يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 45 نتيجة بحث عن '"著作財產權"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.43s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Academic Journal
  8. 8
    Academic Journal
  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
    Academic Journal
  11. 11
    Dissertation/ Thesis

    المؤلفون: 葉盈汝, Yeh, In-Ru

    المساهمون: 沈宗倫, Shen, Chung-Lun

    وصف الملف: 2019688 bytes; application/pdf

    Relation: 一、書籍\n中文\n1. 李劍非,著作權與網路資訊自由,2011年11月。\n2. 章忠信,著作權逐條釋義,2019年,五版。\n3. 羅明通,著作權法論(一),2005年,六版。\n4. 蕭雄淋,著作權法論,2015年,八版。\n5. 蕭雄淋,著作權法漫談精選,1995年。\n英文\n1. Davies, Gillian (1994), COPYRIGHT AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST, Wiley-VCH.\n2. Ficsor, Mihály (2002), COLLECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS, WIPO.\n3. Knox, T. M. (1967), HEGELS PHILOSOPHY OF RIGHT, London: Oxford University Press.\n4. Morgan, Owen (2002), INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION OF PERFORMERS RIGHTS, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.\n5. Murray, Andrew D. (2007), THE REGULATION OF CYBERSPACE CONTROL IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT, New York: Routledge-Cavendish.\n6. Patterson, Lyman Ray (1968), COPYRIGHT IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.\n7. Rosati, Eleonora (2013), ORIGINALITY IN EU COPYRIGHT: FULL HARMONIZATION THROUGH CASE LAW, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing\n8. Throsby, David (2001), ECONOMICS AND CULTURE, Cambridge University Press.\n9. v. Lewinski, S. (2008), INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAW AND POLICY, New York: Oxford University Press Inc.\n10. Watal, Jayashree (2001), INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE WTO AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, Kluwer Law International.\n11. Deazley, Ronan, Kretschmer, Martin, & Bently, Lionel (eds.) (2010), PRIVILEGE AND PROPERTY: ESSAYS ON THE HISTORY OF COPYRIGHT, Cambridge: OpenBook Publishers.\n12. Garnett, Kevin, Davids, Gillian & Harbottle, Gwilym (15th ed.2005), COPINGER AND SKONE JAMES ON COPYRIGHT, Sweet & Maxwell.\n13. Nimmer, Melville B.& Nimmer, David (2001), NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT, Volume VIII, New York: LexisNexis Matthew Bender.\n14. Reinbothe, J. & von Lewinski, S. (2d ed. 2015), THE WIPO TREATIES ON COPYRIGH: A COMMENTARY ON THE WCT, THE WPPT, AND THE BTAP, New York: Oxford University Press Inc.\n15. Walter, M. M. & v. Lewinski, S. (2010), EUROPEAN COPYRIGHT LAW A COMMENTARY, U.K.: Oxford University Press.\n\n二、專書論文\n中文\n16. 許曉芬,視聽著作的另一種觀點—法國法的堅持或偏執?載:國際比較下我國著作權法之總檢討,229-257,2014年。\n17. 陳木金,談教育基本法的立法對我國教育行政的啟示,載:教育行政論壇第五次研討會學術論文集,333-55,1999年。 https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/38157/1/4-5.pdf\n18. 張懿云,視聽表演人保護之研究—以視聽表演北京條約為中心,載:國際比較下我國著作權法之總檢討,301-332,2014年。\n19. 馮震宇,歐盟著作權指令體制與相關歐盟法院判決之研究,載:國際比較下我國著作權法之總檢討,491-543,2014年。\n英文\n1. Fisher, William (2000), Theories of Intellectual Property, in S. Munzer ed., NEW ESSAYS IN THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL THEORY OF PROPERTY, Cambridge University Press. (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)\n2. Katzenberger, Paul (1986), Trips and Copyright Law, in Beier and Schricker eds., FROM GATT TO TRIPS: THE AGREEMENT ON TRADE-RELATED ASPECT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. (Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers)\n德文\n3. P. Katzenberger, Inländerbehandlung nach dem Rom-Abkommen in C. Heath and P. Ganea(eds), Urheberrecht: Gestern-Heute-Morgen, Festschrift für Adolf Dietz zum 65. Geburtstag ,2001, S. 481ff.