المؤلفون: Roman M. Frolov

المصدر: Gerión, Vol 42, Iss 1 (2024)

مصطلحات موضوعية: Roman Republic, Magistracies ad tempus incertum, Promagistrates, Sphere domi, Political culture, Informal political initiative, Archaeology, CC1-960, Ancient history, D51-90

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GERI/article/view/92870; https://doaj.org/toc/0213-0181; https://doaj.org/toc/1988-3080

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/6d1022c31e104a66b872aa6dd9671ebc

المؤلفون: Frolov, Roman M.

المصدر: Gerión. Revista de Historia Antigua; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2024); 57-79 ; Gerión. Revista de Historia Antigua; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2024); 57-79 ; 1988-3080 ; 0213-0181

مصطلحات موضوعية: Roman Republic, Magistracies ad tempus incertum, Promagistrates, Sphere domi, Political culture, Informal political initiative, República Romana, magistraturas ad tempus incertum, promagistrados, esfera domi, cultura política, iniciativa política informal

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GERI/article/view/92870/4564456570154; Bleicken, J. (1990): Zwischen Republik und Prinzipat: Zum Charakter des zweiten Triumvirats, Göttingen.; Blösel, W. (2009): Imperia extraordinaria liberae rei publicae – Studien zur Demilitarisierung der römischen Nobilität, Habilitationsschrift, Köln.; Börm, H. – Havener, W. (2012): “Octavians Rechtsstellung im Januar 27 v.Chr. und das Problem der ‚Übertragung‘ der res publica”, Historia 61, 202-220.; Bringmann, K. (1988): “Das Zweite Triumvirat. Bemerkungen zu Mommsens Lehre von der außerordentlichen konstituierenden Gewalt”, [in] P. Kneissl – V. Losemann (eds.), Alte Geschichte und Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Festschrift für Karl Christ zum 65. Geburtstag, Darmstadt, 22-38.; Broughton, T. R. S. (1951): The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, New York.; Broughton, T. R. S. (1952): The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 2, New York.; Coli, U. (1953): “Sui limiti di durata delle magistrature romane”, [in] A. Berger (ed.), Studi in onore di Vincenzo Arangio-Ruiz nel XLV anno del suo insegnamento 4, Napoli, 395-418.; Cotton, H. M. – Yakobson, A. (2002): “Arcanum imperii: The Powers of Augustus”, [in] G. Clark – T. Rajak (eds.), Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World, Oxford, 193-209.; Dalla Rosa, A. (2015): “L’aureus del 28 a.C. e i poteri triumvirali di Ottaviano”, [in] T. M. Lucchelli – F. Rohr Vio (eds.), Viri Militares. Rappresentazione e propaganda tra Repubblica e Principato, Trieste, 171-200.; De Martino, F. (1993): “Sugli aspetti giuridici del triumvirate”, [in] A. Gara – D. Foraboschi (eds.), Il triumvirato costituente alla fine della repubblica romana. Studi in onore di Mario Attilio Levi, Como, 67-83.; Degrassi, A. (ed.) (1947): Inscriptiones Italiae 13: Fasti et Elogia, vol. 1, Roma.; Drogula, F. K. (2015): Commanders and Command in the Roman Republic and Early Empire, Chapel Hill.; Fadinger, V. (1969): Die Begründung des Prinzipats: quellenkritische und staatsrechtliche Untersuchungen zu Cassius Dio und der Parallelüberlieferung, Berlin.; Fernoux, H.-L. (2011): “Les ambassades civiques des cités de la province d’Asie envoyées à Rome au Ier s. av. J.-C.: législation romaine et prérogatives des cités”, [in] N. Barrandon – F. Kirbihler (eds.), Les gouverneurs et les provinciaux sous la République romaine, Rennes, http://books.openedition.org/pur/109461 (accessed on 10.09.2023).; Frolov, R. M. (2019): “Magistratury ad tempus incertum i ogranichenie prodolzhitel’nosti dolzhnostnyh polnomochij v Rimskoj respublike (po povodu koncepcii U. Koli)” [“Magistracies ad tempus incertum and the Maximum Term of Public Offices in the Roman Republic (on U. Coli’s Conception)”], [in] V. V. Dementieva (ed.), Lumen intellectus. Pamjati Ii Leonidovny Majak [Lumen intellectus. In Memoriam of I. L. Majak], Yaroslavl, 31-52.; Frolov, R. M.(2020a): “Omnes qvi svnt eivs ordinis a pompeio evocantvr: The Proconsul Pompeius’ Senatorial Meeting in 49 B.C.”, Classical Quarterly 70, 707-716 (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838821000057).; Frolov, R. M.(2020b): “Vstupil li prokonsul Cezar’ v gorod Rim v nachale 49 g. do n.je.?” [“Did the Proconsul Caesar enter the City of Rome at the Beginning of 49 BCE?”], Vestnik YarGU. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki 52, 18-25.; Frolov, R. M.(2021): “The privatus Pompeius and Decision-Making in the City of Rome in Early 77 BCE”, Eirene: Studia graeca et latina 57, 217-245.; Frolov, R. M.(2022a): “A Proconsul’s Administration of Rome? The curator annonae Pompeius, recensus, and Public Meetings”, Hermes 150, 190-210 (https://doi.org/10.25162/hermes-2022-0012).; Frolov, R. M.(2022b): “Chapter 1. Introduction”, [in] R. M. Frolov – C. Burden-Strevens (eds.), Leadership and Initiative in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome, Leiden-Boston, 1-35 (https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004511408_002).; Frolov, R. M.