يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 269 نتيجة بحث عن '"National Systems of Innovation"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.77s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Academic Journal

    المساهمون: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials, Generalitat Valenciana, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, European Regional Development Fund

    Relation: International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-093791-B-C22/ES/FORTALECIENDO LAS POLITICAS DE INNOVACION EN EL SECTOR AGROALIMENTARIO/; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//GV%2F2019%2F063/; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//GV%2F2021%2F121/; https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877021300081; urn:issn:0219-8770; http://hdl.handle.net/10251/186154

  8. 8
    Dissertation/ Thesis
  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
    Academic Journal
  11. 11
    Conference

    المساهمون: Díez de Castro, Enrique Carlos, Brândao, Elísio

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Cities in competition. XV Spanish-Portuguese Meeting of Scientific Management (2005), p 529-544; Sevilla

  12. 12
    Report
  13. 13
    Academic Journal
  14. 14
    Academic Journal

    المؤلفون: Wang, Yuandi, Zhou, Zhao

    المصدر: Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 2011, Vol. 3, Issue 3, pp. 160-171.

  15. 15
    Academic Journal

    جغرافية الموضوع: Colombia, Chile, Brasil, México

    وصف الملف: 1 página; application/pdf

    Relation: 51; 38; Espacios; Acevedo Prins, N., Jiménez Gómez, L., & Rojas López, M. (2016). Medición de la competitividad para Brasil, Chile, Colombia y México. Espacios, 37(30), 1–15.; Acevedo Prins, N., Jiménez Gómez, L., & Rojas López, M. (2017a). Análisis bibliométrico de publicaciones sobre competitividad nacional en la base de datos Scopus. Espacios, 38(08), 1–14.; Acevedo Prins, N., Jiménez Gómez, L., & Rojas López, M. (2017b). Análisis bibliométrico sobre indicadores de innovación. Espacios, 38(08), 1–12.; Aubert, J.-E., & World Bank. (2005). Promoting Innovation in Developing Countries: A Conceptual Framework (The Policy Research Working Paper Series). Innovation. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wbkwbrwps/3554.htm; Bogdan, A., & Marius, F. (2015). Innovation and Competitiveness in European Context. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32(15), 728–737. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01455-0; Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., & Goletsis, Y. (2016). A multilevel and multistage efficiency evaluation of innovation systems: A multiobjective DEA approach. Expert Systems With Applications, 62, 63–80. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.017; Carayannis, E. G., & Provance, M. (2008). Measuring firm innovativeness: Towards a composite innovation index built on firm innovative posture, propensity and performance attributes. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(1), 90–107.; De la Fuente, S. (2011). Análisis Factorial. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.; Erciş, A., & Ünalan, M. (2016). Innovation : A comparative case study of Turkey and South Korea. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(October), 701–708. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.071; Feinson, S. (2003). National Innovation Systems Overview and Country Cases. Knowledge Flows and Knowledge Collectives: Understanding The Role of Science and Technology Policies in Development, 13–38.; Fernandes, N., & Fernandes, C. (2016). Global innovation index : Moving beyond the absolute value of ranking with a fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5265–5271. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.123; Grupp, H., & Schubert, T. (2010). Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance. Research Policy, 39(1), 67–78. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.002; Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1999). Análisis Multivariante. (P. Hall, Ed.) (5th ed.). Madrid.; Herciu, M., & Ogrean, C. (2015). Wealth, Competitiveness, and Intellectual Capital – Sources for Economic Development. In Procedia Economics and Finance (Vol. 27, pp. 556–566). Elsevier B.V. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01033-3; Jiménez, L. M., & Acevedo, N. (2015). Índice para la medición de la competitividad en colombia. Revista CEA, 1(2), 109–121. Retrieved from http://itmojs.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/805/762; Kaihua, C., & Mingting, K. (2014). Staged efficiency and its determinants of regional innovation systems: A two-step analytical procedure. The Annals of Regional Science, 52(2), 627–657.; Kao, C., Wu, W.-Y., Hsieh, W.-J., Wang, T.-Y., Lin, C., & Chen, L.-H. (2007). Measuring the national competitiveness of Southeast Asian countries. European Journal of Operational Research., 187(2), 613–628.; Luisa, E., & Castillo, R. (2004). El sistema nacional de innovación : Un análisis teórico-conceptual The National System of Innovation : A Theoretical-Conceptual Analysis, 45(45), 94–117.; Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.; Mahroum, S., & Al-Saleh, Y. (2013). Towards a functional framework for measuring national innovation efficacy. Technovation, 33(10-11), 320–332. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.03.013; Metcalfe, S. (1995). The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives. (P. Stoneman, Ed.). Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (US).: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change.; Mulatu, A. (2016). On the concept of ’competitiveness’ and its usefulness for policy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 36, 50–62. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2015.11.001; OCDE. (1997). National Innovation Systems. Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/56/2101733.pdf; OCDE, & CEPAL. (2013). Perspectivas económicas de América Latina 2013.; OCDE, Commission European, Centre Joint Research, & OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD.; Pérez-moreno, S., Rodríguez, B., & Luque, M. (2016). Assessing global competitiveness under multi-criteria perspective. Economic Modelling, 53, 398–408. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.030; Porter. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan.; Sahin, Onsel, Fusun, Ulengin, Gunduz, Emel, … Ilker. (2008). A new perspective on the competitiveness of nations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 221–246.; Schuschny, A., & Soto, H. (2009). Guía metodológica Diseño de indicadores compuestos de desarrollo sostenible. CEPAL. Santiago de Chile.; Schwab, K., & WEF. (2014). The global Competitiveness Report 2014 - 2015. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www.weforum.org/pdf/Global_Competitiveness_Reports/Reports/factsheet_gcr03.pdf; Shelton, R. D. (2013). Scientometric Insight on a Bottom Line of Innovation: High-Technology Exports.; Solleiro, L., & Castan, R. (2005). Competitiveness and innovation systems: the challenges for Mexico ’s insertion in the global context. Technovation, 25, 1059–1070. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.005; https://dspace.tdea.edu.co/handle/tdea/4086

  16. 16
    Academic Journal

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Dzimba E, van der Poll JA. 2022. Disruptive Innovation at the Base-of-the-Pyramid: Negotiating the Missing Links. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4):171. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040171; https://hdl.handle.net/10500/30139

  17. 17
  18. 18
    Conference
  19. 19
    Academic Journal
  20. 20