يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 855 نتيجة بحث عن '"Evaluación de políticas"', وقت الاستعلام: 1.41s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Dissertation/ Thesis
  2. 2
    Dissertation/ Thesis
  3. 3
    Dissertation/ Thesis
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Conference
  8. 8
  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
  11. 11
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Sociología y tecnociencia; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): Miscellany; 40-70 ; Sociología y Tecnociencia; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2024): Miscelánea; 40-70 ; 1989-8487 ; 10.24197/st.2.2024

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/sociotecno/article/view/7829/6096; Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factor, edited by R. Nelson, 609–626. National Bureau of Economic Research: Princeton University Press.; Bakucs, Z., Fertő, I, Varga, Z. & Benedek. (2018). Impact of European Union development subsidies on Hungarian regions.” European Planning Studies, 26(6), 1121–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1437394; Barajas, A., Huergo, E. & Moreno, L. (2017). Public Support to Business R&D and the Economic Crisis: Spanish Evidence. MPRA Paper No. 81529. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/81529/1/MPRA_paper_81529.pdf; Blundell, R., & Costa Dias, M. (2000). Evaluation Methods for Non-Experimental Data. Fiscal Studies, 21(4), 427–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x; Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x; CDTI. (2018). Informe de monitorización CDTI. Proyectos de investigación y desarrollo en fase de comercialización. CDTI. https://www.cdti.es/recursos/publicaciones/archivos/26165_1971972018113258.pdf; CDTI. (2020). Informe anual 2019. https://www.cdti.es/recursos/publicaciones/archivos/40738_161016102020175253.pdf; Cerulli, G. (2015). Econometric Evaluation of Socio-Economic Programs: Theory and Applications (Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, 49). Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-46405-2; Cummins, S., Flint, E. & Matthews, S. A. (2014). New Neighborhood Grocery Store Increased Awareness Of Food Access But Did Not Alter Dietary Habits Or Obesity. Health Affairs, 33(2), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0512; Cunningham, P., Gök, A. & Laredo, P. (2013). The impact of direct support to R&D and innovation in firms. Nesta Working Paper No. 13/3. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/the_impact_of_direct_support_to_rd_and_innovation_in_firms.pdf; Czarnitzki, D., & Delanote, J. (2017). Incorporating innovation subsidies in the CDM framework: empirical evidence from Belgium. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(1–2), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1202514; Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger. K. (2004). The Link between R&D Subsidies, R&D Spending and Technological Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.575362; David, P. A., Hall, B. H. & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00087-6; De No, J., Molero, J. & Fernández-Zubieta. A. (2018). Análisis de los recursos destinados a I+D+i (Política de Gasto 46) contenidos en los Presupuestos Generales del Estado aprobados para el año 2018. COSCE. https://www.cosce.org/pdf/informeCOSCE_PGE2018_Aprobados.pdf; European Commission (2003). Raising EU R&D Intensity: Improving the Effectiveness of the Mix of Public Support Mechanisms for Private Sector Research and Development. European Commission, Brussels. ISBN 92-8945578-0; Ferraresi, M., Migali, G. & Rizzo, L. (2018). Does intermunicipal cooperation promote efficiency gains? Evidence from Italian municipal unions. Journal of Regional Science, 58(5): 1017–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12388; Fernández-Zubieta, A. & Zcharewicz, T. (2016). RIO Country Report 2015: Spain. JRC. EUR 27849 EN; doi:10.2791/465255; García Sánchez, A., & Molero, J. (2010). Factores que afectan a la innovación: dinamismo tecnológico de los sectores y tipo de innovación. In Análisis sobre ciencia e innovación en España, edited by L. Sanz Menéndez and L. Cruz Castro, pp. 474–498. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT).; García Sánchez, A., Molero, J. & Rama, R. (2016). Are ‘the best’ foreign subsidiaries cooperating for innovation with local partners? The case of an intermediate country. Science and Public Policy, 43(4), 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv057; Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H. & Todd, P. (1998). Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65(2), 261–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00044; Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H. & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching As an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654. https://doi.org/10.2307/2971733; Heckman, J. J., Lalonde, R. J. & Smith, J. A. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In Handbook of labor economics (1865-2097). Elsevier.; Huergo, E., Trenado, M. & Ubierna, A. (2009). Impacto de los créditos blandos en el gasto en I+D empresarial. CDTI. https://www.cdti.es/recursos/publicaciones/archivos/6401_1313201012555.pdf; Huergo, E., Trenado, M. & Ubierna. A. (2016). The impact of public support on firm propensity to engage in R&D: Spanish experience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.011; Ibanez, M., & Blackman, A. (2016). Is Eco-Certification a Win–Win for Developing Country Agriculture? Organic Coffee Certification in Colombia. World Development, 82, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.004; Lichtenberg, F. R. (1988). The Private R&D Investment Response to Federal Design and Technical Competitions. The American Economic Review, 78(3), 550–559. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1809152; Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124; Méndez, F., Sepúlveda, F. & Valdés, N. (2016). Legalization and human capital accumulation. Journal of Population Economics, 29(3), 721–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-016-0585-0; Molero, J., & Garcia, A. (2008). The innovative activity of foreign subsidiaries in the Spanish Innovation System: An evaluation of their impact from a sectoral taxonomy approach. Technovation, 28(11), 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.005; OECD (2006). Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264025851-en.; Olitsky, N. H., & Cosgrove, S. B. (2016). The better blend? Flipping the principles of microeconomics classroom. International Review of Economics Education, 21, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2015.10.004; Rosenbaum, P. R. & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.2307/2683903; Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011; Sianesi, B. (2004). An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323023723; Veugelers, R. (2016). The European Union’s growing innovation divide. Bruegel Policy Contribution. Bruegel Policy Contribution. No. 2016/08. https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/pc_2016_08.pdf; Villa, J. M. (2016). Diff: Simplifying the Estimation of Difference-in-differences Treatment Effects. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 16(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1601600108; Wallsten, S. J. (2000). The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. The RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601030; https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/sociotecno/article/view/7829

  12. 12
    Academic Journal
  13. 13
  14. 14
    Academic Journal
  15. 15
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Journal Studies of Public Policy; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): diciembre 2023 - junio 2024; 83-98 ; Revista Estudios de Políticas Públicas; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2024): diciembre 2023 - junio 2024; 83-98 ; Revista de Estudos de Políticas Públicas; v. 10 n. 1 (2024): diciembre 2023 - junio 2024; 83-98 ; 0719-6296

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  16. 16
    Academic Journal
  17. 17
    Academic Journal
  18. 18
    Academic Journal
  19. 19
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Revista Aval; Bd. 7 Nr. 21 (2022): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 184-198 ; Revista Aval; Vol 7 No 21 (2022): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 184-198 ; Revista Aval; Vol. 7 Núm. 21 (2022): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 184-198 ; Revista Aval; Vol. 7 No 21 (2022): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 184-198 ; Revista Aval; V. 7 N. 21 (2022): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 184-198 ; 2176-9923 ; 1984-3100

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  20. 20
    Book

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Chaves, R., Catala, B., Savall, T. (2023): Evaluación del Plan Fent Cooperatives (2021-2022), Ciriec-España y Universitat de Valencia-IUDESCOOP, Valencia, 1-192; https://hdl.handle.net/10550/91699