يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 49 نتيجة بحث عن '"Reemplazo valvular aórtico"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.56s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Revista de Ecocardiografía Práctica y Otras Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Practical Echocardiography and Other Cardiac Imaging Techniques; 26-28 ; Revista de Ecocardiografía Práctica y Otras Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2023): Revista de Ecocardiografía Práctica y Otras Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca; 26-28 ; 2529-976X

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    المؤلفون: Pérez Abad, Elena

    المساهمون: Saura Redondo, Marta, Universidad de Alcalá. Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Pérez Abad, Elena, Nuevos marcadores biológicos de la estenosis valvular aórtica. Trabajo Fin de Grado/Máster. Universidad de Alcalá, 2024; http://hdl.handle.net/10017/62553

  8. 8
  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
    Academic Journal
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Academic Journal
  13. 13

    المساهمون: Umaña Mallarino, Juan Pablo, Pineda Rodriguez, Ivonne Gisel

    المصدر: 1. Otto C. Expert consensus decision pathway for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the management of adults with aortic stenosis. Journal of the American college of cardiology. 2017; 69: 1313-1346.
    2. Hasegawa S. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement combined with bicuspidization for a quatricuspid aortic valve. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2019; 55: 1006-1007.
    3. Lansac E. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the remodeling technique with aortic annuloplasty: bicuspid valves with repair of specific lesions sets: how I teach it. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 108: 324-33.
    4. Gaudino M. Aortic flow after valve sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses reconstruction. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019; 157(2):455-465.
    5. Sadahiro M. Aortic graft dehiscence after valve-sparing root replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 108: 169-71.
    6. Kato Y. Aortic root remodeling with external ring annuloplasty in acute type A aortic dissection. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2019; 1-6.
    7. Coselli J. Aortic root replacement, the “gold” standard: All that shines is not gold! The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2016; 152: 956-7.
    8. Cooley D. Aortic root surgery with circulatory arrest: Predictors of prolonged postoperative hospital stay. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017; 153 (3):511-518.
    9. Elefteriades J. Aortic valve disease with ascending aortic aneurysm: Impact of concomitant root-sparing (supracoronary) aortic replacement in nonsyndromic patients. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016; 152(3): 791-798.
    11. Desai N. At the root of the repair debate: Outcomes after elective aortic root replacements for aortic insufficiency with aneurysm. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 1199-205.
    12. Bavaria J. Bicuspid aortic insufficiency with aortic root aneurysm: root reimplantation vs Bentall root replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 1221-8.
    13. Lee Y. Clinical outcomes of root reimplantation and Bentall procedure: propensity score matching analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 106: 539-47.
    14. Guillinov M. Combined aortic root replacement and mitral valve surgery: the quest to preserve both valves. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017; 153: 1023-30.
    15. Athanasiou T. Comparing outcomes between valve-sparing root replacement and the Bentall procedure in proximal aortic aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2019; 29: 911-22.
    16. Pacini D. Comparison of two strategies for aortic valve-sparing root replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; en prensa.
    17. Zehr K. Composite graft aortic root reconstruction: Reproducible, durable, and uncomplicated. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016; 152: 1049-51.
