يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 268 نتيجة بحث عن '"Estudios Bibliométricos"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.58s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    Thesis Advisors: Gómez Hernández, José Antonio, Licea de Arenas, Judith, Universidad de Murcia. Departamento de Información y Documentación

    المصدر: TDR (Tesis Doctorales en Red)

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Book

    المؤلفون: Fernández Ramos, Andrés

    المساهمون: Biblioteconomia y Documentacion, Facultad de Filosofia y Letras

    Relation: Desarrollo social: investigación bibliotecológica, información y bibliotecas; Fernández Ramos, A. (2024). Producción científica sobre inclusión social en el ámbito de la Bibliotecología: evolución y temas abordados. En Desarrollo social: investigación bibliotecológica, información y bibliotecas (p. 18). UNAM; http://hdl.handle.net/10612/21723

  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science; No. 86 (2023); 20-40 ; Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science; Núm. 86 (2023); 20-40 ; Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science; n. 86 (2023); 20-40 ; 1562-4730

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  7. 7
    Academic Journal
  8. 8
    Academic Journal
  9. 9
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Revista General de Información y Documentación; Vol. 33 No. 1 (2023); 175-201 ; Revista General de Información y Documentación; Vol. 33 Núm. 1 (2023); 175-201 ; 1988-2858 ; 1132-1873

