يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 65 نتيجة بحث عن '"Rudek, Ivan"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.53s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry; 2016, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p737-743, 7p, 3 Color Photographs, 2 Charts, 2 Graphs

  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Academic Journal
  8. 8
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants; 2012, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p1230-1238, 9p, 4 Color Photographs, 1 Diagram, 1 Chart, 2 Graphs

    مصطلحات جغرافية: MICHIGAN

  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
    Academic Journal

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Fu, Jia‐hui; Oh, Tae‐ju; Benavides, Erika; Rudek, Ivan; Wang, Hom‐lay (2014). "A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery." Clinical Oral Implants Research 25(4): 458-467.; http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106765; Clinical Oral Implants Research; Park, S.H. & Wang, H.L. ( 2006 ) Management of localized buccal dehiscence defect with allografts and acellular dermal matrix. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 26: 589 – 595.; Jensen, S.S. & Terheyden, H. ( 2009 ) Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone‐substitute materials. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 24 ( Suppl. ): 218 – 236.; Junker, R., Dimakis, A., Thoneick, M. & Jansen, J.A. ( 2009 ) Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20 ( Suppl. 4 ): 185 – 206.; Lee, A., Brown, D. & Wang, H.L. ( 2009 ) Sandwich bone augmentation for predictable horizontal bone augmentation. Implant Dentistry 18: 282 – 290.; Loe, H. ( 1967 ) The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. Journal of Periodontology 38 ( Suppl. ): 610 – 616.; Nevins, M., Mellonig, J.T., Clem, D.S., 3rd, Reiser, G.M. & Buser, D.A. ( 1998 ) Implants in regenerated bone: long‐term survival. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 18: 34 – 45.; Oh, T.J., Meraw, S.J., Lee, E.J., Giannobile, W.V. & Wang, H.L. ( 2003 ) Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 80 – 90.; Oh, T.J., Yoon, J., Misch, C.E. & Wang, H.L. ( 2002 ) The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? Journal of Periodontology 73: 322 – 333.; O'Leary, T.J., Drake, R.B. & Naylor, J.E. ( 1972 ) The plaque control record. Journal of Periodontology 43: 38.; Park, S.H., Lee, K.W., Oh, T.J., Misch, C.E., Shotwell, J. & Wang, H.L. ( 2008 ) Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19: 32 – 41.; Park, S.H. & Wang, H.L. ( 2007 ) Clinical significance of incision location on guided bone regeneration: human study. Journal of Periodontology 78: 47 – 51.; Razavi, T., Palmer, R.M., Davies, J., Wilson, R. & Palmer, P.J. ( 2010 ) Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research 21: 718 – 725.; Shiratori, L.N., Marotti, J., Yamanouchi, J., Chilvarquer, I., Contin, I. & Tortamano‐Neto, P. ( 2012 ) Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone‐beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23: 797 – 804.; Shotwell, J.L., Billy, E.J., Wang, H.L. & Oh, T.J. ( 2005 ) Implant surgical guide fabrication for partially edentulous patients. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 93: 294 – 297.; Skoglund, A., Hising, P. & Young, C. ( 1997 ) A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12: 194 – 199.; Szmukler‐Moncler, S., Salama, H., Reingewirtz, Y. & Dubruille, J.H. ( 1998 ) Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone‐dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 43: 192 – 203.; Tyndall, D.A. & Brooks, S.L. ( 2000 ) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the american academy of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 89: 630 – 637.; Wang, H.L., Misch, C. & Neiva, R.F. ( 2004 ) “Sandwich” Bone augmentation technique: rationale and report of pilot cases. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 24: 232 – 245.; Wennerberg, A. & Albrektsson, T. ( 2009 ) Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20 ( Suppl. 4 ): 172 – 184.; Zambon, R., Mardas, N., Horvath, A., Petrie, A., Dard, M. & Donos, N. ( 2012 ) The effect of loading in regenerated bone in dehiscence defects following a combined approach of bone grafting and gbr. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23: 591 – 601.; Zitzmann, N.U., Naef, R. & Scharer, P. ( 1997 ) Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with bio‐oss for guided bone regeneration. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12: 844 – 852.; Zitzmann, N.U., Scharer, P., Marinello, C.P., Schupbach, P. & Berglundh, T. ( 2001 ) Alveolar ridge augmentation with bio‐oss: a histologic study in humans. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 21: 288 – 295.; Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B. & Branemark, P.I. ( 1981 ) A 15‐year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral Surgery 10: 387 – 416.; Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B., Branemark, P.I., Lindhe, J., Eriksson, B. & Sbordone, L. ( 1986 ) Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (i). A 3‐year longitudinal prospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 15: 39 – 52.; Aghaloo, T.L. & Moy, P.K. ( 2007 ) Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 22 ( Suppl. ): 49 – 70.; Bashutski, J.D. & Wang, H.L. ( 2007 ) Common implant esthetic complications. Implant Dentistry 16: 340 – 348.; Benic, G.I., Jung, R.E., Siegenthaler, D.W. & Hammerle, C.H. ( 2009 ) Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5‐year results. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20: 507 – 513.; Burchardt, H. ( 1983 ) The biology of bone graft repair. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 174: 28 – 42.; Buser, D., Dula, K., Belser, U.C., Hirt, H.P. & Berthold, H. ( 1995 ) Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. Ii. Surgical procedure in the mandible. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 15: 10 – 29.; Buser, D., Dula, K., Hirt, H.P. & Schenk, R.K. ( 1996 ) Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes: a clinical study with 40 partially edentulous patients. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 54: 420 – 432; discussion 432–423.; Buser, D., Martin, W. & Belser, U.C. ( 2004 ) Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 19 ( Suppl. ): 43 – 61.; Buser, D., Weber, H.P. & Lang, N.P. ( 1990 ) Tissue integration of non‐submerged implants. 1‐year results of a prospective study with 100 iti hollow‐cylinder and hollow‐screw implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1: 33 – 40.; Cooper, L.F., Masuda, T., Yliheikkila, P.K. & Felton, D.A. ( 1998 ) Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part ii. In vitro studies. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 13: 163 – 174.; Davies, J.E. ( 2003 ) Understanding peri‐implant endosseous healing. Journal of Dental Education 67: 932 – 949.; Degidi, M., Perrotti, V., Shibli, J.A., Novaes, A.B., Piattelli, A. & Iezzi, G. ( 2011 ) Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants. Journal of Periodontology 82: 708 – 715.; Fienitz, T., Schwarz, F., Ritter, L., Dreiseidler, T., Becker, J. & Rothamel, D. ( 2012 ) Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri‐implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23: 882 – 887.; Frost, H.M. ( 1983 ) The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hospital Medical Journal 31: 3 – 9.; Fu, J.H., Hsu, Y.T. & Wang, H.L. ( 2012 ) Identifying occlusal overload and how to deal with it to avoid marginal bone loss around implants. European Journal of Oral Implantology 5 ( Suppl. ): S91 – S103.; Fugazzotto, P.A. ( 2005 ) Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 72 to 133 months. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 20: 77 – 83.; Guerra, I., Morais Branco, F., Vasconcelos, M., Afonso, A., Figueiral, H. & Zita, R. ( 2011 ) Evaluation of implant osseointegration with different regeneration techniques in the treatment of bone defects around implants: an experimental study in a rabbit model. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 314 – 322.; Hammerle, C.H., Jung, R.E. & Feloutzis, A. ( 2002 ) A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 29 ( Suppl. 3 ): 226 – 231; discussion 232–223.; Jemt, T., Lekholm, U. & Grondahl, K. ( 1990 ) 3‐year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum branemark. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 10: 340 – 349.

