نتائج البحث - "結構方程式"

Relation: 呂琦瑋（2013）。從使用者觀點探究社群媒體時代下的新聞消費意涵: 以 Facebook 為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學，台北。\n孟淑華（1995）。傳播理論起源、方法與應用。台北：五南。（原書 Severin, W. J. & Tankard, J. W. (1992). Communication theories; origins, methods, and uses in the mass media (3rd Ed.). New York: Longman.）\n涂瑞華（1996）。台灣媒介與資訊社會。台北：亞太。\n陳學志、卓淑玲（2018）。動機與情緒。在梁庚辰（主編），心理學：身體、心\n靈與文化的整合（頁351-400）。國立臺灣大學出版中心。\n彭家發（1996）。認識大眾傳播。台北：中華民國中山學術文化基金會。\n臺灣傳播調查資料庫（2022）。第二期第五次臺灣傳播調查資料庫一般民眾正式調查問卷。\nAgrawal, N., & Duhachek, A. (2010). Emotional compatibility and the effectiveness of antidrinking messages: A defensive processing perspective on shame and guilt. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 263-273.\nAltay, S., de Araujo, E., & Mercier, H. (2022). "If This account is True, It is Most Enormously Wonderful": Interestingness-If-True and the Sharing of True and False News [Article]. Digital Journalism, 10(3), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1941163\nAn, J., Quercia, D., and Crowcroft, J. (2014). Partisan sharing: Facebook evidence and\nsocietal consequences. In Proceedings of the second edition of the ACM conference on Online social networks - COSN ’14, 13–24, New York, New York, USA. ACM Press.\nAppelman, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Measuring Message Credibility: Construction and Validation of an Exclusive Scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057\nBagdikian, B. H. (1971). The Information Machines: Their Impact on Men and the Media. Harper & Row.\nBagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, 74-94.\nBakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Everyone`s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining,\nBarasch, A., & Berger, J. (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 286-299.\nBastian, B., Jetten, J., & Ferris, L. J. (2014). Pain as social glue: Shared pain increases cooperation. Psychological Science, 25(11), 2079-2085.\nBaumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong - Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human-Motivation [Review]. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497\nBaumeister, R. F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of general psychology, 8(2), 111-121.\nBentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.\nBerger, J. (2011). Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information [Article]. Psychological Science, 22(7), 891-893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611413294\nBerger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002\nBerger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What Makes Online Content Viral? [Article]. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353\nBerriche, M., & Altay, S. (2020). Internet users engage more with phatic posts than with health misinformation on Facebook. Palgrave Communications, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0452-1\nBode, L. (2016). Political News in the News Feed: Learning Politics from Social Media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149\nBordia, P., & DiFonzo, N. (2004). Problem solving in social interactions on the Internet: Rumor as social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(1), 33-49.\nBotha, E. (2014). A means to an end: Using political satire to go viral. Public Relations Review, 40(2), 363-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.11.023\nBowman, S., & Willis, C. (2003). We the media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. American Press Institute.\nBrowne, M. W. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models, 136-162.\nChadwick, A. (2011). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British prime minister and the “Bullygate” affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 3-29.\nCoker, B. (2020). Arousal enhances herding tendencies when decision making. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(3), 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1811\nCorrea, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253.\nDafonte-Gómez, A. (2018). Audience as medium: Motivations and emotions in news sharing. International journal of communication.\nDame Adjin-Tettey, T. (2022). Combating fake news, disinformation, and misinformation: Experimental evidence for media literacy education. Cogent arts & humanities, 9(1), 2037229.\nDe Angelis, M., Bonezzi, A., Peluso, A. M., Rucker, D. D., & Costabile, M. (2012). On Braggarts and Gossips: A Self-Enhancement Account of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Transmission [Article]. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 551-563. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0136\nDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01\nDeFleur, M. L., & Dennis, E. E. (1988). Understanding Mass Communication (3rd ed.). Houghton Mifflin.\nDeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.\nDiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Psychological Factors in Rumor Spread. In N. DiFonzo & P. Bordia (Eds.), Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches (pp. 69-88). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11503-000\nDubois, D., Bonezzi, A., & De Angelis, M. (2016). Sharing with Friends Versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Closeness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence [Article]. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 712-727. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0312\nDuffy, A., & Ling, R. (2020). The Gift of News: Phatic News Sharing on Social Media for Social Cohesion. Journalism Studies, 21(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2019.1627900\nDunbar, R. I. M., Teasdale, B., Thompson, J., Budelmann, F., Duncan, S., Van Emde Boas, E., & Maguire, L. (2016). Emotional arousal when watching drama increases pain threshold and social bonding. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160288. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160288\nEckler, P., & Bolls, P. (2011). Spreading the Virus. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 11(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2011.10722180\nEkman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: a reply to Russell`s mistaken critique.\nFan, R., Xu, K., & Zhao, J. (2020). Weak ties strengthen anger contagion in social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01924.\nFan, X. M., Chang, E. C., & Wegener, D. T. (2015). Two- or one-dimensional view of arousal? Exploring tense and energetic arousal routes to consumer attitudes [Article]. European Journal of Marketing, 49(9-10), 1417-1435. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-04-2013-0189\nForest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 23(3), 295-302.\nFriedland, L. (2003). Public journalism: Past and future. Kettering Foundation Press.\nGillmor, D. (2004). We the media: Grassroots journalism by the People, for the People. O`Reilley.\nGoffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor.\nGranovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.\nGuadagno, R. E., Rempala, D. M., Murphy, S., & Okdie, B. M. (2013). What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2312-2319.\nGuess, A., Aslett, K., Tucker, J., Bonneau, R., and Nagler, J. (2021). Cracking open the\nnews feed. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 1, 1–48.\nHanson, G., & Haridakis, P. (2008). YouTube users watching and sharing the news: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(3).\nHarcup, T., & O`Neill, D. (2017). What is News?: News values revisited (again) [Article]. Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2016.1150193\nHeath, C. (1996). Do people prefer to pass along good or bad news? Valence and relevance of news as predictors of transmission propensity. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 68(2), 79-94.\nHeath, C., Bell, C., & Sternberg, E. (2001). Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(6), 1028.\nHeilman, K. M. (1997). The neurobiology of emotional experience. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.\nHo, J. Y., & Dempsey, M. (2010). Viral marketing: Motivations to forward online content. Journal of Business research, 63(9-10), 1000-1006.\nHoffman, L. H., Glynn, C. J., Huge, M. E., Sietman, R. B., & Thomson, T. (2007). The role of communication in public opinion processes: Understanding the impacts of intrapersonal, media, and social filters. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(3), 287-312.\nHogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377-386.\nHolbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404-420.\nHollenbaugh, E. E. (2021). Self-presentation in social media: Review and research opportunities. Review of communication research, 9, 80-98.\nHolton, A. E., Baek, K., Coddington, M., & Yaschur, C. (2014). Seeking and Sharing: Motivations for Linking on Twitter. Communication Research Reports, 31(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2013.843165\nHu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.