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/article/view/83866/4564456565998; Alencar, S. De, Canongia, C., Antunes, A. M. S., & Alencar, M. (2006). The trends and geography of nanotechnological research. Fennia - International Journal of Geography, 184(1), 37–48. https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3730; Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007; Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70(3), 859–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/ S11192-007-0315-1/METRICS; Braun, T., Schubert, A., & Zsindely, S. (1997). Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38(2), 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457417/METRICS; Chen, K., & Guan, J. (2011). A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2010.10.007; Cornejo, L. (2015). Nanociencia y nanotecnología. https://nuevastecnologiasy materiales.com/nanociencia-y-nanotecnologia/; Fernandez, M. T., Morrillo, F., Bordond, M., & Gomez, I. (2002). Estudio bibliométrico de un área científico-tecnológica del Plan Nacional de Investigación de España (2000-2003). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 25(4), 372–373. https://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/11562; Finardi, U., & Lamberti, C. (2021). Diversity and interdisciplinarity in nanoscience and nanotechnology: a time-related analysis of the subject category. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-020-05119-8/TABLES/9; Foladori, G., Arteaga Figueroa, E., Záyago Lau, E., Appelbaum, R., Robles-Belmont, E., Villa, L., Parker, R., & Leos, V. (2015). Nanotechnology in Mexico: Key Findings Based on OECD Criteria. Minerva, 53(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-015-9281-6; Giwa, S. O., Adegoke, K. A., Sharifpur, M., & Meyer, J. P. (2022). Research trends in nanofluid and its applications: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 24(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-022-05453-Z/FIGURES/3; Gorbea Portal, S. (2001). La representación y organización del conocimiento : metodologías, modelos y aplicaciones: V Congreso Isko España; 2001; Alcalá de Henares, 1–10. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=8602; Grauwin, S., & Jensen, P. (2011). Mapping scientific institutions. Scientometrics, 89(3), 943–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-011-0482-Y/FIGURES/6; Guzman-Sanchez, M. V., & Trujillo Cancino, J. L. (2013). Los mapas bibliométricos o mapas de la ciencia: una herramienta útil para desarrollar estudios métricos de información. BIblioteca Universitaria, 16(2), 95–108. www.redalyc.org/ articulo.oa?id=28529572002; Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0507655102/ASSET/ 8BAD4608-B7BF-4215-8D0A-5C29F690AE48/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ZPQ0420598740002.JPEG; Huang, Z., Chen, H., Chen, Z. K., & Roco, M. C. (2004). International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-004-4117-6/METRICS; Huang, Z., Wu, L., Wang, W., Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., Pan, X., & Wu, C. (2021). Unraveling the publication trends in inhalable nano-systems. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-021-05384-1/FULLTEXT.HTML; Hullmann, A. (2007). Measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 70(3), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-0310-6; Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics, 58(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006877.45467.A7/METRICS; Igami, M. (2008). Exploration of the evolution of nanotechnology via mapping of patent applications. Scientometrics, 77(2), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-1973-8; Kay, L., & Shapira, P. (2009). Developing nanotechnology in Latin America. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-008-9503-Z/TABLES/7; Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.20991; Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2007). Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 565–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-0303-5; Kostoff, R. N., Stump, J. A., Johnson, D., Murday, J. S., Lau, C. G. Y., & Tolles, W. M. (2006). The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(3–4), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-005-9035-8/METRICS; Leydesdorff, L. (2008). The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update. Scientometrics, 76(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-1889-3; Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2007). Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70(3), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-0308-0/METRICS; Li, X., Chen, H., Dang, Y., Lin, Y., Larson, C. A., & Roco, M. C. (2008). A longitudinal analysis of nanotechnology literature: 1976-2004. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(SUPPL. 1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-008-9473-1/FIGURES/11; Li, X., Hu, D., Dang, Y., Chen, H., Roco, M. C., Larson, C. A., & Chan, J. (2009). Nano Mapper: An Internet knowledge mapping system for nanotechnology development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(3), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-008-9491-Z/TABLES/21; Lin, M. W., & Zhang, J. (2007). Language trends in nanoscience and technology: The case of Chinese-language publications. Scientometrics, 70(3), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-007-0302-6/METRICS; Macias-Chapula, C. A. (2001). Papel de la informetría y de la cienciometría y su perspectiva nacional e internacional. ACIMED, 9(supl), 35–41. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1024-94352001000400006; Maghrebi, M., Abbasi, A., Amiri, S., Monsefi, R., & Harati, A. (2011). A collective and abridged lexical query for delineation of nanotechnology publications. Scientometrics, 86(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-010-0304-7/FIGURES/2; México. CONACyT. (2018). Programa Especial de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación (PECiTI) 2014-2018 (p. 108). PECiTL.; Meyer, M., & Persson, O. (1998). Nanotechnology - Interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458355; Meyer, M. S. (2001). Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics, 51(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010572914033/METRICS; Mogoutov, A., & Kahane, B. (2007). Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Research Policy, 36(6), 893–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2007.02.005; National Nanotechnology Initiative. (2021). 2021 National Nanotechnology Initiative Strategic Plan %7C National Nanotechnology Initiative. www.nano.gov/ 2021strategicplan; National Nanotechnology Initiative. (2022). About Nanotechnology. https://www.nano.gov/about-nanotechnology; Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-007-9266-Y/FIGURES/4; Pourhatami, A., Kaviyani-Charati, M., Kargar, B., Baziyad, H., Kargar, M., & Olmeda-Gómez, C. (2021). Mapping the intellectual structure of the coronavirus field (2000–2020): a co-word analysis. In Scientometrics (Vol. 126, Issue 8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04038-2; Rios Gomez C., & Herrero Solana, V. (2005). La producción científica latinoamericana y la ciencia mundial: una revisión bibliografica(1989-2003). Revista INteramericana de Bibliotecologia, 2, 43–61. www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid= S0120-09762005000100003; Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38/METRICS; Shi, J., Duan, K., Wu, G., Zhang, R., & Feng, X. (2020). Comprehensive metrological and content analysis of the public–private partnerships (PPPs) research field: a new bibliometric journey. Scientometrics 2020 124:3, 124(3), 2145–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-020-03607-1; Tague Sutcliffe, J. (1994). Introducción a la informetría. ACIMED, 2(3), 26–35. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1024-94351994000300005; Tanaka, L. S. (2021). Recomendaciones de política pública de nanociencia y nanotecnología en México: privilegiar el bienestar humano y ambiental. Mundo Nano. Revista Interdisciplinaria En Nanociencias y Nanotecnología, 15(28), 1e-23e. https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2022.28.69655; Tripathi, M., Kumar, S., Sonker, S. K., & Babbar, P. (2018). Occurrence of author keywords and keywords plus in social sciences and humanities research : A preliminary study. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 12(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2018.1436951; Vargas Cantin, P., Ortiz Montenegro, I., Rojas Maturana, V., Vargas, P., & Ortiz, I. (2006). Vigilancia tecnológica aplicada a nanociencia y nanotecnología en países de Latinoamérica. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 1(4), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi; Youtie, J., Ward, R., Shapira, P., Porter, A. L., & Newman, N. (2020). Corporate engagement with nanotechnology through research publications. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 23(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-021-05195-4/TABLES/4; Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., & Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. In Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (Vol. 67, Issue 4, pp. 967–972). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437; Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2006). Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing & Management, 42(6), 1513–1531. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IPM.2006.03.016; Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629; https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/article/view/83866

  10. 10
    Conference
  11. 11
    Academic Journal
  12. 12
    Academic Journal
  13. 13
  14. 14
    Academic Journal
  15. 15
    Academic Journal
  16. 16
    Academic Journal
  17. 17
    Academic Journal
  18. 18
    Academic Journal
  19. 19
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Abid, G., Ahmed, S., Elahi, N. S., & Ilyas, S. (2020). Antecedents and mechanism of employee well-being for social sustainability: A sequential mediation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 79–89. ; Abid, G., Contreras, F., Ahmed, S., & Qazi, T. (2019). Contextual factors and organizational commitment: Examining the mediating role of thriving at work. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(17), 1-18. ; Alonso-almeida, M., Llach, J., & Marimon, F. (2014). A Closer Look at the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting as a Tool to Implement Environmental and Social Policies: A Worldwide Sector Analysis. 335(July 2013), 318–335. ; Alvarado-Herrera, A., Bigne, E., Aldas-Manzano, J., ....

    وصف الملف: 38 pp; application/pdf

  20. 20
    Academic Journal