يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 107 نتيجة بحث عن '"Estudios sociales de ciencia y tecnología"', وقت الاستعلام: 1.22s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Trilogía Ciencia Tecnología Sociedad; Vol. 13 No. 25 (2021); e1776 ; Trilogía Ciencia Tecnología Sociedad; Vol. 13 Núm. 25 (2021); e1776 ; 2145-7778 ; 2145-4426

    وصف الملف: application/pdf; application/zip; text/xml; text/html

    Relation: https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/trilogia/article/view/1776/2078; https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/trilogia/article/view/1776/2094; https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/trilogia/article/view/1776/2095; https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/trilogia/article/view/1776/2072; Achinstein, P.; Hannaway, O. (eds). (1985). Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science. The MIT Press.; Achterhuis, H. (ed.). (2001). American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn. Indiana University Press.; Ashman, K. M.; Barringer, P. S. (eds.). (2001). After the Science Wars. Routledge.; Barberousse, A. (2018). Philosophy of Science and Science Studies. En A. Barberousse; D. Bonnay; M. Cozic (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: A Companion (pp. 259-284). Oxford University Press.; Batens, D.; van Bendegem, J. P. (eds). (1988). Theory and Experiment: Recent Insights and New Perspectives on Their Relation. Springer.; Becerra Batán, M. (2016). La cuestión de la Epistemología Histórica como estilo epistemológico. Epistemología e Historia de la Ciencia, v. 1, n. 1, 35-52. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/afjor/article/view/14915; Bijker, W. E.; Hughes, T. P.; Pinch, T. (eds). (2012). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. The MIT Press.; Braunstein, J. F. (2012). Historical Epistemology, Old and New. En Epistemology and History. From Bachelard and Canguilhem to Today’s History of Science (Preprint 434, pp. 33-40). https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/Preprints/P434.PDF; Brandom, R. B. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.; Brandom, R. B. (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard University Press.; Brey, P. (2010). Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, v. 14, n. 1, 36-48. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20101416; Callon, M. (1999). Whose Imposture? Physicists at War with the Third Person. Social Studies of Science, v. 29, n. 2, 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029002011; Daston, L. (2000). Biographies of Scientific Objects. University of Chicago Press.; Daston, L. (2009). Science Studies and the History of Science. Critical Inquiry, v. 35, n. 4, 798-813. https://doi.org/10.1086/599584; Daston, L.; Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. Zone Books.; Esteban, J. M.; Martínez, S. F. (comps.). (2008). Normas y prácticas en la ciencia. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas.; Feest, U.; Sturm, T. (2011). What (Good) is Historical Epistemology? Editors Introduction. Erkenntnis, v. 75, n. 3, 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9345-4; Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. Routledge.; Feltz, B. (1991). Croisées biologiques. Systémique et analytique. Écologie et biologie moléculaire en dialogue. Ciaco.; Ferreirós, J.; Ordóñez, J. (2002). Hacia una filosofía de la experimentación. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, v. 34, n. 102, 47-86. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2002.979; Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. The University of Chicago Press.; Galison, P. (1987). How Experiments End. University of Chicago Press.; Gooding, D.; Pinch, T.; Schaffer, S. (eds.). (1989). The Uses of Experiment. Studies in the Natural Sciences. Cambridge University Press.; Gross, P. R.; Levitt, N. (1994). Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science. The Johns Hopkins University Press.; Hacking, I. (1996). Representar e Intervenir. Paidós.; Hacking, I. (1988). Philosophers of experiment. PSA: Proceeding of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, v. 1988, n. 2, 147-156.; Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge University Press.; Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press.; Ihde, D. (2009) Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University Lectures. SUNY Press.; Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Pergamon.; Kreimer, P. (2017). An Unrequited Love. Social Sciences and STS. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances, v. 11, n. 2. https://journals.openedition.org/rac/2254; Kroes, P.; Meijers, A. (eds.). (2000). The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology (Vol. 20). JAI Press.; Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.; Lakatos, I. (1971). The History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions. En R. C. Buck; R. S. Cohen (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 8, pp. 91-136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_7; Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press.; Latour, B.; Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Publications.; Law, J.; Williams, R. J. (1982). Putting Facts Together: A Study of Scientific Persuasion. Social Studies of Science, v. 12, n. 4, 535-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631282012004003; Lecourt, D. (1969). L’epistémologie historique de Gaston Bachelard. Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin.; Lemaine, G.; Darmon, G.; El Nemer, S. (1982). Noopolis. Les laboratoires de recherche fondamentale: de l'atelier à l'usine. CNRS.; Loeve, S.; Guchet, X.; Bensaude Vincent, B. (eds.). (2018). French Philosophy of Technology: Classical Readings and Contemporary Approaches (Vol. 29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89518-5; Lynch, M. (1985). Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. Routledge & Kegan Paul.; Martínez, S. F.; Huang, X. (2015). Hacia una filosofía de la ciencia centrada en prácticas. Bonilla Artigas Editores.; Meijers, A. (ed.). (2009). Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Science. North Holland.; Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press.; Moreno, J. C. (2018). Análisis de las contribuciones y de los sentidos de la epistemología histórica. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, v. 18, n. 37, 155-177. https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v18i37.2573; Moreno, J. C. (2019). Contribuciones al debate sobre la relevancia moral de los artefactos tecnológicos. Trilogía Ciencia Tecnología Sociedad, v. 11, n. 21, 91-118. https://doi.org/10.22430/21457778.1327; Parsons, K. (ed.). (2003). The Science Wars: Debating Scientific Knowledge and Technology. Prometheus Books.; Pestre, D. (2004). Thirty Years of Science Studies: Knowledge, Society and the Political. History and Technology, v. 20, n. 4, 351-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0734151042000304330; Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. The University of Chicago Press.; Pitt, J. C. (ed.). (2010). New Directions in the Philosophy of Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers.; Radder, H. (ed.). (2003). The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation. University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjsnf; Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific Knowlegde and Its Social Problems. Clarendon Press.; Renn, J. (1995). Historical Epistemology and Interdisciplinarity. En K. Gavroglu; J. Stachel; M. W. Wartofsky (eds.). Physics, Philosophy, and the Scientific Community (pp. 241-251). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2658-0; Renn, J. (1996). Historical Epistemology and the Advancement of Science. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2273558/component/file_2273556/content; Renn, J. (2004). The Relativity Revolution from the Perspective of Historical Epistemology. Isis, v. 95, n. 4, 640-648. https://doi.org/10.1086/430654; Rheinberger, H. J. (1997). Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford University Press.; Rheinberger, H. J. (2010). On Historicizing Epistemology: An Essay. Stanford University Press.; Rouse, J. (1993). What Are Cultural Studies of Scientific Knowledge? Configurations, v. 1, n. 1, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1993.0006; Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically. Cornell University Press.; Rouse, J. (1999). Understanding Scientific Practices: Cultural Studies of Science as a Philosophical Program. En M. Biagioli (ed.), The Science Studies Reader (pp. 442-456). Routledge.; Rouse, J. (2002). How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism. University of Chicago Press.; Rouse, J. (2011). Philosophy of Science and Science Studies in the West: An Unrecognized Convergence. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, v. 5, n. 1, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1215/s12280-010-9145-y; Shapin, S.; Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press.; Shapin, S. (2000). La revolución científica: una interpretación alternativa. Ediciones Paidós.; Shinn, T. (1980). Division du savoir et spécificité organisationnelle : Les laboratoires de recherche industrielle en France. Revue française de sociologie, v. 21, n. 1, 3-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3320898; Shinn, T. (1988). Hiérarchies des chercheurs et formes des recherches. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, v. 74, 2-22.; Sismondo, S. (2010). An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies (2.a ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.; Sokal, A. D. (1996). Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity. Social Text, v. 14, n. 46/47, 217-252. https://doi.org/10.2307/466856; Soler, L.; Zwart, S.; Lynch, M.; Israel-Jost, V. (eds). (2014). Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science. Routledge.; Sturm, T. (2011). Historical Epistemology or History of Epistemology? The Case of the Relation Between Perception and Judgment. Erkenntnis, v. 75, n. 3, 303-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9338-3; Thill, G. (1973). La fête scientifique: D'une praxéologie scientifique à une analyse de la décision chrétienne. Aubier Montaigne.; Tiles, M. (1984). Bachelard: Science and Objectivity. Cambridge University Press.; Tiles, M. (1989). Epistemological History: The Legacy of Bachelard and Canguilhem. En A. Phillips Griffiths (ed.), Contemporary French Philosophy (pp. 141-156). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628733.011; Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Harvard University Press.; Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Pennsylvania State University Press.; Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. The University of Chicago Press.; Vinck, D. (1992). Politique de la science et de la technologie. Du laboratoire aux réseaux: Le travail scientifique en mutation. http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/56991; Vinck, D. (2007). Back to the laboratory as a knowledge production space. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances, v. 1, n. 2, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.002.0159; Vinck, D. (2019). Le chaos producteur de sens et de surgissements du monde. En F. Warrant (dir.), Une pensée de l'écart et de la fête: Hommage à Georges Thill (pp. 107-114). Presses Universitaires de Namur.; Zammito, J. H. (2004). A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. The University of Chicago Press.; https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/trilogia/article/view/1776

  13. 13
    Academic Journal
  14. 14
  15. 15
    Academic Journal
  16. 16
  17. 17
    Academic Journal
  18. 18
    Academic Journal
  19. 19
    Academic Journal
  20. 20
    Academic Journal