\nJackson, J. C., Jong, J., Bilkey, D., Whitehouse, H., Zollmann, S., McNaughton, C., & Halberstadt, J. (2018). Synchrony and Physiological Arousal Increase Cohesion and Cooperation in Large Naturalistic Groups. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18023-4\nJi, Q., Janicke-Bowles, S. H., De Leeuw, R. N., & Oliver, M. B. (2021). The melody to inspiration: The effects of awe-eliciting music on approach motivation and positive well-being. Media Psychology, 24(3), 305-331.\nJohnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of Involvement on Persuasion - a Meta-Analysis [Article]. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 290-314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290\nKamins, M. A., Folkes, V. S., & Perner, L. (1997). Consumer responses to rumors: Good news, bad news. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(2), 165-187.\nKim, J., Lee, C., & Elias, T. (2015). Factors affecting information sharing in social networking sites amongst university students: Application of the knowledge-sharing model to social networking sites. Online Information Review.\nKirkpatrick, A. W. (2021). The spread of fake science: Lexical concreteness, proximity, misinformation sharing, and the moderating role of subjective knowledge [Article]. Public Understanding of Science, 30(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520966165\nKulshrestha, J., Zafar, M. B., Espin Noboa, L. E., Gummadi, K., and Gosh, S. (2015).\nCharacterizing Information Diets of Social Media Users. In Proceedings of the 9th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Menlo Park, CA. AAAI Press.\nKumpel, A. S., Karnowski, V., & Keyling, T. (2015). News Sharing in Social Media: A Review of Current Research on News Sharing Users, Content, and Networks [Review]. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610141\nLarsson, A. O. (2018). “I shared the news today, oh boy”. Journalism Studies, 19(1),\n43–61.\nLarsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion (pp. 25-59). SAGE Publication.\nLee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 331-339.\nLee, N. M. (2018). Fake news, phishing, and fraud: a call for research on digital media literacy education beyond the classroom. Communication Education, 67(4), 460-466.\nMcIntyre, K., & Gyldensted, C. (2018). Constructive journalism: An introduction and practical guide for applying positive psychology techniques to news production. The journal of media innovations, 4(2), 20-34.\nMeijer, I. C., & Kormelink, T. G. (2015). CHECKING, SHARING, CLICKING AND LINKING Changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014 [Article]. Digital Journalism, 3(5), 664-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.937149\nMitchelstein, E., & Boczkowski, P. J. (2010). Online news consumption research: An assessment of past work and an agenda for the future. New media & society, 12(7), 1085-1102.\nNaveed, N., Gottron, T., Kunegis, J., & Alhadi, A. C. (2011, 2011). Bad news travel fast.\nNekmat, E. (2020). Nudge effect of fact-check alerts: Source influence and media skepticism on sharing of news misinformation in social media. Social Media+ Society, 6(1), 2056305119897322.\nNewman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). Digital News Report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/Digital_News-Report_2022.pdf\nNikolinakou, A., & King, K. W. (2018). Viral video ads: Emotional triggers and social media virality. Psychology & Marketing, 35(10), 715-726. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21129\nOkdie, B. M., Rempala, D. M., & Garvey, K. J. (2013). Life in the Bubble: Examining the forwarding of political videos. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2425-2430.\nOlmstead, K., Mitchell, A., & Rosenstiel, T. (2011). Navigating news online: Where people go, how they get there and what lures them away. Pew Research Center. http:// www.journalism.org/files/legacy/NIELSEN%20STUDY%20 -%20Copy.pdf\nOrchard, L. J., & Fullwood, C. (2010). Current perspectives on personality and Internet use. Social Science Computer Review, 28(2), 155-169.\nOsmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter [Article]. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290\nPennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online [Article]. Nature, 592(7855), 590-+. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2\nPennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning [Article]. Cognition, 188, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011\nPiff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M., & Keltner, D. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 108(6), 883.\nRaney, A. A., Janicke-Bowles, S. H., Oliver, M. B., & Dale, K. R. (2020). Introduction to positive media psychology. Routledge.\nReardon, K. K., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication a false dichotomy. Human communication research, 15(2), 284-303.\nRettie, R. (2009). SMS: EXPLOITING THE INTERACTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NEAR-SYNCHRONY. Information, Communication & Society, 12(8), 1131-1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902786943\nRietveld, R., Van Dolen, W., Mazloom, M., & Worring, M. (2020). What you feel, is what you like influence of message appeals on customer engagement on Instagram. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 49, 20-53.\nRimé, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60-85.\nRobin, D. P., Reidenbach, R. E., & Forrest, P. J. (1996). The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers. Journal of Business research, 35(1), 17-28.\nRosen, S., & Tesser, A. (1970). On reluctance to communicate undesirable information: The MUM effect. Sociometry, 253-263.\nRosnow, R. L. (1991). Inside rumor: A personal journey. American psychologist, 46(5), 484.\nRosnow, R. L., Esposito, J. L., & Gibney, L. (1988). Factors influencing rumor spreading: Replication and extension. Language & Communication.\nRudat, A., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2014). Audience design in Twitter: Retweeting behavior between informational value and followers` interests [Article]. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.006\nRussell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 38(2), 311.\nSchimmack, U., & Reisenzein, R. (2002). Experiencing Activation: Energetic Arousal and Tense Arousal Are Not Mixtures of Valence and Activation [Article]. Emotion, 2(4), 412-417. https://doi.org/10.1037//1528-3542.2.4.412\nSerrano, J. M., Iglesias, J., & Loeches, A. (1992). Visual discrimination and recognition of facial expressions of anger, fear, and surprise in 4‐to 6‐month‐old infants. Developmental Psychobiology: The Journal of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, 25(6), 411-425.\nShen, Y. C., Lee, C. T., Pan, L. Y., & Lee, C. Y. (2021). Why people spread rumors on social media: developing and validating a multi-attribute model of online rumor dissemination [Article]. Online Information Review, 45(7), 1227-1246. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-08-2020-0374\nShu, K., Bhattacharjee, A., Alatawi, F., Nazer, T. H., Ding, K. Z., Karami, M., & Liu, H. (2020). Combating disinformation in a social media age [Review]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1385\nSinger, J. B., Hemida, A., Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Reich, Z., & Vujnovic, M. (2011). Participatory journalism: guarding open gates at online newspapers. Wiley-Blackwell.\nStieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217-248. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222290408\nSu, M.-H., Liu, J., & McLeod, D. M. (2019). Pathways to news sharing: Issue frame perceptions and the likelihood of sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 201-210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.026\nSwart, J., Peters, C., & Broersma, M. (2017). Navigating cross-media news use: Media repertoires and the value of news in everyday life [Article]. Journalism Studies, 18(11), 1343-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2015.1129285\nSyn, S. Y., & Oh, S. (2015). Why do social network site users share information on Facebook and Twitter? Journal of Information Science, 41(5), 553-569.\nTan, W. K., & Hsu, C. Y. (2022). The application of emotions, sharing motivations, and psychological distance in examining the intention to share COVID-19-related fake news [Article; Early Access]. Online Information Review, 22. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-08-2021-0448\nTaylor, D. G., Strutton, D., & Thompson, K. (2012). Self-Enhancement as a Motivation for Sharing Online Advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(2), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2012.10722193\nTeeny, J., Deng, X., & Unnava, H. R. (2020). The “Buzz” Behind the Buzz Matters: Energetic and Tense Arousal as Separate Motivations for Word of Mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 429-446. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1151\nTellis, G. J., MacInnis, D. J., Tirunillai, S., & Zhang, Y. W. (2019). What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence [Article]. Journal of Marketing, 83(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919841034\nThorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated Flows: A Framework for Mapping Media Exposure in the Digital Age [Article]. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087\nTomkins, S. S. (1981). The quest for primary motives: Biography and autobiography of an idea. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(2), 306.\nTrilling, D., Kulshrestha, J., De Vreese, C., Halagiera, D., Jakubowski, J., Möller, J., Puschmann, C., Stępińska, A., Stier, S., & Vaccari, C. (2022). Is sharing just a function of viewing? The sharing of political and non-political news on Facebook. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 2. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2022.016\nVan Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann,\nD., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Ste pińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., and Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27.\nVorderer, P., & Hartmann, T. (2009). Entertainment and enjoyment as media effects. In B. Jennings & M. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research. Routledge.\nVästfjäll, D., & Gärling, T. (2007). Validation of a Swedish short self-report measure of core affect. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00595.x\nWaring, S., Alison, L., Carter, G., Barrett‐Pink, C., Humann, M., Swan, L., & Zilinsky, T. (2018). Information sharing in interteam responses to disaster. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 91(3), 591-619.\nWeeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation [Article]. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12164\nWeenig, M. W., Groenenboom, A. C., & Wilke, H. A. (2001). Bad news transmission as a function of the definitiveness of consequences and the relationship between communicator and recipient. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(3), 449.\nWertime, K., & Fenwick, I. (2008). DigiMarketing: The Essential Guide to New Media & Digital Marketing. John Wiley & Sons.\nWhite, G. L., Fishbein, S., & Rutsein, J. (1981). Passionate love and the misattribution of arousal. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(1), 56.\nWirth, W., Hofer, M., & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human communication research, 38(4), 406-428.\nZheng, A., Duff, B. R., Vargas, P., & Yao, M. Z. (2020). Self-presentation on social media: When self-enhancement confronts self-verification. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(3), 289-302.; G0110464005; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/147741; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/147741/1/400501.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/147741
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/147741/1/400501.pdf

View record in BASE

8

Dissertation/ Thesis

學生學業情緒與學習投入關聯性之後設分析與MASEM方法驗證 ; Meta-analysis of correlations between academic emotions and student engagement with the validation by MASEM methods

المؤلفون: 黎佩欣, Li, Pei-Hsin

المساهمون: 余民寧, Yu, Min-Ning

مصطلحات موضوعية: 學業情緒, 學習投入, 後設分析, 後設分析取向的結構方程式模型, academic emotions, student engagement, meta-analysis, meta-analytic structural equation modeling

وصف الملف: 7064764 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 中文文獻：\nBorenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2016). 後設分析 (吳政達審訂)。高教出版。（原著出版於2009）\nCooper H.（2013）。研究統合與後設分析（4版）（張明玲譯）。揚智文化。（原著出版於2009）。\n毛國楠、劉政宏、彭淑玲、李維光、陳慧娟（2008）。能力信念、學業自我價值後效與學業成就對國小學生學習動機與學習情緒之影響。教育心理學報，39（4），569–588。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20071213\n王慧瑜、劉人瑋、葉明功（2018）。有效進行系統文獻回顧與統合分析研究。臺灣臨床藥學雜誌，26（1），1–10。http://doi.org/10.6168/FJCP.201801_26(1).0001\n朱依君、連倖誼（2020）。國小學生參與任務導向學習對學習動機、學習情緒之影響。人文社會科學研究：教育類，14（3），37–57。https://doi.org/10.6618/HSSRP.202009_14(3).3\n吳佩羿、劉曉芬、林志哲（2022）。國中生數學學習興趣、學習情緒、學習投入與學習成就之關係。教育與心理研究，45（2），87-116。https://doi.org/10.53106/102498852022064502004\n吳明隆（2009）。結構方程模式：AMOS的操作與應用。五南。\n李茂能（2016）。當代整合分析理論與實務。五南。\n林冠竹（2015）。學業情緒、學業倦怠與學習涉入之關係暨課室目標結構的調節效果 [碩士論文，國立成功大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n林宴瑛、程炳林（2012）。環境目標結構與控制－價值信念對學業情緒之效果。教育心理學報，44（1），49–72。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20110711\n邱明琪（2018）。教師自主支持、成就目標、學習情緒對國中生數學科學習投入之影響 [碩士論文，銘傳大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n邱素玲、洪福源（2014）大學生班級情緒氣氛、學習自我效能、學習倦怠與學習投入關係研究。彰化師大教育學報，25，85–112。\n張映芬（2021）。國中生完美主義組型暨其與父母期望／苛責、學業情緒、動機涉入之關係。教育科學研究期刊，66（1），203–230。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0007\n郭桂菁（2017）。國中生知覺自然科教師教學風格、學業情緒與學習動機關係之研究 [碩士論文，中國科技大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n陳妍榛（2017）。國小高年級學童知覺到的環境因素、學業情緒、學習投入及學業成就之關係 [碩士論文，南華大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n陳瑋婷（2011）。自我效能、學習策略與學業成就之關係研究：結合後設分析與結構方程模式。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，4（2），83-96。\n陳慧蓉、張郁雯、薛承泰（2018）。脈絡因素、學業自我概念、與學習投入對學業表現的影響：臺灣國小三年級經濟弱勢與一般學生之比較。當代教育研究季刊，26（2），73–107。\n程煒婷（2017）。教師支持與中學生學習投入關係:學業情緒的中介暨情緒調節的調節效果 [碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學]。華藝線上圖書館。\n鈕文英、吳裕益（2015）。單一個案研究法：研究設計與後設分析。心理。\n黃智淵（2016）。學業情緒、情緒調整策略、自我調整學習策略對學業成就之關係：條件化間接效果檢驗暨教學方案之成效分析 [博士論文，國立成功大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n黃雅慧（2017）。臺灣國民中學學生學習投入之多層次分析 [碩士論文，銘傳大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n黃筠婷、程炳林（2021）。國中生學業情緒、情境興趣及學習涉入的交互關係。教育心理學報，52（3），571–593。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202103_52(3).0004\n黃義良、王怡又（2018）。學校行銷與學校效能關聯之探討：採後設分析結合結構方程模式之驗證。嘉大教育研究學刊，40，63-98。\n劉人儀（2017）。以學習投入、倦怠與身心健康探討中學生數學學習情緒與成就[碩士論文，國立臺灣科技大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n劉玉玲（2016）。國中生數學學業情緒及數學學習策略與數學學業成就之研究。課程與教學，19（2），161–192。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201604_19(2).0007\n劉玉玲、謝子陽（2021）。整合未來時間觀與數學學習投入：國中生數學學習模式之研究。課程與教學, 24（1），235–263。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202101_24(1).0009\n蔡松玫（2021）。澎湖縣九年級學生知覺教師教學風格及學業情緒與國文領域學習成就之研究 [碩士論文，國立臺北教育大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n蔡清田（2020）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要研修的核心素養。臺灣教育評論月刊，9（1），8–12。\n賴英娟、巫博瀚（2017）。國中生學業情緒與學習投入對學業成就之影響。課程與教學，20（3），139–163。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201707_20(3).0006\n賴英娟、巫博瀚（2018）。國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能及自主動機對學業情緒之影響。課程與教學，21（2），85–110。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201804_21(2).0004\n薛杏秋（2017）。教師自主支持對國民中學學生自我效能、學習情緒及學習投入影響之研究 [碩士論文，銘傳大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n謝進昌、陳敏瑜（2011）。國內教育、心理後設分析研究出版偏誤檢定之實徵分析。測驗學刊，58（2），391–422。https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.201106.0391\n謝觀崢（2021）。大學生英語學業成就與情緒對英語學習投入預測效果研究。樹德科技大學學報，23（2），107–119。\n簡瑋成（2012）。學習自我效能、學習投入與學習成就之後設分析 [碩士論文，國立暨南國際大學]。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。\n簡嘉菱、程炳林（2013）。環境目標結構、自我決定動機與學業情緒之關係。教育心理學報，44（3），713–733。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20120614\n簡嘉菱、程炳林（2018）。學業拖延與課業情緒之交互關係：課室目標結構的調節效果。教育心理學報，50（2），293–313。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201812_50(2).0006\n\n英文文獻：\nAcosta-Gonzaga, E., & Ruiz-Ledesma, E. F. (2022). Students’ emotions and engagement in the emerging hybrid learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(16), 10236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610236\nAinley, M. (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 283-302). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_13\nAinley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4-12. https://doi.org/ 10. 1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001\nAlpaslan, M. M., & Ulubey, Ö. (2021). Examining the relations between emotions, motivation, classroom engagement and achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(4), 1042–4057.\nAn, F., Yu, J., & Xi, L. (2022). Relations between perceived teacher support and academic achievement: Positive emotions and learning engagement as mediators. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03668-w\nAndre, L., Koene, S., Jansen in de Wal, J., Schuitema, J. A., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2022). Learning under stress: The moderating role of future time perspective. Psychology in the Schools, 59(4), 800–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22645\nAnsong, D., Okumu, M., Bowen, G. L., Walker, A. M., & Eisensmith, S. R. (2017). The role of parent, classmate, and teacher support in student engagement: Evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 54, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.010\nAppleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303\nAppleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002\nBamberger, K. T. (2016). The application of intensive longitudinal methods to investigate change: Stimulating the field of applied family research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 19(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-015-0194-6\nBarkatsas, T., Kasimatis, K., & Gialamas, V. (2009). Learning secondary mathematics with technology: Exploring the complex interrelationship between students’ attitudes, engagement, gender and achievement. Computers & Education, 52, 562–570.