المؤلفون: Chen, Yen-Po, 陳言博

Thesis Advisors: Yang,Connie Guang-Hwa, 楊光華

وصف الملف: 59

الاتاحة: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01852154388453484066

المؤلفون: 陳言博, Chen, Yen-Po

مصطلحات موضوعية: 世界貿易組織, 反傾銷, 爭端解決, 審查基準, World Trade Organization (WTO), Anti-Dumping, Dispute Settlement, Standards of Review

الاتاحة: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0913510421%22.

Alternate Title: OsZAT12 gene responses to abiotic stresses and phytohormones in rice (Oryza sativa).

المؤلفون: 陈言博¹ chenyanbo1221@163.com, 陈宗新¹, 夏快飞², 张明永², 王亚琴¹ wangyaqin@m.scnu.edu.cn

المصدر: Guihaia. Nov2022, Vol. 42 Issue 11, p1797-1810. 14p.

مصطلحات موضوعية: *ZINC-finger proteins, *ABIOTIC stress, *GENETIC regulation, *GENOME editing, *TRANSCRIPTION factors, *ABSCISIC acid, *PLANT hormones, *DROUGHT tolerance

المؤلفون: 陳言博, Chen, Yen-Po

المساهمون: 方嘉麟, Faung, Kai-Lin

مصطلحات موضوعية: 公司, 實質受益, 實質控制, 最終受益, 風險評估, 風險為基礎方法, 洗錢防制, 打擊資恐, 防制洗錢金融行動工作組織, 認識客戶, 客戶盡職調查, 借名登記, 名義股東, 名義董事, 無記名股票, 股權信託, 透明, 問責, Corporation, Beneficial Owner, Significant Control, Ultimate Beneficiary, Risk Assessment, Risk-based Approach (RBA), Anti-Money Laundry (AML), Counter-Terrorism Finance (CTF), Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Know Your Customer (KYC), Customer Due Diligence (CDD), Nominee Registration

