يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 314 نتيجة بحث عن '"Cupani, Marcos"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.63s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal

    المؤلفون: Ghio, Fernanda Belén (ORCID 0000-0002-4223-2470), Bruzzone, Manuel (ORCID 0000-0002-7782-7802), Rojas-Torres, Luis (ORCID 0000-0002-9085-2703), Cupani, Marcos (ORCID 0000-0003-2132-5552)

    المصدر: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2022 10(3):352-365.

    Peer Reviewed: Y

    Page Count: 14

    مصطلحات جغرافية: Argentina

  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Academic Journal

    جغرافية الموضوع: Nacional

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/racc/article/view/37355/37532; http://hdl.handle.net/11336/156382; Aplicación del modelo de Rasch al test de Razonamiento Abstracto del Test de Aptitudes Diferenciales (DAT-T); XVIII Reunión Nacional y VII Encuentro Internacional de la Asociación Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento; Mar del Plata; Argentina; 2021; 200-201; CONICET Digital; CONICET

  8. 8
    Academic Journal
  9. 9
    Academic Journal

    وصف الملف: text/html; application/pdf; text/xml

    Relation: https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3739/3891; https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3739/3778; https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/3739/4023; Núm. 2 , Año 2021 : Acta Colombiana de Psicología; 22; 24; Acta Colombiana de Psicología; Alonso, D., & Brussino, S. (2018). Estructura y evidencias de validez de la versión en español del Cuestionario de Valores Psicosociales (qvp-24). Liberabit, 24(2), 213-230. https:// doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2018.v24n2.04 American Psychological Association [apa]. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologist and code of conduct. apa. Andrich, D. (1978). Application of a psychometric rating model to ordered categories which are scored with successive in¬tegers. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(4), 581-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167800200413 Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2010). Rasch models for measurement: RUMM2030. rumm Laboratory Pty Ltd. Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J. (2019). Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies: Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75, 49-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12310 Baghaei, P. (2008). The Rasch model as a construct validation tool. Rasch Measurement Transaction, 22(1), 1145-1146. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt221a.htm#:~:text=In%20 1955,%20Cronbach%20and%20Meehl,being%20 the%20most%20important%20one Barros, T. S., Torres, A. R. R., & Pereira, C. (2009). Autoritarismo e adesão a sistemas de valores psicosso¬ciais. PsicoUSF, 14(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1590/ s1413-82712009000100006 Bauer, P. C., Barberá, P., Ackermann, K., & Venetz, A. (2017). Is the left-right scale a valid measure of ideology? Political Behavior, 39(3), 553-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11109-016-9368-2 Brussino, S., Imhoff, D., Paz García, A. P., & Dreizik, M. (2017). El análisis psico-político de la ideología política. En Brussino, S. (Coord.), Políticamente, contribuciones desde la psicología política en Argentina (pp. 73-104). conicet. https://rdu.unc.edu.ar/handle/11086/4910 Brussino, S., Imhoff, D., Rabbia, H. H., & Paz García, A. P. (2013). Ideología política en torno a issues y valores so¬ciales: un estudio correlacional en ciudadanos de Córdoba Argentina. América Latina Hoy, 65, 161-182. https://doi. org/10.14201/alh201365161182 Brussino, S., Rabbia, H. H., Imhoff, D., & Paz García, A. P. (2011). Dimensión Operativa de la Ideología Política en ciudadanos de Córdoba/Argentina. Revista Psicología Política, 43, 85-106. https://www.uv.es/garzon/psicolo gia%20politica/N43-4.pdf Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Schoen, H., Bain, P., Silvester, J., Cieciuch, J., Pavlopoulos, V., & Bianchi, C. (2017). Basic values, ideological selfplacement, and voting: A cross-cultural study. Cross-Cultural Research, 51(4), 388411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397117712194 Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Schoen, H., Bain, P. G., Silvester, J., ., & Caprara, M. G. (2018). The contribution of religiosity to ideology: Empirical evidences from five continents. Cross-Cultural Research, 52(5), 524- 541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397118774233 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. ª ed.). Erlbaum. Cordero García, G. (Noviembre, 2008). ¿Qué es ideología? El caso español. Trabajo presentado en el Seminario de Investigadores en Formación del Departamento de Ciencia Política de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Madrid, España. https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0319-3_39 Costello, T. H., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2020). Social and econo¬mic political ideology consistently operate as mutual sup¬pressors: implications for personality, social, and political psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, pre-print. