المؤلفون: 張雅婷, Chang, Ya-Ting

المساهمون: 朱斌妤

مصطلحات موضوعية: 組織法規, 繁文縟節, 效能法規, 數位科技, 人事法規, Organizational rules, Red tape, Green tape, Digital technology, Personnel rules

وصف الملف: 5868307 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 中文文獻\n吳宗憲(2012)。台南市政府文官公共服務動機與工作滿意、工作努力意願之實證研究-以個人∕組織配適度作為調節變項。公共行政學報，(43)，91-126。\n邱華君（2011）。現行考銓制度。一品文化出版。\n林文燦（2022）。公共人力資源管理個案探討:公務人員年金政策與制度改革多面向分析。五南。\n許道然、林文燦（2022）。考銓制度。五南。\n張子瑩、蘇文瑞與陳宏宇（2019）。智慧防災：資料應用及公私協作之實現。國土及公共治理季刊，7(2)，90-95。\n陳敦源、朱斌妤、蕭乃沂、黃東益、廖洲棚、曾憲立（2020）。政府數位轉型：一本必讀的入門書。五南。\n陳敦源、廖洲棚、董祥開（2017）。公共治理與績效管理：以政府網站管理為例之研究。國土及公共治理季刊，5（3），34-53。\n陳敦源、簡鈺珒（2018）。繁文縟節與組織績效：以臺灣作為個案觀察。文官季刊，10（4），25-60。\n陳敦源、黃建勲（2019）。繁文縟節如何影響公共服務動機？2011年臺灣文官調查資料之分析。文官季刊，11（1），35-71。\n黃東益（2021）。開放政府革新在臺灣的實踐與挑戰。T&D飛訊，280，1-25。\n項靖（2019）。AI人工智慧時代的公共治理。T&D飛訊，253，1-37。\n傅凱若、郭庭宇（2021）。公務人員為何沉默？公部門權力距離與員工沉默行為對工作滿意度之影響。文官制度，13（1），35-66。\n董祥開、林嚴凡（2019）。公私部門轉換經驗對工作滿意度之影響：以公私部門工作差異認知為中介變項。行政暨政策學報，68，1-48。\n廖興中、朱斌妤、羅晉、黃東益、郭毓倫（2020）。數位國情架構精進調查與政府數位成熟度評估。國家發展委員會電子治理研究中心。\n廖洲棚、陳敦源、陳恭（2019）。運用大數據評估政府網站可用度：使用者導向的新途徑+。T&D飛訊，253，1-28。\n劉宜君、林昭吟、陳敦源、賴怡樺（2018）。以組織氣候中介跨專業職能認知與工作滿足感關係之初探性研究：以衛生福利中高階人員為例。臺灣社會福利學刊，14(2)，71-113。\n蔡祈賢（2008）公務人力資源管理。商鼎文化出版。\n劉祥得、翁興利（2007）。當前我國公務人員工作滿意度、工作屬性、工作系絡之因果分析。公共行政學報，22，71-110。\n蕭乃沂、朱斌妤（2018）。資料驅動創新的跨域公共治理。國土及公共治理季刊，6(4)，74-85。\n蕭乃沂、黃東益、陳敦源、羅晉（2007）。數位治理的實踐－「國家政策網路智庫」初評與前瞻。研考雙月刊，31(3)，71-80。\n英文文獻\nAbdulkareem A. K., & Ramli R. M. (2021). Does digital literacy predict e-government performance? An extension of Delone and Mclean information system success model. Electronic Government, 17(4), 466-493.\nAmber, Q., Ahmad, M., Khan I. A., & Hashmi, F. A. (2019). Knowledge sharing and social dilemma in bureaucratic organizations: Evidence from public sector in Pakistan. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1-18.\nBlom, R., Borst, R. T., & Voorn, B. (2020). Pathology or inconvenience? A meta-analysis of the impact of red tape on people and organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(4), 623-650.\nBorry, E. L. (2016). A new measure of red tape: Introducing the Three Item Red Tape (TIRT) scale. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 573-593.\nBorry, E. L., DeHart-Davis, L., Kaufmann, W., Merritt, C. C., Mohr, Z., & Tummers, L. (2018). Formalization and consistency heighten organizational rule following: Experimental and survey evidence. Public Administration, 96 (2), 368-385.\nBorst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., & Lako, C. J. (2017). Exploring the job demands-resources model of work engagement in government: Bringing in a psychological perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 372-397.\nBozeman, B. (1993) A Theory of Government “Red Tape”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273-304.\nBozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2011). Rules and Red Tape: A Prism for Public Administration Theory and Research. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.\nBozeman, B., Reed, P., & P. Scott. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration & Society, 24(3), 290-322.\nBrewer, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2010). The impact of red tape on governmental performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 233-257.\nCampbell, J. W. (2020). Red tape, rule burden, and legitimate performance trade-offs: Results from a Vignette experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(4), 741–765\nChan, F. K. Y., Thong J. Y. L., Brown S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2021). Service Design and Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government Services: A Multidimensional Perspective. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 874-894.\nChen, C. A. (2012). Sector imprinting: Exploring its impacts on managers perceived formalized personnel rules, perceived red tape, and current job tenure. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(3): 320-340.\nChen, Y., Hu, L., Tseng, K., Juang, W., & Chang, C. (2019). Cross-boundary e-government systems: Determinants of performance. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 449-459.\nCheung, C. M., Xiao, B. S., & Liu, I. L. (2014). Do actions speak louder than voices? The signaling role of social information cues in influencing consumer purchase decisions. Decision Support Systems, 65, 50-58.\nCohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. NY: Academic Press.\nCooke, D. K., Brant, K. K., & Woods, J. M. (2019). The role of public service motivation in employee work engagement: A test of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(9), 765–775.\nCronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.\nDawes, S., Cresswell, A., & Pardo, T. (2009). From "need to know" to "need to share": Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 392-402.\nDeng, H., Karunasena, K., & Xu, W. (2018). Evaluating the performance of e-government in developing countries: A public value perspective. Internet research, 28 (1), 169-190\nDeHart-Davis, L. (2008). Green tape: A theory of effective organizational rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 361-384.\nDeHart-Davis, L. (2009). Green tape and public employee rule abidance: Why organizational rule attributes matter. Public administration review, 69(5), 901-910.\nDeHart-Davis, L. (2017). Creating Effective Rules in Public Sector Organizations. WA: Georgetown University Press.\nDeHart-Davis, L., Chen, J., & Little, T. D. (2013). Written versus unwritten rules: The role of rule formalization in green tape. International Public Management Journal, 16(3), 331-356.\nDeHart-Davis, L., Davis, R. S., & Mohr, Z. (2015). Green tape and job satisfaction: Can organizational rules make employees happy? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 849-876.\nDeHart-Davis, L., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133-148.\nDobrolyubova, E. (2021). Measuring outcomes of digital transformation in public administration: Literature review and possible steps forward. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(1), 61-86.\nEfron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1998). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.\nFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39-50.\nGeorge, B., Pandey, S. K., Steijn, B., Decramer, A., & Audenaert, M. (2021). Red tape, organizational performance, and employee outcomes: Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and research genda. Public Administration Review, 81 (4), 638-651.\nGlaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.\nGeisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101-107.\nGoodsell, C. T. (2000). Red tape and a theory of bureaucratic rules. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 373-375.\nGraham, C. B., & Hays, S. W. (1986). Managing the Public Organization. Washington, DC: CQ Press.\nGrimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). E-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134-148.\nHair, Jr. J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.\nHair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.\nHair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) PLS-SEM Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139-151.\nHair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, G. V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.\nHattke, F., Hensel, D., & Kalucza, J. (2019). Emotional responses to bureaucratic red tape. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 53-63.\nIm, T. (2011). Information technology and organizational morphology: The case of the korean central government. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 435-443.\nJacobsen, C. B., & Jakobsen, M. L. (2018). Perceived organizational red tape and organizational performance in public services. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 24-36.\nJaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Designing, implementing, and evaluating user-centered and citizen-centered e-government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 6(2), 1-17.\nJanowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221-236.\nKaufman, H. (1977). Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses and Abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings.\nKaufmann, W., Borry, E. L., & DeHart-Davis, L. (2019). More than pathological formalization: understanding organizational structure and red tape. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 236-245.\nKaufmann, W., & Feeney, M. K. (2012). Objective Formalization, Perceived Formalization and Perceived Red Tape. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1195-1214.\nKaufmann, W., Taggart, G., & Bozeman, B. (2019). Administrative delay, red tape, and organizational performance. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(3), 529-553.\nKaufmann, W., & Tummers, L. (2017). The negative effect of red tape on procedural satisfaction. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1311-1327.\nKaufmann, W., & Haans, R. F. J. (2021). Understanding the meaning of concepts across domains through collocation analysis: An application to the study of red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 218-233.\nLee, C., Chang, K., & Berry, F. S. (2011). Testing the development and diffusion of e-government and e-democracy: A global perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444-454.\nLi, M. H., & Feeney, M. K. (2014). Adoption of electronic technologies in local U.S. Governments: Distinguishing between e-services and communication technologies. American Review of Public Administration, 44(1), 75-91.\nLuna-Reyes, L. F. (2017). Opportunities and challenges for digital governance in a world of digital participation. Information Polity, 22(2-3), 197-205.\nMichaels, R. E., Cron, W. L., Dubinsky, A. J., & Joachimsthaler, E. A. (1988). Influence of formalization on the organizational commitment and work alienation of salespeople and industrial buyers. Journal of Marketing Research 25, 376-383.\nMistur, E. M., Kingsley, G., Matisoff, D. C., & An, Y. (2021). Green rules and green tape: Streamlining the environmental review for transportation projects. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 97, 102937.\nMoon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities rhetoric or reality. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.\nMoon, M. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2002). Does the perception of red tape constrain IT innovativeness in organizations? Unexpected results from a simultaneous equation model and implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), 273-292.\nMoore, G. A. (2004). Darwin and the demon: Innovating within established enterprises. Harvard Business Review, 82, 86-92.\nNam, T. (2019). Does e-government raise effectiveness and efficiency?: Examining the cross-national effect. Journal of Global Information Management, 27(3),120-138.\nPandey, S. K., & Bretschneider, S. I. (1997). The impact of red tape`s administrative delay on public organizations` interest in new information technologies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,7(1), 113-130.\nPandey, S. K., & Scott, P. G. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553-580.\nPandey, S. K., & Welch, E. W. (2005). Beyond stereotypes: A multistage model of managerial perceptions of red tape. Administration & Society, 37(5), 542-575.\nPandey, S. K., & Marlowe, J. (2015). Assessing survey-based measurement of personnel red tape with anchoring Vignettes. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(3) 215-237.\nPang, M., Lee, G., & DeLone, W. H. (2014). IT resources, organizational capabilities, and value creation in public-sector organizations: A public-value management perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 29, 187-205.\nPrasad, A., & Shivarajan, S. (2015). Understanding the role of technology in reducing corruption: A transaction cost approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 15 (1), 22-39.\nQuratulain, S., & Khan, A. K. (2015). Red tape, resigned satisfaction, public service motivation, and negative employee attitudes and behaviors: Testing a model of moderated mediation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(4), 307-332.\nRai, A., Tang, X., Brown, P., & Keil, M. (2006). Assimilation patterns in the use of electronic procurement innovations: A cluster analysis. Information & Management, 43(3), 336-349.\nRainey, H. G., Pandey, S. K., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers` perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 567-574.\nRose, J., Persson, J. S., Heeager, L. T., & Irani, Z. (2014). Managing e-government: Value positions and relationships. Information systems journal, 25(5), 531-571.\nScott, M., DeLone, W., & Golden, W.(2016). Measuring egovernment success: a public value approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(3),187-208\nStazyk, E. C., Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2011). Understanding affective organizational commitment: The importance of institutional context. American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603-624.\nTaylor, J. (2016). Working extra hours in the Australian public service: Organizational drivers and consequences. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 193-217.\nTenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205.\nTomaszewicz, A.A. (2015) The impact of digital literacy on e-government development. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3(2), 45-58.\nTuraga, R. M. R., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Red tape and public managers` decision making. American review of public administration, 35 (4), 363-379.\nUrbach, N., Smolnik, S., & Riempp, G. (2010). An empirical investigation of employee portal success. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 184-206.\nVan Dijck, C., & Steen, T. (2022). Collaborating for innovation: A systematic review of the red tape effects at play. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-12.\nVan Loon, N. M., Leisink, P. L. M., & Knies, E. (2016). Red tape: Developing and validating a new job-centered measure. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 662-673.\nVeiga, L., Janowski, T., & Barbosa, L. S. (2016, March). Digital Government and Administrative Burden Reduction. 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2016), New York.\nWalker, R. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2008). An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1112-1127.\nWang, S., & Feeney, M. K. (2016). Determinants of information and communication technology adoption in municipalities. American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 292-313.\nWelch, E. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). E-government and bureaucracy: Toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 379-404; G0106256503; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/146708; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/146708/1/650301.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/146708
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/146708/1/650301.pdf