\n4. Lewinski, Urheberrecht auf dem Weg zur Informationsgesellschaft in Schricker (Hrsg.), 1997, S. 229ff.\n三、期刊論文\n中文\n5. 王必芳,法國行政法上的公益概念,中原經法學第30期,1-69(2003)\n6. 王怡蘋,契約自由與著作人格權之保護,輔仁法學第51期,1-52(2016)\n7. 王思原,著作人與著作人格權之歸屬—英國法的觀察,月旦法學雜誌,第279期,174-84(2018)\n8. 林依仁,文化憲法的意義(上),月旦法學雜誌第290期,164-88(2019)\n9. 林亞婷(譯),Susan Leigh Foster(著),編創舞蹈與編舞者—編舞一詞的由來,藝術評論第18期,1-25(2008)\n10. 周志宏,制定文化基本法之法律問題,法之橋:臺灣與法國之法學交會,243-84(2016)\n11. 洪德欽,歐洲聯盟法的法源,華岡法粹第57期,1-42(2014)\n12. 馬鈺婷,簡介原住民族傳統智慧創作專用權及實務狀況,萬國法律第229期,22-30(2020)\n13. 章忠信,92年新修正著作權法簡析,月旦法學雜誌第103期,103-119(2003)\n14. 章忠信,北京視聽表演條約後的表演人權利保護,智慧產權月刊第179期,5-50(2013)\n15. 陳新民,著作權的社會義務:由德國憲法學的角度檢驗智慧產權的保障及其限制,臺大法學論叢,第37卷第4期,115-177(2008)\n16. 陳建綱,效益主義的發軔:初探邊沁的政治思想,人文及社會科學集刊,第29卷第4期,1-37(2017)\n17. 馮震宇,論文物藝術品攝影著作之保護與利用,月旦法學雜誌,第249期,70-88(2016)\n18. 黃心怡,論攝影之原創性,東吳法律學報第24卷第3期,125-148(2013)\n19. 黃居正、邱盈翠,公共領域的結構轉型:以美國著作權法的理論變遷與食物觀點為中心,歐美研究,第41卷第4期,1023-1097(2011)\n20. 鄭中人,知識經濟時代下的著作權(上),月旦法學雜誌,第105期,92-107(2004)\n21. 蔡明誠,評1990年著作權法修正草案,政大法學評論,第40期,203-216(1989)\n22. 賴文智,著作物重製設備補償金收取制度之研究,智慧產權月刊第85期,107-128(2006)\n23. 謝銘洋,衍生著作及其相關問題研究,最高法院106年度民事學術研討會,台灣法學雜誌第338期,59-82(2018)\n24. 蕭雄淋,著作鄰接權與日本著作權法,中興法學第22期,497-526(1986)\n\n英文\n1. Fisher ll, William W., Recalibrating Originality, 54(2) Houston Law Review, 438-468 (2016).\n2. Ginsburg, Jane C., A Tale of Two Copyrights: Literary Property in Revolutionary France and America, 64 Tul. L. Rev. 991-1031 (1990).\n3. Gruenberger, Michael, A duty to protect the rights of performer? Constitutional foundations of an intellectual property right, 24 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment, 617-685 (2006).\n4. Horwitz, William E., Scope of Gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 after Rumsey v. Wilson: White Buffalo or Brown Cow, 14 CARDOZO Arts & ENT. L.J. 153 (1996).\n5. Hughes, Justin, The Philosophy of Intellectual Property, 77 Geo. L. J. 287-359 (1988)\n6. Hughes, Justin, The Photographer’s Copyright—Photograph as Art, Photograph as Database, 25 HARV. J. L. & TECH. 328-413 (2012).\n7. Maroz, Raman, The freedom of artistic expression in the jurisprudence of the United States supreme court and frderal constitutional court of Germany: A comparative analysis, 35(2) Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 341-382 (2017).\n8. Netanel, N., Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society. 106(2) The Yale Law Journal, 283-387 (1996).\n9. Neu, Timm, The Fair Pay Revolution: German Copyright Law’s International Reach, 26 MICH. St. INT’L. Rev., 445-482 (2018).\n10. Parker, Jordan, Smile and Say, “We Need Not Decide:” Decoding The Federal Courts’ Nonanswers Regarding The Derivative-Works Status of Photographs, 14 TUL. J. Tech & Intell. Prop. 261-281264 (2011).\n11. Reinbothe, J., Martin-Prat, M., & v. Lewinski, S., The New WIPO Treaties: A First Resume, European Intelletual Property Review, 19, 171-6 (1997)\n12. Radin, Margarey Jane, Property and Personhood, 34 Stanford Law Review 957-1015 (1982).\n13. Senftleben, Martin, More Money for Creators and More Support for Copyright in Society-Fair Remuneration Rights in Germany and the Netherlands, 41 COLUM. J.L. & Arts. 413-433 (2018).