وصف الملف: 4644866 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 參考文獻\n一、中文資料\n書籍：\n1. FATF著，行政院洗錢防制辦公室譯，評鑑方法論– 「防制洗錢金融行動工作組織建議」之技術遵循及防制洗錢/打擊資恐之效能評鑑。2013年2月（2017年2月\n2. 方嘉麟主編，變動中的公司法制-17堂案例學會《公司法》，元照，2018年10月初版\n3. 方家麟主編，管理層收購法律規範理論與實務，元照，2014年5月初版\n4. 王文宇，公司法論，2018年10月第6版\n5. 王文宇主編，金融法，元照，2013年9月第7版\n6. 王志誠等，二十一世紀財經法潮流- 林國全教授榮退祝賀論文集，新學林，2020年11月\n7. 行政院洗錢防制辦公室，國家洗錢/資恐風險評估報告，107年4月，初版二刷\n8. 廖大穎，公司法原論，三民書局，初版91年2月\n9. 劉連煜，現代公司法，新學林，頁85-96，2015年9月\n10. 劉興善，論公司法人格之否認，商事法論集，頁272，1982年\n11. 賴英照，公司法人本質之理論，公司法論文集，證券市場發展基金會，1999\n\n\n期刊：\n1. 林國全，一人公司，月旦法學雜誌第22期 張哲源，法人與僱用人侵權行為責任研究，東海大學法學研究第30期，2009/07\n2. 洪令家，從美國法看揭穿公司面紗原則在我國之實踐，中正財經法學，8期\n3. 朱德芳、陳彥良，公司之透明、信賴與問責－以實質受益人規範為核心，中正財經法學，第16期，頁34-35\n4. 洪秀芬、朱德芳，關係企業債權人保護之發展趨勢：以揭穿公司面紗為核心，臺大法學論叢，43卷3期\n5. 洪秀芬，從德國事實上關係企業之控制企業責任法制反思我國控制公司責任規範，東吳法律學報25卷2期，2013.10\n6. 郭大維，股東有限責任與否認公司法人格理論之調和－揭穿公司面紗原則之探討，中正財經法學，7期\n7. 郭大維，論股東表決權拘束契約之效力－評最高法院九十六年度台上字第一三四號民事判決，月旦裁判時報，第10期，2011年8月\n8. 胡韶雯，再論揭穿公司面紗與反向揭穿公司面紗原則，司法新聲，第119期\n9. 張心悌，反向揭穿公司面紗原則之研究，東吳法律學報，24卷4期，2013年4月\n10. 陳彥良，經營權協議與表決權拘束契約，月旦法學教室，第169期，2016年11月\n\n\n網際網路：\n1. 行政院106年11月16日即時新聞，https://www.ey.gov.tw/news_Content2.aspx?n=F8BAEBE9491FC830&s=D835DA41892118D9\n2.經濟部「全國商工行政服務入口網」公司統計資訊：https://gcis.nat.gov.tw/mainNew/doc/bus-org-moncount.pdf\n3. 陳光宇，美國肥咖法案更新相關規定，勤業眾信聯合會計師事務所稅務通訊，https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/tax/articles/newsletter16-03-39.html\n4. 何殷如，美國 FATCA 法案實施對我國金融業之影響，證券暨期貨月刊 第三十一卷 第一期，102年1月16日\n5. 江育維，《跨國稅務新動向》台灣版CRS「金融機構執行盡職審查及申報作業辦法」，勤業眾信聯合會計師事務所稅務通訊，https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/tax/articles/taiwan-crs.html\n6. FATCA及CRS客戶自我聲明書暨資料同意書，附錄一：名詞解釋之「實質受益人」，https://www.fglife.com.tw/Ftp.html?UUID=b185249def6b4c9d9b6b2391a056c562&smp=Y\n7. 香港公司註冊處，重要控制人制度新聞稿，https://www.cr.gov.hk/tc/legislation/scr/overview.htm\n8. 香港公司註冊處，公司備存重要控制人登記冊指引，2018年3月1日。https://www.cr.gov.hk/tc/publications/docs/Guidelines_scr_c.pdf\n10. 謝君臨，史上最大經濟犯罪，力霸案創多項司法紀錄， http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/1713449\n11. 臺灣臺北地方法院檢察署新聞稿，葫蘆公司、百尺竿頭等境外公司虛偽投資案件，http://p.udn.com.tw/upf/news/2017/81.pdf\n12. 曾國禓，國際會計準則 - 長期股權投資之淺釋，安侯建業通訊 2008年9月，https://www.twse.com.tw/ch/listed/download/IFRS000B11.pdf\n13. 呂雪彗，公司法修法 受益人資料須申報 68萬非公發企業影響大，工商時報，2017/12/11。https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20171211000035-260202?chdtv\n14. 李永然，【公司法大翻修】消失的實質受益人 打折的洗錢防制，ETtoday法律新聞，https://www.ettoday.net/news/20181018/1282762.htm#ixzz6nO69XP9n\n\n\n\n二、外文資料\n書籍：\n1. The FATF Recommendations, Oct. 2016\n2. BIS, Basel Committee on Bank Supervision – Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, Janurary 2001\n3. FATF(2012-2018), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, FATF, Paris, France\n3. FATF (2012-2020), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, FATF, Paris, France\n4. FATF-OECD, FATF Guidance on Transpaprency and Benefiicial Ownership, 2014\n5. FATF/OECD, Concealment of Beneficial Ownership, November 2018\n6. FATF – Egmont Group (2018), Concealment of Beneficial Ownership , FATF, Paris, France IDB and OECD, A Beneficial Ownership Implementation Toolkit, March 2019\n7. Stephen M. Bainbridge, M. Todd Henderson，Limited Liability: A Legal and Economic Analysis，Edward Elgar Publishing, September 2016\n8. UKBEIS, Review of the implementation of the PSC Register，BEIS Research Paper Number 2019/005，March 2019\n\n\n期刊：\nThilo Kuntz，Asset Partitioning, Limited Liability and Veil Piercing - Review Essay on Bainbridge/Henderson, Limited Liability，19 European Business Organization Law Review\n\n\n網際網路：\n1. APG- Official Website: http://www.apgml.org\n2. FTAF Official Website: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/about/\n3. 2021 OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum，https://www.oecd.org/corruption-integrity/forum/home/\n4. Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes， http://www.oecd.org/tax/transparency\n5. KPMG, OECD: Update on beneficial ownership information, compliant jurisdictions, https://home.kpmg/us/en/home/insights/2019/11/tnf-oecd-update-beneficial-ownership-information-compliant-jurisdictions.html\n6. United States G-8 Action Plan for Transparency of Company Ownership and Control, the Obama White House Archive, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/06/18/united-states-g-8-action-plan-transparency-company-ownership-and-control\n7. G8 Action Plan Principles to prevent the misuse of companies and legal arrangements， https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000006561.pdf\n8. The U.S. Action Plan to Implement the G-20 High Level