المؤلفون: 楊文蘭 Wen-Lan Yang

المصدر: Kējì Fǎxué Pínglùn, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 149-186 (2016)

مصطلحات موضوعية: 專利侵權訴訟, 社會網絡分析, 角色與位置, 專利價值, 訴訟策略, Patent Infringement Litigation, Social Network Analysis, Role and Position, Patent Value, Litigation Strategy, Law, Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, K1-7720

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://lawreview.nctu.edu.tw/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E7%B6%B2%E7%B5%A1%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E6%8E%A2%E8%A8%8Eled%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8%E5%B0%88%E5%88%A9%E4%BE%B5%E6%AC%8A%E8%A8%B4%E8%A8%9F%E9%97%9C%E4%BF%82%E4%B9%8B/; https://doaj.org/toc/1811-3095

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/ed2be08d009146fe9fa5728c9c0ed3b1

المؤلفون: 王嬿晴, Wang, Yan-Cing

المساهمون: 鄭菀瓊, Cheng, Wan-Chiung

مصطلحات موضوعية: 專利蟑螂, 非實施專利實體, 專利訴訟策略, 專利權濫用, Patent troll, Non-Practicing Entity (NPE), Patent litigation strategy, Patent abuse

وصف الملف: 3582918 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 一、中文文獻\n（一）專書\n1. 王承守、鄧穎懋（2004）。《美國專利訴訟攻防策略運用》。台北：元照。\n2. 張宇樞（2009）。《美國專利訴訟實務》。台北：經濟部智慧財產局。\n3. 陳歆（2012）。《美國專利訴訟關鍵案例解讀》。台北：元照。\n（二）期刊論文\n1. 王立達（2018）。〈標準必要專利權行使之國際規範發展與比較分析──FRAND承諾法律性質、禁制令、權利金與競爭法規制〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，第275期，頁87-110。\n2. 王怡婷（2014）。〈大學型非專利實施實體發展動向觀察－以威斯康辛大學麥迪遜分校校友研究基金會（WARF）實務運作為例〉，《科技法律透析》，第27卷第1期，頁15-21。\n3. 何曜任（2011）。〈美國法專利權濫用理論對我國法之啟示〉，《智慧財產評論》，第9卷第2期，頁1-42。\n4. 周瑋祺（2014）。〈美國國際貿易委員會涉及標準專利(SEPs)案件所核發限制禁止命令遭否決撤銷〉，《科技法律透析》，第26卷第1期，頁8-9。\n5. 林鵬飛（2014）。〈防禦型專利集合之創新商業模式：RPX個案研究〉，《智慧財產月刊》，第189期，頁70-108。\n6. 邱敬淵（2016）。〈專利蟑螂與市場競爭〉，《公平交易委員會電子報》，第53期，頁1-5。\n7. 陳世傑（2013）。〈美國SHIELD法案圍堵專利蟑螂之思考〉，《科技法律透析》，第25卷第7期，頁2-3。\n8. 陳在方（2017）。〈美國專利紛爭解決之關鍵性變革〉，《交大法學評論》，第2期，頁1-62。\n9. 陳志清（2010）。〈企業與未實施專利實體之互動關係及因應策略（上）〉，《專利師》，第2期，頁43-51。\n10. 陳國成（2016）。〈我國均等論實務之發展——由最高法院102年度台上字第1986號判決觀察〉，《科技法學評論》，第13卷第1期，頁70-114。\n11. 馮浩庭（2008）。〈美國專利訴訟程序之研究——現況、困境與美國國會之修法回應〉，《智慧財產月刊》，第110期，頁71-97。\n12. 楊宏暉（2016）。〈標準關鍵專利之濫用與限制競爭〉，《公平交易季刊》，第23卷第4期，頁35-86。\n13. 楊智傑（2012）。〈美國智慧財產權訴訟中核發禁制令之審查〉，《智慧財產月刊》，第160期，頁51-100。\n14. 蔡宗霖（2017）。〈律師費轉嫁機制於美國專利法第285條之運用——以ICON Health & Fitness v. Octane Fitness為例〉，《專利師》，第29期，頁30-60。\n15. 羅育如（2015）。〈大學研發成果商業化評估方法初探〉，《科技法律透析》，第27卷第11期，頁13-20。\n16. 蘇昱婷、劉尚志（2013）。〈美國智慧財產權訴訟中核發禁制令之審查〉，《智慧財產月刊》，第177期，頁56-104。\n（三）網路資料\n1. AST聯手Google及各大廠推出IP3專利團購計畫（2016），新聚能科技，載於：https://synergytek.com.tw/blog/2016/05/22/ast-patent-purchase-promotion/ （最後瀏覽日：2022年2月23日）。\n2. Blue Spike以訊號粹取技術專利組合提起超過70起專利侵權告訴（2013），科技產業資訊室，載於：https://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=7765 （最後瀏覽日：2022年2月23日）。\n3. Hon. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Stephen G. Kuni，李淑蓮編譯（2013），新的領證後複審程序間接提升美國專利品質，北美智權報，載於：http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Laws/US-74.htm （最後瀏覽日：2022年2月23日）。\n4. 王怡婷（2016），何謂不實施專利實體（Non-practicing entitiy，NPE）？，資訊工業策進會科技法律研究所，載於：https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=67&tp=5&d=7300 （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n5. 王怡婷（2016），何謂防禦性聯盟（Defensive Patent Aggregator）？其是否為NPE的重要類型？，科技法律研究所，載於：https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=67&tp=5&d=7320 （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n6. 吳碧娥（2014），台灣企業與NPE合作 可行嗎？北美智權報，載於：http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Industry_Economy/publish-307.htm （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n7. 我國光電產業廠商在美國專利訴訟案件分析，智慧財產局，載於：https://tiponet.tipo.gov.tw/downloads/module030/industry_3_5.pdf （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n8. 李森堙（2017），談美國專利訴訟地域集中現象，科技政策觀點，載於：https://portal.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/article/10322 （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n9. 