  11. 11
    Academic Journal

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Al‐hezaimi, Khalid; Rudek, Ivan; Al‐hamdan, Khalid S.; Javed, Fawad; Nooh, Nasser; Wang, Hom‐lay (2013). "Efficacy of using a dual layer of membrane (d PTFE placed over collagen) for ridge preservation in fresh extraction sites: a microâ computed tomographic study in dogs." Clinical Oral Implants Research 24(10): 1152-1157.; https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/100133; Clinical Oral Implants Research; Javed, F., Al‐Rasheed, A., Almas, K., Romanos, G.E. & Al‐Hezaimi, K. ( 2012 ) Effect of cigarette smoking on the clinical outcomes of periodontal surgical procedures. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 343: 78 – 84.; Al‐Hezaimi, K., Levi, P., Rudy, R., Al‐Jandan, B. & Al‐Rasheed, A. ( 2011 ) An extraction socket classification developed using analysis of bone type and blood supply to the buccal bone in monkeys. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 31: 421 – 427.; Al‐Shabeeb, M.S., Al‐Askar, M., Al‐Rasheed, A., Babay, N., Javed, F., Wang, H.L. & Al‐Hezaimi, K. ( 2011 ) Alveolar bone remodeling around immediate implants placed in accordance with the extraction socket classification–a three‐dimensional micro‐computed tomography analysis. Journal of Periodontology. [Epub ahead of print].; Amler, M.H. ( 1969 ) The time sequence of tissue regeneration in human extraction wounds. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology 27: 309 – 318.; Annen, B.M., Ramel, C.F., Hämmerle, C.H. & Jung, R.E. ( 2011 ) Use of a new cross‐linked collagen membrane for the treatment of peri‐implant dehiscence defects: a randomised controlled double‐blinded clinical trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology 4: 87 – 100.; Araújo, M.G. & Lindhe, J. ( 2005 ) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 32: 212 – 218.; Avila, G., Neiva, R., Misch, C.E., Galindo‐Moreno, P., Benavides, E., Rudek, I. & Wang, H.L. ( 2010 ) Clinical and histologic outcomes after the use of a novel allograft for maxillary sinus augmentation: a case series. Implant Dentistry 19: 330 – 341.; Barber, H.D., Lignelli, J., Smith, B.M. & Bartee, B.K. ( 2009 ) Using a dense PTFE membrane without primary closure to achieve bone and tissue regeneration. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 65: 748 – 752.; Bartee, B.K. ( 1995 ) The use of high‐density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane to treat osseous defects: clinical reports. Implant Dentistry 4: 21 – 26.; Bartee, B.K. & Carr, J.A. ( 1995 ) Evaluation of a high‐density polytetrafluoroethylene (n‐PTFE) membrane as a barrier material to facilitate guided bone regeneration in the rat mandible. Journal of Oral Implantology 21: 88 – 95.; Fickl, S., Schneider, D., Zuhr, O., Hinze, M., Ender, A., Jung, R.E. & Hürzeler, M.B. ( 2009b ) Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation an buccal overbuilding: an animal study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 36: 442 – 448.; Fickl, S., Zuhr, O., Wachtel, H., Kebschull, M. & Hürzeler, M.B. ( 2009a ) Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation with additional buccal overbuilding: a study in the beagle dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 36: 898 – 904.; Gapski, R., Neiva, R., Oh, T.J. & Wang, H.L. ( 2006 ) Histologic analyses of human mineralized bone grafting material in sinus elevation procedures: a case series. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 26: 59 – 69.; Gomes, M.F., Abreu, P.P., Morosolli, A.R.C., Araújo, M.M. & Goulart, M.G.V. ( 2006 ) Densitometric analysis of the autogenous demineralized dentin matrix on the dental socket wound healing process in humans. Brazilian Oral Research 20: 324 – 330.; Javed, F., Näsström, K., Benchimol, D., Altamash, M., Klinge, B. & Engström, P.E. ( 2007 ) Comparison of periodontal and socioeconomic status between subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and non‐diabetic controls. Journal of Periodontology 78: 2112 – 2119.; Mardas, N., D'Aiuto, F., Mezzomo, L., Arzoumanidi, M. & Donos, N. ( 2011a ) Radiographic alveolar bone changes following ridge preservation with two different biomaterials. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 416 – 423.; Mardas, N., D'Aiuto, F., Mezzomo, L., Arzoumanidi, M. & Donos, N. ( 2011b ) Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine‐derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22: 416 – 423.; Neiva, R.F., Tsao, Y.P., Eber, R., Shotwell, J., Billy, E. & Wang, H.L. ( 2008 ) Effects of a putty‐form hydroxyapatite matrix combined with the synthetic cell‐binding peptide P‐15 on alveolar ridge preservation. Journal of Periodontology 79: 291 – 299.; Park, S.H., Brooks, S.L., Oh, T.J. & Wang, H.L. ( 2009 ) Effect of ridge morphology on guided bone regeneration outcome: conventional tomographic study. Journal of Periodontology 80: 1231 – 1236.; Scarano, A., Degidi, M., Iezzi, G., Pecora, G., Piattelli, M., Orsini, G., Caputi, S., Perrotti, V., Mangano, C. & Piattelli, A. ( 2006 ) Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dentistry 15: 197.; Thaller, S.R., Hoyt, J., Borjeson, K., Dart, A. & Tesluk, H. ( 1993 ) Reconstruction of calvarial defects with anorganic bovine bone mineral (Bio‐oss) in a rabbit model. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 4: 79 – 84.; Vignoletti, F., Matesanz, P., Rodrigo, D., Figuero, E., Martin, C. & Sanz, M. ( 2012 ) Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23: 22 – 38.; Waasdorp, J. & Feldman, S. ( 2011 ) Bone regeneration around immediate implants utilizing a dense PTFE membrane without primary closure: a report of 3 cases. Journal of Oral Implantology. [Epub ahead of print].; Yun, J.H., Jun, C.M. & Oh, N.S. ( 2011 ) Secondary closure of an extraction socket using the double membrane guided bone regeneration technique with immediate implant placement. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 41: 253 – 258.; Al‐Askar, M., O'Neill, R., Stark, P.C., Griffin, T., Javed, F. & Al‐Hezaimi, K. ( 2011 ) Effect of single and contiguous teeth extractions on alveolar bone remodeling: a study in dogs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. [Epub ahead of print].; Al‐Hezaimi, K., Javed, F., Ali, T.S., Al‐Askar, M. & Al‐Rasheed, A. ( 2012 ) Rapidly progressive periodontal disease associated with human immunodeficiency virus. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons–Pakistan 22: 186 – 188.

