المؤلفون: Sapta Suhardono, Fauziana Erlis Safitri, Fayza Rachmalia, Frista Ananda Rizky, Dan Hasna Khairunnisa, Iva Yenis Septiariva, I Wayan Koko Suryawan

المصدر: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, Vol 25, Iss 4, Pp 227-240 (2024)

مصطلحات موضوعية: biodiversity, ecological function, urban parks, green open space, ecological effectiveness, Ecology, QH540-549.5

Relation: http://www.ecoeet.com/Assessing-the-Ecological-Function-Effectiveness-of-Urban-Parks-in-Surakarta-City,183790,0,2.html; https://doaj.org/toc/2719-7050; https://doaj.org/article/ad9a93ebe8534213adb00d5648e0390a

الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/183790
https://doaj.org/article/ad9a93ebe8534213adb00d5648e0390a

المؤلفون: Katarzyna M. Mikołajczak, Nikoleta Jones, Christopher J. Sandom, Sophie Wynne‐Jones, Antonia Beardsall, Suzanna Burgelman, Lucy Ellam, Helen C. Wheeler

المصدر: People and Nature, Vol 4, Iss 6, Pp 1435-1449 (2022)

مصطلحات موضوعية: attitudinal support, ecological effectiveness, farmers, mental models, perceptions, rewilding, Human ecology. Anthropogeography, GF1-900, Ecology, QH540-549.5

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2575-8314

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/e4913bbea25a441da1b0b72192f9ee0a

المؤلفون: Kiffner, Christian, Giliba, Richard A., Fust, Pascal, Loos, Jacqueline, Waltert, Matthias

المصدر: http://lobid.org/resources/990113329960206441#!, 61(4):966-979.

مصطلحات موضوعية: wildlife monitoring, group size, ecological effectiveness, declining population paradigm, conservation evidence, shifting baseline syndrome

Relation: https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6475392; https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.13200

الاتاحة: https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6475392
https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.13200

المؤلفون: Zhenmin Ding, Shunbo Yao

المصدر: Ecological Indicators, Vol 145, Iss , Pp 109671- (2022)

مصطلحات موضوعية: Sloping Land Conversion Programme, Ecological effectiveness, Treatment effects model, Vegetation restoration types, Ecology, QH540-549.5

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2201144X; https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/8bbc3b777c2b4812b2a4ed607b49778f

المؤلفون: Martínez-Vega, Javier, Rodriguez-Rodriguez, David

مصطلحات موضوعية: Biodiversidad -- Conservación, Biodiversity conservation, Ecological effectiveness, Terrestrial realm, Marine realm, Systematic literature review

Relation: Partial funding for open access charge: Universidad de Málaga; https://hdl.handle.net/10630/24577; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060924

الاتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/10630/24577
https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060924

المؤلفون: Martínez Vega, Javier, Rodríguez Rodríguez, David

المساهمون: Martínez Vega, Javier

مصطلحات موضوعية: Biodiversity conservation, Ecological effectiveness, Terrestrial realm, Marine realm, Systematic literature review

Relation: Publisher's version; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060924; Sí; Land 2022, 11(6), 924; http://hdl.handle.net/10261/273192

الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/273192

المؤلفون: Katarzyna Mikołajczak, Nikoleta Jones, Christopher J Sandom, Sophie Wynne-Jones, Antonia Beardsall, Suzanna Burgelman, Lucy Ellam, Helen C Wheeler

مصطلحات موضوعية: Environmental sciences, agriculture, ecological effectiveness, farming, mental models, attitudes, perceptions, rewilding, social impacts, values, Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Biodiversity Conservation, Ecology, Biodiversity & Conservation, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, attitudinal support, farmers, SOCIAL VALUES, CONSERVATION, CHALLENGE, LANDSCAPE, CONFLICTS, OUTCOMES, SCIENCE

Relation: 10779/aru.25681377.v1; https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Rewilding_the_farmers_perspective_Perceptions_and_attitudinal_support_for_rewilding_among_the_English_farming_community_/25681377

الاتاحة: https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Rewilding_the_farmers_perspective_Perceptions_and_attitudinal_support_for_rewilding_among_the_English_farming_community_/25681377