Principles on Beneficial Ownership, the Obama White House Archive, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/10/16/us-action-plan-implement-g-20-high-level-principles-beneficial-ownership\n9. G20 High-Level Principles on Beneficial Ownership Transparency，http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2014/g20_high-level_principles_beneficial_ownership_transparency.pdf\n10. BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP PRINCIPLES – On G20 Position Paper, Transparency International, https://www.transparency.org/files/content/activity/2015_TI_G20PositionPaper_BeneficialOwnership.pdf\n11. The Egmont Group, https://egmontgroup.org/en#slider\n12. Basel Committee on on Banking Supervision, General guide to\naccount opening, July 2015, https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d331.pdf\n13. BIS, Basel Committee on Bank Supervision – Customer due diligence for banks, Janurary 2001, https://fraudfighting.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/bcbs77.pdf\n14. IRS, Beneficial Owner for FATCA, https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/beneficial-owners\n15. Introduction the Policy History to EU AMLDs, https://complyadvantage.com/blog/brief-history-amlds-part-one/\n16. On the Predicated Offenses of 6AMLD, https://complyadvantage.com/blog/brief-history-amlds-part-one/\n17. UKBEIS, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-small-business-enterprise-and-employment-bill-is-coming#psc-info\n18. UKBEIS, Summary guide for companies – register of people with significant control, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/621568/170622_NON-STAT_Summary_Guidance_4MLD_Final.pdf\n19. UKCH, Guidance on PSCs, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/753028/170623_NON-STAT_Guidance_for_PSCs_4MLD.pdf\n20. Open Ownership Register, https://register.openownership.org/data_sources/uk-psc-register\n21. PART XIA REGISTER OF CONTROLLERS AND NOMINEE DIRECTORS OF COMPANIES, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CoA1967?ProvIds=P1XIA-#P1XIA-\n22. Companies (Register of Controllers and Nominee Directors) Regulations 2017，https://statutes.agc.gov.sg/SL-Supp/S116-2017/Published/20170330?DocDate=20170330\n23. Registers of controllers and nominee directors in Singapore: 10 things you need to know，https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=dea91420-d3c3-454d-9b88-bab272f043af\n24. The US Senate, CTA Legislation, H.R.2513 - Corporate Transparency Act of 2019, https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2513/text\n25. FACT Coalition, Positions on the CTA, https://thefactcoalition.org/fact-sheet-a-brief-summary-of-the-corporate-transparency-act-of-2019-title-lxiv-of-the-ndaa-h-r-6395/\n26. Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Corporate Transparency Act, Lexology, https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=31182f17-7bb4-46f2-9018-79cc5f4baa7b\n27. Corporate Transparency Act — a new era in U.S. beneficial ownership disclosure, the RegTech Hub, https://medium.com/the-regtech-hub/corporate-transparency-act-a-new-era-in-u-s-beneficial-ownership-disclosure-8b2ba120fbb8\n28. J. Kuester, Corporate Transparency Act and New Implications for US Special Purpose Vehicles, Wealth Structuring and Other Arrangements, White and Case Publication, 26 Jan. 2021, https://www.whitecase.com/publications/alert/corporate-transparency-act-and-new-implications-us-special-purpose-vehicles\n29. Cayman Islands Introduction of Beneficial Ownership Registers，https://www.walkersglobal.com/index.php/publications/99-advisory/847-cayman-islands-introduction-of-beneficial-ownership-registers\n30. BVI beneficial ownership legislation，https://www.mourant.com/file-library/media---2019/2019---guides/bvi-beneficial-ownership-legislation-(dec-19-update).pdf\n31. Bermuda Enhances its Beneficial Ownership Regime，https://www.walkersglobal.com/index.php/publications/99-advisory/1198-bermuda-enhances-its-beneficial-ownership-regime\n32. UKBEIS, Beneficial ownership: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies，https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/beneficial-ownership-uk-overseas-territories-and-crown-dependencies; G0100651509; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/134093; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/134093/1/150901.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/134093
https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202100378
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/134093/1/150901.pdf