李森堙（2018），談TC Heartland案判決後美國專利訴訟管轄相關議題之釐清，Research Portal科技政策觀，載於：https://portal.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/article/10408 （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n10. 從STC.UNM看如何提高技轉中心專利運營績效（2019），新聚能科技，載於：https://synergytek.com.tw/blog/2019/05/07/stc-unm-vs-tp-link-patent-monetization/ （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n11. 陳宜誠（2014），發明專利進步性判準的演進，北美智權報，載於：http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Expert_Column/PE-108.htm （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n12. 舒安居（2014），專利蟑螂的緣起與滅絕：淺談如何跟蟑螂打交道，科技產業資訊室，載於：https://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/post/Read.aspx?PostID=10029（最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n13. 馮震宇（2014），專利訴訟費用負擔大逆轉 對抗NPE新利器浮現？，科技產業資訊室，載於：https://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=9660 （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n14. 新墨西哥大學技轉公司啟動專利戰 武器間接來自台灣研究機構（2020），科技產業資訊室，載於：https://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=16492（最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n15. 葉雲卿（2012），專利訴訟的管理基礎系列 I ─ 淺談ITC專利訴訟，北美智權報，載於：http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Expert_Column/Expert-5.htm （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n16. 蔣士棋（2021），台灣科技業如何利用NPE強化技術競爭力？，北美智權報，載於：http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Industry_Economy/IPNC_210714_0702.htm （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n17. 鴻海子公司鴻穎創新轉移專利給NPE，展開5G標準相關專利訴訟（2021），科技產業資訊室，載於：https://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=18340 （最後瀏覽日：2022年5月23日）。\n \n二、外文文獻\n（一）專書\n1. E. Allan Farnsworth, An introduction to the Legal System of the United States (third ed. 1999).\n2. Lester L. Hewitt, Patent infringement litigation: A Step-by-Step Guide from Dispute through Trial for Executives, Witnesses, and In-House Counsel (2005).\n（二）期刊論文\n1. Allen W. Wang, Rise of the Patent Intermediaries, 25 BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURANL 159 (2010).\n2. Allison, John R Lemley, Mark A, Schwartz, David L, How often do non-practicing entities win patent suits?, 32 BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURANL 237 (2017).\n3. Anna Mayergoyz, Lessons from Europe on How to Tame U.S. Patent Trolls, 42 CORNELL INTERRNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 241, 266 (2009).\n4. Aria Soroudi, Defeating Trolls: The Impact of Octane and Highmark on Patent Trolls, 35 LOYOLA LOS ANGELES ENTERTAINMENT LAW REVIEW 319 (2014).\n5. Ashley Chuang, Fixing the Failures of Software Patent Protection: Deterring Patent Trolling by Applying Industry-Specific Patentability Standards, 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERDISCIPLINARY LAW JOURANL 215 (2006).\n6. Axel Haus & Steffen Juranek, Non-practicing entities: Enforcement specialists, 53 INTERRNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS 38 (2018).\n7. Chien, Colleen, Startups and patent trolls, 17 STANFORD TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW, Paper No. 9-12, (2013) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2146251 (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n8. Christian Helmers, Brian Love & Luke McDonagh, Is There a Patent Troll Problem in the U.K., 24 FORDHAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 509 (2014).\n9. Cohen, Lauren Gurun, Umit G Kominers & Scott Duke, Patent trolls: Evidence from targeted firms, 65 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 5461 (2019).