المؤلفون: Katarzyna M Mikołajczak, Nikoleta Jones, Christopher J Sandom, Sophie Wynne‐Jones, Antonia Beardsall, Suzanna Burgelman, Lucy Ellam, Helen C Wheeler

مصطلحات موضوعية: Conservation and biodiversity, attitudinal support, ecological effectiveness, farmers, mental models, perceptions, rewilding, social impacts, values

Relation: 10779/aru.25681350.v1; https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Rewilding_The_farmers_perspective_Perceptions_and_attitudinal_support_for_rewilding_among_the_English_farming_community/25681350

الاتاحة: https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Rewilding_The_farmers_perspective_Perceptions_and_attitudinal_support_for_rewilding_among_the_English_farming_community/25681350

المؤلفون: Jeanette Silvin Blumröder, Monika T. Hoffmann, Olga Ilina, Susanne Winter, Peter R. Hobson, Pierre L. Ibisch

المصدر: Ecological Processes, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)

مصطلحات موضوعية: Ecological effectiveness, Impact assessment, Forest certification, Sustainable forestry, Ecology, QH540-549.5

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2192-1709

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/26fd859f63624f3e91affd283f46ec00

المؤلفون: Zhang, Yanchao, Ou, Zheyang, Tweedley, James R., Loneragan, Neil R., Zhang, Xiumei, Tian, Tao, Wu, Zhongxin

مصطلحات موضوعية: Ecological effectiveness, Functional diversity, Habitat-based enhancement, Marine ranching, Yellow Sea

Relation: ispartof: Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology vol 573; 991005642170207891; https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/Evaluating-the-effectiveness-of-baited-video/991005642170207891; alma:61MUN_INST/bibs/991005642170207891

الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2024.152001
https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/Evaluating-the-effectiveness-of-baited-video/991005642170207891

المؤلفون: Berger, Joel

المصدر: Conservation Biology, 2007 Aug 01. 21(4), 1105-1116.

URL الوصول: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4620922

المؤلفون: Alatorre, Andrea, Deschamps Lomeli, Jimena, Izquierdo-Tort, Santiago

مصطلحات موضوعية: Payments for ecosystem services, Payments for environmental services, Systematic review, Knowledge production, Ecological effectiveness, Social effectiveness

Relation: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11549023; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11549024; oai:zenodo.org:11549024

الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11549024

المؤلفون: Tomporowski Andrzej, Flizikowski Józef, Kruszelnicka Weronika, Piasecka Izabela, Kasner Robert, Mroziński Adam, Kovalyshyn Stepan

المصدر: Polish Maritime Research, Vol 25, Iss 2, Pp 132-139 (2018)

مصطلحات موضوعية: offshore wind electric power plants, energy, economic and ecological effectiveness, destructiveness, Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering, VM1-989

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2083-7429

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/beb57e320ab644138a1463ffa0b7f9fe

المؤلفون: Jeanette Silvin Blumroeder, Peter Ralph Hobson, Uli Frank Graebener, Joerg-Andreas Krueger, Denis Dobrynin, Natalya Burova, Irina Amosa, Susanne Winter, Pierre Leonhard Ibisch

المصدر: Challenges in Sustainability, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 20-51 (2018)

مصطلحات موضوعية: Arkhangelsk, boreal forest, ecological effectiveness, FSC-certification, Environmental sciences, GE1-350

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/cis-6.1.20; https://doaj.org/toc/2297-6477

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/30bb6e1e503c44b0b33b3c9243e6aa1d

المؤلفون: Díaz-Triana, Julián Esteban, Torres-Rodríguez, Selene, Muñoz-P, Leslye, Avella-M., Andrés

المصدر: Caldasia; Vol. 41 Núm. 1 (2019) ; Caldasia; Vol. 41 No. 1 (2019) ; 2357-3759 ; 0366-5232

مصطلحات موضوعية: ecological effectiveness, ecological indicatorse, cological restoration strategies, plant performance, ecology, applied ecology, ecological restoration, conservation, desempeño de siembras, efectividad ecológica, estrategias de restauración, indicadores ecológicos, ecología, ecología aplicada, restauración ecológica, conservación

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/78300/69879; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/78300

