يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 354 نتيجة بحث عن '"Análisis de políticas públicas"', وقت الاستعلام: 1.32s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Academic Journal
  8. 8
    Academic Journal
  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Education Policy Analysis Archives; Vol. 31 (2023) ; Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas; Vol. 31 (2023) ; Arquivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas; v. 31 (2023) ; 1068-2341

    وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/xml

  11. 11
    Academic Journal

    المؤلفون: Cairney, Paul

    المصدر: Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas; Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas. Nueva época. Número 31. Monográfico (marzo 2023); 31-42 ; 1989-8991 ; 1134-6035 ; 10.24965/gapp.31.2023

    وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html; application/epub+zip; text/xml

    Relation: https://revistasonline.inap.es/index.php/GAPP/article/view/11146/12449; https://revistasonline.inap.es/index.php/GAPP/article/view/11146/12462; https://revistasonline.inap.es/index.php/GAPP/article/view/11146/12463; https://revistasonline.inap.es/index.php/GAPP/article/view/11146/12464; Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing Policy: What’s the problem represented to be? (1.ª ed.). Pearson Education.; Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E. (2020). A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis (6.ª ed.) [international student edition]. SAGE.; Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (2009). Agendas & Instability in American Politics (2.ª ed.). University of Chicago Press.; Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (2015). The Politics of Information. Problem Definition & the Course of Public Policy in America. University of Chicago Press.; Brans, M., Geva-May, I., & Howlett, M. (2017). The policy analysis movement: The state of the art. In M. Brans, I. Geva-May y M. Howlett (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis. Routledge.; Cairney, P. (2016). The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making (1.ª ed.). Palgrave Pivot.; Cairney, P. (2020). Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues (2.ª ed.). Red Globe.; Cairney, P. (2021a). The Politics of Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.; Cairney, P. (2021b). The politics of policy design. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 9, article 100002, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejdp.2021.100002; Cairney, P., & Kwiatkowski, R. (2017). How to Communicate Effectively with Policymakers: Combine Insights from Psychology and Policy Studies. Palgrave Communications, 3, article 37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0046-8; Cairney, P., & Weible, C. (2017). The new policy sciences: combining the cognitive science of choice, multiple theories of context, and basic and applied analysis. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 619-627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9304-2; Cairney, P., Heikkila, T., & Wood, M. (2019). Making Policy in a Complex World [serie: Elements in Public Policy]. Cambridge University Press.; Cairney, P., Keating, M., Kippin, S., & St Denny, E. (2022). Public Policy to Reduce Inequalities Across Europe: hope versus reality. Oxford University Press.; Crow, D., & Jones, M. (2018). Narratives as Tools for Influencing Policy Change. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230061022899; Doucet, F. (2019). Centering the Margins: (Re)defining Useful Research Evidence Through Critical Perspectives. William T. Grant Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED609713; Dunn, W. (2017). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (6.ª ed.). Routledge.; Durnová, A., & Weible, C. (2020). Tempest in a teapot? Toward new collaborations between mainstream policy process studies and interpretive policy studies. Policy Sciences, 53, 571-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09387-y; Enserink, B., Koppenjan, J., & Mayer, I. (2013). A Policy Sciences View on Policy Analysis. In W. Thissen & W. Walker (eds.), Public Policy Analysis: New Developments (pp. 11-40). Springer.; Fischer, F. (1998). Beyond empiricism: policy inquiry in postpositivist perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01929.x; Fukuyama, F. (2018, august 1). What’s Wrong with Public Policy Education. The American Interest (accessed 12.2.20). https://www.the-american-interest.com/2018/08/01/whats-wrong-with-public-policy-education/; Geva-May, I. (ed.) (2005). Thinking Like a Policy Analyst Policy: Analysis as a Clinical Profession. Palgrave Macmillan.; Gigerenzer, G. (2001). The Adaptive Toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 37-50). The MIT Press.; Hassenteufel, P., & Zittoun, P. (2017). From Policy Analytical Styles to Policymaking Styles. In M. Brans, I. Geva-May, & M. Howlett (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis (pp. 56-69). Routledge.; Hindess, B. (1977). Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences. Harvester Press.; Hogwood, B., & Gunn, L. (1984). Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford University Press.; Jones, M., & Radaelli, C. (2016). The narrative policy framework’s call for interpretivists. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 117-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1111156; Jones, M., Shanahan, E., & McBeth, M. (eds.) (2014). The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.; Jordan, A. G., & Cairney, P. (2013). What is the “Dominant Model” of British Policy Making? Comparing Majoritarian and Policy Community Ideas. British Politics, 8(3), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2013.5; Jordan, A. G., & Maloney, W. A. (1997). Accounting for Subgovernments: Explaining the Persistence of Policy Communities. Administration and Society, 29(5), 557-583. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979702900503; Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking Fast and Slow. Penguin.; Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Harper Collins.; Koski, C., & Workman, S. (2018). Drawing practical lessons from punctuated equilibrium theory. Policy and Politics, 46(2), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230061413778; Lasswell, H. (1951). The policy orientation. In D. Lerner, & H. Lasswell (eds.), The policy sciences. Stanford University Press.; Lasswell, H. (1956). The political science of science: An Inquiry into the Possible Reconciliation of Mastery and Freedom. American Political Science Review, 50(4), 961-979. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951330; Lasswell, H. (1971). A pre-view of the policy sciences. American Elsevier Publishing.; Lindblom, C. (1959). The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677; Lindblom, C. (1979). Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517-526. https://doi.org/10.2307/976178; Mayer, I., van Daalen, C. E., & Bots, P. (2013). Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design. In W. Thissen, & W. Walker (eds.), Public Policy Analysis: New Developments (pp. 41-64). Springer.; Meltzer, R., & Schwartz, A. (2019). Policy Analysis as Problem Solving: A Flexible and Evidence-Based Framework. Routledge.; Mintrom, M. (2012). Contemporary Policy Analysis. Oxford University Press.; Mintrom, M. (2019). So you want to be a policy entrepreneur? Policy Design and Practice, 2(4), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1675989; Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional Rational Choice. In P. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (2.ª ed.). Westview Press.; Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x; Radin, B. (2019). Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century. Routledge.; Richardson, J. J., & Jordan, G. (1979). Governing under Pressure: The Policy Process in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy [Government and administration series]. Martin Robertson, & Company Ltd.; Sabatier, P., & Weible, C. (2007). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications. In P. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press.; Schlager, E., & Cox, M. (2018). The IAD Framework and the SES Framework: An Introduction and Assessment of the Ostrom Workshop Frameworks. In C. Weible, & P. Sabatier (eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (4.ª ed.). Routledge.; Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy Design for Democracy. University Press of Kansas.; Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (eds.) (2005). Deserving and Entitled: Social Construction and Public Policy. State University of New York Press.; Simon, H. (1976). Administrative Behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (3.ª ed.). Free Press.; Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2.ª ed.). Zed Books.; Stone, D. (2012). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making (3.ª ed.). WW Norton, & Co.; Thissen, W., & Walker, W. (eds.) (2013). Public Policy Analysis: New Developments. Springer.; True, J., Jones, B., & Baumgartner, F. (2007). Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In P. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (2.ª ed.). Westview Press.; Weible, C., & Cairney, P. (2018). Practical lessons from policy theories. Policy and Politics, 46(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230059147191; Weible, C., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P., & Sabatier, P. (2012). Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences, 45(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9143-5; Weimer, D., & Vining, A. (2017). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice (6.ª ed.). Routledge.; https://revistasonline.inap.es/index.php/GAPP/article/view/11146