\n10. Cohen, Lauren, Gurun, Umit G & Kominers, Scott Duke, Empirical evidence on the behavior and impact of patent trolls: A survey, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2708224\n11. Colleen V. Chien, Of Trolls, Davids, Goliaths, and Kings: Narratives and Evidence in the Litigation of High-Tech Patents, 87 NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW 1571 (2009).\n12. Daniel F. Spulber, How Patents Provide the Foundation of the Market for Inventions, 11 JOURANL OF COMPETITION LAW AND ECONOMICS 271 (2015)\n13. Daniel Roth, Patent Litigation Attorneys’ Fees: Shifting from Status to Conduct, 13 CHICAGO-KENT JOURNAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 257 (2013)\n14. David L. Schwartz & Jay P. Kesan, Analyzing the Role of Non-Practicing Entities in the Patent System, 99 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 425 (2014).\n15. David Rosenberg & Steven Shavell, A Model in Which Suits Are Brought for Their Nuisance Value, 5 INTERRNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS 3 (1985).\n16. Edward Lee, Patent Trolls: Moral Panics, Motions in Limine, and Patent Reform, 19 STANFORD TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW113 (2015).\n17. Eric J. Riedel, Patent Infringement Demand Letters: Does Noerr-Pennington or the First Amendment Preempt State-Law Liability for Misleading Statements, 31 BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURANL 623 (2016).\n18. James Bessen & Michael J. Meurer, The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes, 99 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 387 (2014).\n19. James Bessen, Jennifer Ford & Michael J. Meurer, The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls, 34 REGULATION 26 (2011).\n20. James F McDonough, III, The Myth of the Patent Troll: An Alternative View of the Function of Patent Dealers in an Idea Economy, 56 EMORY LAW JOURANL 189 (2006).\n21. Jay P. Kesan & Carol M. Hayes, FRAND`s forever: standards, patent transfers, and licensing commitments, 89 INDIANA LAW JOURANL 231 (2014).\n22. Joseph Scott Miller, Standard Setting, Patents, and a Access Lock-In: RAND Licensing and the Theory of the Firm, 40 INDIANA LAW REVIEW 351 (2007).\n23. Mark A. Lemley, Are Universities Patent Trolls, 18 FORDHAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 611 (2008).\n24. Matthew Sag, IP Litigation in U.S. District Courts: 1994-2014, 101 IOWA LAW REVIEW 1065 (2016).\n25. Michael J. Mazzeo, Jonathan H. Ashtor & Samantha Zyontz, Do NPEs Matter; Non-Practicing Entities and Patent Litigation Outcomes, 9 JOURANL OF COMPETITION LAW AND ECONOMICS 879 (2013).\n26. Michael Risch, Patent Troll Myths, 42 SETON HALL LAW REVIEW 457 (2012).\n27. Robert P. Merges, The Trouble with Trolls: Innovation, Rent-Seeking, and Patent Law Reform, 24 BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURANL 1583 (2009).\n28. Robin Feldman & Mark A. Lemley, Do Patent Licensing Demands Mean Innovation, 101 IOWA LAW REVIEW 137 (2015).\n29. Sannu K. Shrestha, Trolls or Market-Makers - An Empirical Analysis of Nonpracticing Entities, 110 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW 114 (2010).\n30. Shawn P. Miller, Who`s Suing Us: Decoding Patent Plaintiffs since 2000 with the Stanford NPE Litigation Dataset, 21 STANFORD TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW 235 (2018).\n31. Yan Leychkis, Of Fire Ants and Claim Construction: An Empirical of the Meteoric Rise of the Eastern District of Texas as a Preeminent Forum for Patent Litigation, 9 YALE JOURNAL OF LAW AND TECHNOLOGY 193 (2006-2007).\n（三）政府官方文件\n1. Ftc.gov, Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC study, https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/patent-assertion-entity-activity-ftc-study/p131203_patent_assertion_entity_activity_an_ftc_study_0.pdf (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n2. Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2020: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL33225.pdf (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n3. supremecourt.gov, 2021 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary, https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2021year-endreport.pdf#page=5 (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n4. Usitc.gov, United States International Trade Commission Annual Performance Plan, FY 2020-21 and Annual Performance Report, FY2019, https://www.usitc.gov/documents/usitc_fy2020-2021_app-fy2019_apr-feb2020.pdf (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n（四）國會法案/政策草案\n1. Draft Policy Statement On Licensing Negotiations And Remedies For Standards-Essential Patents Subject To Voluntary F/RAND Commitments, https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1453826/download (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n2. H.R.6245 - Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act of 2012, 112th Congress (2011-2012), https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/6245?s=1&r=58 (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n3. H.R.9 - Innovation Act 114th Congress (2015-2016) https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/9 (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n（五）網路資料\n1. ahdictionary.com, troll, https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=troll (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n2. Eli Whitney Museum, http://eliwhitney.org/museum/about-eli-whitney/inventor#two (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n3. forbes.com, Obama admin’s decision to overturn Apple’s ITC import ban was the right one. https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/08/05/obama-admins-decision-to-overturn-apples-itc-import-ban-was-the-right-one/?sh=59461f71c973 (last visited: Feb. 22, 2022).\n4. insight.rpxcorp, https://insight.rpxcorp.com/litigation/txedce-167729-semcon-ip-v-mediatek#patent_information (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n5. Insight.rpxcorp. https://insight.rpxcorp.com/entity/1034849-3g-licensing-s-a#patents (last visited: Feb. 22, 2022).\n6. Insight.rpxcorp. https://insight.rpxcorp.com/litigation_campaign/73814-american-patents-llc-6-004-049#campaign_overview_section (last visited: Feb. 22, 2022).\n7. Intellectual Ventures, https://www.intellectualventures.com/who-we-are/leadership/nathan-myhrvold (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n8. Justice.gov, Public comments – Draft policy statement on licensing negotiations and remedies for standards-essential patents, https://www.justice.gov/atr/guidelines-and-policy-statements-0/public-comments-draft-policy-statement-licensing-negotiations-and-remedies-standards-essential (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n9. Law360.com, What To Know About RPX`s Deal With Intellectual Ventures, https://www.law360.com/articles/1343848/what-to-know-about-rpx-s-deal-with-intellectual-ventures (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n10. Mondaq.com, United States: Biden Administration Releases Draft Of SEP Policy Revamp, https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/patent/1148644/biden-administration-releases-draft-of-sep-policy-revamp (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n11. Oliver, E., Richardson, K., & Costa, M. How Intellectual Ventures Is Streamlining Its Portfolio, iam-media.com, https://www.iam-media.com/litigation/how-intellectual-ventures-streamlining-its-portfolio (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n12. portal.unifiedpatents.com, https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/patents/analytics/ptab-and-litigation?publication_status=Active&publication_type=G (last visited: Feb. 22, 2022).