milá Valcárcel, Borja (dir.), UAM. Departamento de Biología

مصطلحات موضوعية: Género aviar Junco - Tesis doctorales, Diversificación fenotípica - Tesis doctorales, Selección natural - Tesis doctorales, Selección sexual - Tesis doctorales, Reciente diversificación - Tesis doctorales, Biología y Biomedicina / Biología

URL الوصول: http://hdl.handle.net/10486/681737

المؤلفون: Rubalcaba, Juan G., Polo, Vicente

المصدر: The Auk, 2018 Jul 01. 135(3), 400-408.

URL الوصول: https://www.jstor.org/stable/90023458

المؤلفون: Danner, Julie E., Small, Daniel M., Ryder, T. Brandt, Lohr, Bernard, Masters, Brian S., Gill, Douglas E., Fleischer, Robert C.

المصدر: The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 2018 Mar 01. 130(1), 40-51.

URL الوصول: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26456097

المؤلفون: J. J. Negro, M. C. Blázquez, R. Fernández–Alés, A. Martín–Vicente

المصدر: Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol 44, Iss 1, Pp 109-115 (2021)

مصطلحات موضوعية: selección sexual, selección artificial, efectos pleiotrópicos, endogamia, domesticación, Zoology, QL1-991

Relation: https://raco.cat/index.php/ABC/article/view/384975; https://doaj.org/toc/1578-665X; https://doaj.org/toc/2014-928X; https://doaj.org/article/a0eea2aa48474a9aa557548d79e306f6

الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2021.44.0109
https://doaj.org/article/a0eea2aa48474a9aa557548d79e306f6

المؤلفون: Phillips, Jennifer N., Derryberry, Elizabeth P.

المصدر: The Auk, 2017 Jul 01. 134(3), 564-574.

URL الوصول: https://www.jstor.org/stable/90011056

المؤلفون: Reichard, Dustin G., Kimmitt, Abigail A., Welklin, Joseph F., Ketterson, Ellen D.

المصدر: The Auk, 2017 Jul 01. 134(3), 575-586.

URL الوصول: https://www.jstor.org/stable/90011057

المؤلفون: Mucciolo, Leonardo

المصدر: Revista de Antropología del Museo de Entre Ríos, 5(2), 69-78, (2020-07-30)

مصطلحات موضوعية: osteometría, selección sexual de presas, Holoceno tardío final, cazadores-recolectores, humedal del Paraná inferior

Relation: https://zenodo.org/communities/ramer; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3703184; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3703185; oai:zenodo.org:3703185

الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3703185

المؤلفون: Salamanca-Carreño, Arcesio, Jordana-Vidal, Jordi, Crosby-Granados, René Alejandro, Arias-Landazábal, José Norberto, Parés-Casanova, Pere Miquel

مصطلحات موضوعية: Razas criollas, Alometría multivariante, Crecimiento relativo, Dimorfismo sexual de tamaño, Selección sexual, TG 2020 MVZ 20314, Creole breeds, Multivariate allometry, Relative growth, Size sexual dimorphism, Sexual selection

جغرافية الموضوع: 10(10)

وصف الملف: 1-7; application/pdf

Relation: Animals; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101763; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/20314; Salamanca-Carreño et al. 2020. Sexual Allometric Monomorphism in Araucan Pig from Colombia: Preliminary Results. Animals, 10 (10): 1-7. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/20314

الاتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/20314
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101763

المؤلفون: Echavarría-Carvajal, Jorge

المصدر: Revista Colombiana de Pensamiento Estético e Historia del Arte; No. 5 (2017): January-June 2017; 191-217 ; Revista Colombiana de Pensamiento Estético e Historia del Arte; Núm. 5 (2017): enero-junio de 2017; 191-217 ; 2389-9794

مصطلحات موضوعية: tradução, Katya Mandoki, traducción, Aisthesis, Baumgarten, bio-estética, bio-semiótica, darwinismo, epigénesis, evolución, selección femenina, onto-poética, filo-poética, selección sexual, teoría de la sensibilidad, translation