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620964679 Crawford, J. T., Brandt, M. J., Inbar, Y., Chambers, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2017). Social and economic ideologies diffe¬rentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 383. https://doi.org/10.31234/ osf.io/3g5pz D’Adamo, O., & García Beaudoux, V. (2002). Actitudes polí¬ticas. En F. Morales, D. Páez, Kornblit, A. L., & D. Asún (Coord.), Psicología Social. Pearson Educación. Engelhard Jr., G. (2013). Invariant measurement: Using Rasch models in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073636 Federico, C. M., & Schneider, M. C. (2007). Political experti¬se and the use of ideology: Moderating effects of evaluati¬ve motivation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 221-252. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm010 Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2016). A note on impro¬ving EAP trait estimation in oblique factor-analytic and item response theory models. Psicológica, 37(2), 235-247. https://www.uv.es/revispsi/articulos2.16/7Ferrando.pdf Freire, A., & Kivistik, K. (2013). Mapping and explai¬ning the use of the left-right divide. Brazilian Political Science Review, 7(3), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1590/ s1981-38212013000300003 Glutting, J. (2002). Some psychometric properties of a system to measure adhd among college students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 34, 194- 209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069037 Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651-670. https://doi. org/10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.651 Kalmoe, N. P. (2020). Uses and abuses of ideology in political psychology. Political Psychology, 41(4), 771-793. https:// doi.org/10.1111/pops.12650 Laméris, M. D., Jong-A-Pin, R., & Garretsen, H. (2018). On the measurement of voter ideology. European Journal of Political Economy, 55, 417-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejpoleco.2018.03.003 Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters deci¬de: Information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ cbo9780511791048.001 Lohr, S. (2000). Muetreo: Diseño y Análisis (1. ª ed.). International Thomson. Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). factor: A com¬puter program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38(1), 88-91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192753 Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2019). Robust Promin: un método para la rotación de factores de diagonal pondera¬da. Liberabit, 25(1), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.24265/libera bit.2019.v25n1.08 McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dyna¬mics, and pernicious consequences for democratic policies. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16-42. https://doi. org/10.1177/0002764218759576 McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of clinical and Health psychology, 7(3), 847-862. http://www.aepc.es/ij chp/articulos_pdf/ijchp-256.pdf Morgan, G. S., & Wisneski, D. C. (2017). The structure of politi¬cal ideology varies between and within people: Implications for theories about ideology's causes. Social Cognition, 35(4), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.395 Morrison, A. P., Wells, A., & Nothard, S. (2000). Cognitive fac¬tors in predisposition to auditory and visual hallucinations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 67-78. https:// doi.org/10.1348/014466500163112 Pereira, C., Camino, L., & Bastos da Costa, J. (2004). Análise fatorial confirmatória do Questionário de Valores Psicossociais-QVP24. Estudos de Psicologia, 9(3), 505- 512. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-294x2004000300013 Pereira, C., Camino, L., & Bastos da Costa, J. (2005). Um estu¬do sobre a integração dos níveis de análise dos sistemas de valores. Psicologia: reflexão e crítica, 18(1), 16-25. https:// doi.org/10.1590/s0102-79722005000100004 Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011). Basic per¬sonal values and the meaning of left-right political orienta¬tions in 20 countries. Political Psychology, 32(4), 537-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x Schwartz, S. H. (2003). A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. En Questionnaire Package of the European Social Survey (pp. 259-290). http:// www.europeansocialsurvey.org/index.php?option=com_ docman&task=doc_view&gid=126&Itemid=80 Shea, B. J., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., Henry, D. A., & Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1013-1020. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009 Sheldon, K. M., & Nichols, C. P. (2009). Comparing democrats and republicans on intrinsic and extrinsic values. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(3), 589-623. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00452.x Smith, E. V. (2002). Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and princi¬pal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(2) 205-231. Steinmetz, H., Isidor, R., & Baeuerle, N. (2012). Testing the cir¬cular structure of human values: A meta-analytical structu¬ral equation modelling approach. Survey Research Methods, 6(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2012.v6i1.5096 Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics, (4. ° ed.). Allyn & Bacon. Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007) The Rasch measure¬ment model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum, 57(8), 1358-1362. https:// doi.org/10.1002/art.23108 Tennant, A., & Pallant, J. F. (2006) Unidimensionality matters! (A tale of two Smiths?). Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20, 1048-1051. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt201c.htm; https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28534; https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.2.2