  12. 12
    Academic Journal

    المساهمون: Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan., School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI., Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chietiâ Pescara, Chietiâ Pescara, Italy., Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University., Eng. AB Research Chair for Growth Factors and Bone Regeneration, 3D Imaging and Biomechanical Laboratory, College of Dentistry and College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Al‐hezaimi, Khalid; Rudek, Ivan; Al‐hamdan, Khalid Saleh; Javed, Fawad; Iezzi, Giovanna; Piattelli, Adriano; Wang, Hom‐lay (2013). "Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Coronally Advanced Flaps for the Treatment of Induced Gingival Recession Defects: A Histomorphometric Study in Dogs." Journal of Periodontology 84(8): 1172-1179.; http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141958; Journal of Periodontology; Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963; 21: 533 â 551.; Carney CM, Rossmann JA, Kerns DG, et al. A comparative study of root defect coverage using an acellular dermal matrix with and without a recombinant human plateletâ derived growth factor. J Periodontol 2012; 83: 893 â 901.; Harris RJ. A shortâ term and longâ term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 734 â 743.; Scarano A, Barros RR, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Novaes AB Jr. Acellular dermal matrix graft for gingival augmentation: A preliminary clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural evaluation. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 253 â 259.; Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985; 5(2): 8 â 13.; Saletta D, Pini Prato G, Pagliaro U, Baldi C, Mauri M, Nieri M. Coronally advanced flap procedure: Is the interdental papilla a prognostic factor for root coverage? J Periodontol 2001; 72: 760 â 766.; Sullivan HC, Atkins JH. Free autogenous gingival grafts. 3. Utilization of grafts in the treatment of gingival recession. Periodontics 1968; 6: 152 â 160.; Clauser C, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Pagliaro U, Piniâ Prato G. Evidenceâ based mucogingival therapy. Part 2: Ordinary and individual patient data metaâ analyses of surgical treatment of recession using complete root coverage as the outcome variable. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 741 â 756.; Baldi C, Piniâ Prato G, Pagliaro U, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19â case series. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 1077 â 1084.; Harris RJ. The connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft: The results of 100 consecutivelyâ treated defects. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 448 â 461.; Pini Prato G, Pagliaro U, Baldi C, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Flap with tension versus flap without tension: A randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 188 â 201.; Piniâ Prato G, Baldi C, Pagliaro U, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Treatment of root surface: Root planning versus polishing. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 1064 â 1076.; Melcher AH. On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J Periodontol 1976; 47: 256 â 260.; Aichelmannâ Reidy ME, Yukna RA, Evans GH, Nasr HF, Mayer ET. Clinical evaluation of acellular allograft dermis for the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 998 â 1005.; Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 1975; 25: 229 â 235.; Remya V, Kishore Kumar K, Sudharsan S, Arun KV. Free gingival graft in the treatment of class III gingival recession. Indian J Dent Res 2008; 19: 247 â 252.; Wang HL, Bunyaratavej P, Labadie M, Shyr Y, MacNeil RL. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1301 â 1311.; Owens KW, Yukna RA. Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: A comparative study. Implant Dent 2001; 10: 49 â 58.; Hofmänner P, Alessandri R, Laugisch O, et al. Predictability of surgical techniques used for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recessions â A systematic review. Quintessence Int 2012; 43: 545 â 554.; Yan JJ, Tsai AY, Wong MY, Hou LT. Comparison of acellular dermal graft and palatal autograft in the reconstruction of keratinized gingiva around dental implants: A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 287 â 292.; Wei PC, Laurell L, Geivelis M, Lingen MW, Maddalozzo D. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1297 â 1305.; Wei PC, Laurell L, Lingen MW, Geivelis M. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 2. A histological comparative study. J Periodontol 2002; 73: 257 â 265.; Harris RJ. Gingival augmentation with an acellular dermal matrix: Human histologic evaluation of a case â Placement of the graft on periosteum. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 378 â 385.; Joly JC, Carvalho AM, da Silva RC, Ciotti DL, Cury PR. Root coverage in isolated gingival recessions using autograft versus allograft: A pilot study. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 1017 â 1022.; Woodyard JG, Greenwell H, Hill M, Drisko C, Iasella JM, Scheetz J. The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 44 â 56.; Sallum EA, Nogueiraâ Filho GR, Casati MZ, Pimentel SP, Saldanha JB, Nociti FH Jr. Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in gingival recessions: A histometric study. Am J Dent 2006; 19: 128 â 132.; Javed F, Alâ Askar M, Samaranayake LP, Alâ Hezaimi K. Periodontal disease in habitual cigarette smokers and nonsmokers with and without prediabetes. Am J Med Sci 2013; 345: 94 â 98.; Javed F, Näsström K, Benchimol D, Altamash M, Klinge B, Engström PE. Comparison of periodontal and socioeconomic status between subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nonâ diabetic controls. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 2112 â 2119.; Javed F, Alâ Rasheed A, Almas K, Romanos GE, Alâ Hezaimi K. Effect of cigarette smoking on the clinical outcomes of periodontal surgical procedures. Am J Med Sci 2012; 343: 78 â 84.; Alâ Hezaimi K, Alâ Fahad H, O’Neill R, Shuman L, Griffin T. The effect of enamel matrix protein on gingival tissue thickness in vivo. Odontology 2012; 100: 61 â 66.; Alâ Hezaimi K, Alâ Askar M, Alâ Fahad H, et al. Effect of enamel matrix derivative protein on the healing of standardized epithelial wounds: A histomorphometric analysis in vivo. Int Wound J 2012; 9: 436 â 441.; Alâ Hezaimi K, Naghshbandi J, Alâ Rasheed A, Merdad K, Simon JH, Rotstein I. Efficacy of the enamel matrix derivative to induce cementogenesis in vital and endodontically treated teeth with osseous dehiscence defects. Dent Traumatol 2011; 27: 350 â 355.; Kim DM. Periodontal plastic surgery procedures reduce localized gingival recession defects. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142: 850 â 851.; Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985; 56: 715 â 720.; Mlinek A, Smukler H, Buchner A. The use of free gingival grafts for the coverage of denuded roots. J Periodontol 1973; 44: 248 â 254.; Matter J. Creeping attachment of free gingival grafts. A fiveâ year followâ up study. J Periodontol 1980; 51: 681 â 685.; Miller PD Jr. Root coverage using the free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application. III. A successful and predictable procedure in areas of deepâ wide recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985; 5 ( 2 ): 14 â 37.; Jahnke PV, Sandifer JB, Gher ME, Gray JL, Richardson AC. Thick free gingival and connective tissue autografts for root coverage. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 315 â 322.; Langer B, Calagna L. The subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44: 363 â 367.; Langer B, Calagna LJ. The subepithelial connective tissue graft. A new approach to the enhancement of anterior cosmetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1982; 2(2): 22 â 33.; Mazzocco F, Comuzzi L, Stefani R, Milan Y, Favero G, Stellini E. Coronally advanced flap combined with a subepithelial connective tissue graft using fullâ or partialâ thickness flap reflection. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 1524 â 1529.; Humayun N, Kolhatkar S, Souiyas J, Bhola M. Mucosal coronally positioned flap for the management of excessive gingival display in the presence of hypermobility of the upper lip and vertical maxillary excess: A case report. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 1858 â 1863.; Froum SJ, Tarnow D. Modified coronally positioned flap for obtaining new attachment in Class 2 and 3 furcation defects. Part I: Rationale and surgical technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995; 15: 462 â 473.; Caffesse RG, Kon S, Castelli WA, Nasjleti CE. Revascularization following the lateral sliding flap procedure. J Periodontol 1984; 55: 352 â 358.; Allen EP. AlloDerm: An effective alternative to palatal donor tissue for treatment of gingival recession. Dent Today 2006;25:48, 50â 52, quiz 52.; de Queiroz Côrtes A, Sallum AW, Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr., Sallum EA. A twoâ year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 683 â 689.; Jagannathachary S, Prakash S. Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of class II gingival recession defects: A randomized controlled clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent 2010; 1: 73 â 78.; Henderson RD, Greenwell H, Drisko C, et al. Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 571 â 582.; Cummings LC, Kaldahl WB, Allen EP. Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 178 â 186.