\n13. Pwc.com, 2017 Patent Litigation Study, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/forensic-services/publications/assets/2017-patent-litigation-study.pdf (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n14. Pwc.com, 2018 Patent Litigation Study, https://www.ipwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2018-pwc-patent-litigation-study.pdf (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n15. Randall R. Rader, Colleen V. Chien & David Hricik, Make Patent Trolls Pay in Court, https://socalip.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/make-patent-trolls-pay-in-court-nytimes.pdf (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n16. Resis, R., History of the patent troll and lessons learned., https://bannerwitcoff.com/_docs/library/articles/HistoryOfPatentTroll.pdf (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n17. Richard Lloyd, IV pulls back from patent acquisitions to focus on monetising existing portfolio through sale and licence, https://www.iam-media.com/litigation/iv-pulls-back-patent-acquisitions-focus-monetising-existing-portfolio-through-sale-and-licence (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n18. Rpxcorp.com, 2017 in Review: A Year of Transition, https://www.rpxcorp.com/intelligence/blog/2017-in-review-a-year-of-transition/ (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n19. Rpxcorp.com, 2018 Patent Litigation and Marketplace Overview, https://www.rpxcorp.com/intelligence/blog/2018-patent-litigation-and-marketplace-overview/ (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n20. Rpxcorp.com, https://www.rpxcorp.com/platform/rpx-network/ (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n21. Rpxcorp.com, NPE Litigation: Costs by Key Events, https://www.rpxcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/05/Final-NPE-Litigation-Costs-by-Key-Events1.pdf (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n22. Rpxcorp.com, Q1 in Review: Courts Tackle SEP Issues as Patent Deals and Third-Party Funding Bolster NPE Activity, https://www.rpxcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2022/04/RPX-Q1-in-Review-April-2022.pdf (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n23. Rpxcorp.com, Q4 in Review: NPEs Cap Off a Busy 2021 as SEP Policies Evolve in the US and UK, https://www.rpxcorp.com/intelligence/blog/q4-in-review-npes-cap-off-a-busy-2021-as-sep-policies-evolve-in-the-us-and-uk/(last visited: May 22, 2022).\n24. Transpacificip.com, http://www.transpacificip.com/our-company/our-story (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n25. Unifiedpatents.com, Who do Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) Target? https://www.unifiedpatents.com/insights/2019/11/13/da67lqresu99qshdibvrvv7vu4plk8?utm_source=Unified+Patents+Newsletter&utm_campaign=a216f37e21-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_10_02_08_16_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_5140119467-a216f37e21-124538539 (last visited: May 22, 2022).\n26. usitc.gov, About Section 337 https://www.usitc.gov/intellectual_property/about_section_337.htm (last visited: May 22, 2022)\n27. wikipedia.org, troll, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll (last visited: May 22, 2022).; G0108364209; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/142105; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/142105/1/420901.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/142105
https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202201521
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/142105/1/420901.pdf

