يعرض 1 - 4 نتائج من 4 نتيجة بحث عن '"170 - Ética (Filosofía moral)::179 - Otras normas éticas"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.93s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    المساهمون: Mejia Sarmiento, Javier Ricardo, Muñoz Muñoz, Richar Leonardo

    وصف الملف: 156 páginas; application/pdf

    Relation: 60 Minutes. [@60Minutes]. (2021, October 3). Facebook has realized that if they change the algorithm to be safer, people will spend less time on the site … [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/60minutes/status/1444810664502079491; Auger, J. (2012). Why Robot? Speculative design, the domestication of technology and the considered future. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.629606; Bowman, S. L. (2018). Immersion and shared imagination in Role-Playing games. In Role-Playing Game Studies (pp. 379–394). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637532-22; Buraparate, P. (2019, June 6). Dungeons & Dragons & Design Thinking. Medium. https://uxdesign.cc/dungeons-dragons-design-thinking-688a0b7cca3f; Cáceres, L. A., Castañeda, K. P. & Triana, L. F. (2021). La pandemia como factor determinante en la transformación digital empresarial y comportamiento del consumidor [Tesis de especialización, Universidad EAN]. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10882/11424.; Comisión para el Esclarecimiento de la Verdad, la Convivencia y la No Repetición. (2022, June 28). Inicio %7C Informe Final Comisión de la Verdad. ¿Qué es la Comisión de la Verdad? https://comisiondelaverdad.co/; Danko, S., Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2006). Humanizing Design through Narrative Inquiry. Journal of Interior Design, 31(2), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2005.tb00408.x; DDC - Danish Design Center. (2022, November 30). Toolkit: The Digital Ethics Compass. https://ddc.dk/tools/toolkit-the-digital-ethics-compass/; Dean Mohamedally & Panayiotis Zaphiris (2009) Categorization Constructionist Assessment with Software-Based Affinity Diagramming, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 25:1, 22-48, DOI:10.1080/10447310802546690; Design Council. (2004). Framework for Innovation - Design Council. Design Council Website. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/framework-for-innovation/; Design Council. (2021). Beyond Net Zero: A Systemic Design Approach. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/resources/guide/beyond-net-zero-systemic-design-approach; Devon, R., & Van De Poel, I. (2004). Design Ethics: The Social Ethics Paradigm. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 461–469. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228827371_Design_ethics_The_social_ethics_paradigm; Digital Experience Platform %7C Expresia. (2023). EXPRESIA. https://www.expresia.com/; Drew, C., Winhall, J., & Robinson, C. (2021). System-Shifting Design: An emerging practice explored. Design Council & The Point People. https://rsdsymposium.org/system-shifting-design-an-emerging-practice-explored; Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press.; Easydamus. (2013, October). “Real” alignments? http://easydamus.com/alignmentreal.html; Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538; Geary, A. (2019, December 10). UX design jobs surge by 320pc in five years %7C UX Design Blog. UX Design Institute. https://www.uxdesigninstitute.com/blog/ux-design-jobs-surge-by-320pc-in-five-years/; Geremia, H. (2022). Roll for Alignment: The Application of Moral and Ethical Systems in Tabletop and Digital Dungeons & Dragons. 10.13140/RG.2.2.35030.73285; Godin, D., and Zahedi, M. (2014) Aspects of Research through Design: A Literature Review, in Lim, Y., Niedderer, K., Redstrom, J., Stolterman, E. and Valtonen, A. (eds.), Design's Big Debates - DRS International Conference 2014, 16-19 June, Umea, Sweden. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conferencepapers/drs2014/researchpapers/85; Jones, P., & Kijima, K. (2018). Systemic Design: Theory, Methods, and Practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8; Khoury, M., Gibson, M. J., Savić, D., Chen, A. S., Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L., Langford, H., … & Wigley, S. (2018). A serious game designed to explore and understand the complexities of flood mitigation options in urban–rural catchments. Water, 10(12), 1885. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121885; Lara-Díaz, M. F., Beltrán-Rojas, J. C. y Araque-Jaramillo, S. M. (2019). Resultados de un programa de estimulación lingüística y cognitiva dirigido a adultos mayores y su impacto en la calidad de vida. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 67(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v67n1.60831; Lucero, A. (2015). Using Affinity Diagrams to Evaluate Interactive Prototypes. In: Abascal, J., Barbosa, S., Fetter, M., Gross, T., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015. INTERACT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9297. Springer, Cham.; Mackay D. (2001). The fantasy role-playing game : a new performing art. McFarland.; Manney, P. (2008). Empathy in the Time of Technology: How Storytelling is the Key to Empathy. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 19(1), 51–61. http://jetpress.org/v19/manney.pdf; Mascarenhas, O. a. J., Cardozo, L., Afonso, N., Siddique, M., Steinberg, J., Lepczyk, M., & Aranha, A. (2006). Hypothesized predictors of patient-physician trust and distrust in the elderly: implications for health and disease management. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 1(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.2147/ciia.2006.1.2.175; Mitrović, I., Auger, J., Hanna, J., & Helgason, I. (2021). Beyond speculative design: Past, Present - Future.; Monkman, H., Griffith, J., Macdonald, L., Joseph, A. L., & Lesselroth, B. (2022). Why Do People Use Online Lab Results and What Do They Look For: A Qualitative Study. En Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/shti220539; Oberholtzer, M., & Wongpichet, K. (2020). The Magic of Dungeons and Dragons for Design Thinking Workshops. Medium. https://medium.com/denkwerk-stories/the-magic-of-dungeons-and-dragons-for-design-thinking-workshops-36a4d47f88a3; Potter, J. (2003). Discourse Analysis and Discursive Psychology., 73-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/10595-005; Potter, J., Edwards, D., Wetherell, M. (1993). A Model Of Discourse In Action. American Behavioral Scientist, 3(36), 383-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764293036003008; Roosen, C. (2020, July 17). What Came Before the Affinity Map - Reconsidering Professor Jiro Kawakita and The KJ Method. Adventures in a Designed World. https://www.christopherroosen.com/blog/2020/7/17/what-came-before-the-affinity-map-reconsidering-professor-jiro-kawakita-and-the-kj-method; Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., Camerer, C. (1998). Not So Different After All: a Cross-discipline View Of Trust. AMR, 3(23), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617; Schrier, K. (2016). Designing role-playing video games for ethical thinking. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 831–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9489-7; Scupin, R. (1997). The KJ Method: A Technique for Analyzing Data Derived from Japanese Ethnology. Human Organization. 56. 10.17730/humo.56.2.x335923511444655.; Seymour-Smith, S. (2015). Applying Discursive Approaches To Health Psychology. Health Psychology, 4(34), 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000165; Sweeting, B. (2018). Wicked problems in design and ethics. In Translational systems sciences (pp. 119–143). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_5; Systemic Design Association. (2023). Systemic Design Association. https://systemic-design.org/; Tangible. (2021). Ethical Compass. A compass to navigate complexity. https://ddc.dk/tools/toolkit-the-digital-ethics-compass/; Tenzer, J. and Stevens, P. (2007). Guide: games with uml for interactive design exploration. Knowledge-Based Systems, 20(7), 652-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2007.05.005; The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development [CIPD]. (2008, March). CIPD - PESTLE analysis. Internet Archive. https://web.archive.org/web/20080901152355/http://www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/corpstrtgy/general/pestle-analysis.htm; Torres, T. (2021). Continuous discovery habits: Discover Products that Create Customer Value and Business Value.; Torres, T. (2022, September 21). Ask Teresa: Who’s responsible for what in the product trio? Product Talk. https://www.producttalk.org/2022/02/responsibility-in-a-product-trio/; Zhang, X., & Lai, E. (2022). A Web-Based Gaming Approach to Decrease HIV-Related Stigma: Game development and Mixed Methods evaluation. JMIR Serious Games, 10(4), e37219. https://doi.org/10.2196/37219; Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85470; Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/

  2. 2
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    المساهمون: Yáñez-Canal, Jaime, Estudios sobre el Desarrollo Socio/Moral, Díaz Arboleda, Juan Sebastián 0000000319313982

    جغرافية الموضوع: Colombia

    وصف الملف: x, 200, [xix] páginas; application/pdf

    Relation: Agresti, A. (2019). An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley.; Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212; Álvarez, A. (2005). Práctica y ética de la eutanasia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.; American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code; Aristóteles. (2012). Ética nicomaquea. (A. Gómez Robledo, Trad.; 3ra ed.). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.; Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en adolescentes. Psicothema, 12(2), 314–319.; Baumgartner, W. & Pasquerella, L. (2004). Brentano’s value theory: beauty, goodness, and the concept of correct emotion. En Jacquette, D (Eds.). The Cambridge companion to Brentano (pp. 220–236). Cambridge University Press.; Beltrán, W. M., Larotta, S. P. (2020). Diversidad religiosa, valores y participación política en Colombia. Resultados de la encuesta nacional sobre diversidad religiosa 2020. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.; Brentano, F. (2002). El origen del conocimiento moral. Tecnos. (Trabajo original publicado en 1889).; Brentano, F. (2009). The foundation and construction of ethics. Routledge. (Trabajo original publicado en 1952).; Brentano, F. (2020). Psicología desde el punto de vista empírico. Sígueme. (Trabajo original publicado en 1874).; Brosch, T. & Sander, D. (2016). Handbook of value. Perspectives from economics, neuroscience, philosophy, psychology, and sociology. Oxford University Press.; Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. Temple University Press.; Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.; Chu-García, M. (2013). La objetividad de los valores en Husserl y Scheler. Una “disputa fenomenológica”. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, 4(2), pp. 279–293. https://doi.org/10.5944/rif.4-II.2013.29796; Cohen, J., Marcoux, I., Bilsen, J., Deboosere, P., Van Der Wal, G., & Deliens, L. (2006). European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries. Social Science & Medicine, 63(3), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.026; Cohen, J., Van Landeghem, P., Carpentier, N., & Deliens, L. (2014). Public acceptance of euthanasia in Europe: A survey study in 47 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 59(1), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0461-6; Cooper, J. M. (1989). Greek philosophers on euthanasia and suicide. En B. A. Brody (Ed.), Suicide and Euthanasia (pp. 9–38). Springer.; Crimmins, J. E. (2014). Bentham and utilitarianism in the early nineteenth century. En B. Eggleston & D. E. Miller (Eds.). The Cambridge companion to utilitarianism. Cambridge University Press.; Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Avon.; Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.; Devettere, R. J. (2002). Introduction to virtue ethics. Insights from the Ancient Greeks. Washington University Press.; De Waal, F. B. M. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Harvard University Press.; DiBianca Fasoli, A., Saunders, A., & Andrade, I. (2018). What is moral sanctity? Sanctity in the moral worldviews of U.S. political liberals. The Social Science Journal, 55(4), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.03.002; Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13; Dunn, T., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2013). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046; Dworkin, R. (1994). El dominio de la vida: Una discusión acerca del aborto, la eutanasia y la libertad individual. Ariel; Emanuel, E. J., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., Urwin, J. W., & Cohen, J. (2016). Attitudes and Practices of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe. JAMA, 316(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.8499; Fernández-Beites, P. (2020). El valor y el bien como objetos de la intencionalidad en Max Scheler. Anuario filosófico, 53(3), 495–517. https://doi.org/10.15581/009.53.3.005; Finnis, J. (2004). Un argumento filosófico contra la eutanasia. En J. Keown (Ed.), La eutanasia examinada. Perspectivas éticas, clínicas y legales (pp. 49–64). Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Friedlander, H. (1995). The origins of Nazi genocide: from euthanasia to the final solution. The University of North Carolina Press.; Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations: Communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, market pricing. Free Press.; Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. The MIT Press.; Frondizi, R. (2016). ¿Qué son los valores? Introducción a la axiología. Fondo de cultura Económica.; Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.; Glück, J., & Weststrate, N. M. (2022). The wisdom researchers and the elephant: An integrative model of wise behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(4), 342–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650; Goodwin, K. A. & Goodwin, C. J. (2017). Research in psychology: methods and design. Wiley.; Gorsuch, R. L., & Venable, G. D. (1983). Development of an “Age Universal” I-E scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385677; Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral Foundations Theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. En P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4; Graham, J., Haidt, J., Motyl, M., Meindl, P., Iskiwitch, C., & Mooijman, M. (2018). Moral Foundations Theory. On the advantages of moral pluralism over moral monism. En K. Gray & J. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of Moral Psychology (pp. 211–222).The Guilford Press.; Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141; Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-95X.108.4.814; Haidt, J. (2010). Moral psychology must not be based on faith and hope: Commentary on Narvaez (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 182–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610362352; Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.; Haidt, J. (2013) Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. Journal of Moral Education, 42(3), 281–297, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2013.817327; Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008a). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. En W. A. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 181–218). MIT Press.; Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008b). Social intuitionists reason, in conversation. En W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuitions and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 241–254). MIT Press.; Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z; Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Dedalus (Fall), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555; Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. En P. Carruthers, S. Lawrence, & S. Stich (eds.) The innate mind: Foundations and the future (Vol. 3, pp. 367–391). Oxford University Press.; Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2011). How Moral Foundations Theory succeeded in building on sand: A Response to Suhler and Churchland. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2117–2122. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21638; Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613; Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. II. Journal of TheoreticalBiology, 7, 17–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6; Harris, J. (1985). The value of life: An introduction to medical ethics. Routledge & Kegan Paul.; Harris, J. (2004). La eutanasia y el valor de la vida. En J. Keown (Ed.), La eutanasia examinada. Perspectivas éticas, clínicas y legales (pp. 29–48). Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativas, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill.; Hirose, I. & Olson, J. (2015). The Oxford handbook of value theory. Oxford University Press.; Hsieh, I. J., & Chen, Y. Y. (2021). The associations among moral foundations, political ideology, and social issues: A study of these associations in an asian sample. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 21(1-2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340100; Hume, D. (2005). Tratado de la naturaleza humana: autobiografía (F. Duque, Ed.; 4ta ed.). Tecnos. (Trabajo original publicado en 1739).; Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define america. Basic Books.; Inglehart, R. C., Nash, R., Hassan, Q. N., & Schwartzbaum, J. (2021). Attitudes toward euthanasia: A longitudinal analysis of the role of economic, cultural, and health-related factors. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 62(3), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.01.009; Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: the psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366; Jacobson, D. (2008). Does social intuitionism flatter morality or challenge it? En W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuitions and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 219–232). MIT Press.; Kant, I. (2005). Crítica de la razón práctica (D. M. Granja, Trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Trabajo original publicado en 1788); Kant, I. (2008). La metafísica de las costumbres (A. Cortina & J. Conill, Trad.; 4ta ed.). Tecnos. (Trabajo original publicado en 1797); Kant, I. (2012). Fundamentación para una metafísica de las costumbres (R. R. Aramayo, Trad.; 2da ed.). Alianza. (Trabajo original publicado en 1785); Kant, I. (2013). Contestación a la pregunta: ¿Qué es la