  13. 13
    Academic Journal
  14. 14
    Academic Journal
  15. 15
    Academic Journal

    المساهمون: Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI., Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan.

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Chan, Hsun‐liang; Benavides, Erika; Yeh, Chu‐yuan; Fu, Jia‐hui; Rudek, Ivan E.; Wang, Hom‐lay (2011). "Risk Assessment of Lingual Plate Perforation in Posterior Mandibular Region: A Virtual Implant Placement Study Using Coneâ Beam Computed Tomography." Journal of Periodontology 82(1): 129-135.; https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141229; Journal of Periodontology; Gastaldo JF, Cury PR, Sendyk WR. Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1242 â 1246.; Romeo E, Lops D, Rossi A, Storelli S, Rozza R, Chiapasco M. Surgical and prosthetic management of interproximal region with singleâ implant restorations: 1â year prospective study. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1048 â 1055.; Pearson K. Determination of the coefficient of correlation. Science 1909; 30: 23 â 25.; Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on preâ surgical planning of threeâ dimensional coneâ beam images: A pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 816 â 821.; Ganz SD. Computerâ aided design/computerâ aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 777 â 808, vii.; Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computerâ guided templateâ based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 ( Suppl. 4 ): 73 â 86.; Berberi A, Le Breton G, Mani J, Woimant H, Nasseh I. Lingual paresthesia following surgical placement of implants: Report of a case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 580 â 582.; Sammartino G, Marenzi G, Citarella R, Ciccarelli R, Wang HL. Analysis of the occlusal stress transmitted to the inferior alveolar nerve by an osseointegrated threaded fixture. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1735 â 1744.; Chiapasco M, Abati S, Romeo E, Vogel G. Clinical outcome of autogenous bone blocks or guided bone regeneration with eâ PTFE membranes for the reconstruction of narrow edentulous ridges. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 278 â 288.; Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of interâ implant distance on the height of interâ implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 546 â 549.; Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Tarnow D. Practical application of anatomy for the dental implant surgeon. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1833 â 1846.; Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, BrÃ¥nemark PI. A 15â year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10: 387 â 416.; Scheller H, Urgell JP, Kultje C, et al. A 5â year multicenter study on implantâ supported single crown restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 212 â 218.; Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 248 â 251.; Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implantâ protected occlusion: A biomechanical rationale. Compendium 1994; 15: 1330, 1332, 1334 passim; quiz 1344.; Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 1975; 8: 393 â 405.; Lin CL, Wang JC, Ramp LC, Liu PR. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 57 â 64.; Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat 2010; 32: 343 â 349.; White SC. Coneâ beam imaging in dentistry. Health Phys 2008; 95: 628 â 637.; Quirynen M, Mraiwa N, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R. Morphology and dimensions of the mandibular jaw bone in the interforaminal region in patients requiring implants in the distal areas. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 280 â 285.; Tepper G, Hofschneider UB, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 68 â 72.; Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat 2010; 32 ( 4 ): 343 â 349.; Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, Hafezeqoran A, Gavgani FE. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e32 â e36.; Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, Müller S, Muellerâ Lisse UG. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4â row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 198 â 203.; Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is coneâ beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707 â 730.; Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCTâ NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 291 â 294.; Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3â D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible: A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 539 â 542.; Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of threeâ dimensional measurements using coneâ beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 410 â 416.; Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited coneâ beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 228 â 231.; Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial Xâ ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): System configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 51 â 59.; Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 ( Suppl. ): 43 â 61.

  16. 16
    Academic Journal

    المساهمون: Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan., Department of Cariology, Restorative Science and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan., Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI., Private practice, Beverly Hills, MI.