المؤلفون: 岳林

المساهمون: 北京大学法学院

المصدر: 知网

مصطلحات موضوعية: 法律实践, 司法策略, 诉讼策略

Relation: 北京大学研究生学志.2010,(02),89-100.; 963904; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/102394

الاتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/102394

المؤلفون: 杨静

المساهمون: 北京大学法学院 北京100089

المصدر: 知网

مصطلحات موضوعية: 计算机软件, 著作权侵权诉讼, 抗辩事由, 诉讼策略

Relation: 山西财经大学学报.2007,(S2),216-218.; 772195; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/99006

الاتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/99006

المؤلفون: 林曉玟, Lin, Hsiao Wen

المساهمون: 馮震宇

مصطلحات موضوعية: 專利訴訟策略, 觸控技術, 義隆電子, 禾瑞亞, Patent Litigation Strategy, Touch Technology, ELAN Microelectronics Corp. (ELAN), eGalax_eMPIA Technology Inc (EETI)

وصف الملف: 1895962 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: G0098361018; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/89088

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/89088

المؤلفون: 趙振傑, Chao, Chen-Chieh

المساهمون: 電信管理研究所, 黃國平, Hwang, Kuo-Ping

مصطلحات موضوعية: 專利訴訟, 專利佈局, 專利訴訟策略, 智慧裝置, Patent Lawsuit, Patent Portfolio, Patent Lawsuit Strategy, Smart Device, manag, eco

Relation: http://ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/136415

الاتاحة: http://ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/136415

المؤلفون: 孫偉棟, Sun, Wei-Tung, 劉尚志, Liu, Shang-Jyh

المساهمون: 科技法律研究所

مصطلحات موضوعية: 學名藥, 專利藥, 專利連結, 專利訴訟策略, 橘皮書, 藥品價格競爭及專利期展延法案, generic drug, brand name drug, patent linkage, patent litigation strategy, orange Book, Hatch-Waxman Act, scipo, manag

Relation: http://hdl.handle.net/11536/73428

الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/11536/73428

المؤلفون: 吳俊彥, Wu, Chun-Yen

المساهمون: 企業管理系碩士班, 張真堯, 嚴國慶, Chen-yao Chang, Kuo-qin Yan

مصطلحات موضوعية: 專利, 訴訟策略, 限制理論, 訴訟成本, 訴訟風險, litigation cost, litigation risk, patent, litigation strategy, theory of constraints

وصف الملف: 1077064 bytes; application/octet-stream

Relation: 096CYUT5121038; http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/handle/310901800/29005; http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/bitstream/310901800/29005/1/096CYUT5121038-001.zip

الاتاحة: http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/handle/310901800/29005
http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/bitstream/310901800/29005/1/096CYUT5121038-001.zip

المؤلفون: 王仲, Jong Wang, 朱博湧, Po-Young Chu

المساهمون: 高階主管管理碩士學程

مصطلحات موضوعية: 智財權, 專利權, 專利管理訴訟, 專利管理訴訟策略, intellectual property right, patent, management of patent lawsuit, strategy for management of patent lawsuit, eco, droit

Relation: http://hdl.handle.net/11536/79391

الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/11536/79391

المؤلفون: 謝采薇, Hsieh, Kelly

المساهمون: 劉江彬, Liu, C. B.

مصطلحات موضوعية: 定暫時狀態假處分, 訴訟策略, 智慧財產法院, 訴訟保險, 智慧財產權管理, Preliminary injunction, the stratery of litigation, The Intellectual property Court, Litigation insurance, the management of intellectual property, droit, scipo

Relation: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/1/36100801.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/2/36100802.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/3/36100803.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/4/36100804.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/5/36100805.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/6/36100806.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/7/36100807.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/8/36100808.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/9/36100809.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/10/36100810.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/11/36100811.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/12/36100812.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/33869

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/1/36100801.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/2/36100802.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/3/36100803.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/4/36100804.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/5/36100805.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/6/36100806.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/7/36100807.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/8/36100808.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/9/36100809.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33869/10/36100810.pdf

المؤلفون: 林曉玟, Lin, Hsiao Wen

مصطلحات موضوعية: 專利訴訟策略, 觸控技術, 義隆電子, 禾瑞亞, Patent Litigation Strategy, Touch Technology, ELAN Microelectronics Corp. (ELAN), eGalax_eMPIA Technology Inc (EETI)

الاتاحة: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0098361018%22.

المؤلفون: 謝采薇, Hsieh, Kelly

مصطلحات موضوعية: 定暫時狀態假處分, 訴訟策略, 智慧財產法院, 訴訟保險, 智慧財產權管理, Preliminary injunction, the stratery of litigation, The Intellectual property Court, Litigation insurance, the management of intellectual property

الاتاحة: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0093361008%22.