    18. Di Marco L. Composite valve graft implantation for the treatment of aortic valve and root disease: Results in 1045 patients. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016; 152; 1041-48.
    19. Borger M. David aortic valve-sparing reimplantation versus biological aortic root replacement: a retrospective analysis of 411 patients. Indian journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020 Jan;36 (Suppl 1): 97-103.
    20. Gao B. Del Nido cardioplegia for myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ASAIO Journal. 2018; 64: 360-367.
    21. Yacoub M. Design, dynamism, and valve repair. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017; 153: 396-8.
    22. Takayama H. Double mattress suture lines for valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Card Surg. 2019; 34: 1344-1346.
    23. Chen E. Durability and safety of David V valve-sparing root replacement in acute type A aortic dissection. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019; 157: 14-23.
    24. Delgado V. Effect of aortic valve replacement on aortic root dilation rate in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 1981-8.
    25. D. Oliveira N. Efficacy of aortic valve resuspension in establishing valve competence in acute type A dissections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 103: 1460-6.
    26. Tarelli G. Impact of cusp repair on reoperation risk after the David procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 1503-11.
    27. Yu C. Is valve-sparing root replacement a safe option in acute type A aortic dissection? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2019; 29: 766-775.
    28. Urbanski P. Long-term outcomes after valve-sparing anatomical aortic root reconstruction in acute dissection involving the root. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020 Apr; 159(4):1176-1184.e1.
    29. Okita Y. Mid-term results of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with expanded indications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100: 845-52.
    30. Ailawadi G. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery provides excellent outcomes without increased cost: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 14-21.
    31. Matsuda H. Morphology of sinus of Valsalva after aortic valve sparing root replacement using Valsalva graft. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 104:2-22.
    32. World Medical Association. Revisión Declaración de Helsinki-59a Asamblea General-Seúl Corea Octubre 2008.
    33. Salud MDE, Salud ELMDE. MINISTERIO DE SALUD RESOLUCION NUMERO 8430 DE 1993. 1993;1993(Octubre 4):1–1.
    34. David T. A progress report on reimplantation of the aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;-:1-10.
    35. Price J, de Kechrone L, Glineur D, Vanoverschelde JL, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G. Risk of valve-related events after aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:606–13.
    36. Jamieson WR, Burr L, Miyagishima R, Germann E, MacNab J, Stanford E, et al. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance over 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:994–1000.
    37. Malas T, Saczkowski R, Sohmer B, Ruel M, Mesana T, de Kerchove L, et al. Is aortic valve repair reproducible? Analysis of the learning curve for aortic valve repair. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(12):1497.
    38. Urbanski PP, Jankulovski A, Doldurov K, Zhan X, Sodan A, Zacher M, et al. Reconstructive aortic valve surgery in the elderly: techniques and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;17:32896–9.
    39. El Khoury, et al. Why I choose to repair and not to replace the aortic valve? General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019 Jan;67(1):20-24.
    40. Tsang W, et al. Aortic root changes before and after surgery for chronic aortic dilation: A 3D Echocardiographic study. Echocardiography. 2018; 1-10.
    Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
    Universidad del Rosario
    instacron:Universidad del Rosario

