-
1Academic Journal
المؤلفون: Chen, Yanhong, Liu, Luning, Zhang, Zhenyuan
المصدر: Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 2023, Vol. 14, Issue 5, pp. 838-856.
-
2Dissertation/ Thesis
المؤلفون: 詹沐融, Chan, Mu-Jung
المساهمون: 胡偉民 黃柏鈞, Hu, Wei-Min Huang, Po-Chun
مصطلحات موضوعية: 貧困縣政策, 財政貪腐, 雙重差分法, Poverty alleviation policies, Corruption, Difference-in-difference method
وصف الملف: 1451520 bytes; application/pdf
Relation: 陳剛, 李樹, & 尹希果. (2008). 腐敗與中國經濟增長——實證主義的視角. 經濟社會體制比較, 3, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-3947.2008.03.010 仇童偉, & 彭嫦燕. (2023). 脫貧摘帽的經濟影響及財政扶持績效——來自中國地方政府財政預決算的證據. 中國經濟學, 1(5), 104-139. 馮振強. (2016). 貪腐原因探究. 中外企業家, 4X, 253–254. 何強. (2016). 國家級貧困縣都出了哪些巨貪. 雜文選刊：上半月, 6, 56–57. 黃志平. (2018). 國家級貧困縣的設立推動了當地經濟發展嗎?——基於 PSM-DID 方法的實證研究. 中國農村經濟, 5, 98–111. 人民網. (2018, January 14). 貧困縣成為扶貧貪腐重災區 村幹部違紀縣紀委壓案不辦. http://politics.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2018/0114/c1001-29763187.html 人民網. (2019, July 30). 主政深度貧困縣五年受賄1400多萬. http://fanfu.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2019/0730/c64371-31264329.html 宋小寧, & 佟健. (2013). 財政轉移支付資金被濫用的原因分析. 經濟經緯, 3, 141–144. 王煥剛, 張程, & 聶常虹. (2021). 我國扶貧政策演進歷程與農村社會的多維度變遷: 分析與啟示. 中國科學院院刊, 36(7), 787-796. 謝來位. (2014). 推進公務用車管理改革的對策研究. 理論與改革, 2, 88–91. 嚴仍昱. (2013). “三公經費”公開：意義、現狀及完善——以中央部門“三公經費”公開為例. 廣州大學學報（社會科學版）, 12(6), 12–16. 周浩. (2012). “三公經費”管理存在的問題及對策. 交通財會, 6, 35–38. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9016.2012.06.012 袁飛, 陶然, 徐志剛, & 劉明興. (2008). 財政集權過程中的轉移支付和財政供養人 口規模膨脹. 經濟研究, 5, 70–80. 徐彥平. (2014). 國家貧困縣政策改革的路徑依賴及其破解之道. 理論導刊, 9, 14–16. 宣講家網. (2014, February 27). 為什麼爭當貧困縣？http://www.71.cn/2014/0227/760403.shtml 環球網. (2015, October 09). 審計署公告：廣西部分貧困縣「窮人」買車2645輛. https://china.huanqiu.com/article/9CaKrn 王愛雲.（2019）. 改革開放40年中國農村扶貧開發歷程與經驗.泰山學院學報， 41（1）， 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2590.2019.01.002 Angrist, J. D., Angrist, J. D., & Jörn-Steffen Pischke. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. (1st ed., pp. 1–373). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829828 Abadie, A., & Vives-i-Bastida, J. (2022). Synthetic controls in action. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.06279 Arkhangelsky, D., Athey, S., Hirshberg, D. A., Imbens, G. W., & Wager, S. (2021). Synthetic difference-in-differences. American Economic Review, 111(12), 4088–4118. Austin, P. C., & Stuart, E. A. (2015). Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34(28), 3661–3679. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6607 Arce, J. S. S. (2016). The political logic of poverty relief: Electoral strategies and social policy in Mexico. Foro Internacional, 56(4), 1160-. Brollo, F. (2010). The political resource curse (Issue w15705). SSRN. Clarke, D., Pailañir, D., Athey, S., & Imbens, G. (2023). Synthetic difference in differences estimation. arXiv.Org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2301.11859 de Kadt, D., & Lieberman, E. S. (n.d.). Do citizens reward good service? Voter responses to basic service provision in Southern Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2668334 Imbens, G., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences : an introduction / Guido W. Imbens (Stanford University), Donald B. Rubin (Harvard University). Cambridge University Press. Jacobs, A. (2013, March 27). Elite in China face austerity under Xi’s rule. The New York Times. Nwabuzor, A. (2005). Corruption and development: New initiatives in economic openness and strengthened rule of law. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1–2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3402-3 Qian, N., & Wen, J. Y. (2015). The impact of Xi Jinping's anti-corruption campaign on luxury imports in China (Preliminary draft). Qin, C., & Chong, T. T. L. (2018). Can poverty be alleviated in China? The Review of Income and Wealth, 64(1), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12273 Quah, D. (2003). One third of the world’s growth and inequality. In T. S. Eicher & S. J. Turnovsky (Eds.), Growth and inequality: Issues and policy implications. The CESifo Seminar Series. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33-. https://doi.org/10.2307/2683903 Wang, K. (2022). Does poverty relief breed corruption? An evaluation of China’s poverty alleviation program. Chinese Journal of Political Science, 27(2), 341–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-021-09785-w; G0111255025; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152913; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/152913/1/502501.pdf
-
3Dissertation/ Thesis
المؤلفون: 戴俊安, Tai, Chun-An
المساهمون: 胡偉民, Hu, Wei-Min
مصطلحات موضوعية: 雙重差分法, 脫貧摘帽, 經濟成長, Difference-in-Differences, Being Lifted out of Poverty, Economic Growth