الاتاحة: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/78300

المؤلفون: Díaz-Triana, Julián Esteban, Torres-Rodríguez, Selene, Muñoz-P, Leslye, Avella-M., Andrés

المصدر: Caldasia; Vol. 41 Núm. 1 (2019); 60-77 ; Caldasia; Vol. 41 No. 1 (2019); 60-77 ; 2357-3759 ; 0366-5232

مصطلحات موضوعية: ecological effectiveness, ecological indicators, ecological restoration strategies, plant performance, ecología, applied ecology, ecological restoration, conservation, desempeño de siembras, efectividad ecológica, estrategias de restauración, indicadores ecológicos, ecología aplicada, restauración ecológica, conservación

وصف الملف: application/pdf; application/xml

Relation: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/71318/69468; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/71318/70945; Apfelbaum SI, Haney AW, editores. 2012. The Restoring Ecological Health to Your Land Workbook. Step 6, Develop a Good Monitoring Program. SER. USA: Island Press. p. 91-107.; Badano EI, Pérez D, Vergara CH. 2009. Love of nurse plants is not enough for restoring oak forests in a seasonally dry tropical environment. Restor. Ecol. 17(5):571–576. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00530.x.; Bash JS, Ryan CM. 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: Is anyone monitoring? Environ. Manage. 29(6):877–885. doi:10.1007/s00267-001-0066-3.; Basu S, Behera N. 1993. The effects of tropical soil conversion on soil microbial biomass. Biol. Fert. Soils 16(4):302–304. doi:10.1007/BF00369310.; Bell SS, Middlebrooks ML, Hall MO. 2014. The Value of Long-Term Assessment of Restoration: Support from a Seagrass Investigation. Restor. Ecol. 22(3):304–310. doi:10.1111/rec.12087.; Bertacchi MIF, Amazonas NT, Brancalion PHS, Brondani GE, de Oliveira ACS, de Pascoa MAR, Rodrigues RR. 2016. Establishment of tree seedlings in the understory of restoration plantations: Natural regeneration and enrichment plantings. Restor. Ecol. 24(1):100– 108. doi:10.1111/rec.12290.; Bhadouria R, Srivastava P, Singh R, Tripathi S, Singh H, Raghubanshi AS. 2017. Tree seedling establishment in dry tropics: an urgent need of interaction studies. Environ. Syst. Decis. 37(1):88–100. doi:10.1007/s10669-017-9625-x.; Bjerke MB, Renger R. 2017. Being smart about writing SMART objectives. Eval. Program Plann. 61:125–127. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.009.; Block WM, Franklin AB, Ward Jr. JP, Ganey LJ, White GC. 2001. Design and Implementation of Monitoring Studies to Evaluate the Success of Ecological Restoration on Wildlife. Restor. Ecol. 9(3):293–303. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.2001.009003293.x.; Brancalion PHS, Viani RAG, Rodrigues RRR, Gandolf, S. 2012. Avaliação e monitoramento de áreas em processo de restauração. En: Martins SV, editor. Restauração ecológica de ecossistemas degradados. Viçosa, Brasil: Editora UFV. p. 262–293.; Brienen RJW, Zuidema PA, Martínez-Ramos M. 2010. Attaining the canopy in dry and moist tropical forests: strong differences in tree growth trajectories reflect variation in growing conditions. Oecologia 163(2):485–496. doi:10.1007/s00442-009-1540-5.; Buchanan BP, Nagle GN, Walter MT. 2014. Long-Term Monitoring And Assessment Of A Stream Restoration Project In Central New York. River Res. Appl. 30(2):245–258. doi:10.1002/rra.2639.; DeLuca TH, Aplet GH, Wilmer B, Burchfield J. 2010. The Unknown Trajectory of Forest Restoration: A Call for Ecosystem Monitoring. J. For. 108:288–295.; [DGADRE] Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. c2015. Technical Handbook on the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework of the Common Agricultural Policy 2014 – 2020. European Commission. [Revisada en: 1 Mar 2018]. http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetailDoc&id=21095&no=3; Díaz-Martín R. 2007. El monitoreo en la restauración ecológica. En: Vargas O, GREUNAL, editores. Guía metodológica para la restauración ecológica del bosque altoandino. Bogotá: Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología. p. 119–122.; Ehrenfeld JG. 2000. Defining the limits of restoration: The need for realistic goals. Restor. Ecol. 8(1):2–9. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.2000.80002.x.; Elzinga CL, Salzer DW, Willoughby JW. 1998. Measuring & monitoring plant populations. Denver: Bureau of Land Management y TNC. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management.; Encino-Ruiz L, Lindig-Cisneros R, Gómez- Romero M, Blanco-García A. 2013. Desempeño de tres especies arbóreas del bosque tropical caducifolio en un ensayo de restauración ecológica. Bot. Sci. 91(1):107–114.; England J, Skinner KS, Carter MG. 2008. Monitoring, river restoration and the water framework Directive. Water Environ. J. 22(4):227–234. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2007.00090.x.; Evans KA, Guariguata MR. 2016. Success from the ground up: Participatory monitoring and forest restoration. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR Occasional Paper 159. doi:10.17528/cifor/006284.; Florentine SK, Gardner J, Graz PF, Moloney S. 2013. Plant recruitment and survival as indicators of ecological restoration in abandoned pasture land in Nurcoung, Victoria, Australia. Ecol. Process. 2:1–13. doi:10.1186/2192-1709- 2-34.; Fundación Natura. c2010. Propuesta Piloto de Restauración, Plan de Restauración Ecológica del Bosque Seco. Proyecto Hidroeléctrico El Quimbo. Bogotá D.C. [Revisada en: 28 Feb 2017]. http://www.natura.org.co/; Gerhardt K. 1996. Effects of root competition and canopy openness on survival and growth of tree seedlings in a tropical seasonal dry forest. Forest Ecol. Manage. 82(1–3):33–48. doi:10.1016/0378-1127(95)03700-4.; Gonzalez-M R, Avella A, Díaz-T JE. 2015. Plataformas de monitoreo para vegetación: toma y análisis de datos. En: Aguilar-G M, Ramírez W, editores. Monitoreo a procesos de restauración ecológica, aplicado a ecosistemas terrestres. Bogotá: Instituto Humboldt (IAvH). p. 87–107.; Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4(1):1–9.; Herrick JE, Schuman GE, Rango A. 2006. Monitoring ecological processes for restoration projects. J. Nat. Conserv. 14(3–4):161–171. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2006.05.001.; Herrick JE, Van Zee JW, McCord SE, Courtright EM, Karl JW, Burkett LM. 2015. Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland, and Savanna Ecosystems Volume 1: Core Methods. Segunda edición. Las Cruces, New Mexico: USDA - ARS Jornada Experimental Range.; Holl K, Cairns J. 2002. Monitoring and appraisal. En: Perrow MR, Davy AJ, editors. Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Cambridge U.K: Cambridge University Press. p. 411–432.; Hutto RL, Belote RT. 2013. Distinguishing four types of monitoring based on the questions they address. Forest Ecol. Manag. 289:183–189. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.005.; INGETEC. c2008. Estudio de Impacto Ambiental del Proyecto Hidroeléctrico El Quimbo. [Revisada en: 15 Oct 2018]. http://www. proyectoelquimboemgesa.com.co/site/Portals/0/ documents/Estudio_de_impacto_ambiental.pdf; Klein LR, Clayton SR, Alldredge JR, Goodwin P. 2007. Long-term monitoring and evaluation of the lower red river meadow restoration project, Idaho, U.S.A. Restor. Ecol. 15(2):223–239. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00206.x.; Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE. 2009. Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24(9):482–486. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.005.; Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE. 2010. The science and application of ecological monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 143(6):1317–1328. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.013.; Londe V, Caldas de Sousa H, Kozovits AR. 2017. Key plant indicators for monitoring areas undergoing restoration: A case study at the Das Velhas River, southeast Brazil. Ecol. Eng. 103:191–197. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.012.; Marignani M, Del Vico E, Maccherini S. 2007. Spatial scale and sampling size affect the concordance between remotely sensed information and plant community discrimination in restoration monitoring. Biodivers. Conserv. 16:3851–3861. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9184-4.; Matthews JW, Spyreas G, Endress AG. 2009. Trajectories of vegetation-based indicators used to assess wetland restoration progress. Ecol. Appl. 19(8):2093–2107. doi:10.1890/08-1371.1.; Méndez-Toribio M, Martínez-G C, Ceccon E, Guariguata MR. 2017. Plantes actuales de restauración ecológica en Latinoamérica: Avances y omisiones. Trop. J. Environ Sci. 51(2):1–30. doi:10.15359/rca.51-2.1.; Morán M, Campos JJ, Louman AB. 2006. Uso de Principios, Criterios e Indicadores para monitorear y evaluar las acciones y efectos de políticas en el manejo de los recursos naturales. Serie Técnica, Informe técnico/CATIE no. 347. Costa Rica: Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente Sede Central, CATIE.; O’Connor S, Salafsky N, Salzer DW. 2004. Monitoring Forest Restoration Projects in the Context of an Adaptive Management Cycle. En: Mansourian S, Vallauri D, Dudley N, editores. Forest Restoration in Landscapes – Beyond Planting Trees. New York: Springer Science. p. 145–149.; Park H, Higgs E. 2018. A criteria and indicators monitoring framework for food forestry embedded in the principles of ecological restoration. Environ. Monit. Assess. 190(3):113. doi:10.1007/s10661-018-6494-9.; Ramírez W, Aguilar-G M, Cabrera M. 2015. Introducción al monitoreo de la restauración ecológica. En: Aguilar-G M, Ramírez W, editores. Monitoreo a procesos de restauración ecológica, aplicado a ecosistemas terrestres. Bogotá: Instituto Humboldt (IAvH). p. 27–32.; Rieger J, Stanley J, Traynor R. 2014. Project Planning and Management for Ecological Restoration. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration. Washington, DC: Island Press. Chapter 13, Monitoring and Evaluation; p. 203–214.; [SDC] Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation. c2003. External evaluation: Are we doing the right things? Are we doing things right? [Revisada en: 15 Jun de 2016 https:// www.eda.admin.ch/dam/deza/en/documents/publikationen/Diverses/23673-externe-evaluation_EN.pdf; Stokes DJ, Bulmer RH, Lundquist CJ. 2016. Addressing the mismatch between restoration objectives and monitoring needs to support mangrove management. Ocean Coast. Manag. 134:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.024.; Sullivan JJ, Molles LE. 2016. Biodiversity monitoring by community-based restoration groups in New Zealand. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 17(3):210–217. doi:10.1111/emr.12225.; Torres JM, Magaña O. 2001. Evaluación de plantaciones forestales. México D.F.: Limusa Noriega Editores.; Torres-Rodríguez S, Díaz-Triana JE, Villota A, Gómez W, Avella-M. A. 2019. Diagnóstico ecológico, formulación e implementación de estrategias para la restauración de un bosque seco tropical interandino (Huila, Colombia). Caldasia 41(1):42–59. doi:10.15446/caldasia.v41n1.71275; Vallauri D, Aronson J, Dudley N, Vallejo R. 2004. Monitoring and Evaluating Forest Restoration Success. En: Mansourian S, Vallauri D, Dudley N, editores. Forest Restoration in Landscapes – Beyond Planting Trees. New York: Springer Science. p. 150–156.; Van Diggelen R, Grootjans AP, Harris JA. 2001. Ecological Restoration: State of the Art or State of the Science? Restor. Ecol. 9:115–118. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002115.x; Vargas O, Mora F. 2007. La restauración ecológica – su contexto, definiciones y dimensiones. En: Vargas O, editor. Estrategias para la restauración ecológica del bosque altoandino – El caso de la Reserva Forestal Municipal de Cogua, Cundinamarca. Bogotá: Grupo de Restauración Ecológica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia y Colciencias. p. 19–40.; Vargas O. 2011. Restauración Ecológica: Biodiversidad y Conservación. Acta biol. Colomb. 16(2):221–246.; Viani RAG, Barreto TE, Farah FT, Rodrigues RR, Brancalion PHS. 2018. Monitoring Young Tropical Forest Restoration Sites: How much to measure?. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 11:1–9. doi:10.1177/1940082918780916.; Weber C, Åberg U, Buijse AD, Hughes FMR, McKie BG, Piégay H, Roni P, Vollenweider S, Haertel-Borer S. 2018. Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: collaborative learning across multiple projects. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 5(1):e1257. doi:10.1002/wat2.1257.; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/71318

