المؤلفون: Fox, Richard

المصدر: Catholic University Law Review

مصطلحات موضوعية: Voodoo information, heightened authentication standard, evidence, evidence derived from social networking websites, social networking, facebook, twitter, technology, technological evidence, admissibility, inadmissibility, inadmissible, admissible, fact finders, electronically generated documents, Rule 901, Federal Rules of Evidence, FRE, FRE 901, Maryland Court of Appeals, Griffin v. State, myspace, overly burdensome, reasonable juror standard, lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co, Rule 104(b), e-mail, shea v. state, instant messages, instant messaging

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol62/iss1/6; https://scholarship.law.edu/context/lawreview/article/1029/viewcontent/Fox_197_226.pdf

الاتاحة: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol62/iss1/6
https://scholarship.law.edu/context/lawreview/article/1029/viewcontent/Fox_197_226.pdf

المؤلفون: Saltzburg, Stephen A.

المصدر: GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

مصطلحات موضوعية: Abstract http://ssrn.com/abstract=2641141 Revise My Submission Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser | Share | Email Authentication and Hearsay: Which Trumps? Stephen A. Saltzburg George Washington University School of Law 2015 30 Crim. Just. (2015). GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2015-29 GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-29 Abstract: This article addresses the relationship between two federal rules of evidence: Rules 104(a) and 104(b) and which standards a trial judge should apply in admitting hearsay evidence when its authentication is in question. Focusing on United States v. Harvey, 117 F.3d 1044 (7th Circ. 1997) and a simple hypothetical, the article concludes that evidence must be authenticated under Rule 104(b) as well as satisfying the hearsay rule and Rule 104(a). Number of Pages in PDF File: 4 Keywords: Evidence, Authentication, Hearsay, Rule 104(a), Rule 104(b) JEL Classification: K41 Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper Date posted: Suggested Citation Saltzburg, Stephen A, Authentication and Hearsay: Which Trumps? (2015). 30 Crim. Just. (2015), GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2015-29, GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-29. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract= Contact Information Stephen A. Saltzburg (Contact Author) George Washington University School of Law ( email ) 2000 H Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20052 United States 202-994-7089 (Phone), Law, droit, scipo

Relation: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications/1145

الاتاحة: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications/1145

المؤلفون: Saltzburg, Stephen A.

المصدر: GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

مصطلحات موضوعية: Abstract http://ssrn.com/abstract=2641141 Revise My Submission Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser | Share | Email Authentication and Hearsay: Which Trumps? Stephen A. Saltzburg George Washington University School of Law 2015 30 Crim. Just. (2015). GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2015-29 GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-29 Abstract: This article addresses the relationship between two federal rules of evidence: Rules 104(a) and 104(b) and which standards a trial judge should apply in admitting hearsay evidence when its authentication is in question. Focusing on United States v. Harvey, 117 F.3d 1044 (7th Circ. 1997) and a simple hypothetical, the article concludes that evidence must be authenticated under Rule 104(b) as well as satisfying the hearsay rule and Rule 104(a). Number of Pages in PDF File: 4 Keywords: Evidence, Authentication, Hearsay, Rule 104(a), Rule 104(b) JEL Classification: K41 Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper Date posted: Suggested Citation Saltzburg, Stephen A, Authentication and Hearsay: Which Trumps? (2015). 30 Crim. Just. (2015)., GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2015-29, GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-29. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract= Contact Information Stephen A. Saltzburg (Contact Author) George Washington University School of Law ( email ) 2000 H Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20052 United States 202-994-7089 (Phone), Law

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications/1145; https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/context/faculty_publications/article/2398/viewcontent/SSRN_v30n1_SPR2015_SC.pdf

الاتاحة: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications/1145
https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/context/faculty_publications/article/2398/viewcontent/SSRN_v30n1_SPR2015_SC.pdf

المؤلفون: Simpson, Reagan Wm., Huang, Warren S.

المصدر: Oklahoma Law Review

مصطلحات موضوعية: symposium, Uniform Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Evidence, admissibility, Rule 103, Rule 104, Rule 404, Rule 412, Rule 609, character evidence, prior criminal convictions, Evidence

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr/vol54/iss3/4; https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/context/olr/article/1587/viewcontent/30_54OklaLRev513SimpsonHuang_282001_29.pdf

الاتاحة: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr/vol54/iss3/4
https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/context/olr/article/1587/viewcontent/30_54OklaLRev513SimpsonHuang_282001_29.pdf