\nBaron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173\nBecker, E. S., Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Taxer, J. L. (2015). Antecedents of teachers’ emotions in the classroom: an intraindividual approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00635\nBeedie, C. J., Terry, P. C., Lane, A. M., & Devonport, T. J. (2011). Differential assessment of emotions and moods: Development and validation of the emotion and mood components of anxiety questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.034\nBeedie, C. J., Terry, P., & Lane, A. (2005). Distinctions between emotion and mood. Cognition and Emotion, 19(6), 847–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000057\nBench, S. W., & Lench, H. C. (2013). On the Function of Boredom. Behavioral Sciences, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3030459\nBergh, D. D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C., Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., Su, P., Lau, C. L. L., & Joo, H. (2016). Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2338\nBieg, M., Goetz, T., & Hubbard, K. (2013). Can I master it and does it matter? An intraindividual analysis on control–value antecedents of trait and state academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.006\nBordbar, M. (2021). Autonomy-supportive faculty, students’ self-system processes, positive academic emotions, and agentic engagement: Adding emotions to self-system model of motivational development. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727794\nBudsankom, P., Sawangboon, T., Damrongpanit, S., & Chuensirimongkol, J. (2015). Factors affecting higher order thinking skills of students: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(19), 2639–2652.\nÇağırgan, D., & Soytürk, İ. (2021). The relationship between math anxiety, student engagement in mathematics and responsibilities towards learning among middle school students. İlköğretim Online, 20(1), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.040\nCamacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., Hou, H., & Oades, L. G. (2021). Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1051-1095. https://doi.org /10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3\nCaraway, K., Tucker, C. M., Reinke, W. M., & Hall, C. (2003). Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10092\nCarmona-Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Current Psychology, 40(6), 2938-2947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00227-8\nChang, D.-F., Chien, W.-C., & Chou, W.-C. (2016). Meta-analysis approach to detect the effect of student engagement on academic achievement, ICIC Express Letters, 10(10), 2441-2446.\nChen, J., & Liang, M. (2022). Play hard, study hard? The influence of gamification on students’ study engagement, 994700. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.994700\nCheung, M. (2020). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 25(4), 430-455. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/epsqt\nCheung, M. W. L. (2014). Fixed- and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Examples and analyses in R. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0361-y\nCheung, M. W. L. (2015). Meta-Analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. John Wiley & Sons.\nCheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 1082-989X.10.1.40\nCheung, M. W.-L. (2014). Fixed- and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Examples and analyses in R. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0361-y\nCho, H. J., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Yough, M. (2023). How autonomy-supportive learning environments promote Asian international students’ academic adjustment: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09401-x\nConnell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system process. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Scroufe (Eds), Self processes and development (pp. 43–77). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.\nCrombie, I. K., & Davies, H. T. (2009). What is meta-analysis. Hayward Medical Communications.\nD’Errico, F., Paciello, M., & Cerniglia, L. (2016). When emotions enhance students’ engagement in e-learning processes. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1144\nDarwin, C. (2009). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511694110\nDaschmann, E. C., Goetz, T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2011). Testing the predictors of boredom at school: Development and validation of the precursors to boredom scales. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X526038\nDembereldorj, Z. (2021). Exploring Online Student Engagement during COVID-19 Pandemic in Mongolia. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(7), 10–18.\nDeng, W., Lei, W., Guo, X., Li, X., Ge, W., & Hu, W. (2022). Effects of regulatory focus on online learning engagement of high school students: The mediating role of self-efficacy and academic emotions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(3), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12642\nDenovan, A., Dagnall, N., Macaskill, A., & Papageorgiou, K. (2020). Future time perspective, positive emotions and student engagement: a longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 45(7), 1533-1546. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307 5079.2019.1616168\nDerakhshan, A., Fathi, J., Pawlak, M., & Kruk, M. (2022). Classroom social climate, growth language mindset, and student engagement: The mediating role of boredom in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2099407\nDewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 922–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211014538\nDubovi, I., & Adler, I. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 induced anxiety on students’ engagement while learning with online computer-based simulations: The mediating role of boredom. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2100427\nDurlak, J. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (1991). A practitioner’s guide to meta-analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19(3), 291-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00938026\nDuval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000a). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529\nDuval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000b). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x\nEccles, J., & Wang, M.-T. (2012). Part I commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133-145). Springer.\nEe, J., & Ong, C. W. (2014). Which social emotional competencies are enhanced at a social emotional learning camp? Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2012.761945\nEgger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629\nEkman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3-4), 169-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068\nEkman, P. (1994). Moods, emotions, and traits. In P. Ekman & R. Davidson (Eds), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp.55–58). Oxford University Press.\nEkman, P. (2016). What scientists who study emotion agree about. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615596992\nEllsworth, P. C. (2013). Appraisal theory: Old and new questions. Emotion Review, 5(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912463617\nEysenck, H. J. (1978). An exercise in mega-silliness. American Psychologist, 33(5), 517a. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.5.517.a\nFahrenberg, J., Foerster, F., & Müller, W. (1996). Laboratory and field studies for improvement of ambulatory monitoring methodology. In Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 237-255). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.\nFan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540119\nFan, Y., Chen, J., Shirkey, G., John, R., Wu, S. R., Park, H., & Shao, C. (2016). Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: An updated review. Ecological Processes, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3\nFang, J., Brown, G. T. L., & Hamilton, R. (2022). Changes in Chinese students’ academic emotions after examinations: Pride in success, shame in failure, and self-loathing in comparison. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12552\nFederici, R. A., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2014). Students’ perceptions of emotional and instrumental teacher support: Relations with motivational and emotional responses. International Education Studies, 7(1), 21-36. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n1p21\nFeng, E., & Hong, G. (2022). Engagement mediates the relationship between emotion and achievement of Chinese EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 895594. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895594\nFinn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing From School. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117\nFinn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Chirstenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Springer.\nFlunger, B., Mayer, A., & Umbach, N. (2018). Beneficial for some or for everyone? Exploring the effects of an autonomy-supportive intervention in the real-life classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000284\nFredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059\nFredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002\nFredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.\nFredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367-1378. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512\nFrenzel, A. C. (2014). Teacher emotions. In E. A. Linnenbrink-Garcia & R. Pekrun (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 494-519). Routledge.\nFrenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Lüdtke, O. (2018). Emotion transmission in the classroom revisited: A reciprocal effects model of teacher and student Enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 628. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000228\nFrenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014695\nGarn, A. C., Simonton, K., Dasingert, T., & Simonton, A. (2017). Predicting changes in student engagement in university physical education: Application of control-value theory of achievement emotions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 29, 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.12.005\nGaspard, H., & Lauermann, F. (2021). Emotionally and motivationally supportive classrooms: A state-trait analysis of lesson- and classroom-specific variation in teacher- and student-reported teacher enthusiasm and student engagement. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101494\nGeary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Scofield, J. E. (2021). In-class attention, spatial ability, and mathematics anxiety predict across-grade gains in adolescents’ mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 754–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000487\nGlass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003\nGoetz, T., Bieleke, M., Gogol, K., van Tartwijk, J., Mainhard, T., Lipnevich, A. A., & Pekrun, R. (2021). Getting along and feeling good: Reciprocal associations between student-teacher relationship quality and students’ emotions. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101349\nGonzález, A., Garrido, J. M. F., Castro, Y. R., & Rodríguez, M. V. C. (2015). Class anxiety in secondary education: Exploring structural relations with perceived control, engagement, disaffection, and performance. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, E68. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.70\nGonzález, A., Rodríguez, Y., Faílde, J. M., & Carrera, M. V. (2016). Anxiety in the statistics class: Structural relations with self-concept, intrinsic value, and engagement in two samples of undergraduates. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.019\nGraham, S., & Weiner, B. (1986). From an attributional theory of emotion to developmental psychology: A round-trip ticket? Social Cognition, 4(2), 152–179. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1986.4.2.152\nGranado, X. O., Mendoza Lira, M., Apablaza, C. G. C., & López, V. M. M. (2017). Positive emotions, autonomy support and academic performance of university students: The mediating role of academic engagement and self-efficacy. Revista de Psicodidactica, 22(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.14280\nGuo, Y. (2021). Exploring the dynamic interplay between foreign language enjoyment and learner engagement with regard to EFL achievement and absenteeism: A sequential mixed methods study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.766058\nHagenauer, G., Hascher, T., & Volet, S. E. (2015). Teacher emotions in the classroom: Associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(4), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0250-0\nHamedi, S. M., Pishghadam, R., & Fadardi, J. S. (2020). The contribution of reading emotions to reading comprehension: The mediating effect of reading engagement using a structural equation modeling approach. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 19(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-019-09256-3\nHanin, V., & Van Nieuwenhoven, C. (2016). The influence of motivational and emotional factors in mathematical learning in secondary education. European Review of Applied Psychology, 66(3), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2016.04.006\nHarper, S. R., Carini, R. M., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2004). Gender differences in student engagement among African American undergraduates at historically black colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Development, 45(3), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2004.0035\nHiggins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557\nHiggins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M., & Welch, V. (Eds). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention (2nd Edition). Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.\nHong, E., Mason, E., Peng, Y., & Lee, N. (2015). Effects of homework motivation and worry anxiety on homework achievement in mathematics and English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(7–8), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1131721\nHu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118\nHu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (Dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020114231387\nHuang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23(3), 359-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10648- 011-9155-x\nHusain, M. M. (2022). To what extent emotion, cognition and behaviour enhance a student’s engagement: A case study on the MAJA teaching approach. Policy Futures in Education, 20(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/147821032110320\nİlhan, A., Poçan, S., & Gemcioğlu, M. (2022). The effect of mathematics class commitment and anxiety on mathematics success: A path analysis study. Education and Urban Society, 54(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245211028621\nJack, R. E., Garrod, O. G. B., Yu, H., Caldara, R., & Schyns, P. G. (2012). Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(19), 7241–7244. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200155109\nJackson, D., & Turner, R. (2017). Power analysis for random‐effects meta‐analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(3), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1240\nJak, S., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2020). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters. Psychological Methods, 25(4), 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000245\nJak, S., Li, H., Kolbe, L., de Jonge, H., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2021). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one-stage MASEM. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(5), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1498\nKahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505\nKahu, E., Stephens, C., Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2015). Linking academic emotions and student engagement: Mature-aged distance students’ transition to university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.895305\nKamari, S., Fouladchang, M., Khormaei, F., & Jowkar, B. (2021). Social achievement goals and academic engagement: The mediating role of academic and social positive emotions. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.110241\nKang, X., & Wu, Y. (2022). Academic enjoyment, behavioral engagement, self-concept, organizational strategy and achievement in EFL setting: A multiple mediation analysis. PLOS ONE, 17(4), e0267405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267405\nKaplan, D. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 15215-15222). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00776-2\nKeller, R. E., Johnson, E., & DeShong, S. (2017). A structural equation model looking at student’s participatory behavior and their success in Calculus I. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0093-0\nKhajavy, G. H. (2020). Modeling the relations between foreign language engagement, emotions, grit and reading achievement. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 241–249). Multilingual Matters.\nKing, R. B., & Frondozo, C. E. (2022). Variety is the spice of life: How emotional diversity is associated with better student engagement and achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), e12436. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12436\nKline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oxford/detail.action?docID= 4000663\nKreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010\nKuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283\nKuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0019\nLai Y.-C., & Wu P.-H. (2019). The relationship of classroom goal structures, self-determination motivation, and achievement emotions. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 22(4), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201910_22(4).0006\nLakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Mukamurera, J. (2021). Explaining persistence in online courses in higher education: A difference-in-differences analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00251-4\nLau, R. S., & Cheung, G. W. (2012). Estimating and comparing specific mediation effects in complex latent variable models. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110391673\nLazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oxford/detail.action?docID=4700723\nLei, H., & Cui, Y. (2016). Effects of academic emotions on achievement among mainland Chinese students: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44(9), 1541-1553. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016. 44.9.1541\nLei, H., Cui, Y., & Chiu, M. M. (2018). The relationship between teacher support and students’ academic emotions: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02288\nLei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054\nLeptokaridou, E. T., Vlachopoulos, S. P., & Papaioannou, A. G. (2016). Experimental longitudinal test of the influence of autonomy-supportive teaching on motivation for participation in elementary school physical education. Educational Psychology, 36(7), 1138–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.950195\nLi, G., Li, Z., Wu, X., & Zhen, R. (2022). Relations between class competition and primary school students’ academic achievement: Learning anxiety and learning engagement as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.775213\nLi, H., Zhang, A., Zhang, M., Huang, B., Zhao, X., Gao, J., & Si, J. (2021). Concurrent and longitudinal associations between parental educational involvement, teacher support, and math anxiety: The role of math learning involvement in elementary school children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101984\nLi, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059\nLi, W., Gao, W., & Sha, J. (2020). Perceived teacher autonomy support and school engagement of Tibetan students in elementary and middle schools: Mediating effect of self-efficacy and academic emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(50). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00050\nLi, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2013). Interrelations of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive school engagement in high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9857-5\nLi, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Personal and ecological assets and academic competence in early adolescence: The mediating role of school engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(7), 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9535-4\nLiberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. British Medical Journal, 339, b2700 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700\nLichtenfeld, S., Pekrun, R., Marsh, H. W., Nett, U. E., & Reiss, K. (2022). Achievement emotions and elementary school children’s academic performance: Longitudinal models of developmental ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000748\nLight, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Harvard University Press.\nLim, N. (2016). Cultural differences in emotion: Differences in emotional arousal level between the East and the West. Integrative Medicine Research, 5(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2016.03.004\nLinnenbrink, E. A. (2007). The role of affect in student learning: A multi-dimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect, motivation, and engagement. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds), Emotion in education (pp.107–124). Elsevier Academic Press.\nLinnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.004\nLittell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. K. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press.\nLiu, H., Li, J., & Fang, F. (2022). Examining the complexity between boredom and engagement in English learning: Evidence from chinese high school students. Sustainability, 14(24), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416920\nLiu, H., Yao, M., Li, J., & Li, R. (2021). Multiple mediators in the relationship between perceived teacher autonomy support and student engagement in math and literacy learning. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 116-136. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/ 01443 410.2020.1837346\nLiu, R. D., Zhen, R., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Jiang, R., et al. (2018). Teacher support and math engagement: roles of academic self-efficacy and positive emotions. Educational Psychology, 38(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017. 1359238\nLiu, R.-D., Zhen, R., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Jiang, R., & Xu, L. (2018). Teacher support and math engagement: Roles of academic self-efficacy and positive emotions. Educational Psychology, 38(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1359238\nLiu, S., Zou, S., Zhang, D., Wang, X., & Wu, X. (2022). Problematic Internet use and academic engagement during the COVID-19 lockdown: The indirect effects of depression, anxiety, and insomnia in early, middle, and late adolescence. Journal of Affective Disorders, 309, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.043\nLiukkonen, J., Barkoukis, V., Watt, A., & Jaakkola, T. (2010). Motivational climate and students’ emotional experiences and effort in physical education. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(5), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383044\nLoderer, K., Pekrun, R., & Lester, J. C. (2020). Beyond cold technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis on emotions in technology-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.learninstruc.2018.08.002\nLohbeck, A., Nitkowski, D., & Petermann, F. (2016). A control-value theory approach: Relationships between academic self-concept, interest, and test anxiety in elementary school children. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45(6), 887–904.\nLuo, W., Lee, K., Ng, P. T., & Ong, J. X. W. (2014). Incremental Beliefs of Ability, Achievement Emotions and Learning of Singapore Students. Educational Psychology, 34(5), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.909008\nLuo, W., Ng, P. T., Lee, K., & Aye, M. (2016). Self-efficacy, value, and achievement emotions as mediators between parenting practice and homework behavior: A control-value theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.017\nLuo, Z., & Luo, W. (2022). Discrete achievement emotions as mediators between achievement goals and academic engagement of Singapore students. Educational Psychology, 42(6), 749-766. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410. 2022.2048795\nMaharajan, M. K., Rajiah, K., Tam, A. M., Chaw, S. L., Ang, M. J., & Yong, M. W. (2017). Pharmacy students’ anxiety towards research during their undergraduate degree; How to reduce it? PLOS ONE, 12(4), e0176095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176095\nMainhard, T., Oudman, Sophie, Hornstra, Lisette, Bosker, Roe J., & Goetz, Thomas. (2018). Student emotions in class: The relative importance of teachers and their interpersonal relations with students. Learning and Instruction, 53, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.011\nMehdipour Maralani, F., Shalbaf, A., & Gholamali Lavasani, M. (2018). Agentic engagement and test anxiety: The mediatory role of the basic psychological needs. SAGE Open, 8(2), 215824401877288. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018772\nMehl, M. R., & Conner, T. S. (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. Guilford Press.\nNaik, S., & Wawrzynski, M. (2018). Gender, Race, Finance, and Student Engagement in Cocurricular Activities in a South African University. Journal of College Student Development, 59, 598–613. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2018.0055\nNtoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158497\nObermeier, R., Schlesier, J., Meyer, S., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2022). Trajectories of scholastic well-being: The effect of achievement emotions and instructional quality in the first year of secondary school (fifth grade). Social Psychology of Education, 25(5), 1051–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09726-2\nOh-Young, C., Gordon, H. R. D., Xing, X., & Filler, J. (2018). Meta-analytic procedures for career and technical education post-secondary researchers and practitioners. Journal of Research in Technical Career, 2(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.9741/25 78-2118.1010\nOriol, X., Amutio, A., Mendoza, M., Da Costa, S., & Miranda, R. (2016). Emotional creativity as predictor of intrinsic motivation and academic engagement in university students: The mediating role of positive emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01243\nOrwin, R. G. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8(2), 157-159. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164923\nPage, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4\nPaechter, M., Macher, D., Martskvishvili, K., Wimmer, S., & Papousek, I. (2017). Mathematics anxiety and statistics anxiety. Shared but also unshared components and antagonistic contributions to performance in statistics. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01196\nPajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-Efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0991\nPatrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1994). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 781-791. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.781\nPekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9\nPekrun, R. (2016). Using self-report to assess emotions in education. In M. Zembylas & P. A. Schutz (Eds), Methodological Advances in Research on Emotion and Education (pp. 43–54). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29049-2_4\nPekrun, R. (2020). Commentary: Self-report is indispensable to assess students’ learning. Frontline Learning Research, 8(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i3.637\nPekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12\nPekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013383\nPekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 13-36). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50003-4\nPekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2005). Achievement Emotions Questionnaire—Mathematics (AEQ-M): User’s manual. University of Munich, Department of Psychology.\nPekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019243\nPekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002\nPekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/ 10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4\nPekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., & Goetz, T. (2017). Achievement emotions and academic performance: Longitudinal models of reciprocal effects. Child Development, 88(5), 1653–1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12704\nPekrun, R., Marsh, H. W., Elliot, A. J., Stockinger, K., Perry, R. P., Vogl, E., Goetz, T., van Tilburg, W. A. P., Lüdtke, O., & Vispoel, W. P. (2023). A three-dimensional taxonomy of achievement emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(1), 145-178. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000448\nPerone, S., Anderson, A. J., & Weybright, E. H. (2023). Older and wiser? Age-related change in state and trait boredom during adolescence and associations with neural correlates of self-regulation. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 9(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-023-00213-2\nPincus, T., Miles, C., Froud, R., Underwood, M., Carnes, D., & Taylor, S. J. (2011). Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: A consensus study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-14\nPintrich, P. R., & Groot, E. V. D. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.\nPinxten, M., Marsh, H. W., De Fraine, B., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Van Damme, J. (2014). Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived math effort expenditure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12028\nPreacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679848\nPutwain, D. W., Schmitz, E. A., Wood, P., & Pekrun, R. (2021). The role of achievement emotions in primary school mathematics: Control–value antecedents and achievement outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12367\nPutwain, D. W., Wood, P., & Pekrun, R. (2022). Achievement emotions and academic achievement: Reciprocal relations and the moderating influence of academic buoyancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000637\nQuintero, M., Hasty, L., Li, T., Song, S., & Wang, Z. (2022). A multidimensional examination of math anxiety and engagement on math achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12482\nRaeisi-Vanani, A., Plonsky, L., Wang, W., Lee, K., & Peng, P. (2022). Applying meta-analytic structural equation modeling to second language research: An introduction. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100018\nReeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690\nReeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034934\nReeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451\nReeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002\nReeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H. (2020). How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101899\nReschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1\nReschly, A. L., Huebner, E. S., Appleton, J. J., & Antaramian, S. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents’ engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20306\nReyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700-712. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027268\nRimm-Kaufman, S., Baroody, A., Larsen, R., Curby, T., & Abry, T. (2015). To what extent do teacher-student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037252\nRoorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2017). Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3\nRosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638\nRussell, J., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.311\nSadoughi, M., & Hejazi, S. Y. (2021). Teacher support and academic engagement among EFL learners: The role of positive academic emotions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021. 101060\nSakiz, G. (2012). Perceived instructor affective support in relation to academic emotions and motivation in college. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.625611\nSakiz, G. (2015). Perceived teacher factors in relation to students’ achievement-related outcomes in science classrooms in elementary school. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 115–129.\nSakiz, G. (2017). Perceived teacher affective support in relation to emotional and motivational variables in elementary school science classrooms in Turkey. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35(1), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1278683\nSakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.10.005\nSaleem, M. S., Isha, A. S. N., Awan, M. I., Yusop, Y. B., & Naji, G. M. A. (2022). Fostering academic engagement in post-graduate students: Assessing the role of positive emotions, positive psychology, and stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920395\nSalmela-Aro, K., & Read, S. (2017). Study engagement and burnout profiles among Finnish higher education students. Burnout Research, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2017.11.001\nSánchez Rosas, J., Takaya, P., & Molinari, A. (2016). The role of teacher behavior, motivation and emotion in predicting academic social participation in class. Pensando Psicología, 12, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.16925/pe.v12i19.1327\nSchaufeli, W. B. (2017). General engagement: Conceptualization and measurement with the Utrecht General Engagement Scale (UGES). Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 1(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-017-0001-x\nSchaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1015630930326\nScherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058216\nSchober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864\nSharp, J. G., Hemmings, B., Kay, R., & Sharp, J. C. (2019). Academic boredom and the perceived course experiences of final year Education Studies students at university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(5), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1386287\nSharpe, D. (1997). Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(8), 881-901.