يعرض 1 - 5 نتائج من 5 نتيجة بحث عن '"M. M. Chernenkiy"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.35s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Andrology and Genital Surgery; Том 24, № 3 (2023); 66-74 ; Андрология и генитальная хирургия; Том 24, № 3 (2023); 66-74 ; 2412-8902 ; 2070-9781

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/684/534; Campbell S.C., Novick A.C., Belldegrun A. et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009;182(4):1271–9. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004; Ljungberg B., Bensalah K., Canfield S. et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 2015;67(5):913–24. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005; MacLennan S., Imamura M., Lapitan M.C. et al. Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol 2012;62(6):1097–117. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.028; Liss M.A., Wang S., Palazzi K. et al. Evaluation of national trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy in relation to the publication of the American Urologic Association guidelines for the management of clinical T1 renal masses. BMC Urol 2014;14:101. DOI:10.1186/1471-2490-14-101; Fergany A.F., Hafez K.S., Novick A.C. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol 2000;163(2):442–5. PMID: 10647650.; Capitanio U., Terrone C., Antonelli A. et al. Nephron-sparing techniques independently decrease the risk of cardiovascular events relative to radical nephrectomy in patients with a T1a–T1b renal mass and normal preoperative renal function. Eur Urol 2015;67(4):683–9. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.027; MacLennan S., Imamura M., Lapitan M.C. et al. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol 2012;61(5):972–93. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.039; Kim S.P., Thompson R.H., Boorjian S.A. et al. Comparative effectiveness for survival and renal function of partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2012;188(1):51–7. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.006; Scosyrev E., Messing E.M., Sylvester R. et al. Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904. Eur Urol 2014;65(2):372–7. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.044; Kim C.S., Bae E.H., Ma S.K. et al. Impact of partial nephrectomy on kidney function in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BMC Nephrol 2014;15:181. DOI:10.1186/1471-2369-15-181; McCallum W., Testani J.M. Updates in cardiorenal syndrome. Med Clin North Am 2023;107(4):763–80. DOI:10.1016/j.mcna.2023.03.011; Van Poppel H., Da Pozzo L., Albrecht W. et al. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2007;51(6):1606–15. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.013; Antonelli A., Ficarra V., Bertini R. et al. Elective partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: results of a retrospective, comparative, multi-institutional study. BJU Int 2012;109(7):1013–8. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10431.x; Gong I.H., Hwang J., Choi D.K. et al. Relationship among total kidney volume, renal function and age. J Urol 2012;187(1):344–9. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.005; Jeon H.G., Gong I.H., Hwang J.H. et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative kidney volume for predicting renal function in renal cell carcinoma patients receiving a radical or partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2012;109(10):1468–73. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10531.x; Tobert C.M., Boelkins B., Culver S. et al. Surgeon assessment of renal preservation with partial nephrectomy provides information comparable to measurement of volume preservation with 3D image analysis. J Urol 2014;191(5):1218–24. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.003; Eum S.H., Lee H., Ko E.J. et al. Comparison of CT volumetry versus nuclear renography for predicting remaining kidney function after uninephrectomy in living kidney donors. Sci Rep 2022;12(1):5144. DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09187-9; Hori Y., Obinata D., Funakoshi D. et al. Preoperative CT volumetry of estimated residual kidney for prediction of postoperative chronic kidney disease in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Nephrol 2021;25(3):315–21. DOI:10.1007/s10157-020-01984-8; Yanishi M., Kinoshita H., Yoshida T. et al. Comparison of renal scintigraphy and computed tomographic renal volumetry for determining split renal function and estimating post-transplant renal function. Transplant Proc 2015;47(9):2700–2. DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.07.037; Almeida M., Pereira P.R., Ramos M. et al. CT volumetry performs better than nuclear renography in predicting estimated renal function one year after living donation. Int Urol Nephrol 2023;55(3):553–62. DOI:10.1007/s11255-022-03441-9; You S., Ma X., Zhang C. et al. Determination of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with CT urography versus renal dynamic imaging Gates method. Eur Radiol 2018;28(3):1077–84. DOI:10.1007/s00330-017-5061-z; Diez A., Powelson J., Sundaram C.P. et al. Correlation between CT-based measured renal volumes and nuclear-renography-based split renal function in living kidney donors. Clinical diagnostic utility and practice patterns. Clin Transplant 2014;28(6):675–82. DOI:10.1111/ctr.12365; Nilsson H., Wadström J., Andersson L.G. et al. Measuring split renal function in renal donors: can computed tomography replace renography? Acta Radiol 2004;45(4):474–80. DOI:10.1080/02841850410005282; Tsushima Y., Blomley M.J., Okabe K. et al. Determination of glomerular filtration rate per unit renal volume using computerized tomography: correlation with conventional measures of total and divided renal function. J Urol 2001;165(2):382–5. DOI:10.1097/00005392-200102000-00007; Hackstein N., Buch T., Rau W.S. et al. Split renal function measured by triphasic helical CT. Eur J Radiol 2007;61(2):303–9. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.09.001; Helck A., Schonermarck U., Habicht A. et al. Determination of split renal function using dynamic CT-angiography: preliminary results. PloS One 2014;9(3):e91774. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0091774; Summerlin A.L., Lockhart M.E., Strang A.M. et al. Determination of split renal function by 3D reconstruction of CT angiograms: a comparison with gamma camera renography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(5):1552–8. DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.4023; Hua L., Sebben R., Olakkengil S. et al. Correlation between computed tomography volumetry and nuclear medicine split renal function in live kidney donation: a single-centre experience. ANZ J Surg 2020;90(7–8):1347–51. DOI:10.1111/ans.16087; Shi W., Liang X., Wu N. et al. Assessment of split renal function using a combination of contrast-enhanced CT and serum creatinine values for glomerular filtration rate estimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;215(1):142–7. DOI:10.2214/AJR.19.22125; Lal H., Yadav P., Kaul A. et al. Role of computed tomography in estimation of residual renal function at one year after donor nephrectomy: comparison with nuclear scintigraphy. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2021;32(4):993–8. DOI:10.4103/1319-2442.338312; Patankar K., Low R.S., Blakeway D., Ferrari P. Comparison of computer tomographic volumetry versus nuclear split renal function to determine residual renal function after living kidney donation. Acta Radiol 2014;55(6):753–60. DOI:10.1177/0284185113504195; Barbas A.S., Li Y., Zair M. et al. CT volumetry is superior to nuclear renography for prediction of residual kidney function in living donors. Clin Transplant 2016;30(9):1028–35. DOI:10.1111/ctr.12784; Mitsui Y., Sadahira T., Araki M. et al. The assessment of renal cortex and parenchymal volume using automated CT volumetry for predicting renal function after donor nephrectomy. Clin Exp Nephrol 2018;22(2):453–58. DOI:10.1007/s10157-017-1454-1; Houbois C., Haneder S., Merkt M. et al. Can computed tomography volumetry of the renal cortex replace MAG3-scintigraphy in all patients for determining split renal function? Eur J Radiol 2018;103:105–11. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.04.016; Fiev D., Proskura A., Khokhlachev S. et al. A prospective study of novel mathematical analysis of the contrast-enhanced computed tomography vs renal scintigraphy in renal function evaluation. Eur J Radiol 2020;130:109169. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109169; Фиев Д.Н. Виртуальное моделирование для выбора метода лечения и планирования операций при хирургических заболеваниях почек. Дис. д-ра мед. наук. М., 2015.; Сирота Е.С. Компьютер-ассистированные операции при заболеваниях почки. Дис. . д-ра мед. наук. М., 2018.; Проскура А.В. Оценка функции почки с помощью трехмерной виртуальной обработки данных МСКТ с контрастированием. Дис. . канд. мед. наук. М., 2020.; Попов С.В., Гусейнов Р.Г., Борисенков М.Б. и др. Сравнительная оценка выживаемости пациентов с раком почки после эндовидеохирургической радикальной нефрэктомии и резекции почки. Онкоурология 2013;9(2):21–5. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2013-9-2-21-25; Ракул С.А., Поздняков К.В., Елоев Р.А. Отдаленные онкологические результаты хирургического лечения локализованных опухолей почек. Онкоурология 2021;17(4):27–37. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-4-27-37; Котов С.В., Неменов А.А., Юсуфов А.Г. и др. Сравнение периоперационных и ранних функциональных результатов лапароскопической резекции почки с опухолью при стадии cT1aN0M0 и cT1b–T2aN0M0. Онкоурология 2021;17(4):38–46. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-4-38-46; Волкова М.И., Скворцов И.Я., Климов А.В. и др. Влияние объема хирургического вмешательства на функциональные результаты и кардиоспецифическую выживаемость у больных клинически локализованным раком почки. Онкоурология 2014;10(3):22–30. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2014-10-3-22-30; Larcher A., Wallis C.J.D., Pavan N. et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy among very elderly patients: report from the RESURGE collaborative international database. Cent European J Urol 2020;73(3):273–9. DOI:10.5173/ceju.2020.0179; Porpiglia F., Fiori C., Bertolo R. et al. Long-term functional evaluation of the treated kidney in a prospective series of patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumors. Eur Urol 2012;62(1):130–5. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.001; Pansadoro A., Cochetti G., D’amico F. et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic renal tumour enucleation with local hypotension on demand. World J Urol 2015;33(3):427–32. DOI:10.1007/s00345-014-1325-2; Rod X., Peyronnet B., Seisen T. et al. Impact of ischaemia time on renal function after partial nephrectomy: a systematic review. BJU Int 2016;118(5):692–705. DOI:10.1111/bju.13580; Jiang Y.L., Peng C.X., Wang H.Z., Qian LJ. Comparison of the long-term follow-up and perioperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for 4 cm to 7 cm renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol 2019;19(1):48. DOI:10.1186/s12894-019-0480-6; https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/684

  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5