المؤلفون: Confederate States of America. War Department.

المصدر: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/dul1.ark:/13960/t49p3vz6h.

مصطلحات موضوعية: Confederate States of America.--Recruiting, enlistment, etc, Confederate States of America.--Medical personnel--Rules and practice, Confederate States of America.--Medical care

Relation: sdr-ia-duke.001118301; (OCoLC)28691339; http://hdl.handle.net/2027/dul1.ark:/13960/t49p3vz6h

الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/dul1.ark:/13960/t49p3vz6h

المؤلفون: Terry, Cora Duvall

مصطلحات موضوعية: public sector distinction, nonprofit sector distinction, red tape, personnel rules

Relation: terry_cora_d_201512_phd; http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/terry_cora_d_201512_phd; http://hdl.handle.net/10724/35469"

الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/10724/35469",
http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/terry_cora_d_201512_phd

المؤلفون: Terry, Cora Duvall

مصطلحات موضوعية: public sector distinction, nonprofit sector distinction, red tape, personnel rules, eco, phil

Relation: http://hdl.handle.net/10724/35469"

الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/10724/35469"

المؤلفون: Svák, Martin

المساهمون: Kressová, Petra, Gregar, Aleš

مصطلحات موضوعية: řízení lidských zdrojů, motivace, odměňování, personální činnost, personální řád, human resource management, motivation, rewards, personnel activity, personnel rules

وصف الملف: 65s., 14s. příloh; 556772 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: Elektronický archiv Knihovny UTB; http://hdl.handle.net/10563/777; 4072

الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/10563/777