يعرض 1 - 13 نتائج من 13 نتيجة بحث عن '"電腦輔助合作學習"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.51s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Dissertation/ Thesis
  4. 4
    Dissertation/ Thesis
  5. 5
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    المؤلفون: 林靜宜

    المساهمون: 洪煌堯

    Time: 27

    وصف الملف: 10251619 bytes; application/pdf

    Relation: 中文部分; 丁嘉琦(1999)。花蓮縣國小教師科學本質觀點之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國; 民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。; 李悅美(2002)。國民小學高年級學童科學本質觀之研究。台北市立師範學院; 科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。; 林陳涌(1995)。高中學生對科學本質了解之研究。NSC84-2511-S-003-; 083,行政院國家科學委員會。; 林陳涌 (1996)。「了解科學本質量表」之發展與效化。科學教育學刊,4; (1),1-58。; 邱明富(2003)。科學史融入教學以提升國小學童科學本質觀與對科學態度之; 行動研究。國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。; 洪文東(1999)。科學的創造發明與發現。台北市,臺灣書店。; 高慧蓮和蘇明洲(2000)。科學的本質與哲學觀的演進。屏東科學教育月刊,; 12,2-15。; 張巨青、吳寅華 (1994)。邏輯與歷史:現代科學方法論的嬗變。台北市:淑; 馨出版社。; 陸慧英(2003)。利用線上協作改變教育範式─以建構新知為教育目標與手; 段。載於陳懷德、黃亮華(主編),邁向數位學社會(161-171頁)。台北; 市:遠流。; 許玫理(1992)。我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之調查研究。國立; 彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。; 張鳳琴(1994)。高雄地區公立高中學生對科學知識本質之看法。國立高雄師; 範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。; 郭重卲和許玫理(1992):從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教育的過去與未; 來。彰化師範大學學報,3,531-560。; 郭重卲(1996)。建構論:科學哲學的省思。教育研究雙月刊,49,16-23。; 陳文言(2006)。以多媒體將科學史融入自然與生活科技課程對學生的科學本; 質觀與科學態度之影響研究。國立新竹教育大學應用科學系碩士論文,未; 出版,新竹市。; 莊嘉坤(1995)。國小學童對科學的態度探討。八十四年度師範學院教育學術; 論文發表會論文集,2,1-20。; 黃鴻博(1998)。國民小學教師對科學本質信念之研究。中師數理學報,1,; 189-221。; 黃寶蓉 (2000)。科學本質在教與學的意涵之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教; 育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。; 程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥(譯)(1994)。Thomas S. Kuhn(著)。; 科學陏命的結構。台北市:遠流。; 舒煒光、邱仁宗(1990)。當代西方科學哲學評述。台北市:水牛出版社。; 詹志禹(1996)。認識與知識:建構論vs 接受觀。教育研究雙月刊,49,; 25-38。; 董庭豪(2009)。透過電腦助合作活動增進國小學童數學估算表現之研; 究。國立新竹教育大學數位學科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。; 謝薰靜(2005)。中小學教師對科學本質與科學史教學需求性的研究。國立台; 中教育大學自然科學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台中市。; 蘇義賢(2008)。電腦模擬教學在高中生活科技之應用─以室內配線教學為; 例。國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。; 西文部分; Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, C. G. (1998).; The nature of science and instructional practice; making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82; 417-436.; Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, C. G. (2000). The influence; of history of science course on students’ views of; nature of science. Journal of Research in Science; Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.; Abimbola, I. O. (1983). The relevance of the ―new‖; philosophy of science for the science curriculum.; School Science and Mathematics, 83, 181-193.; Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of; Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 39-55.; Cleminson, A. (1990). Establishing an epistemological base; for science teaching in the light of contemporary; notions of the nature science and of how children learn; science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27; (5), 429-445.; Criffiths, A. K., & Barman, C. R. (1995). High school; students’ views about the nature of science: Results; from three countries. School Science and Mathematics, 95; (5), 248-255.; Chen, G. D., Ou, K. L., C. C., & Liu, B. J., (2001).; Intervention and strategy analysis for web group-; learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1); 58-72.; Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess; views on nature of science and attitudes toward; teaching science. Science Education, 90(5), 803-819.; Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996).; Young people's image of science. Buckingham, UK: Open; University Press.; Harasim, L. M. (1993). Networks: Computers and; international communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.; Harasim, L., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995).; Learning networks: a field guide to teaching and; learning online: Mit Press.; Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E.; (2003). The nature of learners' science content; understandings with the use of on-line resources.; Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346.; Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L.; (2008). Principle-based design to foster adaptive use; of technology for building community knowledge. In G.; Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P.A. Kirschner, & F.J. Prins; (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning; Sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the; Eighth International Conference for the Learning; Sciences – ICLS 2008, Vol. 1 (pp. 374-381). Utrecht; the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning; Sciences, Inc.; Hong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-; centered, principle-based design approach to support; learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology; Research & Development, 57(5), 613-627.; Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together; and alone: cooperative, competitive, and; individualistic learning. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.; Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools; Engaging Critical Thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle; River, N.J.: Merrill.; Katz, S., & Lesgold, A. (1993). Collaborative Problem-; Solving and Reflection in Sherlock II. Paper presented; at the Workshop on Collaborative Problem Solving; Theoretical frameworks and Innovative systems; Edinburgh.; Koschmann, T. (1996). Computer Supported Collaborative; Learning: theory and practice of an emerging paradigm.; New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum.; Lederman, N. G. (1986). Relating teaching behavior and; classroom climate to change in students’ conceptions; of nature of science. Science Education, 70(1), 3-19.; Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’; conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the; research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29; (4), 331-359.; Marble, S. T, (1992). Student descriptions of the nature of; science. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at; Austin). (University Microfilms NO AAC93-0227).; Nussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual change; Philosophical perspectives. International Journal of; Science Education, 11, 530-540.; Owston, R. D. (1997). The world wide web: A technology to; enhance teaching and learning. Educational Researcher; 27-33.; Parker, R. (1984). Small-group cooperative learning in the; classroom. (ERIC No. 242065).; Proper, H., Wideen, M. F., & Ivany, G. (1988). World view; projected by science teachers: a study of classroom; dialogue. Science Education, 72(5), 547-560.; Pena-Shalf, J. B.,& Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student; interactions and meaning construction in computer; bulletin board discussions. Computers and Education, 42; (3), 243-265.; Palmquist, B. C. & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice; teacher’s views of the science during a; postbaccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of; arch in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595-615.; Roach, L. E. & Wandersee, J. H. (1993). Short story; sience: Using historical vignettes as teaching tool. The Science Teacher, 60(6), 18-21.Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Chaudhury, S. R., Dimitriadis, Y., Patton, C., & DiGiano, C. (2007). Ink, Improvisation, and Interactive Engagement: Learning with Tablets. Computer, 40(9), 42-48.Savoraara, H. (2005). An exploration of students’ strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 39-52.; Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilley (Eds.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.; Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a kowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.; Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan Reference, USA.; Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.; Scardamalia, M., &Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer(Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp.97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.; Slavin, R. E. (1985). Team-Assisted Individualization: Combining Cooperative Learning and Individualized Instruction in Mathematics. In Slavin, R. E., Sharan, S., Kagan, Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Webb, C.& Schmuck, R. (Eds). Learning to Cooperative, Cooperating to Learn (pp.177-209). New York: Plenum.; Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83(4), 493-509.; Songer, N., & Linn, M. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of research in science teaching, 28, 761-784.; Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (4), 409-421.; Suchin, V. (1993). Effect of research experience on teachers'' perceptions of the nature science (science training). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.; Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.; Stahl, G. (2000). A model of Collaborative Knowledge –Building. In B.Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds), Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp.70-77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.; Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, form; http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf; Suthers, D. (1998). Technical report: Computer Aided Education and Training Initiative. Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.; Sun, K. T., Lin, Y. C. & Yu, C. J. (2008). A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Computers & Education, 50, 1411-1422.; Tomlinson, H., & Henderson, W. (1995). Computer supported collaborative learning in schools: a distributed approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 131-140.; Tsai, C. C. (1998). An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientations of Taiwanese eighth graders. Science Education, 82(4), 473-789.; Tsai, C. C.,& Kuo, P. C. (2008). Cram school students’ conceptions of learning and learning science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 353-375.; Teo Yiong-Hwee & Churchill, D. (2007). Using sentence opener to support students’ argumentation in an online learning environment. Educational Media International, 44(3), 207-218.; Wolfer, A. J., Robinson, J. B., Mason, S. L., Heppert, J. A., & Eills, J. D. (2001). Effect of problem-based inquiry laboratory experience on general chemistry students’ understandings of the nature of science. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching National Meeting, St. Louis, MO, March 2001.; G0096152003; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/49785

  6. 6
    Dissertation/ Thesis
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13