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Koh, Richard U.; Oh, Tae‐ju; Rudek, Ivan; Neiva, Gisele F.; Misch, Carl E.; Rothman, Edward D.; Wang, Hom‐lay (2011). "Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Crestal and Subcrestal Immediate Implant Placement." Journal of Periodontology 82(8): 1112-1120.; https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141272; Journal of Periodontology; EPOCRATES online. Available at: https://online.epocrates.com/home. Accessed September 6, 2007.; Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 22 â 29.; Shapoff CA, Lahey B, Wasserlauf PA, Kim DM. Radiographic analysis of crestal bone levels around Laserâ Lok collar dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30: 129 â 137.; Schwartzâ Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: A literature review. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 915 â 923.; Soboyejo WO, Nemetski B, Allameh S, Marcantonio N, Mercer C, Ricci J. Interactions between MC3T3â E1 cells and textured Ti6Al4V surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 62: 56 â 72.; Nevins M, Nevins ML, Camelo M, Boyesen JL, Kim DM. Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 111 â 121.; Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Resolution of bone defects of varying dimension and configuration in the marginal portion of the periâ implant bone. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 309 â 317.; Hämmerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 ( Suppl. ): 26 â 28.; American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system. Available at: http://www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm. Accessed September 6, 2007.; O’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972; 43: 38.; Shotwell JL, Billy EJ, Wang HL, Oh TJ. Implant surgical guide fabrication for partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 294 â 297.; Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 351 â 358.; Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, et al. Ridge preservation with freezeâ dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: A clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 990 â 999.; Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963; 21: 533 â 551.; Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964; 22: 121 â 135.; Wang HL, Kiyonobu K, Neiva RF. Socket augmentation: Rationale and technique. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 286 â 296.; Schulte W, Kleineikenscheidt H, Lindner K, Schareyka R. The Tübingen immediate implant in clinical studies. (in German) Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1978; 33: 348 â 359.; Huang LH, Neiva RE, Soehren SE, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. The effect of plateletâ rich plasma on the coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure: A pilot human trial. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 1768 â 1777.; Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after singleâ implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17: 326 â 333.; Lindeboom JA, Tjiook Y, Kroon FH. Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: A prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101: 705 â 710.; Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 5 â 15.; Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 1127 â 1131.; Polizzi G, Grunder U, Goené R, et al. Immediate and delayed implant placement into extraction sockets: A 5â year report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 93 â 99.; Quirynen M, Van Assche N, Botticelli D, Berglundh T. How does the timing of implant placement to extraction affect outcome? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22 ( Suppl. ): 203 â 223.; Wood DL, Hoag PM, Donnenfeld OW, Rosenfeld LD. Alveolar crest reduction following full and partial thickness flaps. J Periodontol 1972; 43: 141 â 144.; Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 645 â 652.; Huynhâ Ba G, Pjetursson BE, Sanz M, et al. Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 37 â 42.; BrÃ¥nemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intraâ osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3: 81 â 100.; Schulte W, Heimke G. The Tübinger immediate implant. Quintessenz 1976; 27: 17 â 23.; Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989; 9: 332 â 343.; Denissen HW, Kalk W, Veldhuis HA, van Waas MA. Anatomic consideration for preventive implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 191 â 196.; Watzek G, Haider R, Mensdorffâ Pouilly N, Haas R. Immediate and delayed implantation for complete restoration of the jaw following extraction of all residual teeth: A retrospective study comparing different types of serial immediate implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 561 â 567.; Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hardâ tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 820 â 828.; Araújo MG, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 606 â 614.; Hämmerle CH, Brägger U, Bürgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 111 â 119.

  17. 17
    Academic Journal

    المساهمون: School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Department of Periodontics & Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA., Eng. A.B. Research Chair for Growth Factors and Bone Regeneration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    وصف الملف: 658364 bytes; 3106 bytes; application/pdf; text/plain

    Relation: Chan, Hsun-Liang; Brooks, Sharon L.; Fu, Jia-Hui; Yeh, Chu-Yuan; Rudek, Ivan; Wang, Hom-Lay; (2011). "Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography." Clinical Oral Implants Research 22(2): 201-206.; https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79062; Clinical Oral Implants Research

  18. 18
    Academic Journal
  19. 19
    Academic Journal

    المساهمون: Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School ofPublic Health, Ann Arbor, MI., Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University ofMichigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI., Private practice, Beverly Hills, MI., Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University ofGranada School of Dentistry, Granada, Spain.