وصف الملف: 2159488 bytes; application/pdf
Relation: 一、 中文部分 仇童偉、彭嫦燕（2023）。脫貧摘帽的經濟影響及財政扶持績效—來自中國地方政府財政預決算的證據，《中國經濟學》，（5），104-139。 尹志超、郭沛瑤（2021）。精準扶貧政策效果評估—家庭消費視角下的實證研究，《管理世界》，（4）。 方迎風（2019）。國家級貧困縣的經濟增長與減貧效應—基於中國縣級面板資料的實證分析，《社會科學研究》，（1），15-25。 王美艷（2014）。農民工的貧困狀況與影響因素—兼與城市居民比較，《宏觀經濟研究》，（9），3-16。 王藝敏、劉志紅（2016）。大型公共支出項目的政策效果估計—以「八七扶貧攻堅計劃」為例，《財貿經濟》，（1），33-47。 田勇、殷俊與薛慧元（2019）。“輸血”還是“造血”？面向農戶的公共轉移支付的減貧效應評估—基於農業產出的視角》，《經濟問題》，（3）。 朱夢冰、李實（2017）。精準扶貧重在精準識別貧困人口—農村低保政策的瞄準效果分析，《中國社會科學》，（9）。 范燕麗、叢樹海與郗曼（2021）。從“爭窮保帽”到“主動摘帽” ：正向激勵與農民持續增收，《財政研究》，（12）。 郭熙保、周強（2016）。長期多維貧困、不平等與致貧因素，《經濟研究》，（6），143-156。 黄志平（2018）。國家級貧困縣的設立推動了當地經濟發展嗎?—基於 PSM-DID 方法的實證研究，《中國農村經濟》，（5），98-111。 劉冬梅（2001）。中國政府開發式扶貧資金投放效果的實證研究，《管理世界》，（6），123-131。 劉瑞明、趙仁傑（2015）。西部大開發：增長驅動還是政策陷阱—基於PSM-DID方法的研究，《中國工業經濟》，（6）。 鄭家喜、江帆（2016）。國家扶貧開發工作重點縣政策：驅動增長、縮小差距，還是政策失靈—基於PSM-DID方法的研究，《經濟問題探索》，（12）。 賴玥、成天柱（2014）。財政扶貧的效率損失—基於財政激勵視角的縣級面板數據分析，《經濟問題》，（5），33-37。 韓依依（2022）。貧困縣“脫貧摘帽”對居民儲蓄的影響—基於PSM-漸進DID的估計。中央財金大學，行政管理碩士論文。 二、 英文部分 Alder, S., Shao, L., & Zilibotti, F. (2013). Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 305-349. Duclos, J. Y., Araar, A., & Giles, J. (2010). Chronic and transient poverty：Measurement and estimation, with evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 91, 266-277. Gustafsson, B., & Zhong, W. (2000). How and Why Has Poverty in China Changed? A Study Based on Microdata for 1988 and 1995. The China Quarterly, 164, 983-1006. Heckscher, E., & Ohlin, B. (1933). International and inter-regional trade. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Knowles, S. (2005). Inequality and economic growth：The empirical relationship reconsidered in the light of comparable data. Journal of Development Studies, 41, 135-159. Myrdal, K. G. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. London：Gerald Duckworth. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39 (1), 33-38. Ward, P. S. (2016). Transient poverty, poverty dynamics, and vulnerability to poverty： An empirical analysis using a balanced panel from rural China. World Development, 78, 541-553.; G0111255018; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152909; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/152909/1/501801.pdf
-
4Dissertation/ Thesis
المؤلفون: 莊淑君, Chuang, Shu-Chun
المساهمون: 黃嘉威, Huang, Chia-Wei
مصطلحات موضوعية: 境外資金匯回專法, 資本支出, 研發支出, 經營績效, 雙重差分法, 三重差分法, Overseas fund repatriation act, Capital expenditure, Research and development expenditure, Operational performance, Difference-in-differences, Triple difference
وصف الملف: 2358253 bytes; application/pdf
Relation: 王佩如（2021）。境外資金匯回管理運用及課稅條例對台灣中小企業主之影響 〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班。 林巧燕（2021）。境外資金匯回管理運用及課稅條例專法之探討 〔未出版之碩士論文〕。東吳大學法律研究所。 陳瑞東、彭俊揚、陳俐臻（2017）。投資抵減、研發支出對企業經營績效之影響－以電子業為例。台灣財稅研究，46(3)，128-154。 盧聯生、卓芷菁（2021）。境外資金匯回管理運用及課稅條例之研析。台灣財稅研究，50(3)，50-81。 Adam, T., & Goyal, V. K. (2008). The investment opportunity set and its proxy variables. Journal of Financial Research, 31, 41-63. Akinyomi, O. J., & Olagunju, A. (2013). Determinants of capital structure in Nigeria. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 3(4), 999-1005. Fredriksson, A., & de Oliveira, G. M. (2019). Impact evaluation using difference-in-differences. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 519-532. Atanassov, J., & Liu, X. (2020). Can corporate income tax cuts stimulate innovation? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(5), 1415-1465. Bitzan, J., Hong, Y., & Huseynov, F. (2023). Did the tax cuts and jobs act stimulate capital expenditures? A firm-level approach. SSRN Electronic Journal. Bond, S., & Meghir, C. (1994). Dynamic investment models and the firm’s financial policy. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(2), 197-222. Hall, B., & Lerner, J. (2009). The financing of R&D and innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1 Hall, B., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 449-469. Canace, T.G., Jackson, S.B., & Ma, T. (2018). R&D investments, capital expenditures, and earnings thresholds. Review of Accounting Studies, 23, 265–295. Chen, P. C., Chan, W. C., Hung, S. W., Hsiang, H. J., & Wu., L. C. (2016). Do R&D expenditures matter more than those of marketing to company performance? The moderating role of industry characteristics and investment density. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(2), 205-216. Chen, Y., & Fang, J. (2018). Policy preference: pie or trap?