  12. 12
    Academic Journal
  13. 13
    Conference

    المؤلفون: Escámez-Navas, Sebastián

    Relation: XV Congreso de la Asociación Española de Ciencia Política y de la Administración; Girona (España); 06/09/2022; Sebastián Escámez Navas, “Experiencias de aprendizaje del análisis y evaluación de las políticas públicas centrado en el estudiantado y el desarrollo de sus competencias”, ponencia presentada al XV Congreso de la Asociación Española de Ciencia Política y de la Administración (Girona, 6-9 de septiembre de 2022).; https://hdl.handle.net/10630/25309

  14. 14
    Academic Journal
  15. 15
  16. 16
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Reflexión Política; Vol. 24 No. 49 (2022): Reflexión Política Nº 49 (january - june); 64-76 ; Reflexión Política; Vol. 24 Núm. 49 (2022): Reflexión Política (enero a junio); 64-76 ; 2590-8669 ; 0124-0781

    وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/xml

    Relation: https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4400/3619; https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4400/3776; Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information, 24(2), 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901885024002001; Campbell, A. L. (2011). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. In How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State (Vol. 83). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2006-007; Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202; Campbell, A. L. (2020). The Affordable Care Act and mass policy feedbacks. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(4), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8255493; Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual review of sociology, 41, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142; Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev., 43, 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039; DeLeon, P., & Martell, C. R. (2006). The policy sciences: past, present, and future. Handbook of public policy, 31-47. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608054.n3; Donovan, M. C. (1993). Social constructions of people with AIDS: Target populations and United States policy, 1981–1990. Review of Policy Research, 12(3‐4), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608054.n3; Donovan, M. C. (2014). The problem with making AIDS comfortable: Federal policymaking and the rhetoric of innocence. In M C Donovan (Ed.), Activism and Marginalization in the AIDS Crisis, 139–168. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315865515-11; Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative politics, 275-296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246; Hogan, N. L. (1997). The social construction of target populations and the transformation of prison-based AIDS policy: A descriptive case study. Journal of Homosexuality, 32(3–4), 77–114. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v32n03_04; Husmann, M. A. (2015). Social constructions of obesity target population: an empirical look at obesity policy narratives. Policy Sciences, 48(4), 415–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9229-6; Hynes, B. O. D., & Hayes, N. (2011). Who benefits from early childcare subsidy design in Ireland? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 19(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982711X597017; Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.; Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (Eds.). (2005). Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy. SUNY Press.; Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. L. (2015). 14 Making distinctions: the social construction of target populations.; Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, 259. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783472352.00022; Ingram, H., Schneider, A. L., & DeLeon, P. (2007). Social Construction and Policy Design. En. PA Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (93-126). Boulder.; Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 3–14.; Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. American Elsevier Publishing Company New York.; Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public administration review, 32(4), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/974990; McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 30(3), 1771-1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800; Mannheim, K. (2013). Ideology and utopia. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315002828; Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704000623; Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2004). Social construction and policy implementation: Inmate health as a public health issue. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502002.x; Patterson, D. A., & Keefe, R. H. (2008). Using social construction theory as a foundation for macro-level interventions in communities impacted by HIV and addictions. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 35(2), 111–126.; Pierce, J. J., Siddiki, S., Jones, M. D., Schumacher, K., Pattison, A., & Peterson, H. (2014). Social construction and policy design: A review of past applications. Policy Studies Journal, 42(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12040; Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710; Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (Eds.). (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.; Schneider, A., & Sidney, M. (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory? 1. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00298.x; Schroedel, J. R., & Jordan, D. R. (1998). Senate voting and social construction of target populations: A study of AIDS policy making, 1987-1992. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 23(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-23-1-107; Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason (Vol. 3). MIT press.; Soss, J. (2005). Making clients and citizens: Welfare policy as a source of status, belief, and action. Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy, 291–328.; Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (2007). A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political; Science Review, 101(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070049; Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (Eds.). (2018). Theories of the policy process. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284; https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4400

  17. 17
    Academic Journal
  18. 18
    Academic Journal
  19. 19
    Academic Journal
  20. 20