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Avila, Gustavo; Wang, Hom‐lay; Galindo‐moreno, Pablo; Misch, Carl E.; Bagramian, Robert A.; Rudek, Ivan; Benavides, Erika; Moreno‐riestra, Ildefonso; Braun, Thomas; Neiva, Rodrigo (2010). "The Influence of the Buccoâ Palatal Distance on Sinus Augmentation Outcomes." Journal of Periodontology 81(7): 1041-1050.; https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141630; Journal of Periodontology; Gapski R, Neiva R, Oh TJ, Wang HL. Histologic analyses of human mineralized bonegrafting material in sinus elevation procedures: A case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 59 â 69.; Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Earlyfailures in 4,641 consecutively placed BrÃ¥nemarkdental implants: A study from stage 1 surgery to the connection ofcompleted prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 142 â 146.; McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 377 â 396.; Fiorellini JP, Nevins ML. Localized ridge augmentation/preservation. Asystematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8: 321 â 327.; Tonetti MS, Hämmerle CH; European Workshop on Periodontology Group C. Advances in bone augmentation to enable dentalimplant placement: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshopon Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 168 â 172.; Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor withautogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980; 38: 613 â 616.; Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: theosteotome technique. Compendium 1994; 15: 152, 154â 156, 158 passim; quiz 162.; Cosci F, Luccioli M. A new sinus lift technique in conjunction withplacement of 265 implants: A 6â year retrospective study. Implant Dent 2000; 9: 363 â 368.; Vercellotti T, De Paoli S, Nevins M. The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinusmembrane elevation: Introduction of a new technique forsimplification of the sinus augmentation procedure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001; 21: 561 â 567.; Galindoâ Moreno P, Avila G, Fernándezâ Barbero JE, et al. Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using acomposite bone graft mixture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 376 â 382.; Fenner M, Vairaktaris E, Stockmann P, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW, Nkenke E. Influence of residual alveolar bone height onimplant stability in the maxilla: An experimental animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 751 â 755.; Fenner M, Vairaktaris E, Fischer K, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW, Nkenke E. Influence of residual alveolar bone height onosseointegration of implants in the maxilla: A pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 555 â 559.; Rios HF, Avila G, Galindoâ Moreno P, Wang HL. The influence of remaining alveolar bone uponlateral window sinus augmentation implant survival. Implant Dent 2009; 18: 402 â 412.; Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Nemcovsky CE, Weinreb M. The amount of newly formed bone in sinus graftingprocedures depends on tissue depth as well as the type andresidual amount of the grafted material. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 193 â 199.; Watzek G, Fürst G, Gruber R. Biologic basis of sinus grafting. In: Jensen OT, ed. The Sinus Bone Graft. Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence Books; 2006: 13 â 26.; O’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972; 43: 38.; Levin L, Herzberg R, Dolev E, Schwartzâ Arad D. Smoking and complications of onlay bone grafts andsinus lift operations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 369 â 373.; Ziccardi VB, Smith JA, Braun TW. Osteoma of the maxillary antrum. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80: 378 â 379.; Bowers GM, Schallhorn RG, Mellonig JT. Histologic evaluation of new attachment in humanintrabony defects. A literature review. J Periodontol 1982; 53: 509 â 514.; Landi L, Pretel RW Jr., Hakimi NM, Setayesh R. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a combinationof DFDBA and bovineâ derived porous hydroxyapatite: A preliminaryhistologic and histomorphometric report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20: 574 â 583.; Kolerman R, Tal H, Moses O. Histomorphometric analysis of newly formed boneafter maxillary sinus floor augmentation using ground corticalbone allograft and internal collagen membrane. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 2104 â 2111.; Froum SJ, Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, et al. The use of a mineralized allograft for sinusaugmentation: An interim histological case report from aprospective clinical study. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005; 26: 259 â 260, 262â 264, 266â 268; quiz 270â 271.; Hanisch O, Lozada JL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ, Kan JY, Spiekermann H. Maxillary sinus augmentation prior to placement ofendosseous implants: A histomorphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 329 â 336.; Gapski R, Misch C, Stapleton D, et al. Histological, histomorphometric, and radiographicevaluation of a sinus augmentation with a new bone allograft: Aclinical case report. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 430 â 438.; Cammack GV 2nd, Nevins M, Clem DS 3rd, Hatch JP, Mellonig JT. Histologic evaluation of mineralized anddemineralized freezeâ dried bone allograft for ridge and sinusaugmentations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 231 â 237.; Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on thesurvival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8: 328 â 343.; Froum SJ, Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Sinusfloor elevation using anorganic bovine bone matrix (OsteoGraf/N)with and without autogenous bone: A clinical, histologic,radiographic, and histomorphometric analysisâ Part2 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18: 528 â 543.; Tawil G, Mawla M. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral(Bioâ Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayeredcollagen barrier (Bioâ Gide): A clinical report of immediate anddelayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 713 â 721.; Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Histologic and clinical comparison of bilateralsinus floor elevations with and without barrier membrane placementin 12 patients: Part 3 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20: 117 â 125.; Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO. The critical size defect as an experimental modelfor craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 299 â 308.; Choi KS, Kan JY, Boyne PJ, Goodacre CJ, Lozada JL, Rungcharassaeng K. The effects of resorbable membrane on humanmaxillary sinus graft: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 73 â 80.; Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 391 â 401.; Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changesfollowing singleâ tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic12â month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313 â 323.; Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization followingextractions: A radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 48 â 56.; Misch CE. Divisions of available bone in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol 1990; 7: 9 â 17.

  20. 20
    Academic Journal