—test of tax policy based on accelerated depreciation of fixed assets. Securities Market Guide, 311(06), 32–41. Hsu, C. W., Lien, Y. C., & Chen, H. (2015). R&D internationalization and innovation performance. International Business Review, 24(2), 187-195. Connolly, R. A., & Hirschey, M. (2005). Firm size and the effect of R&D on Tobin’s q. R&D Management, 35(2), 217-223. Himmelberg, C. P., Hubbard, R. G., & Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), 353-384. Shefer, D., & Frenkel, A. (2005). R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis. Technovation, 25(1), 25-32. Dimitrov, V., & Jain, P. C. (2006). Recapitalization of one class of common stock into dual-class: Growth and long-run stock returns. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 342-366. Cooper, D. J., & Ezzamel, M. (2013). Globalization discourses and performance measurement systems in a multinational firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(4), 288-313. Dharmapala, D., & Hines Jr, J. R. (2009). Which countries become tax havens? Journal of Public Economics, 93(9-10), 1058-1068. Duan, S., Lu, Y., Cheng, Y., & Liu, Q. (2023). The impact of tax reduction on enterprises’ financialization-a quasi-natural experiment based on the reduction of VAT rate. PLoS ONE, 18(12). Eberhart, A., Maxwell, W., & Siddique, A. (2004). An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. Journal of Finance, 59, 623-650. Fadhila, Z., & Handayani, R. (2019). Tax amnesty effect on tax avoidance and its consequences on firm value (empirical study on companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange). Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 11(1), 34-47. Freihat, A. R., & Kanakriyah, R. (2017). Impact of R&D expenditure on financial performance: Jordanian evidence. European Journal of Business and Management, 9, 73-83. Graham, J. R. (2003). Taxes and corporate finance: a review. The Review of Financial Studies, 16(4), 1075-1129. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 883-895. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707. Griner, E.H., & Gordon, L.A. (1995). Internal cash flow, insider ownership, and capital expenditures: a test of the pecking order and managerial hypotheses. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22, 179-199. Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 2, 1031-1082. Hirschey, M., & Weygandt, J. J. (1985). Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 326-335. Hsieh, P. H., Mishra, C. S., & Gobeli, D. H. (2003). The return on R&D versus capital expenditures in pharmaceutical and chemical industries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(2), 141-150. Hashmi, S.D., Gulzar, S., Ghafoor, Z. et al. (2020). Sensitivity of firm size measures to practices of corporate finance: evidence from BRICS. Future Business Journal, 6, 9. Long, S. K., Yemane, A., & Stockley, K. (2010). Disentangling the effects of health reform in Massachusetts: How important are the special provisions for young adults? American Economic Review, 100 (2), 297-302. Rahman, M. M., & Howlader, M. S. (2022). The impact of research and development expenditure on firm performance and firm value: evidence from a South Asian emerging economy. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(4), 825-845. Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147-175. Nurlaela, S., Mursito, B., Kustiyah, E., Istiqomah, I., & Hartono, S. (2019). Asset turnover, capital structure and financial performance consumption industry company in Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(3), 297-301. Nguyen, A. D. M., Onnis, L., & Rossi, R. (2021). The macroeconomic effects of income and consumption tax changes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(2), 439-66. Opler, T.C., & Titman, S. (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance. The Journal of Finance, 49, 1015-1040. Perfect, S. B., & Wiles, K. W. (1994). Alternative constructions of tobin’s q: An empirical comparison. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1(3-4), 313-341. Rajan, R.G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50, 1421-1460. Ramey, V. A. (2011). Can government purchases stimulate the economy? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), 673-85. Sa’adah, N. (2018). Tax amnesty policy as an effort to improve state revenues and investment growth. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175. Taipi, E., & Ballkoci, V. (2017). Capital expenditure and firm performance evidence from albanian construction sector. European Scientific Journal, 13(28), 231. Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1-19. Usman, M., Shaique, M., Khan, S., Shaikh, R., & Baig, N. (2017). Impact of R&D investment on firm performance and firm value: evidence from developed nations (G-7). Journal of Management, Finance and Accounting, 7(2), 302-321. Ramey, V. A. (2011). Can government purchases stimulate the economy? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), 673-685. Yue, Z., Yang, G., & Wang, H. (2023). How do tax reductions motivate technological innovation? Palgrave Communications, 10(1), 1-18.; G0111357010; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152721; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/152721/1/701001.pdf