(2022c): “Senatus consultum ultimum 52 g. do n.je.: legitimacija vmeshatel’stva promagistratov v sferu domi” [“The senatus consultum ultimum of 52 BCE: The Legitimation of Promagistrates’ Intervention in the Sphere domi”], [in] E. S. Danilov – R. M. Frolov – O. G. Tsimbal (eds.), Cari. Magistraty. Imperatory [Kings, Magistrates, Emperors], Yaroslavl, 94-113.; Giovannini, A. (1983): Consulare imperium, Basel.; Girardet, K. M. (1990a): “Der Rechtsstatus Oktavians im Jahre 32 v. Chr.”, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 133, 322-350.; Girardet, K. M. (1990b): “Die Entmachtung des Konsulates im Übergang von der Republik zur Monarchie und die Rechtsgrundlagen des augusteischen Prinzipats”, [in] W. Görler – S. Koster (eds.), Pratum Saraviense: Festgabe für Peter Steinmetz, Stuttgart, 59-126.; Girardet, K. M. (1995): “Per continuos annos decem (res gestae divi Augusti 7,1). Zur Frage nach dem Endtermin des Triumvirats”, Chiron 25, 147-161.; Jordan, B. (2023): Imperial Power, Provincial Government, and the Emergence of Roman Asia, 133 BCE-14 CE, Oxford (https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198887065.001.0001).; Laffi, U. (1993): “Poteri triumvirali e organi repubblicani”, [in] A. Gara – D. Foraboschi (ed.), Il triumvirato costituente alla fine della repubblica romana. Studi in onore di Mario Attilio Levi, Como, 37-65.; Lange, C. H. (2008): “Civil War in the Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Conquering the World and Fighting a War at Home”, [in] E. Bragg – L. I. Hau – E. Macaulay-Lewis (eds.), Beyond the Battlefields: New Perspectives on Warfare and Society in the Graeco-Roman World, Newcastle, 185-204.; Lange, C. H. (2009): Res Publica Constituta. Actium, Apollo and the Accomplishment of the Triumviral Assignment, Leiden-Boston.; Lintott, A. W. (1974): “Cicero and Milo”, Journal of Roman Studies 64, 62-78.; Millar, F. (1973): “Triumvirate and Principate”, Journal of Roman Studies 63, 50-67.; Mommsen, T. (1887a): Römisches Staatsrecht, Bd. 1, 3. Aufl., Leipzig.; Mommsen, T. (1887b): Römisches Staatsrecht, Bd. 2, 3. Aufl., Leipzig.; Mommsen, T. (1888): Römisches Staatsrecht Bd. 3. Leipzig.; Morrell, K. (2022): “Petitioning for Change in the Republican Empire”, [in] R. M. Frolov – C. Burden-Strevens (eds.), Leadership and Initiative in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome, Leiden-Boston, 433-453 (https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004511408_017).; Raggi, A. – Buongiorno, P. (2020): Il “senatus consultum de Plarasensibus et Aphrodisiensibus” del 39 a. C. Edizione, traduzione e commento, Stuttgart.; Reynolds, J. (1982): Aphrodisias and Rome, London.; Rich, J. W. (1992): “The Second Triumvirate. Jochen Bleicken: Zwischen Republik und Prinzipat: zum Charakter des Zweiten Triumvirats”, Classical Review 42, 112-114.; Rich, J. W. (2012): “Making the Emergency Permanent: Auctoritas, potestas and the Evolution of the Principate of Augustus”, [in] Y. Rivière (ed.), Des réformes augustéennes, Rome, 37-121.; Roddaz, J.-M. (1992): “Imperium: nature et compétences à la fin de la République et au début de l’Empire”, Cahiers du Centre Gustave-Glotz 3, 189-211.; Roddaz, J.-M. (1996): “Les triumvirs et les provinces”, [in] E. Hermon (ed.), Pouvoir et imperium (IIIe av. J.-C. - Ier ap. J.-C.), Naples, 77-96.; Russell, A. (2016): The Politics of Public Space in Republican Rome, Cambridge.; Sherk, R. J. (1969): Roman Documents from the Greek East. Senatus Consulta and Epistulae to the Age of Augustus, Baltimore.; Straumann, B. (2016): Crisis and Constitutionalism. Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution, Oxford.; Vervaet, F. J. (2006): “The Official Position of Cn. Pompeius in 49 and 48 BCE”, Latomus 65, 928-953.; Vervaet, F. J. (2009): “In what Capacity did Caesar Octavianus restitute the Republic?”, [in] F. Hurlet – B. Mineo (eds.), Le principat d’Auguste: Réalités et représentations du pouvoir. Autour de la Res publica restitute, Rennes, 49-71 (https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.125793).; Vervaet, F. J. (2010): “The Secret History: The Official Position of Imperator Caesar Divi Filius from 31 to 27 BCE”, Ancient Society 40, 79-152.; Vervaet, F. J. (2014): The High Command in the Roman Republic. The Principle of the summum imperium auspiciumque from 509 to 19 BCE, Stuttgart.; Vervaet, F. J. (2020): “The Triumvirate Rei Publicae Constituendae: Political and Constitutional Aspects”, [in] F. Pina Polo (ed.), The Triumviral Period: Civil War, Political Crisis and Socioeconomic Transformations, Zaragoza, 23-48.; Willems, P. (1883): Le sénat de la république romaine, vol. 2, Paris.; Zack, A. (2022): Das Ende des Zweiten Triumvirates und die Amtsgewalten des Imperator Caesar Divi filius (Octavianus) in der politischen Ordnung Roms (43-27 v. Chr.), Norderstedt (http://doi.org/10.22602/IQ.9783745870800).; https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GERI/article/view/92870

الاتاحة: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GERI/article/view/92870