المؤلفون: 林江峰(計畫主持人), 顏慧欣, 陳言博, 羅錦嵐, 陳品妤, 陳怡彤

المساهمون: 淡江大學國際貿易學系

Relation: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/78718

الاتاحة: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/78718

المؤلفون: 陳言博, Chen, Yen-Po

المساهمون: 楊光華, Yang,Connie Guang-Hwa

مصطلحات موضوعية: 世界貿易組織, 反傾銷, 爭端解決, 審查基準, World Trade Organization (WTO), Anti-Dumping, Dispute Settlement, Standards of Review

Time: 36

وصف الملف: 42449 bytes; 74691 bytes; 19712 bytes; 83137 bytes; 94692 bytes; 280697 bytes; 304314 bytes; 249259 bytes; 112018 bytes; 190610 bytes; 92092 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 中文書目：; 1. Arthur Kaufmann 著，吳從周 譯，《類推與「事務本質」–兼論類型理論》，台北：學林，1999年1月。; 2. 羅昌發，《國際貿易法》，台北，原照，1999年7月。; 3. ______，《美國貿易救濟制度：國際經貿法研究（一）》，台北，月旦，1994年3月; 英文書目：; 1. Aust, Anthony, MODERN TREATY LAW AND PRACTICE, Cambridge University Press, (2000).; 2. Brownlie, Ian, Principles of International Law, 5th ed. (1998); 3. Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Patros C.(eds.), THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE REGULATION: EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS FOR THE WTO, World Trade Forum Vol.4, The University of Michigan Press (2003).; 4. Craig, Paul ＆de Búrca, Gráinne, EU LAW—TEXT, CASES AND MATERIALS 132-37 3d. ed., Oxford University Press (2003).; 5. Dale, Richard, ANTI-DUMPING LAW IN A LIBERAL TRADE ORDER (1980).; 6. Evans, Gali E., LAWMAKING UNDER THE TRADE CONSTITUTION (2002).; 7. Harris, D.J., CASES AND MATERIALS ON INTERNATIONAL LAW, 5th ed Sweet＆Maxwell (1998).; 8. Hoekman, Bernard M. and Kostecki, Michel M., THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE WORLD TRADING SYSTEM, 2d. ed. (2001).; 9. Kennedy, Daniel L. ＆ Southwick, James D. (eds.), THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW, ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF ROBERT E. HUDEC, Cambridge University Press (2002).; 11. Jackson, John H., THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION: CONSTITUTION AND JURISPRUDENCE, Chatham House Papers (1998).; 12. Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur, OPPENHEIM’S INTERNATIONAL LAW, 9th ed., Harlow: Longman Group (1996).; 13. Matsushita, M, Schoenbaum, T., and Macroidis, P., THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION: LAW, PRACTICE, AND POLICY, Oxford university Press (2003).; 14. Oesch, Matthias, STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN WTO DISPUTE RESOLUTION (2003).; 15. Treiblicock, Michael J. and Howse, Robert, THE REGULATION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, 2d. ed., (1999).; 16. Viner, Jacob, DUMPING: A PROBLEM IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE (1966).; 17. Weiler, J.H.H., THE EU, THE WTO, AND THE NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade?, Oxford University Press (2000).; 英文期刊論文：; 1. Akakwam, Philip A., The Standard of Review in the 1994 Antidumping Code: Circumscribing the Role of GATT Panels in Reviewing National Antidumping Determinations, 5 Minnesota Journal of Global Trade (1996).; 2. Croley, Steven P. and Jackson, John H., WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments, 90(193) American Journal of International Law (1996).; 3. Davey, William J., Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceed its Authority? A Consideration of Deference Shown by the System to Member Government Decisions and its Use of Issue-Avoidance Techniques, 4 Journal of International Economic Law (2001).; 4. Durling, James P. Deference but Only When Due: WTO Review of Anti-dumping Measures, 6(1) Journal of International Economic Law (2003).; 5. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, Tensions between the Dispute Settlement Process and the Diplomatic and Treaty–making Activities of the WTO, 1(3) World Trade Review (2002).; 6. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, Reflections on the Appellate Body of the WTO, American Society of International Law Proceedings (2003).; 7. Howse, Robert ＆ Nicilaidis, Kalypso, Legitimacy through “Higher Law”? Why Constitutionalizing the WTO is a step TOO Far, in THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE REGULATION: EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS FOR THE WTO, World Trade Forum Vol.4, The University of Michigan Press (2003).; 8. Howse, Robert, The Most Dangerous Branch? WTO Appellate Body Jurisprudence in the Nature and Limits of the Judicial Power, in THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE REGULATION：EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS FOR THE WTO, World Trade Forum Vol.4, The University of Michigan Press (2003).; 9. Howse, Robert, Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence, in THE