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/estetica/article/view/92102/77274; Aydon, C. (2003) Charles Darwin: The Naturalist Who Started a Scientific Revolution. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Carroll & Graf; Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., Tobby, J. (ed.) (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Phsychology and Generation of Culture. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Oxford University; Baumgarten, A. G. (1750) Aesthetica Scripsit Alexander Gottlieb Bavmgarten. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Georg Olms Verlag; Berleant, A. (2010) Sensibility and Sense: The Aesthetic Transformation of the Human World. Exeter, Reino Unido: Imprint Academic; Boyd, R. y Richerson, P. J. (2005) Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago, Estados Unidos: University of Chicago; Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex.; Darwin, C. (1876) Origin of Species. Londres, Inglaterra: John Murray; Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford, Inglaterra: Oxford University; Dewey, J. (1980) Art as Experience. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Perigee; Dissanayake, E. (2007) What Art Is and What It Does: An Overview of Contemporary Evolutionary Hypotheses. En C. Martindale, P. Locher, V. M. Petrov (ed.) Evolutionary and Neurocognitive Approaches to Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts (pp. 1-14). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Baywood; Dobzhansky, T. (1973) Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except under the Light of Evolution. The American Biology Teacher, (35), 125–129. Dutton, D. (2009) The Art Instinct; Beauty, Pleasure and Human Evolution. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Bloomsbury; Etcoff, N. (2000) Survival of the Prettiest: The Science of Beauty. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Anchor; Gould, S. J. (1996) The Mismeasure of Man. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Norton; Gould, S. J. y Lewontin, R. C. (1979) The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London (205)1161, 581–598; Grammer, K. et al. (2003) Darwinian Aesthetics: Sexual Selection and the Biology of Beauty. Biological Reviews, (78)3, 385–407; Jablonka, E. y Lamb, M. J. (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, Estados Unidos: MIT; Joyce, G. (19 de junio de 2002) Defining Life. Astrobiology Magazine. Recuperado de http://www.astrobio.net/news-exclusive/defining-life/; Kaplan, S. (1995) Environmental Preference in Knowledge-Seeking, Knowledge-Using Organisms. En J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tobby (ed.) The Adapted Mind (pp. 581-600). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Oxford University; Korzeniewski, B. (2001) Cybernetic Formulation of the Definition of Life. Journal of Theoretical Biology, (209)3, 275–86, doi:10.1006/ jtbi.2001.2262; Lewontin, R. C. et al. (1985) Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Pantheon; Mandoki, K. (1994) Prosaica uno. Estética cotidiana y juegos de la cultura. México: Grijalbo; Mandoki, K. (2006a) Prosaica II. Prácticas Estéticas e Identidades Sociales. México: Conaculta; Mandoki, K. (2006b) Estética cotidiana y juegos de la cultura. México: Siglo XXI; Mandoki K. (2015) The indispensable excess of aesthetic: evolution of sensibility in nature. Maryland, Estados Unidos: Lexington; Nagel, T. (1974) What Is it Like to Be a Bat?. The Philosophical Review, (83)4, 435-450; Orians, G. H. y Heerwagen, J. H. (1992) Evolved Response to Landscapes. En J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tobby (ed.) The Adapted Mind. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Oxford University; Peirce, C. S. (1955) En J. Buchler (ed.) Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Dover; Ricardo, A. y Szostak, J.W. (2009) Origin of Life on Earth. Scientific American, (301)3, 40, 54–61; Ryan, M. J. (1980) Female Mate Choice in a Neo-Tropical Frog. Science (209), 523–525; Sebeok, T. A. (1963) Review of Communication among Social Bees; Porpoises and Sonar; Man and Dolphin. Language, (39)3, 448–66; Szostak, J.W., Bartel, D. P., Luisi, P. L. (2001) Synthesizing Life. Nature, (409)6818, 387–390; Thornhill, R. (2003) Darwinian Aesthetics Informs Traditional Aesthetics. En E. Voland y K. Grammer (ed.), Evolutionary Aesthetics (pp. 9-35). Dordrecht, Holanda: Springer; Trivers, R. (1985) Social Evolution. Menlo Park, Estados Unidos: Benjamin/ Cummings; Vélez Caicedo, A. C. (2008) Homo Artisticus: Una Perspectiva Biológica- Evolutiva. Medellín, Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia Voland, E. y Grammer, K. (2003) En E. Voland y K. Grammer (ed.) Evolutionary Aesthetics. Dordrecht, Holanda: Springer; Von Frisch, K. (1954) The Dancing Bees: An Account of the Life and Senses of the Honeybee. Londres, Inglaterra: Methuen and Company; Von Uexküll, J. (1982) The Theory of Meaning. Semiotica (42)1, 25–82.; Von Uexküll, J. (1992) A Stroll through the Worlds of Animals and Men: A Picture Book of Invisible Worlds. Semiotica, (89)4, 319–391. Weitz, M. (1987) The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. En J. Margolis (ed.) Philosophy Looks at the Arts (p. 153). Filadelfia, Estados Unidos: Temple University; Welsch, W. (2004) Animal Aesthetics. Contemporary Aesthetics (2). Recuperado de http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/ pages/article.php?articleID=243; Zeki, S. (2006) The Neurology of Ambiguity. En M. Turner (ed.) The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity (pp.243-270). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Oxford University; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/estetica/article/view/92102