\n14. Stengel, Daniel, Intellectual Property in Philosophy, Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy 90, no. 1, 20-50 (2004)\n15. Hilty, Rero M. & Peukert, Alexander, Equitable remuneration in copyright law: The amended german copyright act as trap for the entertainment industry in the U.S., 22(2) Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 401-450 (2004).\n16. Joyce, Craig & Patterson, L. Ray, Copyright in 1791: An Essay Concerning the Founders` View of the Copyright Power Granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution, 52 Emory Law Journal 909-953 (2003)\n\n四、其他\n1. 許忠信,國際著作權公約及發展趨勢,智慧產局培訓學院教材53。\n2. 王泰銓編印(1996),伍、法國著作權法令曁判決之研究,國際著作權法令曁判決之研究,內政部85年度研究報告。\n3. 蔡明誠編印(1996),肆、德國著作權法令曁判決之研究,國際著作權法令曁判決之研究,內政部85年度研究報告。\n4. 蔡明誠(2010),從比較法觀點論著作之原創性及創作性要件,載:行政訴訟及懲戒廳(編),智慧產權訴訟制度相關論文彙編第1輯。\n5. 蔡英文編印(1996),陸、歐盟著作權法令曁判決之研究,國際著作權法令曁判決之研究,內政部85年度研究報告。\n6. 陳家駿、張懿云、馮震宇、黃銘傑、謝銘洋、劉孔中(2013),整體著作權法制之檢討,計畫系統編號:PG8902-0127,台北,經濟部智慧產局。\n7. 林郁菁,著作權法對表演人保護規範本土化之研究,國立交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文(2007)\n8. 立法院:會議議案關係文書院總第553號政府提案第3963號之1 https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lgmeetimage?cfcec7c7cdcacfcfc5c7cdd2cec7c9\n9. 立法院:會議議案關係文書院總第553號政府提案第5490,810,1548號之1\n10. 台北市藝術創作者職業工會(2019):藝術工作勞動調查報告 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l3UI_amy5zDXKWyUBpyKRGl-PBaCjFl9/view?fbclid=IwAR3t2q3DmrBK_I1KcwsOYQgQmrSk2qcGB5ZneKZCoRg_8TKjK6jrwW4PreU\n11. 吳尚昆(2019),文化基本法制定後對著作權的思考 https://wulaw.blog/2019/05/23/文化基本法制定後對著作權的思考\n12. 吳霈栩、郭建中(2019),美國音樂現代化法案對數位音樂的影響 http://www.winklerpartners.com/?p=9475&lang=zh-hant\n13. 風傳媒(2015),月河—險些被剪掉的奧斯卡最佳電影歌曲 https://www.storm.mg/article/52741?page=2\n14. 經濟部智慧產局:魔術表演能不能受著作權法保護? https://www.tipo.gov.tw/tw/cp-51-658167-1d8f5-1.html\n15. 章忠信(1999),立法院三讀通過科學技術基本法,著作權筆記http://www.copyrightnote.org/ArticleContent.aspx?ID=54&aid=2019\n16. 章忠信(2011):美國錄音著作保護現況,著作權筆記 http://www.copyrightnote.org/ArticleContent.aspx?ID=54&aid=2235\n17. APEO-ARTIS (2014):Performers’ Right in International and European Legislation: Situation and Elements for Improvement https://www.aepo-artis.org/usr/files/di/fi/2/AEPO-ARTIS-study-on-performers-rights-1-December-2014-FINAL_201611291138.pdf\n18. APEO-ARTIS (2018):Performers’ Right in International and European Legislation: Situation and Elements for Improvement https://www.aepo-artis.org/usr/files/di/fi/2/AEPO-ARTIS-Study-2018---Performers%E2%80%99-Rights-in-International-and-European-_20181161711.pdf\n19. Bursztynsky, Jessica (2020): Netflix says these three effects of the coronavirus crisis are impacting its business, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/21/netflix-q1-2020-earnings-three-effects-coronavirus-has-on-business.html\n20. ECS (2018): Comment of the European Copyright Society Addressing Selected Aspects of the Implementation of Articles 18 to 22 of the Directive (EU) 2019/79- on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. https://europeancopyrightsocietydotorg.