\nSheng, Z., Kong, W., Cortina, J. M., & Hou, S. (2016). Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: Current practices and recommendations. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1206\nSkinner, E. A. (2016). Engagement and disaffection as central to processes of motivational resilience and development. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed, pp. 145-168). Routledge.\nSkinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840\nSkinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0013164408323233\nSkinner, E., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2\nSlåtten, T., Lien, G., Evenstad, S. B. N., & Onshus, T. (2021). Supportive study climate and academic performance among university students: The role of psychological capital, positive emotions and study engagement. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 13(4), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2020-0045\nSong, F., Eastwood, A. J., Gilbody, S., Duley, L., & Sutton, A. J. (2000). Publication and related biases. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 4(10), 1–115.\nSubramainan, L., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2020). A systematic review on students’ engagement in classroom: Indicators, challenges and computational techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110113\nTai, T.-E., & Tang, C. W. (2021). The role of graduate students’ learning strategies in reducing their English medium instruction avoidance: The mediation effect of language anxiety. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1777937\nTam, K. Y. Y., Poon, C. Y. S., Hui, V. K. Y., Wong, C. Y. F., Kwong, V. W. Y., Yuen, G. W. C., et al. (2019). Boredom begets boredom: An experience sampling study on the impact of teacher boredom on student boredom and motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 124-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep. 12309\nTan, J., Mao, J., Jiang, Y., & Gao, M. (2021). The influence of academic emotions on learning effects: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1818 9678\nTarka, P. (2018). An overview of structural equation modeling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 52(1), 313–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8\nTawfik, G. M., Dila, K. A. S., Mohamed, M. Y. F., Tam, D. N. H., Kien, N. D., Ahmed, A. M., et al. (2019). A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropical Medicine and Health, 47(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6\nTaylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6(1), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/875647939000600106\nTight, M. (2020). Student retention and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(5), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1576860\nTrowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy.\nTulis, M., & Ainley, M. (2011). Interest, enjoyment and pride after failure experiences? Predictors of students’ state-emotions after success and failure during learning in mathematics. Educational Psychology, 31(7), 779-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01443410.2011.608524\nTurner, R. M., Bird, S. M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2013). The impact of study size on meta-analyses: Examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e59202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059202\nTvedt, M. S., Bru, E., & Idsoe, T. (2021). Perceived teacher support and intentions to quit upper secondary school: Direct, and indirect associations via emotional engagement and boredom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1659401\nTze, V. M. C., Daniels, L. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Evaluating the relationship between boredom and academic outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9301-y\nTze, V. M. C., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2014). Patterns of boredom and its relationship with perceived autonomy support and engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.001\nUNESCO. (2015). Global Citizenship Education: Topics and learning objectives. the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.\nValentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). How many studies do you need?: A Primer on Statistical Power for Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), 215–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609346961\nViechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03\nViswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865-885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x\nVoelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with School. American Journal of Education, 105(3), 294–318.\nWang, J., Liu, R.-D., Ding, Y., Xu, L., Liu, Y., & Zhen, R. (2017). Teacher’s autonomy support and engagement in math: Multiple mediating roles of self-efficacy, intrinsic value, and boredom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1006. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01006\nWang, M.-T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The Math and Science Engagement Scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008\nWang, Y., Cao, Y., Gong, S., Wang, Z., Li, N., & Ai, L. (2022). Interaction and learning engagement in online learning: The mediating roles of online learning self-efficacy and academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102128\nWang, Z., Wang, L., Chang, S., & Wang, H. (2022). The mediating effect of parenting stress on the relationship between social support and quality of life in parents of children with autistic spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Frontiers in psychiatry, 13, 713620. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.713620\nWatson, D., Anna, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. 54(6), 1063–1070.\nWilcox, G., McQuay, J., Blackstaffe, A., Perry, R., & Hawe, P. (2016). Twenty percent of the variance between students in academic engagement is explained by grade level, gender, family affluence, anxiety, and social support. School Psychology Forum, 10(4), 397–409.\nWilliamson, B. (2021). Psychodata: Disassembling the psychological, economic, and statistical infrastructure of ‘social-emotional learning’. Journal of Education Policy, 36(1), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1672895\nWright, S. (1921). Correlation and Causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557–585.\nWu, P.-I., Liu, H.-F., & Lin, C.-C. (2022). The relationships among mathematics learning interest, learning emotions, learning engagement, and learning achievement of junior high school students. Journal of Education & Psychology, 45(2), 87–116. https://doi.org/10.53106/102498852022064502004\nYıldırım, S. (2012). Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: A multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.596855\nZapata-Cuervo, N., Montes-Guerra, M. I., Shin, H. H., Jeong, M., & Cho, M.-H. (2023). Students’ psychological perceptions toward online learning engagement and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of students in three different countries. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 35(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1907195\nZhang, T. (2009). Relations among school students’ self-determined motivation perceived enjoyment, effort, and physical activity behaviors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109(3), 783–790. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.109.3.783-790\nZhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q. P. (2019). The Relationship between math anxiety and math performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613\nZhao, Y., & Yang, L. (2022). Examining the relationship between perceived teacher support and students’ academic engagement in foreign language learning: Enjoyment and boredom as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987554\nZhen, R., Liu, R. D., Ding, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., & Xu, L. (2017). The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relation between basic psychological needs satisfaction and learning engagement among Chinese adolescent students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.01\nZhou, L., & Wu, Y. (2021). Validation of the Chinese version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire–Elementary School. Social Behavior and Personality, 49(5), E10118–E10128. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.10118\nZins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2007). The scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school success. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17(2–3), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410701413145; G0102152515; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/147246; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/147246/1/251501.pdf