الاتاحة: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/estetica/article/view/92102

المؤلفون: Moreno Naranjo, Leonardo

المساهمون: Gutíerrez Domínguez, Germán Antonio, Aprendizaje y Comportamiento Animal

مصطلحات موضوعية: Psicología, Mate preferences, Emotions, Priming, Human mating, Empathy gap, Sexual differences, Sexual selection, Preferencias de pareja, Emociones, Emparejamiento humano, Brecha empática, Diferencias sexuales, Selección sexual

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Human emotions: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Emotion Review, 8(2), 173-186.; Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Sex differences in disgust: why are women more easily disgusted than men?. Emotion review, 10(2), 149-160.; American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.; Andrade, E. B., & Ariely, D. (2009). The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 1-8.; Bateson, M., & Healy, S. D. (2005). Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends in ecology & evolution, 20(12), 659-664.; Bechara, A. (2004). The role of emotion in decision-making: evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage. Brain and cognition, 55(1), 30-40.; Bechara, A., y Damasio, A. R. (2005) The somatic marker hypothesis. Games and Economic Behavior, 336-372.; Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2003). Role of the amygdala in decision‐making. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 985(1), 356-369.; Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., y Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7-15.; Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Grafton, S. T., & Ortigue, S. (2006). The power of love on the human brain. Social Neuroscience,, 1(2), 90-103.; Bless, H., Fiedler, K., & Forgas, J. P. (2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. Affect in social thinking and behavior, 6584.; Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Sufficient and necessary conditions in dual-process models: The case of mood and information processing. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.). Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 423–440). New York: Guilford Press.; Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59.; Braun, M. F., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 805-819.; Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.; Buss, D. M. (2006a). Strategies of human mating. Psihologijske teme, 15(2), 239-260.; Buss, D. M. (2006b). The evolution of love. The new psychology of love, 65-86.; Buss, D. M. (2013). Mate Preferences Questionnaire. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved from www.midss.ie; Buss, D. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Psychology Press.; Buss, D. M. (2018). Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 155-160.; Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 346-361.; Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1).; Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 491-503.; Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological review, 100(2), 204.; Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77-110.; Bynion, T. M., & Feldner, M. T. (2017). Self-assessment manikin. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 1-3.; Campbell, L., Chin, K., & Stanton, S. C. (2016). Initial evidence that individuals form new relationships with partners that more closely match their ideal preferences. Collabra: Psychology, 2(1).; Carvalho, S., Leite, J., Galdo-Álvarez, S., & Gonçalves, Ó. F. (2012). The emotional movie database (EMDB): A self-report and psychophysiological study. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 37(4), 279-294.; Cattell, R. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1967). Likeness and completeness theories examined by sixteen personality factor measures on stably and unstably married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(4p1), 351.; Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016a). Mate preferences. In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 1-11). Springer International Publishing.; Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016b). How are mate preferences linked with actual mate selection? Tests of mate preference integration algorithms using computer simulations and actual mating couples. PloS one, 11(6), e0156078.; Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016c). Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 111(1), 53.; Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Why is age so important in human mating? Evolved age preferences and their influences on multiple mating behaviors. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences.; Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes; Applications (pp. 323-417). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; Cruz, J. E. & Javela, L.G. (2018). Psicología evolucionista, volver a lo natural. En G. Gutiérrez (Ed), Teorías en Psicología. Integración y el futuro de la disciplina (pp. 84-98). Manual Moderno/Ascofapsi/Colpsic.; Daly, M., & Perry, G. (2018). Perspectivas evolucionistas sobre el cuidado y el bienestar infantil. En G. Gutiérrez (Ed), Teorías en Psicología. Integración y el futuro de la disciplina (pp. 134-157). Manual Moderno/Ascofapsi/Colpsic.; Damasio, A.R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior. In H. Levin, H. Eisenberg, & A. Benton (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction (pp. 217-228). New York: Oxford University Press.; Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray.; Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (2 vols.). London: John Murray.; Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of personality and social psychology, 30(4), 510.; Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 94(2), 245.; Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2018). Best practices for testing the predictive validity of ideal partner preference-matching. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 167-181; Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Hunt, L. L. (2014). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 623–665.; Eckland, B. (1968). Theories of mate selection. Eugen. Quart. 15:71-84.; Efran, M. G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8(1), 45-54.; Ericson, K. M., & Fuster, A. (2014). The endowment effect. Annu. Rev. Econ., 6(1), 555-579.; Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en medición, 6(1), 27-36.; Fisher, R.A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review, (7) 184:192.; Fisher, H. (2004). Why we love: Th e nature and chemistry of romantic love. New York: Henry Holt.; Fletcher, G. J., & Kerr, P. S. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological bulletin, 136(4), 627.; Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2013). The science of intimate relationships (Vol. 323). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.; Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 20-36.; Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(1), 72.; Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper and Row.; Förster, J., Özelsel, A., & Epstude, K. (2010). How love and lust change people’s perception of relationship partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 237-246.; Forgas, J. P. (2011). She just doesn't look like a philosopher…? Affective influences on the halo effect in impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(7), 812-817.; Forgas, J. P., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Mood effects on person-perception judgments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(1), 53.; Forgas, J., & Laham, S. (2016). Halo effects. In R. Pohl, Cognitive Illusions: Intriguing Phenomena in Judgement, Thinking and Memory (2nd ed., pp. 276-290). London: Psychology Press.; Fuller, R. C., Houle, D., & Travis, J. (2005). Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. The American Naturalist, 166(4), 437-446.; Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and brain sciences, 23(04), 573-587.; Garza, R., Heredia, R. R., & Cieslicka, A. B. (2016). Male and female perception of physical attractiveness: an eye movement study. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(1).; Gerlach, T. M., Arslan, R. C., Schultze, T., Reinhard, S. K., & Penke, L. (2019). Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 313.; Gilbert, D. T., Gill, M. J., & Wilson, T. D. (2002). The future is now: Temporal correction in affective forecasting. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 88(1), 430-444.; Gillath, O., Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). When sex primes love: Subliminal sexual priming motivates relationship goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1057-1069.; Gray, P. B., Garcia, J. R., & Gesselman, A. N. (2018). Age-related patterns in sexual behaviors and attitudes among single US Adults: An evolutionary approach. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences.; Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women's sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and individual Differences, 28(5), 929-963.; Gutiérrez, G. (2010). Selección sexual, comportamiento y aprendizaje. En E. Zerda (Ed.), Bases biológicas del comportamiento animal y humano (pp. 217-240). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.; Hall, J. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1976). When love is blind: Maintaining idealized images of one's spouse. Human Relations, 29(8), 751-761.; Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of theoretical biology, 7(1), 17-52.; Hamm, A. O., & Vaitl, D. (1993). Affective associations: The conditioning model and the organization of emotions. The structure of emotion, 203-217.; Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 3-23.; Haselton, M. G., & Ketelaar, T. (2006). Irrational emotions or emotional wisdom? The evolutionary psychology of affect and social behavior. Affect in social thinking and behavior, 8, 21.; Hitczenko, M. (2013). Modeling anchoring effects in sequential Likert scale questions (No. 13-15). Working Papers.; Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 161-172.; Huston, T. L., & Houts, R. M. (1998). The psychological infrastructure of courtship and marriage: The role of personality and compatibility in romantic relationships. The developmental course of marital dysfunction, 114-151.; Jin, Z., Shiomura, K., & Jiang, L. (2015). Assessing Implicit Mate Preferences among Chinese and Japanese Women by Providing Love, Sex, or Money Cues. Psychological reports, 116(1), 195-206.; Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 363-391.; Kaplan, R. M. (1978). Is beauty talent? Sex interaction in the attractiveness halo effect. Sex Roles, 4(2), 195-204.; Katsena, L., & Dimdins, G. (2015). An improved method for evaluating ideal standards in self‐perception and mate preferences. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 56(2), 228-235.; Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75-91.; Ketelaar, T., & Clore, G. L. (1997). Emotion and reason: The proximate effects and ultimate functions of emotions. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 124, pp. 355-396). North-Holland.; Kleiman, D. G., & Malcolm, J. R. (1981). The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In Parental care in mammals (pp. 347-387). Springer, Boston, MA.; Kučera, D., & Haviger, J. (2012). Using mood induction procedures in psychological research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 31-40.; Lai, V. T., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2012). Affective primacy vs. cognitive primacy: Dissolving the debate. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 243.; LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York, NY, US: Simon & Schuster.; Levinger, G. K., & Snoek, J. D. (1972). Attraction in relationship: A new look at interpersonal attraction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.; Li, N. P., & Meltzer, A. L. (2015). The validity of sex-differentiated mate preferences: Reconciling the seemingly conflicting evidence. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(2), 89.; Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 291-294.; Loewenstein, G. (2005). Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychology, 24(4S), S49.; Lukaszewski, A. W., & Roney, J. R. (2010). Kind toward whom? Mate preferences for personality traits are target specific. Evolution and human behavior, 31(1), 29-38.; Matallana, D., Gómez-Restrepo, C., Ramirez, P., Martínez, N. T., & Rondon, M. (2016). El reconocimiento de emociones, la empatía y los juicios morales en la Encuesta Nacional de Salud Mental (ENSM) de 2015 en Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 45, 96-104.; Matthews, R. N., & Domjan, M. (2011). Selección sexual: competencia de esperma, sistemas de apareamiento y aprendizaje. En G. Gutiérrez & M. R. Papini (Eds.), Darwin y las Ciencias del Comportamiento (pp. 115-136). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia/Colegio Colombiano de Psicólogos.; Miller, G. F. (1998). A review of sexual selection and human evolution: How mate choice shaped human nature. Handbook of evolutionary psychology: ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 87-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.; Miller, G. F. (2011). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor Books.; Miller, G. F., & Todd, P. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2(5), 190-198.; Møller, A. P., & Alatalo, R. V. (1999). Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1414), 85-91.; Moreno, L. (2016). Preferencias en rasgos para la selección de parejas a largo plazo. (Tesis de pregrado). Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.; Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Diez pasos para la construcción de un test. Psicothema, 31(1).; Muñiz, J. (2010). Las teorías de los tests: teoría clásica y teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Papeles del Psicólogo: revista del Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos.; Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(1), 79.; Naranjo, A. (2013). El comportamiento proceptivo femenino. (Tesis de maestría). Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.; Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological review, 84(3), 231.; Ortega, L. A. & Gutiérrez, G. (2018). Nada en Biología (o Psicología) tiene sentido excepto a la luz de la teoría de la evolución. En G. Gutiérrez (Ed), Teorías en Psicología: Integración y el futuro de la disciplina (pp. 69-83). Manual Moderno/Ascofapsi/Colpsic.; Ortiz Rodríguez, J. G. (2019). Papel de la inteligencia social como criterio de selección sexual en mujeres jóvenes. (Tesis de Maestría). Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.; Pianka, E. R. (1970). On r-and K-selection. The American Naturalist, 104(940), 592-597.; Pinilla-Palacios, A. (2017). Contagio emocional: Incidencia de los estados emocionales sobre la valoración de expresiones faciales (Maestría en Psicología). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.; Philippot, P. (1993). Inducing and assessing differentiated emotion feeling states in the laboratory. Cognition and Emotion, 7(2), 171–193.; Provencher, V., & Jacob, R. (2016). Impact of perceived healthiness of food on food choices and intake. Current obesity reports, 5(1), 65-71.; Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can't get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 24(12), 1294-1303.; Ridley, M. (1993). The red queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. Penguin UK.; Rosenzweig, P. (2007). The Halo Effect.and the Eight Other Business Delusions that Deceive Managers. Riverside: Free Press.; Ryan, M.J. (1990): Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 7: 157–195.; Sefcek, J. A., Brumbach, B. H., Vasquez, G., & Miller, G. F. (2007). The evolutionary psychology of human mate choice: How ecology, genes, fertility, and fashion influence mating strategies. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 18(2-3), 125-182.; Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447-458.; Scheib, J. E., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1431), 1913-1917.; Schmitt, D. P. (2014). Evaluating evidence of mate preference adaptations: How do we really know what Homo sapiens sapiens really want? En V. Weekes-Shackelford & T.Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 3-39). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0314-6_1.; Schmitt, D. P. (2015) Fundamentals of Human Mating Strategies, in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (ed D. M. Buss), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.; Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(2), 293-307.; Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological assessment, 12(1), 102.; Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self‐report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167-194.; Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological review, 93(2), 119.; Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24-31.; Sugiyama, L. S. (2015). Physical attractiveness: An adaptationist perspective. The handbook of evolutionary psychology, 1-68.; Thomas, A. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2018). Mating strategy flexibility in the laboratory: Preferences for long-and short-term mating change in response to evolutionarily relevant variables. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(1), 82-93.; Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., & Lenton, A. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(38), 15011-15016.; Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. En D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 5-67): New York: Wiley.; Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971, (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine.; Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.; Van den Berghe, P. L. (1983). Human inbreeding avoidance: Culture in nature. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 91-102.; Verhulst, B., Lodge, M., & Lavine, H. (2010). The attractiveness halo: Why some candidates are perceived more favorably than others. Journal of nonverbal behavior, 34(2), 111-117.; Wardle, M. C., Gonzalez, R., Bechara, A., & Martin-Thormeyer, E. M. (2010). Iowa Gambling Task performance and emotional distress interact to predict risky sexual behavior in individuals with dual substance and HIV diagnoses. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 32(10), 1110-1121.; Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: A meta‐analysis. European Journal of social psychology, 26(4), 557-580.; White, G. L., Fishbein, S., & Rutsein, J. (1981). Passionate love and the misattribution of arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(1), 56.; Widaman, K. F., Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., & Sawalani, G. M. (2011). On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. In K. H. Trzesniewski, M. B. Donnellan, & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists (pp. 39-61). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.; Wieland, A., Durach, C. F., Kembro, J., & Treiblmaier, H. (2017). Statistical and judgmental criteria for scale purification. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(4), 321-328.; Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205-214.; Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1999). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.; Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American psychologist, 35(2), 151.; Zajonc, R.B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist 39, 117–123.; Zentner, M., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). A sociocultural framework for understanding partner preferences of women and men: Integration of concepts and evidence. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 328-373.; Zeveloff, S. I., & Boyce, M. S. (1980). Parental investment and mating systems in mammals. Evolution, 34(5), 973-982.; Moreno, L. (2019). Estados emocionales y sus efectos en la evaluación de parejas a largo plazo. (Tesis de Maestría). Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75855

الاتاحة: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/75855