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/ecs-comment-article-17-cdsm.pdf\n21. Treppoz, Edouard & Arbant, Géraldine (2019), The EU Copyright Directive: The new best-seller right. https://mediawrites.law/the-eu-copyright-directive-the-new-best-seller-right/\n22. UNESCO (2013):Creative Economy Report 2013 http://www.unesco.org/culture/pdf/creative-economy-report-2013.pdf\n23. UNESCO, ILO & BIRPI (1961):Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the International Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000003572\n24. UNESCO & WIPO (1985):MODEL PROVISIONS FOR NATIONAL LAWS ON THE PROTECTION OF EXPRESSIONS OF FOLKLORE AGAINST ILLICIT EXPLOITATION AND OTHER PREJUDICIAL ACTIONS https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/folklore/1982-folklore-model-provisions.pdf\n25. v. Lewinski, S. (2007) :Stakeholder Consultation on Copyright Levies in a Converging World. Response of the Max Planck Institute Intellectual Property, Munich https://ip.mpg.de/en/publications/details/stakeholder-consultation-on-copyright-levies-in-a-converging-world-response-of-the-max-planck-institute-intellectual-property-munich.html\n26. WCED (1987):Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf\n27. WIPO(1981):Guide to the Rome Convention and to the Phonograms Convention https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=3161&plang=EN\n28. WIPO (1991):The International Bureau of WIPO prepared a memorandum for the first session of the Committee of Experts on a Possible Protocol to the Berne Convention in November 1991 (document BCP/CE/I/2)\n29. WIPO (1992):Questions Concerning a Possible Protocol to the Berne Convention, part I, Memorandum.\n30. WIPO (1996):Resolution Concerning Audiovisual Performances Adopted by the Diplomatic Conference on December 20,1996 https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/diplconf/en/crnr_dc/crnr_dc_99.doc\n31. WIPO (2001):Wipo Report on Fact-Finding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge (1998-1999): Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge Holders https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/tk/768/wipo_pub_768.pdf\n32. WIPO (2008):Protecting Traditional Knowledge, Folklore/Traditional Cultural Expressions and Genetic Resources: Policy and Legal Challenges for Caribbean countries https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=114457\n33. WIPO (2011):Statement by Javier Bardem to the High Level Copyright Dialogue on the Film Industry https://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/activities/copyright_dialogue/statements/bardem.html\n34. WIPO (2016):Mihály Ficsor, Copyright, cultural diversity and development https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/./wipo_ipda_ge_16_t14.pptx\n35. WTO:Frequently asked questions about TRIPS [ trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights ] in the WTO https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/tripfq_e.htm\n36. Persée:Rapport par M. Le Chapelier du comité de constitution sur la pétition des auteurs dramatiques, lors de la séance du 13 janvier 1791 https://www.persee.fr/doc/arcpa_0000-0000_1885_num_22_1_9756_t1_0210_0000_4; G0104652026; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/134108; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/134108/1/202601.pdf

  12. 12
    Academic Journal
  13. 13
    Academic Journal

    المؤلفون: 田芙蓉

    المساهمون: 北京大学 法学博士,北京天恒可持续发展研究所研究员

    المصدر: 知网

    Relation: 世界发明.2007,(01),78-79.; 755172; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/317113

  14. 14
    Academic Journal
  15. 15
    Academic Journal
  16. 16
    Academic Journal
  17. 17
    Academic Journal

    المؤلفون: 崔立红

    المساهمون: 北京大学知识产权学院

    المصدر: 知网

    Relation: 中华商标.2001,(03),32-34.; 955416; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/163506

  18. 18
    Dissertation/ Thesis
  19. 19
  20. 20