    وصف الملف: 49 pp.; application/pdf

  14. 14
    Academic Journal
  15. 15

    المؤلفون: Delgado Bárcena, Laura

    المساهمون: Jorge Monjas, Pablo, Universidad de Valladolid. Facultad de Medicina

    المصدر: UVaDOC: Repositorio Documental de la Universidad de Valladolid
    Universidad de Valladolid
    UVaDOC. Repositorio Documental de la Universidad de Valladolid
    instname

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  16. 16

    المؤلفون: Cubides Nuñez, Ricardo Alonso

    المساهمون: Guerra, Pablo Antonio, Buitrago-Medina, Daniel-Alejandro, Trillos, Marcial, Lombo, Miguel, Galindo, Patricia, Pulido, Felipe

    المصدر: 1. Bonow R, Carabello B, de Leon A, Edmunds L, Fedderly B, Freed M et al. Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Circulation. 1998;98(18):1949-1984.
    2. Horstkotte D. Guidelines on Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis Executive Summary The Task Force on Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal. 2004;25(3):267-276.
    3. Ramlawi B, Bedeir K, Lamelas J. Aortic Valve Surgery: Minimally Invasive Options. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal. 2016;12(1):27-32
    4. Melnitchouk S, Dal-Bianco J, Borger M. Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery via Mini-Thoracotomy: Current Update. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2015;17(11)
    5. Ferreira R, Silva R, Marchi E. Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016
    6. Ji Hyun Bang. M:D. Et. Al, Minimally Invasive Approaches Versus Conventional Sternotomy For Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Matching Study, Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;45:80-84
    7. Bang J, Kim J, Lee J, Kim J, Jung S, Choo S et al. Minimally Invasive Approaches Versus Conventional Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Matching Study. The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2012;45(2):80-84.
    8. Alison F, Eugene A, Aubrey C, Minimally Invasive Mitral Surgery Through Right Mini-Thoracotomy Under Direct Vision J Thorac Dis 2013;5(S6):S673-S679
    9. Miceli A, Murzi M, Canarutto D, Gilmanov D, Ferrarini M, Farneti Pa, Solinas M, Glauber M. Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair Through Right Minithoracotomy In The Setting Of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Early Outcomes And Long-Term Follow-Up. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2015;4(5):422-427
    11. Elattar M, van Kesteren F, Wiegerinck E, Vanbavel E, Baan J, Cocchieri R et al. Automated CTA based measurements for planning support of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2017;39:123-128.
    12. Glauber M, Ferrarini M, Miceli A. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(1):26-32.
    13. InformedegestiónFundaciónClínicaShaio, 2016.
    14. Ferreira R, Silva R, Marchi E. Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016.
    15. Boti B, Hindori V, Schade E, Kougioumtzoglou A, Verbeek E, Driessen-Waaijer A et al. Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement: associations of radiological assessments with procedure complexity. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2019;14(1).
    16. Van Brabandt H, Neyt M, Hulstaert F. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): risky and costly. BMJ. 2012;345(jul31 4):e4710-e4710.
    17. Azpitarte J, María Alonso Á, García Gallego F, González Santos J, Paré C, Tello A. Guías de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en valvulopatías. Revista Española de Cardiología. 2000;53(9):1209-1278.
    18. Gargiulo G, Sannino A, Capodanno D, Barbanti M, Buccheri S, Perrino C et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016;165(5):334.
    19. Siontis G, Praz F, Pilgrim T, Mavridis D, Verma S, Salanti G et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. European Heart Journal. 2016;37(47):3503-3512.
    20. Ando T, Takagi H, Grines C. Transfemoral, transapical and transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of early and mid-term deaths. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2017;25(3):484-492.
    21. Singh K, Carson K, Rashid M, Jayasinghe R, AlQahtani A, Dick A et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2018;27(2):227-234.
    22. Mantha A, Juo Y, Morchi R, Ebrahimi R, Ziaeian B, Shemin R et al. Evolution of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Era of Transcatheter Valve Technology. JAMA Surgery. 2017;152(11):1080.
    23. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2739-2786
    24. Gleason T, Reardon M, Popma J, Deeb G, Yakubov S, Lee J et al. 5-Year Outcomes of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;72(22):2687-2696.
    25. Capodanno D, Petronio AS, Prendergast B, et al.Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:408–417.
    26. Rodriguez-Gabella T, Voisine P, Dagenais F, Mohammadi S, Perron J, Dumont E et al. Long-Term Outcomes Following Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis Implantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;71(13):1401-1412.
    27. Douglas P, Leon M, Mack M, Svensson L, Webb J, Hahn R et al. Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial. JAMA Cardiology. 2017;2(11):1197.
    28. Didier R, Eltchaninoff H, Donzeau-Gouge P, Chevreul K, Fajadet J, Leprince P et al. Five-Year Clinical Outcome and Valve Durability After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients. FRANCE-2 registry. Circulation. 2018;138(23):2597-2607.
    29. Asgar A. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Valve Durability. Circulation. 2018;138(23):2608-2610.
    30. Mack M, Leon M, Smith C, Miller D, Moses J, Tuzcu E et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2477-2484.
    31. Nishimura R, Otto C, Bonow R, Carabello B, Erwin J, Fleisher L et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;70(2):252-289.
    32. Martínez Ochoa C, Cañas E, Castro Pérez J, Saldarriaga Giraldo C, González Berrío C, González Jaramillo N. Valor predictivo del EuroSCORE II y el STS score en pacientes sometidos a cirugía cardiaca valvular por el abordaje mínimamente invasivo. Revista Colombiana de Cardiología. 2016;23(5):427-434.
    Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
    Universidad del Rosario
    instacron:Universidad del Rosario

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  17. 17
  18. 18
    Dissertation/ Thesis
  19. 19
    Academic Journal
  20. 20
    Academic Journal