يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 21 نتيجة بحث عن '"2000 h"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.57s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
  6. 6
    Image
  7. 7
    Image
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
    Image
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Image
  13. 13
  14. 14
    Image
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
    Academic Journal

    المؤلفون: Saltzburg, Stephen A.

    المصدر: GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

    مصطلحات موضوعية: Abstract http://ssrn.com/abstract=2641141 Revise My Submission Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser | Share | Email Authentication and Hearsay: Which Trumps? Stephen A. Saltzburg George Washington University School of Law 2015 30 Crim. Just. (2015). GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2015-29 GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-29 Abstract: This article addresses the relationship between two federal rules of evidence: Rules 104(a) and 104(b) and which standards a trial judge should apply in admitting hearsay evidence when its authentication is in question. Focusing on United States v. Harvey, 117 F.3d 1044 (7th Circ. 1997) and a simple hypothetical, the article concludes that evidence must be authenticated under Rule 104(b) as well as satisfying the hearsay rule and Rule 104(a). Number of Pages in PDF File: 4 Keywords: Evidence, Authentication, Hearsay, Rule 104(a), Rule 104(b) JEL Classification: K41 Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper Date posted: Suggested Citation Saltzburg, Stephen A, Authentication and Hearsay: Which Trumps? (2015). 30 Crim. Just. (2015), GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2015-29, GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-29. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract= Contact Information Stephen A. Saltzburg (Contact Author) George Washington University School of Law ( email ) 2000 H Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20052 United States 202-994-7089 (Phone), Law, droit, scipo

  19. 19
    Academic Journal

    المؤلفون: Saltzburg, Stephen A.

    المصدر: GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

    مصطلحات موضوعية: Abstract http://ssrn.com/abstract=2641141 Revise My Submission Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser | Share | Email Authentication and Hearsay: Which Trumps? Stephen A. Saltzburg George Washington University School of Law 2015 30 Crim. Just. (2015). GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2015-29 GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-29 Abstract: This article addresses the relationship between two federal rules of evidence: Rules 104(a) and 104(b) and which standards a trial judge should apply in admitting hearsay evidence when its authentication is in question. Focusing on United States v. Harvey, 117 F.3d 1044 (7th Circ. 1997) and a simple hypothetical, the article concludes that evidence must be authenticated under Rule 104(b) as well as satisfying the hearsay rule and Rule 104(a). Number of Pages in PDF File: 4 Keywords: Evidence, Authentication, Hearsay, Rule 104(a), Rule 104(b) JEL Classification: K41 Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper Date posted: Suggested Citation Saltzburg, Stephen A, Authentication and Hearsay: Which Trumps? (2015). 30 Crim. Just. (2015)., GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2015-29, GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-29. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract= Contact Information Stephen A. Saltzburg (Contact Author) George Washington University School of Law ( email ) 2000 H Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20052 United States 202-994-7089 (Phone), Law

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  20. 20
    Academic Journal