-
5Dissertation/ Thesis
المؤلفون: 周郁翔, Chou, Yu-Hsiang
المساهمون: 羅秉政, Kendro Vincent
مصطلحات موضوعية: 氣候政策, 加州碳排放限額與交易系統, 雙重差分法, 綜合控制法, Climate policy, California cap-and-trade program, Difference-in-differences, Synthetic control method
وصف الملف: 11811629 bytes; application/pdf
Relation: Abadie, A. (2021). Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature, 59(2), 391-425. Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132. Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. Journal of the American Satistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2015). Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 495-510. Abrell, J., Ndoye Faye, A., & Zachmann, G. (2011). Assessing the impact of the EU ETS using firm level data (No. 2011/08). Bruegel Working Paper. Albertini, E. (2013). Does environmental management improve financial performance? A meta-analytical review. Organization & Environment, 26(4), 431-457. Alpay, E., Kerkvliet, J., & Buccola, S. (2002). Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4), 887-901. Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Anger, N., & Oberndorfer, U. (2008). Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for Germany. Energy Policy, 36(1), 12-22. Barbera, A. J., & McConnell, V. D. (1990). The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: direct and indirect effects. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18(1), 50-65. Bartram, S. M., Hou, K., & Kim, S. (2022). Real effects of climate policy: Financial constraints and spillovers. Journal of Financial Economics, 143(2), 668-696. Basseches, J. A. (2020). California cap-and-trade: History, design, effectiveness. Contesting carbon. Oxfordshire: Routledge. Ben-Michael, E., Feller, A., & Rothstein, J. (2021). The augmented synthetic control method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(536), 1789-1803. Berman, E., & Bui, L. T. (2001). Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 498-510. Bernardini, E., Di Giampaolo, J., Faiella, I., & Poli, R. (2021). The impact of carbon risk on stock returns: Evidence from the European electric utilities. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(1), 1-26. Billmeier, A., & Nannicini, T. (2013). Assessing economic liberalization episodes: A synthetic control approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 983-1001. Blackman, A., Lahiri, B., Pizer, W., Planter, M. R., & Piña, C. M. (2010). Voluntary environmental regulation in developing countries: Mexico’s Clean Industry Program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(3), 182-192. Borghesi, S., Cainelli, G., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). Brown sunsets and green dawns in the industrial sector: Environmental innovations, firm behavior and the European emission trading. FEEM Working Paper No. 3.2012. Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278-293. Bushnell, J. B., Chong, H., & Mansur, E. T. (2013). Profiting from regulation: Evidence from the European carbon market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 78-106. Calel, R. (2020). Adopt or innovate: Understanding technological responses to cap-and-trade. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(3), 170-201. Calel, R., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (2016). Environmental policy and directed technological change: Evidence from the European carbon market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(1), 173-191. Caron, J., Rausch, S., & Winchester, N. (2015). Leakage from sub-national climate policy: The case of California’s cap-and-trade program. The Energy Journal, 36(2), 167-190. Chan, H. S. R., Li, S., & Zhang, F. (2013). Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy, 63, 1056-1064. Chen, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, F. (2021). Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120744. Cohen, M. A., Fenn, S., & Naimon, J. S. (1995). Environmental and financial performance: Are they related?. Investor Responsibility Research Center, Environmental Information Service. Commins, N., Lyons, S., Schiffbauer, M., & Tol, R. S. (2011). Climate policy & corporate behavior. The Energy Journal, 32(4), 51-68. Compagnie, V., Struyfs, K., & Torsin, W. (2023). Tax avoidance as an unintended consequence of environmental regulation: Evidence from the EU ETS. Journal of Corporate Finance, 82, 102463. Conley, T. G., & Taber, C. R. (2011). Inference with “difference in differences” with a small number of policy changes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 113-125. Cordeiro, J. J., & Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: Evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(2), 104-114. Cui, J., Zhang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Carbon pricing induces innovation: Evidence from China's regional carbon market pilots. In AEA Papers and Proceedings (Vol. 108, pp. 453-457). American Economic Association. Cushing, L., Blaustein-Rejto, D., Wander, M., Pastor, M., Sadd, J., Zhu, A., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2018). Carbon trading, co-pollutants, and environmental equity: Evidence from California’s cap-and-trade program (2011–2015). PLoS Medicine, 15(7), e1002604. da Silva, P. P., Moreno, B., & Figueiredo, N. C. (2016). Firm-specific impacts of CO2 prices on the stock market value of the Spanish power industry. Energy Policy, 94, 492-501. Dasgupta, K., & Mason, B. J. (2020). The effect of interest rate caps on bankruptcy: Synthetic control evidence from recent payday lending bans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 119, 105917. de Azevedo Rezende, L., Bansi, A. C., Alves, M. F. R., & Galina, S. V. R. (2019). Take your time: Examining when green innovation affects financial performance in multinationals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 993-1003. Dechezleprêtre, A., Nachtigall, D., & Venmans, F. (2023). The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 118, 102758. Demailly, D., & Quirion, P. (2008). European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry. Energy economics, 30(4), 2009-2027. Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. The Accounting Review, 86(6), 1969-1994. Earnhart, D., & Lizal, L. (2007). Effect of pollution control on corporate financial performance in a transition economy. European Environment, 17(4), 247-266. Filbeck, G., & Gorman, R. F. (2004). The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environmental and Resource Economics, 29(2), 137-157. Ford, J. A., Steen, J., & Verreynne, M. L. (2014). How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: Going beyond the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 204-213. Gollop, F. M., & Roberts, M. J. (1983). Environmental regulations and productivity growth: The case of fossil-fueled electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy, 91(4), 654-674. Gore Jr, A. (1992). Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. J. (2003). Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 384-402. Griffin, P. A. (2013). Cap‐and‐trade emission allowances and US companies' balance sheets. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(1), 7-31. Hang, M., Geyer‐Klingeberg, J., & Rathgeber, A. W. (2019). It is merely a matter of time: A meta‐analysis of the causality between environmental performance and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 257-273. Hansen, B. (2022). Econometrics. Princeton University Press. Hernandez-Cortes, D., & Meng, K. C. (2023). Do environmental markets cause environmental injustice? Evidence from California’s carbon market. Journal of Public Economics, 217, 104786. Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German Panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163-173. Hu, J., Crijns-Graus, W., Lam, L., & Gilbert, A. (2015). Ex-ante evaluation of EU ETS during 2013–2030: EU-internal abatement. Energy Policy, 77, 152-163. Huang, N., He, R., Luo, L., & Shen, H. (2023). Carbon emission trading scheme and firm debt financing. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 100384. Ivanov, I. T., Kruttli, M. S., & Watugala, S. W. (2024). Banking on carbon: Corporate lending and cap-and-trade policy. The Review of Financial Studies, 37(5), 1640-1684. Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: a Panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610-619. Jaggi, B., & Freedman, M. (1992). An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: Pulp and paper firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19(5), 697-713. Jaraitė, J., & Maria, C. D. (2016). Did the EU ETS make a difference? An empirical assessment using Lithuanian firm-level data. The Energy Journal, 37(2), 68-92. Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2019). Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature. Climate Policy, 19(4), 453-471. Jong, T., Couwenberg, O., & Woerdman, E. (2014). Does EU emissions trading bite? An event study. Energy Policy, 69, 510-519. Kramer, N., & Lessmann, C. (2023). The Effects of Carbon Trading: Evidence from California’s ETS. Working Paper. Lanoie, P., Laurent‐Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: new insights on the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(3), 803-842. Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 121-128. Lessmann, C., & Kramer, N. (2024). The effect of cap-and-trade on sectoral emissions: Evidence from California. Energy Policy, 188, 114066. Liu, J., & Liu, X. (2023). Effects of carbon emission trading schemes on green technological innovation by industrial enterprises: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3), 100410. Liu, Z., & Sun, H. (2021). Assessing the impact of emissions trading scheme on low-carbon technological innovation: Evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106589. Löfgren, Å., Wråke, M., Hagberg, T., & Roth, S. (2014). Why the EU ETS needs reforming: an empirical analysis of the impact on company investments. Climate Policy, 14(5), 537-558. Marin, G., Marino, M., & Pellegrin, C. (2018). The impact of the European Emission Trading Scheme on multiple measures of economic performance. Environmental and Resource Economics, 71, 551-582. Martin, R., Muuls, M., & Wagner, U. (2013). Carbon markets, carbon prices and innovation: Evidence from interviews with managers. In Annual Meetings of the American Economic Association, San Diego. Citeseer. Martin, R., Muûls, M., & Wagner, U. J. (2016). The impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on regulated firms: What is the evidence after ten years?. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Mascia, D. V., & Onali, E. (2024). Keep calm and carry on emitting: cap-and-trade rules, local emissions and growth. Regional Studies, 58(1), 220-237. Mo, J. L., Zhu, L., & Fan, Y. (2012). The impact of the EU ETS on the corporate value of European electricity corporations. Energy, 45(1), 3-11. Moreno, B., & da Silva, P. P. (2016). How do Spanish polluting sectors' stock market returns react to European Union allowances prices? A Panel data approach. Energy, 103, 240-250. Ni, X., Jin, Q., & Huang, K. (2022). Environmental regulation and the cost of debt: Evidence from the carbon emission trading system pilot in China. Finance Research Letters, 49, 103134. Oberndorfer, U. (2009). EU emission allowances and the stock market: Evidence from the electricity industry. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1116-1126. Oestreich, A. M., & Tsiakas, I. (2015). Carbon emissions and stock returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Journal of Banking & Finance, 58, 294-308. Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119-132. Petrick, S., & Wagner, U. J. (2014). The impact of carbon trading on industry: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Kiel Working Paper No. 1912, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (2014). Popp, D. (2006). International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: The effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51(1), 46-71. Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 95-117. Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118. Ranson, M., & Stavins, R. N. (2012). Post-Durban climate policy architecture based on linkage of cap-and-trade systems (No. w18140). National Bureau of Economic Research. Ren, S., Hu, Y., Zheng, J., & Wang, Y. (2020). Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119989. Ren, S., Yang, X., Hu, Y., & Chevallier, J. (2022). Emission trading, induced innovation and firm performance. Energy Economics, 112, 106157. Sanchez, C. M., & McKinley, W. (1998). Environmental regulatory influence and product innovation: The contingency effects of organizational characteristics. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(4), 257-278. Schmalensee, R., & Stavins, R. N. (2017). Lessons learned from three decades of experience with cap and trade. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195-204. Sun, R., Wang, K., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2022). China’s carbon emission trading scheme and firm performance. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(3), 837-851. Tang, H. L., Liu, J. M., Mao, J., & Wu, J. G. (2020). The effects of emission trading system on corporate innovation and productivity-empirical evidence from China’s SO2 emission trading system. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(17), 21604-21620. Tian, Y., Akimov, A., Roca, E., & Wong, V. (2016). Does the carbon market help or hurt the stock price of electricity companies? Further evidence from the European context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1619-1626. Triebswetter, U., & Hitchens, D. (2005). The impact of environmental regulation on competitiveness in the German manufacturing industry—a comparison with other countries of the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(7), 733-745. Triebswetter, U., & Wackerbauer, J. (2008). Integrated environmental product innovation in the region of Munich and its impact on company competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(14), 1484-1493. Veith, S., Werner, J. R., & Zimmermann, J. (2009). Capital market response to emission rights returns: Evidence from the European power sector. Energy economics, 31(4), 605-613. Venmans, F. (2015). Capital market response to emission allowance prices: a multivariate GARCH approach. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 17, 577-620. Wagner, M. (2005). How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 76(2), 105-118. Wagner, U. J., Muûls, M., Martin, R., & Colmer, J. (2014, June). The causal effects of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Evidence from French manufacturing plants. In Fifth World Congress of Environmental and Resources Economists, Instanbul, Turkey. Citeseer. Walch, R. T. (2018). The effect of California’s carbon cap and trade program on co-pollutants and environmental justice: Evidence from the electricity sector. Environment, PM2, 5, 440-48. Walker, H., Di Sisto, L., & McBain, D. (2008). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(1), 69-85. Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Guo, X. (2019). Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors. Energy Policy, 132, 611-619. Xiao, J., Li, G., Zhu, B., Xie, L., Hu, Y., & Huang, J. (2021). Evaluating the impact of carbon emissions trading scheme on Chinese firms’ total factor productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, 127104. Yu, H. (2013). The EU ETS and firm profits: An ex-post analysis for Swedish energy firms. Environmental Economics, (4, Iss. 3), 59-71. Yu, P., Hao, R., & Sun, Y. (2023). How do the designs of emission trading system affect the value of covered firms—A quasi-natural experiment based on China. Energy Economics, 126, 106944. Zhang, Y. J., Shi, W., & Jiang, L. (2020). Does China's carbon emissions trading policy improve the technology innovation of relevant enterprises?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 872-885. Zhou, F., & Wang, X. (2022). The carbon emissions trading scheme and green technology innovation in China: A new structural economics perspective. Economic Analysis and Policy, 74, 365-381. Zhu, J., Fan, Y., Deng, X., & Xue, L. (2019). Low-carbon innovation induced by emissions trading in China. Nature Communications, 10(1), 4088. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2007). Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11-12), 1041-1052.; G0111352023; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/151521; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/151521/1/202301.pdf
-
6Academic Journal
المؤلفون: 李一平, Li Yi-ping, 罗晶晶, Luo Jing-jing, 张海峰, Zhang Hai-feng
مصطلحات موضوعية: “一带一路”, BRI, 东盟十国, ASEAN, 营商环境, business environment, 双重差分法, Differences-in-Differences method
Relation: 厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版),2020,262(6):70-82; https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/178218
-
7Academic Journal
المؤلفون: 李炯芃
Relation: 经济数学,2019,(04); https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/177311
-
8Academic Journal
Relation: 经济科学,2019,(02):14-26; https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/176150
-
9Academic Journal
Relation: 管理科学学报,2019,22(05):99-109; https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/175297
-
10Academic Journal
Relation: 财贸经济,2019,40(02):147-160; https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/175279
-
11Academic Journal
Relation: 世界经济,2018,41(09):121-145; https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/171848
-
12Academic Journal
المساهمون: 北京大学国家发展研究院,北京,10087, 复旦大学经济学院,上海,200433
المصدر: CSSCI ; 知网 ; 万方 ; http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_jjyglyj201703005.aspx
مصطلحات موضوعية: 地域性城市 市领导县 县域经济 双重差分法 geographical city city-leading-county county economy difference-in-difference
Relation: 经济与管理研究. 2017, 38(3), 43-52.; 1896059; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/462540
-
13Academic Journal
المساهمون: 陈诗一 复旦大学.经济学院, 郭峰 北京大学.国家发展研究院, 石庆石 复旦大学.经济学院
المصدر: 知网 ; CSSCI
Relation: 中国工业经济.2016,40-56.; 1471371; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/448326
-
14Dissertation/ Thesis
المؤلفون: 姜尚旻
المساهمون: 交通管理科學系碩士在職專班, 沈宗緯, Shen, Chung-Wei
مصطلحات موضوعية: 智慧路邊停車計費系統, 雙重差分法, 路邊停車, 交通事故, smart on-street parking system, Difference-in-difference method, on-street parking, traffic accident, info, manag
-
15Academic Journal
المساهمون: 雷震 美国宾州州立大学.能源与矿物工程系, 孟俣希 美国宾州州立大学.能源与矿物工程系, 叶静怡 北京大学.经济学院, 付明卫 中国社会科学院经济研究所.