Ilustración? En I. Kant. ¿Qué es la Ilustración? Y otros escritos de ética, política y filosofía de la historia. (R. R. Aramayo, Trad., Ed.; 2da ed.). Alianza. (Trabajo original publicado en 1784); Kelly, E. (1997). Structure and diversity. Studies in the phenomenological philosophy of Max Scheler. Springer.; Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. En D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 347–480). Rand McNally.; Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006; Lakoff. G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books.; Lockhart, C., Lee, C. H. J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2023). The sanctity of life: The role of purity in attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia. International Journal of Psychology, 58(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12877; MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press.; MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? University of Notre Dame Press.; MacIntyre, J. L. (2020). The passions in An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals. En J. Taylor (Ed.). Reading Hume on the Principles of Morals (pp. 255–272). Oxford University Press.; Maltby, J. (2002). The Age Universal I-E Scale-12 and orientation toward religion: Confirmatory factor analysis, The Journal of Psychology, 136(5), 555–560. https://doi.org / 10.1080/00223980209605550; Marcus, G. (2004). The birth of the mind. Basic books.; Milesi, P. (2016). Moral foundations and political attitudes: The moderating role of political sophistication. International Journal of Psychology, 51(4), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12158; Mill, J. S. (2015). Utilitarianism. En Mill, J. S. On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and other essays. M. Philp & F. Rosen, Eds., pp. 113–177). Oxford University Press. (Trabajo original publicado en 1871); Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (2021). Resolución 971. https://minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/resolucion-971-de-2021.pdf; Moore, G. E. (1993). Principa ethica (T. Baldwin, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Trabajo original publicado en 1903); Moral, J. (2019). La Escala de Afectos Positivos y Negativos (PANAS) en personas mexicanas casadas de Monterrey. Interacciones. Revista de Avances en Psicología, 5(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.24016/2019.v5n1.151; Moral, J. (2011). La escala de afecto positivo y negativo (PANAS) en parejas casadas mexicanas. CIENCIA Ergo-Sum, 18(2), 117–125. https://cienciaergosum.uaemex.mx/article/view/7409; Mroz, S., Dierickx, S., Deliens, L., Cohen, J., & Chambaere, K. (2021). Assisted dying around the world: A status quaestionis. Annals of Palliative Medicine, 10(3), 3540–3553. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-637; Mulhall, S. & Swift, A. (1992). Liberals and communitarians. Oxford: Blackwell.; Narvaez, D. (2008). The social-intuitionist model: Some counter-intuitions. En W. A. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 233–240). MIT Press.; Narvaez, D. (2010). Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610362351; Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231; Pacheco, L., Pinedo, I., & Yáñez-Canal, J. (2017). Las emociones y la moral: una propuesta desde la psicología. En Yáñez-Canal, J., Segovia, L. M., Chaparro, J. M. (Eds.), Desarrollo moral y emociones (pp. 17–80). Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios.; Papacchini, A. (2001). Derecho a la vida. Colciencias y Universidad del Valle.; Parish, S. M. (1994). Moral knowing in a Hindu sacred city: an exploration of mind, emotion, and self. Columbia University Press.; Patiño, J. (2019). El vuelo del colibrí: morir con dignidad. Uniediciones.; Piaget, J. (1984). El criterio moral en el niño. Martínez Roca. (Trabajo original publicado en 1932); Pinedo, I., & Yáñez-Canal, J. (2018). Las emociones: una breve historia en su marco filosófico y cultural en la Antigüedad. Cuadernos de Filosofía Latinoamericana, 39(119), 13–45. https://www.doi.org/10.15332/25005375.5049; Pinedo, I., & Yáñez-Canal, J. (2019). Las emociones: una breve historia en su marco filosófico y cultural. Edad Media. Revista Guillermo de Ockham, 17(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.3460; Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.; Rawls, J. (1999a). A theory of justice. Revised edition. Harvard University Press.; Rawls, J. (1999b). Kantian constructivism in moral theory. En Freeman, S. (Ed.), Collected Papers (pp. 303–358). Harvard University Press.; Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness. A restatement. Harvard University Press.; Rivera, F. (2014). Virtud, felicidad y religión en la filosofía moral de Kant. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.; Ross, W. D. (2002). The right and the good. Oxford University Press. (Trabajo original publicado en 1930); Sánchez-Migallón, S. (2010). La ambivalente posición de Max Scheler ante la ética de Franz Brentano. Tópicos, 39, pp. 45–75. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v39i1.98; Sandoval, R. (2003). El utilitarismo: referente de la teoría Rawlsiana. Eidos, 1, pp. 48–61. https://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/1521; Santas, G. (2001). Goodness and Justice. Plato, Aristotle and the Moderns. Blackwell.; Saroglou, V., & Craninx, M. (2021). Religious moral righteousness over care: A review and a meta-analysis. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.002; Scanlon, T. M. (2003). Contractualism and utilitarianism. En Scanlon, T. M. The difficulty of tolerance: essays in political philosophy (pp. 124–150). Cambridge University Press.; Scheler, M. (2001). Ética: nuevo ensayo de fundamentación de un personalismo ético (H. Rodriguez Sanz, Trad.). Caparrós. (Trabajo original publicado en 1913); Scheler, M. (2003). Ordo Amoris. En Good, P. Gramática de los sentimientos. Lo emocional como fundamento de la ética (D. Gamper, Trad.). Crítica. (Trabajo original publicado en 1957); Schneewind, J. B. (1992). Autonomy, obligation, and virtue: An overview of Kant’s moral philosophy. En P. Guyer (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Kant (pp. 309–341). Cambridge University Press.; Schneewind, J. B. (1998). The invention of autonomy. A history of modern moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press.; Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 878–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878; Shweder, R. (1984). Anthropology's romantic rebellion against the enlightenment, or there's more to thinking than reason and evidence. En R. Shweder & R. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 27–66). Cambridge University Press.; Shweder, R. A., & Haidt, J. (1993). The future of moral psychology: Truth, intuition, and the pluralist way. Psychological Science, 4(6), 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00582.x; Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and Moral Development. En Jerome Kagan & Sharon Lamb (Eds.). The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). University of Chicago Press.; Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt, & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). Routledge.; Simkin, H., & Etchezahar, E. (2013). Las orientaciones religiosas extrínseca e intrínseca: validación de la “Age Universal” I-E Scale en el contexto Argentino. Psykhe: Revista de la Escuela de Psicología, 22(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.22.1.477; Sperber, D. (2005). Modularity and relevance: How can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive? En P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. Stich (eds.), The innate mind: Structure and contents (Vol. 1, pp. 53–68). Oxford University Press.; Stratton-Lake, P. (2020). Intuitionism in ethics. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Ed. Verano 2020). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/intuitionism-ethics; Suhler, C. L., & Churchland, P. (2011). Can innate, modular “foundations” explain morality?Challenges for Haidt’s moral foundations theory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2103–2116. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21637; Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Harvard University Press.; Tiberius, V. (2013). Well-being, wisdom, and thick theorizing: on the division of labor between moral philosophy and positive psychology. En S. Kirchin (Ed.), Thick concepts (pp. 217–233). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672349.003.0013; Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). Resolving the debate on innate ideas: Learnability constraints and the evolved interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions. En P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. Stich (eds.), The innate mind: Structure and contents (Vol. 1, pp. 305–337). Oxford University Press.; Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755; Trizano-Hermosilla, I., Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach's alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769; Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.; Verbakel, E., & Jaspers, E. (2010). A comparative study on permissiveness toward euthanasia: religiosity, slippery slope, autonomy, and death with dignity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp074; Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807; Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063; Williams, B. (2011). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Routledge.; Wood, A. W. (2005). Kant. Blackwell.; Yáñez-Canal, J. (2019). Lawrence Kohlberg y la psicología moral: trayectoria y variaciones conceptuales. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología, 12(3), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.12304; Yánez-Canal, J. & Fonseca, M. A. (2012). Lawrence Kohlberg, un camino extendido hacia la sabiduría. En J. Yáñez-Canal, J. Chaparro & L. Segovia (Eds.), Experticia, sabiduría y desarrollo moral (pp. 15–66). Universidad Minuto de Dios.; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/86550; Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/

  3. 3
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    المؤلفون: Ospina Castañeda, Santiago

    المساهمون: Ávila Gaitan , Iván Darío

    وصف الملف: 135 Páginas; application/pdf

    Relation: Adamo, P. (26 de junio 2023). A diferencia de la tragedia del Titán, el naufragio de Grecia fue tratado como carente de protagonistas y de héroes. BBC NEWS. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-66020301; Ávila, I. D. (2013). De la Isla del Doctor Moreau al Planeta de los simios: La dicotomía humano/animal como problema político. Bogotá, Colombia. Ediciones desde abajo.; Ávila, I.D. (2016), octubre. La cuestión animal (ista). Bogotá, Colombia. Ediciones desde abajo.; Ávila, I.D. (2017). El Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Críticos Animales como proyecto decolonial. Tabula rasa, volumen (27), 339-35; Ávila, I.D. (2019). Las fronteras de Las fronteras de la justicia: Notas para una crítica materialista del animalismo liberal. S.E; Ávila, I.D. (2019). Los animales ante la muerte del hombre: (Tecno) biopoder y performances de la (des) domesticación. Tabula Rasa, 31, 251-268. DOI: https://www.revistatabularasa.org/numero31/los-animales-ante-la-muerte-del-hombretecnobiopoder- y-performances-de-la-desdomesticacion/; Ávila, I.D. (16 de mayo de 2023). Entrevista a Iván Darío Ávila Gaitán. Glosario de resistencia animal(ista) parte 2. Antropolgia de la Vida Animal. https://www.antropologiavidaanimal.es/blog/entrevista-a-ivan-dario-avila-gaitanglosario- de-resistencia-animalista-parte- 2/?fbclid=IwAR1wVKbgDGjaZ8jRMcxrEBIqlZvirY9qEdS8_o83vTwvi3Yul1_Bi0LUA CE; Bekoff, M. (2003). Nosotros los animales. Madrid, España. Editorial Trotta.; Best, S. (2013). El Surgimiento de los Estudios Críticos Animalistas. Ecosofía (1), 37-63.; Comisión de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas. (1948). Declaración universal de los derechos humanos. Naciones Unidas. Recuperado de: https://www.un.org/es/aboutus/ universal-declaration-of-human-rights; de julio de 2012). La declaración de Cambridge sobre la consciencia. Ética Animal. https://www.animal-ethics.org/declaracion-consciencia-cambridge/; Donaldson y Kimlicka, 2018. Zoópolis, una revolución animalista. Madrid, España. Errata Naturae Editores.; Francione, G. (2009). Introducción a los derechos animales ¿tu hijo o el perro? S.E; González, A. Ávila, I.D. (2014). Resistencia