الاتاحة: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/71318

المؤلفون: Christopher Wolf, William J. Ripple

المصدر: Royal Society Open Science, Vol 5, Iss 3 (2018)

مصطلحات موضوعية: predator, geographical range, reintroduction, intact guild, carnivore guild, ecological effectiveness, Science

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2054-5703

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/7fcad5c55ab44c6dbf9ee3ab8f513631

المؤلفون: Christopher Wolf, William J. Ripple

مصطلحات موضوعية: Ecology, predator, geographical range, reintroduction, intact guild, carnivore guild, ecological effectiveness

Relation: https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/supplement_Supplementary_Figures_and_Tables_from_Rewilding_the_world_s_large_carnivores/5918881

الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5918881.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/supplement_Supplementary_Figures_and_Tables_from_Rewilding_the_world_s_large_carnivores/5918881

المؤلفون: Blumroeder, Jeanette Silvin, Hobson, Peter Ralph, Graebener, Uli Frank, Krueger, Joerg-Andreas, Dobrynin, Denis, Burova, Natalya, Amosa, Irina, Winter, Susanne, Ibisch, Pierre Leonhard

المساهمون: WWF Germany, Anton Studentsov, Andrey Shegolev and Nicolay Shmatkov, WWF Russia, Tatiana Yanitskaya and Mikhail Karpachevskiy, FSC Russia, Eberswalde University for Susatainable Development, Monika Hoffmann, Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management

المصدر: Challenges in Sustainability; Vol 6, Issue 1 (2018); 20-51

مصطلحات موضوعية: Arkhangelsk, boreal forest, ecological effectiveness, FSC-certification, sustainability

وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html; application/xml

Relation: http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/cis-6.1.20/pdf; http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/cis-6.1.20/html; http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/cis-6.1.20/xml; http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/cis-6.1.20

الاتاحة: http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/cis-6.1.20

المؤلفون: A. Sergeeva V., А. Сергеева В.

المصدر: Business Strategies; № 6 (2018); 51-56 ; Стратегии бизнеса; № 6 (2018); 51-56 ; 2311-7184 ; 10.17747/2311-7184-2018-6

مصطلحات موضوعية: methodical provision, innovative enterprise, social effectiveness, economic effectiveness, ecological effectiveness, стратегия, методическое обеспечение, инновационное предприятие, социальная эффективность, экономическая эффективность, экологическая эффективность

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.strategybusiness.ru/jour/article/view/451/387; Авсянников Н. М. Инновационный менеджмент. М.: Изд-во РУДН, 2002. 175 с.; Ансофф И. Стратегическое управление. М.: Экономика, 1989. 519 с.; Идрисов А. Б. и др. Стратегическое планирование и анализ эффективности инвестиций. М.: Филинъ, 1997. 160 с.; Карлоф Б. Деловая стратегия. М.: Экономика, 1991. 239 с.; Кинг У., Клиланд Д. Стратегическое планирование и хозяйственная политика. М.:Прогресс, 1982.; С. 167–173.; Краюхин Г. А., Смирнов Р. В., Соколова А. А. Организационно-экономический механизм инновационного развития предприятия. Санкт-Петербург: СПбГИЭУ, 2008. 197 с.; Минцберг Г., Стратегический процесс. СПб.:Питер, 2001. 438с.; Стратегическое управление на промышленном предприятии / под ред. Г. А. Краюхин. СПб.: Питер, 2016. 464 с.; Шеховцева Л. С. О некоторых понятиях стратегического управления. // Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. 2002. № 6. С 34–40.; Minakov V.F., Minakova T.E., Galstyan A.Sh., Shiyanova A.A. Time constant of innovation effects doubling // Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015. № 6–3. P. 310–312.; Teller R. Operational Management: Fundamental Concept and Methods. NY.: Happer and Row. 1978. 438 p.; https://www.strategybusiness.ru/jour/article/view/451

الاتاحة: https://www.strategybusiness.ru/jour/article/view/451
https://doi.org/10.17747/2311-7184-2018-6-51-56