EU, THE WTO, AND THE NAFTA: TOWARDS A COMMON LAW OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE?, Oxford University Press (2000).; 11. Jackson, John H., Sovereignty, Subsidiary, and Separation of Power : The High-Wire Balancing Act of Globalisation, in THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW, ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF ROBERT E. HUDEC, Cambridge University Press (2002).; 12. Jackson, John H., The WTO “Constitution” and Proposed Reforms: Seven “Mantras” Revised, 4(1) Journal of International Economic Law (2001).; 13. Jackson, John H.,Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept, Vol. 97 American Journal of International Law (2003).; 14. Maki, Peter C., Interpreting GATT Using the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaty: A Method to Increase the Legitimacy of the Dispute Settlement System, 9 Minnesota Journal of Global Trade (2000); 15. McRae, Donald, The WTO in International Law: Tradition Continued or New Frontier? 3(1) Journal of International Economic Law (2002).; 16. Lennard, Michael, Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements, 5(1) Journal of International Economic Law (2002).; 17. Rosenthal, Paul C. ＆ Vermylen, Robert T.C., The WTO Antidumping and Subsidies Agreement: Did the U.S. Achieve Its Objectives during the Uruguay Round? 31(3) Law ＆ Policy in International Business.; 18. Steinberg, Richard H., Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints, 98 American Journal of International Law (2004).; 19. Tarullo, Daniel K., The Hidden Cost of International Dispute Settlement: WTO Review of Domestic Anti-dumping Decisions, 34 Law ＆ Policy in International Business.; 20. Tarullo, Daniel K., Paved with good intentions: The Dynamic Effects of WTO Review of Anti-dumping Action, 2(3) World Trade Review (2003).; 21. Weiss, Wolfgang, Security and Predictability under WTO Law, 2(2) World Trade Review (2003).; 22. Yocis, David A., Guatemala Cement and WTO Review of National Anti-dumping Determinations, 76 New York University Law Review (2001).; 23. Zleptnig, Stefan, The Standard Review in WTO Law: An Analysis of Law, Legitimacy and the Distribution of Legal and Political Authority, 6(2) European Integration online Papers (EIoP) (2002); WTO文件：; 1. WTO Legal Text, Declaration on Dispute Settlement Pursuant to The Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 Or Part V of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.; 2. WTO Legal Text, Decision on Review of Article 17.6 of the Agreement on the Implementation of Article Ⅵ of the General Agreement on Tariff and Trade 1994, in The Legal Text- the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations.; 3. 美國—石油案（US－Reformulated Gasoline）, WT/DS2/R; 4. 歐體—荷爾蒙案（EC—Hormones）, WT/DS48/11, WT/DS26/AB/R and WT/DS48/AB/R; 5. 日本—酒精飲料案（Japan－Alcoholic Beverages）, WT/DS11/AB/R; 6. 美國—內衣案（United States—Underwear）, WT/DS24/R and WT/DS24/AB/R; 7. 瓜地馬拉—波特蘭水泥案(Guatemala-Portland Cement from Mexico), WT/DS60/AB/R, WT/DS60/R; 8. 泰國—結構鋼案(Thailand-Structural Steel from Poland), WT/DS122/AB/R, WT/DS122/R; 9. 墨西哥—HFSC案(Mexico-HFSC from U.S.), WT/DS132/AB/RW, WT/DS132/R; 11. 歐體—寢具案(EC- Bed Linen from India), WT/DS141/AB/R, WT/DS141/R; 12. 美國—熱軋鋼案(US-Hot-Rolled Steel from Japan), WT/DS184/AB/R, WT/DS184/R; 13. 歐體—鑄鐵圓管及配件案(EC-Cast Iron Tubes＆Fittings from Brazil), WT/DS219/AB/R, WT/ DS219/R; 14. 美國—柏德修正案(US-Byrd Amendment from Australia, Brazil et al), WT/DS234/AB/R, WT/DS234/R; 15. 美國-鋼鐵產品落日審查案(US-Steel Sunset Review from Japan), WT/ DS244/AB/R, WT/DS244/R; 16. 美國-軟木傾銷案(US-Soft Lumber from Canada), WT/ DS264/AB/R, WT/DS264/R.; 國際協定：; 1. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaty, 23 May 1969, 1155 United Nations Treaty Series 331 (1980); 8 International Legal Materials 679.; 2. Final Act Embodying The Results of The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (Marrakesh Agreement Establishing The World Trade Organization), 15 April 1994, The Legal Texts: The Results of The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, published by the WTO, Cambridge University Press, 2003.; 外國裁判：; 1.Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. National Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837(1984); 網站資料：; www.wto.org; www.ustr.gov; 其他：; 1. Ending the Uruguay Round: An Interview with GATT Chief Sutherland, Inside U.S. Trade, 24 Dec. 1993.; 2. Official says U.S. Rulings could complicate WTO Zeroing Case, Inside U.S. Trade, 9 April 2004.; 3. The New Oxford Dictionary of English, Judy Pearsall ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998).; G0913510421; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/35147

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/35147