animal: ética, perspectivismo y política de subversión.; Revista LECA, volumen (I), 31-72; Gómez, J. (2013). Reseña. Iván Darío Ávila Gaitán. De la Isla del Doctor Moreau al Planeta de los simios: La dicotomía humano/animal como problema político. Revista Pléyade, volumen (12), 227-232.; Habermas, J. (2010). El concepto de dignidad humana y la utopía realista de los derechos humanos. Revista Dianoia, volumen (64), 3-25.; Horta, O. (2010). La desconsideración moral de los animales no humanos en la bioética. Isegoría; Horta, O. (2011). La argumentación de Singer en Liberación animal: concepciones normativas, interés en vivir y agregacionismo. Revista Dianoia, Volumen 67, pp. 65-85; Horta, O. (2017). Un paso adelante en defensa de los animales. Madrid, España. Plaza y Valdés Editores; Horta, O. (2020). ¿Qué es el especismo? Devenires, volumen (48), 163-198.; Kant, I. (2012). Fundamentación para una metafísica de las costumbres. Madrid, España. Alianza editorial.; Londoño, D. (2016). La cuestión del reconocimiento de la personalidad jurídica de los animales no humanos. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad tecnológica de Pereira] repositorio institucional – Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira.; López, I. (20 de marzo de 2023). Entrevista a Imanol López Barrios. Glosario de resistencia animal(ista) parte 1. Antropología de la Vida Animal. https://www.antropologiavidaanimal.es/blog/entrevista-a-imanol-lopez-barrios-glosariode- resistencia-animalista-parte- 1/?fbclid=IwAR3crH2B1QZxVD76POa4bq3d8jPw6r3wDhN8l825TpfQiGNPJICzHQLk cTc; Lucumí, J.P. (15 de junio de 2023). Naufragio en la costa griega. France 24. https://www.france24.com/es/europa/20230615-naufragio-en-la-costa-griega-el-rostrode- los-migrantes-y-sus-familiares; Michelini, D. (2010). Dignidad humana en Kant y Habermas. Revista anual de la Unidad de Historiografía e Historia de las Ideas, volumen (12), 41-49.; Muñoz, D. (2020). La dignidad: ¿un concepto especista? Aproximación en perspectiva posthumanista. Muñoz, D. (Ed), La dignidad humana puesta en cuestión: aportes críticos en torno a una idea fundamental (pp. 43-84). Editorial Bonaventuriana.; Nussbaum, M. (2007). Las fronteras de la justicia. Consideraciones sobre la exclusión. Barcelona, España. Ediciones Paidos Ibérica.; Pezzeta, S. (2018). El reconocimiento de los derechos políticos de los demás animales en la obra de Donaldson y Kymlicka, Zoópolis. Revista LECA, volumen (II), 333-343.; Regan, T. (2016). En defensa de los derechos de los animales. Ciudad de México, México. Fondo de cultura económica.; Regan. (2006). Jaulas vacías. España. Ediciones Altarriba.; Singer, P. (1999). Liberación animal. Madrid, España. Editorial Trotta.; Spaemann, R. (1988). Sobre el concepto de dignidad humana. Persona y Derecho, (19), 13-33.; Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira; Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira; https://repositorio.utp.edu.co/home; https://hdl.handle.net/11059/14989

  4. 4
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    المساهمون: Serrano Escallón, Gonzalo

    وصف الملف: 104 páginas; application/pdf

    Relation: Allen, C., Wallach, W., & Smit, I. (2011). Why machine ethics? In Machine Ethics (Vol. 9780521112352). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.005; Andersen, L. (2021). Human Rights in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24.; Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2007). Machine ethics: Creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Magazine, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075011-8; Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139046855.020; Bostrom, N., Ettinger, R. C. W., & Tandy, C. (2004). Death and Anti-Death, Volume 2: Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 64.; Bradley, T. (2017). Facebook AI Creates Its Own Language In Creepy Preview Of Our Potential Future. Forbes. Caliskan, A., Bryson, J.; Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora necessarily contain human biases. Science, 356(6334).; Dennett, D. (1994). Artificial Life as Philosophy. Artificial Life, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1162/artl.1994.1.3.291; Everitt, T., & Hutter, M. (2018). Universal artificial intelligence: Practical agents and fundamental challenges. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Vol. 117). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3_2; Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5; Friedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Bias in Computer Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/230538.230561; Función Pública. (1982) Ley 23 de 1982. Recuperado de https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=3431; Función Pública. (1993). Ley 44 de 1993. Recuperado de https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=3429#:~:text=%2D%20Incurrir%C3%A1%20en%20prisi%C3%B3n%20de%20dos,expresa%20del%20titular%20del%20derecho; Función Pública. (2015). Decreto 1066 de 2015 Sector Administrativo del Interior. Recuperado de https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=76835; Gips, J. (2011). Towards the ethical robot. In Machine Ethics (Vol. 9780521112352). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.015; Goertzel, B. (2014). Artificial General Intelligence: Concept, State of the Art, and Future Prospects. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2014-0001; Good, I. J. (1966). Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2458(08)60418-0; Greenwald, A. G., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2014). With malice toward none and charity for some: Ingroup favoritism enables discrimination. American Psychologist, 69(7). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036056; Guarini, M. (2006). Particularism and the classification and reclassification of moral cases. In IEEE Intelligent Systems (Vol. 21, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.76; Harari, Y. N. (2017). Reboot for the AI revolution. Nature, 550(7676). https://doi.org/10.1038/550324a; Harari, Y. N. (2018). Homo Deus Breve historia del mañana (1st ed.). DEBATE.; Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 lecciones para el siglo XXI (1st ed.). DEBATE.; Hugo De, G., & Goertzel, B. (2009). Report on the first conference on artificial general intelligence (AGI-08). AI Magazine, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v30i1.2151; Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2; John P, S. (2011). When is a robot a moral agent? In Machine Ethics (Vol. 9780521112352). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.010; Kukita, M. (2017). When HAL Kills, Stop Asking Who’s to Blame.; Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4; Moor, J. H. (2011). The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics. In Machine Ethics (Vol. 9780521112352). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.002; Moor, J. H. (1985). WHAT IS COMPUTER ETHICS? Metaphilosophy, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x; Moor, J. H. (2017). Are there decisions computers should never make? In Computer Ethics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-39; Nemitz, P. (2018). Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (Vol. 376, Issue 2133). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089; Omohundro, S. M. (2008). The basic AI drives. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 171(1). https://doi.org/10.18254/s207751800009748-1; Omohundro, S. (2007). The nature of self-improving artificial intelligence. Singularity Summit, 5.; Omohundro, S. (2016). Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence Autonomous technology and the greater human good. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 263.; OpenAI. (2023). OpenAI Terms of Use. Recuperado de https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use; ChatGPT. (2023, 10 de julio). "Cuando se creó la primera computadora" y "Cuando se creó el machine learning" [Conversación en línea]. Mensaje publicado en https://conv.example.com/chatgpt/conversation; OpenAI. (2023). La Ilustración de Kant: El poder de la razón y la emancipación intelectual. [ChatGPT iOS app]. OpenAI.; OpenAI. (2023, July 7). ChatGPT iOS App Conversation [Chat log]. iOS App Version 1.0.0. Tomado de https://chat.openai.com/c/5e4aa563-e0bb-467b-8c19-702b580d63de; Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA). (1993). Decisión 351: Régimen común sobre Derecho de autor y Derechos conexos. Recuperado de http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/junac/decisiones/dec351s.asp; Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756; Siau, K., & Wang, W. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) Ethics: Ethics of AI and ethical AI. In Journal of Database Management (Vol. 31, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2020040105; Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (2015). CONCEPTO No. 02 de 2015. Recuperado de http://www.legal.unal.edu.co/rlunal/home/doc.jsp?d_i=87497; Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (2003). ACUERDO 035 de 2003. Recuperado de http://www.legal.unal.edu.co/rlunal/home/doc.jsp?d_i=34248#:~:text=ART%C3%8DCULO%2014.&text=El%20derecho%20de%20autor%20protege,re%C3%BAnen%20caracter%C3%ADsticas%20de%20creaci%C3%B3n%20original; Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (2012). CIRCULAR No. 1 de 2012. Recuperado de http://www.legal.unal.edu.co/rlunal/home/doc.jsp?d_i=44925; Urbina, F., Lowden, C. T., Culberson, J. C., & Ekins, S. (2022). MegaSyn: Integrating Generative Molecular Design, Automated Analog Designer, and Synthetic Viability Prediction. ACS Omega, 7(22). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01404; VINGE, V. (1993). The coming singularity: how to survive in the post-human era. Vision 21: Interdiscipinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace.; Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. In Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001; Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., Dihal, K., & Cave, S. (2019). Ethical and societal implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: a roadmap for research. Nuffield Foundation.; Allen, C., Smit, I., & Wallach, W. (2005). Artificial morality: Top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0004-4; Anderson, S. L. (2011). Machine metaethics. In Machine Ethics (Vol. 9780521112352). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.003; Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016, May 23). Machine Bias: Risk Assessments in Criminal Sentencing. ProPublica. Retrieved from https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing; Arkoudas, K., & Bringsjord, S. (2014). Philosophical foundations. In The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139046855.004; Bedau, M. A. (2003). Artificial life: Organization, adaptation and complexity from the bottom up. In Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Vol. 7, Issue 11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.012; Bradley, T. (2017, July 31). Facebook AI Creates Its Own Language in Creepy Preview of Our Potential Future. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/tonybradley/2017/07/31/facebook-ai-creates-its-own-language-in-creepy-preview-of-our-potential-future/; Bundy, A. (2017). Preparing for the future of Artificial Intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0685-0; Bynum, T. W. (2012). The historical roots of information and computer ethics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511845239.003; Deep Mind (2023, Julio). RoboCat: A Self-Improving Robotic Agent. DeepMind Blog. Retrieved from https://www.deepmind.com/blog/robocat-a-self-improving-robotic-agent; Dennett, D. C. (2020). When HAL Kills, Who’s to Blame? Computer Ethics. In HAL’s Legacy (pp. 351–365). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3404.003.0018; Dwoskin, E. (2018, July 26). Amazon Pushes ICE to Buy Its Face Recognition Surveillance Tech. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/technology/amazon-aclu-facial-recognition-congress.html; Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. In Minds and Machines (Vol. 14, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d; Grossman, L. (2014, June 9). Computer Program Claims to Have Passed the Turing Test. TIME. Retrieved from https://time.com/2847900/eugene-goostman-turing-test/; Greene, D., Hoffmann, A. L., & Stark, L. (2019). Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019-January. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.258; J. Storrs, H. (2011). Ethics for machines. In Machine Ethics (Vol. 9780521112352). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.004; Jolie, A. (2013, May 13). My Medical Choice. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/my-medical-choice.html; Johnson, D. G. (2011). Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents. In Machine Ethics (Vol. 9780521112352). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.012; King, T. C., Aggarwal, N., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Crime: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Foreseeable Threats and Solutions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-00081-0; Koolen, C., & van Cranenburgh, A. (2017). These are not the Stereotypes You are Looking For: Bias and Fairness in Authorial Gender Attribution. EACL 2017 - Ethics in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the 1st ACL Workshop. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-1602; McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (2006). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 27(4).; McCarthy, J. (2021). What is AI? / Basic Questions. Stanford.; McDermott, D. (2011). What Matters to a Machine? In Machine Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511978036.010; Mitcham, C. (1996). Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy, Carl Mitcham. 1994. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769601600315; Nagel, T. (2016). WHAT IS IT LIKE TO BE A BAT? In Journey into Philosophy: An Introduction with Classic and Contemporary Readings. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1477175616000336; Peter Stone, E. (2016). Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030. One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 Study Panel, September.; Robinson, W. S. (2014). Philosophical challenges. In The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139046855.005; Sullins, J. P. (2005). Ethics and artificial life: From modeling to moral agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0003-5; Sweeney, L. (2013). Discrimination in online Ad delivery. Communications of the ACM, 56(5). https://doi.org/10.1145/2447976.2447990; Taddeo, M. (2018). The Limits of Deterrence Theory in Cyberspace. Philosophy and Technology, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0290-2; The Washington Post. (2023, March 5). How AI Voice Technology is Being Used in Scams. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/03/05/ai-voice-scam/; Toronto Sun. (2016, May 13). Woman follows GPS, ends up in Ontario lake. Retrieved from https://torontosun.com/2016/05/13/woman-follows-gps-ends-up-in-ontario-lake; Torrance, S. (2011). Machine ethics and the idea of a more-than-human moral world. In Machine Ethics (Vol. 9780521112352). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.008; Turkle, S. (2011). Authenticity in the age of digital companions. In Machine Ethics (Vol. 9780521112352). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.006; Turner A. (2023). How Many People Have Smartphones Worldwide (Jun 2023). BankMyCell.; Vincent, J. (2018, January 12). Google’s racist algorithm comes back to haunt the company. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/12/16882408/google-racist-gorillas-photo-recognition-algorithm-ai; Virtuoso.tech. (s. f.). AI Brings More Convincing Phishing Scams for Business Owners. Recuperado de https://virtuoso.tech/ai-brings-more-convincing-phishing-scams-for-business-owners/; (No author mentioned). (2023, May 22). A.I. That Labels Photos From Google and Apple Comes Under Scrutiny. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/22/technology/ai-photo-labels-google-apple.html; (No author mentioned). (s. f.). Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) are Facing Their Own Version of the Trolley Problem. Futurity. Retrieved from https://www.futurity.org/autonomous-vehicles-av-ethics-trolley-problem-2863992-2/; (No author mentioned). (s. f.). Billionaire Wealth Has Surged by $5.5 Trillion During the Pandemic — But Elon Musk Still Thinks a Tax on the Rich is a 'Power Grab'. Global Citizen. Retrieved from https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/wealth-inequality-oxfam-billionaires-elon-musk/; (No author mentioned). (s. f.). ChatGPT-4 Reinforces Sexist Stereotypes. Equality Now. Retrieved from https://www.equalitynow.org/news_and_insights/chatgpt-4-reinforces-sexist-stereotypes/; (No author mentioned). (2023, March). March 2023 Global Poverty Update: World Bank Challenge Estimating Poverty Pandemic. World Bank Blogs - Open Data. Retrieved from https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/march-2023-global-poverty-update-world-bank-challenge-estimating-poverty-pandemic; (No author mentioned). (2022, November 28). Meta fined €227 million by Ireland's DPC over data leak. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/28/23481786/meta-fine-facebook-data-leak-ireland-dpc-gdpr; (No author mentioned). (2019, February 14). OpenAI restricts access to dangerous text-generating AI. Nature. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00673-1; (No author mentioned). (s. f.). Our Machines Now Have Knowledge We'll Never Understand. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/our-machines-now-have-knowledge-well-never-understand/; n.d. (2017). Report of COMEST on Robotics Ethics. https://unescoblob.blob.core.windows.net/pdf/UploadCKEditor/REPORT%20OF%20COMEST%20ON%20ROBOTICS%20ETHICS%2014.09.17.pdf; (No author mentioned). (2023, February). Silicon Valley Inequality. CalMatters. Retrieved from https://calmatters.org/california-divide/2023/02/silicon-valley-inequality/; (No author mentioned). (2016, January 23). Survival of the Richest. Oxfam Library. Retrieved from https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621477/bp-survival-of-the-richest-160123-en.pdf; (No author mentioned). (2023, May 3). Which countries are trying to regulate artificial intelligence? Euronews. Retrieved from https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/05/03/which-countries-are-trying-to-regulate-artificial-intelligence; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/85311; Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia; https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/