المصدر: CSSCI ; 知网
Relation: 经济研究.2015,50(2),118-131.; 1317799; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/421629
-
16Academic Journal
المؤلفون: 汤淑女, 简伟研, 郭岩, Winnie C-M Yip
المساهمون: 北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系,北京,100191, Blavatnik School of Government,University of Ox-ford,Oxford OX4JJ,UK
المصدر: 万方 ; 知网 ; http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_bjykdxxx201403020.aspx
مصطلحات موضوعية: 保险 健康 高血压 卫生服务利用 双重差分法 Insurance health Hypertension Health services utilization Difference in differences
Relation: 北京大学学报（医学版）.2014,(3),445-449.; 769462; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/210471
-
17Academic Journal
المساهمون: 中国人民大学商学院,北京,100872, 北京大学光华管理学院,北京,100871
المصدر: CSSCI ; 知网 ; 万方 ; http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_jjllyjjgl201406006.aspx
Relation: 经济理论与经济管理.2014,(6),71-83.; 682251; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/201066
-
18Academic Journal
المساهمون: 北京大学中国经济研究中心 北京 100871, 澳门科技大学澳门, 澳门大学工商管理学院澳门
المصدر: 万方 ; 知网 ; http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_zgwsjj201401002.aspx
مصطلحات موضوعية: 中国医药卫生体制改革, 道德风险, 双重差分法, 倾向得分匹配法, China’s health care reform, moral hazard, difference-in-difference, propensity score matching
Relation: 中国卫生经济.2014,(1),5-10.; 770766; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/34705
-
19Dissertation/ Thesis
المؤلفون: 許維真, Hsu, Wei-Chen
المساهمون: 交通管理科學系, 沈宗緯, Shen, Tsung-Wei
مصطلحات موضوعية: 淡海輕軌, 公車運量, 雙重差分法, 準實驗設計, 輕軌, Light Rail, Bus Volume, DID, quasi-experiment, geo, envir
-
20Dissertation/ Thesis
المؤلفون: 許珮嘉, Hsu, Pei-Chia
المساهمون: 胡偉民 黃柏鈞, Hu, Wei-Min Huang, Po-Chun
مصطلحات موضوعية: 汽車限購政策, 外溢效果, 雙重差分法, Automobile Purchase Restriction Policy, Spillover effect, Difference-in-Differences
وصف الملف: 2057555 bytes; application/pdf
Relation: 中文參考文獻\n牛文元 （2010）。中國新型化城市報告2010。中國科學院研究報告。\n王庭奕 （2017）。北京市汽車限購政策對自主品牌銷售的影響（碩士）。國立政治大學，台北市。\n北京交通發展研究中心 （2011)。北京交通發展年度報告。\n宣昌勇、艾文衛、張昊 （2013）。我國大中城市小客車限購困局的成因與突破——以北京 “搖號” 制度為例。管理世界，(8)，173-174。\n侯幸、彭時平、馬燁 （2013）。北京上牌搖號與上海車牌拍賣政策下消費者成本比較。中國軟科學，（11) ，58-65。\n張彤、侯幸、吳昱 （2017）。效率、民意與車牌分配方式選擇。經濟學(季刊)，(2), 707-728。\n馮采 （2018）。汽車限購政策的成效和溢出效應分析——基於汽車上牌資料的實證研究。當代財經，8。\n陳華、劉清波（2013，11月05日）。1.4萬北京車主河北上牌，當地形成上牌服務產業鏈。北京日報。\n資料引自http://finance.people.com.cn/n/2013/1105/c1004-23432433.html。\n謝旭軒、張世秋、易如、吳丹、黃德生（2011）。北京市交通擁堵的社會成本分析。中國人口資源與環境，21(1)，28-32。\n\n英文參考文獻\nChin, A., & Smith, P. (1997). Automobile ownership and government policy: The economics of Singapore`s vehicle quota scheme. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 31(2), 129-140.\nChen, X., & Zhao, J. (2013). Bidding to drive: Car license auction policy in Shanghai and its public acceptance.Transport Policy, 27, 39-52.\nFeng, S., & Li, Q. (2013). Car ownership control in Chinese mega cities: Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou. Journeys (LTA Academy Singapore).\nHao, H., Wang, H., & Ouyang, M. (2011). Comparison of policies on vehicle ownership and use between Beijing and Shanghai and their impacts on fuel consumption by passenger vehicles.Energy Policy,39(2), 1016-1021.\nIBM. (2010). The globalization of traffic congestion: IBM 2010 commuter pain survey, Technical report\nKuo,L. (2013). The Genius Ways Beijing Drivers Get Around the City`s License Plate Lottery ,Quartz ,from: https://qz.com/153742/the-genius-ways-beijing-drivers-get-around-the-citys-license-plate-lottery/\nLi, S. (2018). Better lucky than rich? Welfare analysis of automobile licence allocations in Beijing and Shanghai.The Review of Economic Studies,85(4), 2389-2428.\nYang, J., Liu, Y., Qin, P., & Liu, A. A. (2014). A review of Beijing׳ s vehicle registration lottery: Short-term effects on vehicle growth and fuel consumption.Energy Policy,75, 157-166.\nZheng, Y., Moody, J., Wang, S., & Zhao, J. (2021). Measuring policy leakage of Beijing’s car ownership restriction.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,148, 223-236.; G0108255018; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/136586; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/136586/1/501801.pdf
Full Text Finder