  10. 10
    Academic Journal
  11. 11
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2020): Innovaciones en la evaluación de los problemas emocionales en niños y adolescentes; 175-185 ; Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Psychology ; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2020): Innovaciones en la evaluación de los problemas emocionales en niños y adolescentes; 175-185 ; 2254-6057 ; 1136-5420 ; 10.5944/rppc.vol.25.num.3.2020

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  12. 12
    Academic Journal
  13. 13
    Academic Journal
  14. 14
    Academic Journal

    المؤلفون: Azpilicueta, Ana E.1,2,3 (AUTHOR) estefaniaazpilicueta@gmail.com, Cupani, Marcos1,2 (AUTHOR), Ghío, Fernanda B.1,2 (AUTHOR), Morán, Valeria E.4 (AUTHOR), Garrido, Sebastián J.1,2 (AUTHOR), Bruzzone, Manuel2 (AUTHOR)

    المصدر: Current Psychology. Nov2023, Vol. 42 Issue 31, p27828-27839. 12p.

  15. 15
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Contextos Educativos. Revista de Educación; No. 24 (2019): Monograph: Liderazgo, emprendimiento y empoderamiento docente para generar sociedades inclusivas; 197-211 ; Contextos Educativos. Revista de Educación; Núm. 24 (2019): Monográfico: Liderazgo, emprendimiento y empoderamiento docente para generar sociedades inclusivas; 197-211 ; 1695-5714 ; 1575-023X ; 10.18172/con.num24

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  16. 16
    Academic Journal
  17. 17
    Academic Journal

    وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html; application/xml

    Relation: https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2009/pdf1.11; https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2009/2516; https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2009/pdf1.11IN; https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2009/2517; https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/2009/2472; Núm. 1 , Año 2019 : ACTA COLOMBIANA DE PSICOLOGÏA; 260; 248; 22; Acta Colombiana de Psicología; Aronson, Z. H., Reilly, R. R., & Lynn, G. S. (2006). The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(3), 221-247.; Baldasaro, R. E., Shanahan, M. J., Bauer, D. J. (2013). Psychometric Properties of the Mini-IPIP in a Large, Nationally Representative Sample of Young Adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(1), 74-84. Doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.700466; Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. American Psychologist, 39(3), 214.; Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Mainly Openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 524-529.; Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155-159; Costa, P., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). NEO PI-R manual profesional. Odessa, FL: Evaluación Psicológica Resources, Inc; Credé, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 874-888.; Cronbach, L.J. (1942). Studies of acquiescence as a factor in the true/false test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 401-415. Cupani, M. (2009). El Cuestionario de Personalidad IPIP-FFM: Resultados preliminares de una adaptación en una muestra de preadolescentes argentinos. Perspectivas en Psicología, 6, 51-58.; Cupani, M. & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2016). The development of an alternative IPIP inventory measuring the Big-Five factor markers in an Argentine sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 40-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.051; Cupani, M., Pilatti, A., Urrizaga, A., Chincolla, A., & de Minzi, M. C. R. (2014). Inventario de Personalidad IPIP-NEO: estudios preliminares de adaptación al español en estudiantes argentinos. Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología, 6(1), 55-73.; De Vries, R.E. (2013). The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 871-880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003; Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R.E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192-203.; Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.; Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo Seva, U. (2000). Unrestricted versus restricted factor analysis of multidimensional test items: Some aspects of the problem and some suggestions. Psicológica, 21(2), 301-323.; Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Unrestricted item factor analysis and some relations with item response theory. Recuperado de http://psico.fcep.urv.es/utilitats/factor/ [ Links].; Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Chico, E. (2009). A general factor-analytic procedure for assessing response bias in questionnaire measures. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(2), 364-381.; Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality psychology in Europe, 7(1), 7-28.; Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., et al. (2005). The international personality item pool and the future of public domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.; Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. Jr., (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.; Gow, A.J., Whiteman, M.C., Pattie, A., & Deary, I.J.(2005). Goldberg's “IPIP” Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 317-329.; Guenole, N., & Chernyshenko, O. (2005). The suitability of Goldberg's Big-Five IPIP personality markers in New Zealand: A dimensionality, bias, and criterion validity evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34, 86-96.; Gross, M.N., Zalazar Jaime, M.F., Piccolo, N.V., & Cupani, M. (2012). Nuevos estudios de validación del cuestionario de personalidad IPIP-FFM. X Congreso Latinoamericano de Sociedades de Estadística, Córdoba, Argentina.; Grucza, R. A., & Goldberg, L R. (2007). The Comparative Validity of 11 Modern Personality Inventories: Predictions of Behavioral Acts, Informant Reports, and Clinical Indicators. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(2), 167-18; Hofstee, W. K. B., ten Berge, J. M. F., & Hendriks, A.A.J. (1998). How to score questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 897-909.; Javeline, D. (1999). Response effects in polite cultures: a test of acquiescence in Kazakhstan. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63(1), 1-28.; Johnson, T., Kulesa, P., Cho, Y. I., & Shavitt, S. (2005). The relationship between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 264-277.; Kumar, R. (2005). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.; Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2013). On the shortcomings of shortened tests: A literature review. International Journal of Testing, 13, 223-2484.; Langford, P. H. (2003). A one-minute measure of the Big Five? Evaluating and abridging Shafer’s (1999a) Big Five markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(5), 1127-1140.; Ledesma, R. D., Sánchez, R., & Díaz-Lázaro, C. M. (2011). Adjective checklist to assess the big five personality factors in the Argentine population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 46-55.; Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2009). Acquiescent responding in partially balanced multidimensional scales. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62(2), 319-326.; Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). Factor 9.2: A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semi-confirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(2), 497-498.; McCrae, R. R., Costa Jr, P. T., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., HRebícková, M., Avia, M. D., . & Saunders, P. R. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(1), 173.; McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: data from 50 cultures. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(3), 547.; Meisenberg, G., & Williams, A. (2008). Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1539-1550.; Milojev, P., Osborne, D., Greaves, L.M., Barlow, F.K. & Sibley, C.G. (2013). The Mini-IPIP6: Tiny yet highly stable markers of Big Six personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 936-944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.004; Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1990). BILOG 3: Ítem analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Scientific Software International.; Mlacic´, B., & Goldberg, L.R. (2007). An analysis of a crosscultural personality inventory: The IPIP Big-Five factor markers in Croatia. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 168-177.; Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2002). Clasificación y descripción de las metodologías de investigación en Psicología. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 2(3), 503-508; Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212.; Rammstedt, B., Goldberg, L.R., & Borg, I. (2010). The measurement equivalence of Big-Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 53-61.; Rammstedt, B., Kemper, C. J., & Borg, I. (2013).Correcting Big Five personality measurements for acquiescence: An 18-country cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality, 27(1), 71-81.; Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1984). Components of depressed mood in married men and women the center for epidemiologic studies' depression scale. American Journal of Epidemiology, 119(6), 997-1004.; Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2002). Assessing the big five: Applications of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales. B. De Raad, M. Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, WA (2002), pp. 29-58.; Sibley, C. G. (2012). The Mini-IPIP6: Item Response Theory analysis of a short measure of the big-six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 21-31.; Shrive, F. M., Stuart, H., Quan, H., & Ghali, W. A. (2006). Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods. BMC medical research methodology, 6(1), 57.; Soto, C. J. & John. O.P. (2017). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory’2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004; Soto, C.J., John, O.P., Gosling, S.D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94,718-737.; Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(5), 1041.; Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. Vazsonyi, A. T., Ksinan, A. Mikuška, J. & Jiskrova, G. (2015).; The Big Five and adolescent adjustment: An empirical test across six cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 234-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.049; Vigil-Colet, A., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Morales-Vives, F. (2015). The effects of ageing on self-reported aggression measures are partly explained by response bias. Psicothema, 27(3), 209-215.; Zheng, L., Goldberg, L.R., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Tang, Y., & Liu, L. (2008). Reliability and concurrent validation of the IPIP Big-Five Factor markers in China: Consistencies in factor structure between internet-obtained heterosexual and homosexual samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 649-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.009.; https://hdl.handle.net/10983/28445; https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2019.22.1.12

  18. 18
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica; Vol. 23 Núm. 3 (2018); 211-220 ; Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Psychology ; Vol. 23 No. 3 (2018); 211-220 ; 2254-6057 ; 1136-5420 ; 10.5944/rppc.vol.23.num.3.2018

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  19. 19
    Academic Journal
  20. 20
    Academic Journal

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Madrona, P. G., Gutiérrez-Marín, E. C., Cupani, M., Samalot-Rivera, A., Suárez, A. D., & Sánchez, G. F. L. (2019). The Effects of an Appropriate Behavior Program on Elementary School Children Social Skills Development in Physical Education. Frontiers In Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01998; pa_21691619; https://hdl.handle.net/10578/36303