نتائج البحث - "科技创新"

Relation: REFERENCES Acar, O. A., Tuncdogan, A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023). Collective creativity and innovation: An interdisciplinary review, integration, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 50(6), 2119-2151. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231212416 Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 949-995. https://doi.org/10.1086/432166 Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451 Agan, B., & Balcilar, M. (2022). On the determinants of green technology diffusion: An empirical analysis of economic, social, political, and environmental factors. Sustainability, 14(4), 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042008 Akinluyi E. A., Stell, D., Perera, N., & Sibley-Allen C. (2021). Developing the COVID-19 intensive care medical equipment distribution platform: Outcomes and lessons learned. BMJ Open Quality. Apr;10(2):e001383. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001383 Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Cepeda-Carrión, G., & Leal-Rodríguez, A. L. (2018). Potential and realized absorptive capacity as complementary drivers of green product and process innovation performance. Sustainability, 10, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020381 Algarni, M. A., Ali, M., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., & Albort-Morant, G. (2023). The differential effects of potential and realized absorptive capacity on imitation and innovation strategies, and its impact on sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113674 Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Little Brown. Alves, M. F. R., & Galina, S. V. R. (2021). Measuring dynamic absorptive capacity in national innovation surveys. Management Decision, 59(2), 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2019-0560 Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696-717. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406 Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032 Archibugi, D., & Iammarino, S. (1999). The policy implications of the globalisation of innovation. Research Policy, 28(2-3), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00116-4 Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Patacconi, A. (2019). A theory of the US innovation ecosystem: Evolution and the social value of diversity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(2), 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty067 Auld, G., Bernstein, S., Cashore, B., & Levin, K. (2021). Managing pandemics as super wicked problems: Lessons from, and for, COVID-19 and the climate crisis. Policy Sciences, 54(4), 707-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09442-2 Azagra-Caro, J. M., Archontakis, F., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., & Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2006). Faculty support for the objectives of university-industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: The importance of regional absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 35(1), 37-55. Balakrishnan, S., & Fox, I. (1993). Asset specificity, firm heterogeneity and capital structure. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140103 Baldwin, C. Y., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Kapoor, R., & West, J. (2024). Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies. Research Policy, 53(3), 104949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104949 Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800106 Bang, H., Jensen, M. D., & Nedergaard, P. (2015). ‘We the People’ versus ‘We the Heads of States’: The debate on the democratic deficit of the European Union. Policy Studies, 36(2), 196-216. http://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2014.1000846 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-82. http://doi.org/ 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 Bartoloni, S., Calò, E., Marinelli, L., Pascucci, F., Dezi, L., Carayannis, E., Revel, G. M., & Gregori, G. L. (2022). Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new quintuple helix-Design thinking approach to technology. Technovation, 113, 102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102413 Băzăvan, A. (2019). Chinese government’s shifting role in the national innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119738 Bell, D. (1972). On meritocracy and equality. Public Interest, 29, 29-68. Bell, D. A. (2015). The China model: Political meritocracy and the limits of democracy. Princeton University Press. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040711 Berwick, E., & Christia, F. (2018). State capacity redux: Integrating classical and experimental contributions to an enduring debate. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-072215-012907 Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C.B. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47-55. Bonhomme, S., & Manresa, E. (2015). Grouped patterns of heterogeneity in panel data. Econometrica, 83(3), 1147-1184. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta11319 Boon, W., Edler, J. (2018). Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 435-447. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy014 Borrás S., & Edquist C. (2019). Holistic innovation policy: Theoretical foundations, policy problems, and instrument choices. Oxford University Press. Borrás, S., & Laatsit, M. (2019). Towards system oriented innovation policy evaluation? Evidence from EU28 member states. Research Policy, 48(1), 312-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.020 Brem, A.,Viardot, E., & Nylund, P. A. (2021). Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120451 Breznitz, D., & Ornston, D. (2013). The revolutionary power of peripheral agencies: Explaining radical policy innovation in Finland and Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 46(10), 1219-1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012472466 Breznitz, D., Ornston, D., & Samford, S. (2018), Mission critical: The ends, means, and design of innovation agencies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 883-896. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty027 Buchanan, A., Cole, T., & Keohane, R. O. (2011). Justice in the diffusion of innovation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 19(3), 306-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00348.x Bührer, S., Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Palmén, R., & Reidl, S. (2020). Evaluating gender equality effects in research and innovation systems. Scientometrics, 125, 1459-1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03596-1 Burcharth, A.L.D.A., Lettl, C., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2015). Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.024 Cai, Y., & Lattu, A. (2022). Triple helix or quadruple helix: Which model of innovation to choose for empirical studies? Minerva, 60(2), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09453-6 Calderini, M., Fia, M., & Gerli, F. (2023). Organizing for transformative innovation policies: The role of social enterprises. Theoretical insights and evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 52(7), 104818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104818 Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426 Caragliu, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2012). The impact of regional absorptive capacity on spatial knowledge spillovers: The Cohen and Levinthal model revisited. Applied Economics, 44(11), 1363-1374. Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D.F.J., Meissner, D. & Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&D Management, 48(1), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12300 Carayannis, E .G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2021). Democracy of climate and climate for democracy: The evolution of quadruple and quintuple helix innovation systems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 2050–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00778-x Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F .J., & Grigoroudis, E. (2021). Democracy and the environment: How political freedom is linked with environmental sustainability. Sustainability, 13, 5522. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105522 Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00138-x Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.003 Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.006 Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., Pachón J. R. C., & Cegarra J. L. M. (2012). E-government and citizen's engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities. International Journal of Information Management, 32(5), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.02.008 Ceptureanu, S. I., Ceptureanu, E. G., & Cerqueti, R. (2022). Innovation ambidexterity and impact on the performance in IT companies: The moderating role of business experience. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(7), 746-759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1918337 Cevallos, R. A. & Moreno, C. M. (2020). National policy councils for science, technology, and innovation: A scheme for structural definition and implementation. Science and Public Policy, 47(5), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa052 Chang, C.-H., Chen, Y.-S., & Lin, M.-J.J. (2014). Determinants of absorptive capacity. R&D Management, 44(5), 466-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12086 Chang, C.-Y., Chang, Y.-Y., Tsao, Y.-C., & Kraus, S. (2022). The power of knowledge management: How top management team bricolage boosts ambidexterity and performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(11), 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0753 Chen, H-T. (1996). A comprehensive typology for program evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 17(2), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409601700204 Chen, C.-Y., Lin, Y.-L., & Chu, P. Y. (2013). Facilitators of national innovation policy in a SME-dominated country: A case study of Taiwan. Innovation, 15(4), 405-415. http://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.4.405 Choi, S.-K., Han, S., & Kwak, K.-T (2021). Innovation capabilities and the performance of start-ups in Korea: The role of government support policies. Sustainability, 13, 6009. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116009 Christofi, M., Stylianou, I., Hadjielias, E., De Massis, A., & Kastanakis, M. N. (2023). Tackling pandemic-related health grand challenges: The role of organizational ambidexterity, social equality, and innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12662 Cloitre, A., Dos Santos Paulino, V., & Theodoraki, C. (2023). The quadruple/quintuple helix model in entrepreneurial ecosystems: An institutional perspective on the space case study. R&D Management, 53(4), 675-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12547 Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553 Cooke, P. (2010). Regional innovation systems: Development opportunities from the ‘Green Turn’. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 831-844. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511156 Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975 Crescenzi, R., & Gagliardi, L. (2018). The innovative performance of firms in heterogeneous environments: The interplay between external knowledge and internal absorptive capacities. Research Policy, 47(4), 782-795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.006 Crespo, N. F., & Crespo, C. F. (2016). Global innovation index: Moving beyond the absolute value of ranking with a fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5265-5271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.123 Criscuolo, P., & Narula, R. (2008). A novel approach to national technological accumulation and absorptive capacity: Aggregating Cohen and Levinthal. European Journal of Development Research, 20(1), 56-73. http://doi.org/10.1080/09578810701853181 Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135 Dahl, R. A. (1998). On Democracy. Yale University Press. Dahlman, C., & Nelson, R. (1995). Social absorption capability, national innovation systems and economic development. In D.H. Perkins and B.H. Koo (Eds.), Social capability and long-term growth (pp. 82-122). Macmillan Press. Daniels, N. (1978). Merit and Meritocracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 7(3), 206-223. David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6 De Bakker, F. G. A., Rasche, A., & Ponte, S. (2019). Multi-stakeholder initiatives on Sustainability: A cross-disciplinary review and research agenda for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(03), 343-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2019.10 Delre, S. A., Jager, W., Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Janssen, M. A. (2010). Will it spread or not? The effects of social influences and network topology on innovation diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(2), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00714.x De Marchi, V., Giuliani, E., & Rabellotti, R. (2018). Do global value chains offer developing countries learning and innovation opportunities? European Journal of Development Research, 30, 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0126-z Díaz‐Casero, J. C., Díaz‐Aunión, D. Á. M., Sánchez‐Escobedo, M. C., Coduras, A., & Hernández‐Mogollón, R. (2012). Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity. Management Decision, 50(9), 1686-1711. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211266750 Diercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy, 48(4), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028 Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.002 Ding, H. (2022). What kinds of countries have better innovation performance? A country-level fsQCA and NCA study. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100215 Dosi, G., & Soete, L. (2022). On the syndemic nature of crises: A Freeman perspective. Research Policy, 51(1), 104393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104393 Duit, A., & Löf, A. (2018). Dealing with a wicked problem? A dark tale of carnivore management in Sweden 2007-2011. Administration & Society, 50(8), 1072-1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715595668 Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870902863869 Durant, J. (1999). Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 313-319. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782329 Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches-Their emergence and characteristics In C. Edquist (Ed). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. (pp.1-35). Pinter. Edquist, C. (2019). Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model? Research Policy, 48(4), 869-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008 Elahi, S., Kalantari, N., Azar, A, & Hassanzadeh, M. (2016). Impact of common innovation infrastructures on the national innovative performance: Mediating role of knowledge and technology absorptive capacity. Innovation, 18(4), 536-560. http://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1233825 Ellis, J., Smith, J., & White, R. (2020). Corruption and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(7), 2124-2149. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109019000735 Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011 Enkel, E., Heil, S., Hengstler, M., & Wirth, H. (2017). Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute? Technovation, 60-61, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.08.002 Ergas, H. (2005). The importance of technology policy. In P. Dasgupta & P. Stoneman (Eds). Economic policy and technological performance (pp. 51-96). Cambridge University Press. Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.022 Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29 (2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 Evans, P. (1996). Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on Synergy. World Development, 24(6), 1119-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(96)00021-6 Fabrizio, K. R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38(2), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.023 Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies-The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006 Farè, L., Audretsch, D. B., & Dejardin, M. (2023). Does democracy foster entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00737-7 Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202-225. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.2.zok202 Flink, T., & Kaldewey, D. (2018). The new production of legitimacy: STI policy discourses beyond the contract metaphor. Research Policy, 47(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.008 Filippetti, A., Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2016). The impact of internationalization on innovation at countries’ level: The role of absorptive capacity. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(2), 413-439. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew032 Florida, R. (2014). The creative class and economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(3), 196-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242414541693 Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. (pp.1-6). Pinter Publishers. Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems-Complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2) 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6 Flink, T., & Kaldewey, D. (2018). The new production of legitimacy: STI policy discourses beyond the contract metaphor. Research Policy, 47(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.008 Fu, X., Hou, J., & Liu, X. (2018). Unpacking the relationship between outward direct investment and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. World Development, 102, 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.09.021 Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4 Gabel, M., Jung, C., & Nüesch, S. (2024). Tracing non-linearity in the relationship of economic freedom and national health innovation system efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 122788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122788 Gaimon, C., & Ramachandran, K. (2021). The knowledge value chain: An operational perspective. Production and Operations Management, 30(3), 715-724. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13312 Galli, R., & Teubal, M. (1997). Paradigm Shifts in National Innovation Systems. In C. Edquist (Ed). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. (pp. 342-370). Pinter. Gao, Y., Zang, L., Roth, A., & Wang, P. (2017). Does democracy cause innovation? An empirical test of the popper hypothesis. Research Policy, 46(7), 1272-1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.014 Gherhes, C., Yu, Z., Vorley, T., & Xue, L. (2023). Technological trajectories as an outcome of the structure-agency interplay at the national level: Insights from emerging varieties of AI. World Development, 168, 106252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106252 Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press. Gilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2006). Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.06.007 Girschik, V. (2020). Managing legitimacy in business‐driven social change: The role of relational work. Journal of Management Studies, 57(4), 775-804. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12544 Gölgeci, I., Swiatowiec-Szczepanska, J., & Raczkowski, K. (2017). How does cultural intelligence influence the relationships between potential and realised absorptive capacity and innovativeness? Evidence from Poland. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(8), 857-871. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1245858 Gong, G., & Keller, W. (2003). Convergence and polarization in global income levels: A review of recent results on the role of international technology diffusion. Research Policy, 32(6), 1055-1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00136-1 Goodin, R. E. (2017). The epistemic benefits of deliberative democracy. Policy Science, 50, 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9286-0 Goodwin, G. (2019). The problem and promise of coproduction: Politics, history, and autonomy. World Development, 122, 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.007. Gough, C., & Shackley, S. (2001). The respectable politics of climate change: The epistemic communities and NGOs. International Affairs, 77(2), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00195 Griffin, L. (2010). The limits to good governance and the state of exception: A case study of North Sea fisheries. Geoforum, 41(2), 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.10.007 Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2013). Structural microfoundations of innovation. Journal of Management, 40(2), 586-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313513612 Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026 Gutin, I., & Hummer, R. A. (2021). Social inequality and the future of US life expectancy. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1), 501-520. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-072320-100249 Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442 Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834510939 Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism systems of innovation approaches. In P.A. Hall, & D. Soskice. (Eds). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp.1-68). Oxford University Press. Hare, C. & Monogan, J. E. (2020). The democratic deficit on salient issues: Immigration and healthcare in the states. Journal of Public Policy, 40(1), 116-143, http://doi:10.1017/S0143814X18000296 Hausken, K., & Moxnes, J. F. (2019). Innovation, development and national indices. Social Indicators Research, 141(3), 1165–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1873-8 Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827 He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2020). Can meritocracy replace democracy? A conceptual framework. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(9), 1093-1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720948388 He, C., Wang, T., Shah, S.A., Chang, Y., & Zhou, X. (2023). A study on the moderating role of national absorptive capacity between institutional quality and FDI inflow: Evidence from developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 2177-2198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2022.2096659 He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 Henderson, D. (2019). Policy entrepreneurship in context: Understanding the emergence of novel policy solutions for services innovation in Finland and Ireland, Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 668-678. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz020 Hennen L. (1999), Participatory technology assessment: A response to technical modernity? Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782310 Heracleous, L., Papachroni, A., Andriopoulos, C., & Gotsi, M. (2017). Structural ambidexterity and competency traps: Insights from Xerox PARC. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.014 Hill, C. W. L. (1995). National institutional structures, transaction cost economizing and competitive advantage: The case of Japan. Organization Science, 6(1), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.119 Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15(1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0056 Hommen, L., & Edquist, C. (2008). Globalization and innovation policy. In C. Edquist & L. Hommen (Eds.), Small country innovation systems: Comparing globalisation, change and policy in Asia and Europe (pp. 442-484). Edward Elgar Publishing. Hossain, M., Atif, M., Ahmed, A., & Mia, L. (2020). Do LGBT workplace diversity policies create value for firms? Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 775-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04158-z Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1 Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34(9), 1322-1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.04.009 Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2008). China’s national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 37(9), 1465-1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.003 Huang, C., & Sharif, N. (2016). Global technology leadership: The case of China. Science and Public Policy, 43(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv019 Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century (pp. 5-12). University of Oklahoma Press. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Olander, H. (2014). Coping with rivals’ absorptive capacity in innovation activities. Technovation, 34(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.07.005 Huttunen, S., Ojanen, M., Ott, A., & Saarikoski, H. (2022). What about citizens? A literature review of citizen engagement in sustainability transitions research. Energy Research & Social Science, 91, 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102714 Ibanez, A., AlRadaideh, A., Jimber del Rio, J. A., & Sisodia, G. S. (2023). Good governance and innovation: A renewed global framework for national and supranational policy advancement. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01324-7 Ingold, K., Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Kammermann, L. (2019). The acceptance of instruments in instrument mix situations: Citizens’ perspective on Swiss energy transition. Research Policy, 48(10), 103694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.018 Jackman, R. W. (1974). Political democracy and social equality: A comparative analysis. American Sociological Review, 39(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094274 Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573106 Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576 Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., García-Morales, V. J., & Molina, L. M. (2011). Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity. Technovation, 31(5-6), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.002 Jin, N., Yang, N., Fawad Sharif, S. M., Li, R., & Du, J. (2023). Influence of knowledge flow and knowledge stock on the technological niche through absorptive capacity in the R&D network. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(12), 1533-1546. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2098101 Jochim, A. E., & May, P. J. (2010). Beyond subsystems: Policy regimes and governance. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 303-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00363.x Johnson, B. (1992). Institutional learning. In B.-Å. Lundvall (Ed.), National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. (pp. 23-44). Anthem Press. Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0015 Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). The reconfiguration of national innovation systems-The example of German biotechnology. Research Policy, 33(3), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.001 Kalantari, E., Montazer, G., & Ghazinoory, S. (2022). Modeling the characteristics of collaborative science and technology policy network. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(5), 504-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1908537 Kallio, A., Harmaakorpi, V., & Pihkala, T. (2010). Absorptive capacity and social capital in regional innovation systems: The case of the Lahti region in Finland. Urban Studies, 47(2), 303-319. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433 Kaufmann, D. (2013). The influence of causation and effectuation logics on targeted policies: The cases of Singapore and Israel. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(7), 853-870. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.815714 Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 Khedhaouria, A., & Thurik, R. (2017). Configurational conditions of national innovation capability: A fuzzy set analysis approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.005 Ko, Y., Ko, H., Chung, Y, & Woo, C. (2021). Do gender equality and work-life balance matter for innovation performance? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(2), 148-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1799971 Kohlbacher, M., Weitlaner, D., Hollosi, A., Grünwald, S., & Grahsl, H. (2013). Innovation in clusters: Effects of absorptive capacity and environmental moderators. Competitiveness Review, 23(3), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/10595421311319807 Korda, R. J., Clements, M. S., & Dixon, J. (2011). Socioeconomic inequalities in the diffusion of health technology: Uptake of coronary procedures as an example. Social Science & Medicine, 72(2), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.002 Kouton, J., Bétila, R. R., & Lawin, M. (2021). The impact of ICT development on health outcomes in Africa: Does economic freedom matter? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 1830-1869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00689-3 Krammer, S. M. S. (2009). Drivers of national innovation in transition: Evidence from a panel of Eastern European countries. Research Policy, 38(5), 845-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.022 Krasner, S. D. (1983). International Regimes. Cornell University Press. Kuckertz, A., Berger, E. S. C., & Mpeqa, A. (2016). The more the merrier? Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1288-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.094 Kuhlmann, S. (2001). Future governance of innovation policy in Europe-three scenarios. Research Policy, 30(6), 953-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00167-0 Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998), Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:53.0.CO;2-L Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 797-818. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083085 Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2012). The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 148-166. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00537.x Lee, J-H, & Woo, J. (2020). Green new deal policy of South Korea: Policy innovation for a sustainability transition. Sustainability, 12(23), 10191. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310191 Lee, C. C., & Yang, J. (2000). Knowledge value chain. Journal of Management Development, 19(9), 783-794. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710010378228 Lee, S. H., & Yoo, T. (2007). Government policy and trajectories of radical innovation in dirigiste states: A comparative analysis of national innovation systems in France and Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 451-470. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403383 Lehmann, E. E., & Seitz, N. (2017). Freedom and innovation: A country and state level analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1009-1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9478-3 Levidow, L. (1998). Democratizing technology-or technologizing democracy? Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe. Technology in Society, 20(2), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(98)00003-7 Levinthal, D.A., & March, J.G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009 Li, X. (2012). Behind the recent surge of Chinese patenting: An institutional view. Research Policy, 41(1), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.003 Li, Z. (2020). Confucian meritocracy, political legitimacy and constitutional democracy. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(9), 1076-1092. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720948403 Limaj, E., & Bernroider, E. W. N. (2019). The roles of absorptive capacity and cultural balance for exploratory and exploitative innovation in SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 94, 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.052 Lin, G. T-R., Chang Y.-H., & Shen, Y. C. (2010). Innovation policy analysis and learning: Comparing Ireland and Taiwan. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(7-8), 731-762. http://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.483290 Lindvall, D., & Karlsson, M. (2023). Exploring the democracy-climate nexus: A review of correlations between democracy and climate policy performance. Climate Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2256697 Link A., & Scott J. T. (2010). Government as entrepreneur: Evaluating the commercialization success of SBIR projects. Research Policy, 39(5), 589-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.006 Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731 Liu, Z., Cai, L., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Gender diversity and environmental performance: New evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(21), 13775. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113775 Llorente, C., Revuelta, G., & Carrió, M. (2021). Social participation in science: Perspectives of Spanish civil society organizations. Public Understanding of Science, 30(1), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520960663 López-Cabarcos, M. A., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., & Quiñoá-Piñeiro, L. (2021). An approach to a country's innovation considering cultural, economic, and social conditions. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 2747-2766. http://10.1080/1331677X.2020.1838314 Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). Introduction. In B.-Å. Lundvall (Ed.), National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. (pp. 1-20). Anthem Press. Lundvall, B.-Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8. Maggor, E. (2021). The politics of innovation policy: Building Israel’s “Neo-developmental” state. Politics & Society, 49(4), 451-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329220945527 Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1 Malik, A., Sharma, P., Pereira, V., & Temouri, Y. (2021). From regional innovation systems to global innovation hubs: Evidence of a quadruple helix from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 128, 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.009 Mancusi, M. L. (2008). International spillovers and absorptive capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on patents and citations, Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.06.007. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 Martin, S., & Scott, J. T. (2000). The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00084-0 Matusik, S. F., & Heeley, M. B. (2005). Absorptive capacity in the software industry: Identifying dimensions that affect knowledge and knowledge creation activities. Journal of Management, 31(4), 549-572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272293 May, P. J., & Jochim, A. E. (2013). Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics, and governing. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 426-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12024 Mazzucato, M. (2015). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. PublicAffairs. McAdam, M., & Debackere, K. (2017). Beyond ‘triple helix’ toward ‘quadruple helix’ models in regional innovation systems: Implications for theory and practice. R&D Management, 48(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12309 McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069340 Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technical change (pp. 409-512). Blackwell Publishers. Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1988). Evaluation of industrial innovation policy: Concepts, methods and lessons. In J.D. Roessner (Ed.), Government innovation policy: Design, implementation, evaluation (pp. 121-133). Macmillan in association with the Policy Studies Organization. Midgal, J. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World. Princeton University Press. Midttun, A., & Witoszek, N. (2020). The competitive advantage of collaboration–Throwing new light on the Nordic model. New Political Economy, 25(6), 880-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1657078 Miller, D. (1992). Deliberative democracy and social choice. Political Studies, 40(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01812.x Mitcham, C. (2021). Science policy and democracy. Technology in Society, 67, 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101783 Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105 Moon, H.-S., & Lee, J.-D. (2005). A fuzzy set theory approach to national composite S&T indices. Scientometrics, 64(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0238-7 Moro, M. A., Andersen, M. M., Smets, B. F., & McKnight, U. S. (2019). National innovative capacity in the water sector: A comparison between China and Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.329 Mowery, D. C., & Oxley, J. E. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 67-93. Mueller, V., Rosenbusch, N., & Bausch, A. (2013). Success patterns of exploratory and exploitative innovation. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1606-1636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313484516 Mueller, E., Syme, L., & Haeussler, C. (2020). Absorbing partner knowledge in R&D collaborations-The influence of founders on potential and realized absorptive capacity. R&D Management, 50(2), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12395 Murovec, N., & Prodan, I. (2009). Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation, 29(12), 859-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.010 Nadeem, M. A., Liu, Z., Zulfiqar, S., Younis, A., & Xu, Y. (2021). Does corruption impede innovation in developing economies? Insights from Pakistan: A call for policies reforms. Crime, Law and Social Change, 75(2), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09927-w Nelson, R. R. (1992). National innovation systems: A retrospective on a study. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(2), 347-374. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/1.2.347 Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R.R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 1-21). Oxford University Press. Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31(2), 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00140-8 Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press. Ng, D., & Sanchez-Aragon, L. F. (2022). Putting the cart (antecedents) before the horse (absorptive capacity): The role of competitive antecedents to the absorptive capacity innovation process. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(9), 2306-2332. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2021-0518 Niosi, J., Saviotti, P., Bellon, B., & Crow, M. (1993). National systems of innovation: In search of a workable concept. Technology in Society, 15(2), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791x(93)90003-7 Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 North, D. (1981) Structure and change in economic history. W.W. Norton & Company. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. Nowacki, C., & Monk, A. (2020). Ambidexterity in government: The influence of different types of legitimacy on innovation. Research Policy, 49(1), 103840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103840 Omidi, V., Shahabadi, A., & Mehregan, N. (2020). Innovation drivers in developing countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(2), 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0568-3 O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025 Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (1998). Regimes and regime building in American government: A review of literature on the 1940s. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 689-702. https://doi.org/10.2307/2658250 Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data on innovation (n.d.). https://www.oecd.org/science/oslo-manual-2018-9789264304604-en.htm Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073-1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X. Papaioannou, T. (2021). The idea of justice in innovation: Applying non-ideal political theory to address questions of sustainable public policy in emerging technologies. Sustainability, 13(5), 2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052655 Pavitt, K., & Patel, P. (1999). Global corporations and national systems of innovation: Who dominates whom? In D. Archibugi, J. Howells, & J. Michie (Eds.), Innovation policy in a global economy (pp. 94-119). Cambridge University Press. Pejovich, S. (1999). The effects of the interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic development. Journal of Markets & Morality, 2(2), 164-181. Pesch, U. (2021). Imaginaries of innovation: Turning technology development into a public issue, Science and Public Policy, 48(2), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab017 Pesch, U., & Vermaas, P. E. (2020). The wickedness of Rittel and Webber’s dilemmas. Administration & Society, 52(6), 960-979. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720934010 Peters, B. G. (2015). State failure, governance failure and policy failure: Exploring the linkages. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3-4), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715581540 Petralia, S., Balland, P.-A., & Morrison, A. (2017). Climbing the ladder of technological development. Research Policy, 46(5), 956-969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.012 Pettersson, F., & Sørensen, C. H. (2020). Why do cities invest in bus priority measures? Policy, polity, and politics in Stockholm and Copenhagen, Transport Policy, 98, 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.10.013 Petraite, M., Mubarak, M.F., Rimantas, R., & Von Zedtwitz, M. (2022). The role of international networks in upgrading national innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121873 Pittiglio, R., Sica, E., & Villa, S. (2009). Innovation and internationalization: The case of Italy, Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 588-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9107-5 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Popa, E. O., Blok, V., & Wesselink, R. (2020). A processual approach to friction in quadruple helix collaborations. Science and Public Policy, 47(6), 876-889. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa054 Popper, K. (1952). Open society and its enemies (2nd ed.). Routledge. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press. Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press. Prebble, M. (2021). Public value is unknowable; Public authority makes every government decision a wicked problem. Administration & Society, 53(10), 1582-1602. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211022685 Proksch, D., Busch-Casler, J., Haberstroh, M. M., & Pinkwart, A. (2019). National health innovation systems: Clustering the OECD countries by innovative output in healthcare using a multi indicator approach. Research Policy, 48(1), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.004 Qian, H. F., & Jung, H. J. (2017). Solving the knowledge filter puzzle: Absorptive capacity, entrepreneurship and regional development. Small Business Economics, 48(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9769-y Rakas, M., & Hain, D. S. (2019). The state of innovation system research: What happens beneath the surface? Research Policy, 48(9), 103787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.011 Rangus, K., & Slavec, A. (2017). The interplay of decentralization, employee involvement and absorptive capacity on firms’ innovation and business performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.017 Rask, M. (2013). The tragedy of citizen deliberation: Two cases of participatory technology assessment. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.751012 Ren, S., Hao, Y., & Wu, H. (2021). Government corruption, market segmentation and renewable energy technology innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113686 Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01405730 Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004269288 Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725 Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. Roper, S., & Love, J. H. (2018). Knowledge context, learning and innovation: An integrating framework. Industry and Innovation, 25(4), 339-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1414744 Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6 Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., Dańska-Borsiak, B., Grzelak, M. M., & Pleśniarska, A. (2022). In search of key determinants of innovativeness in the regions of the Visegrad Group countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1015-1045. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.029 Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1981). Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s. Greenwood Press. Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120302 Sancho-Zamora, R., Gutiérrez-Broncano, S., Hernández-Perlines, F., & Peña-García, I. (2021). A multidimensional study of absorptive capacity and innovation capacity and their impact on business performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751997 Sauermann, H., Vohland, K., Antoniou, V., Balazs, B., Gobel, C., Karatzas, K., Mooney, P., Perello, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., & Winter, S. (2020). Citizen science and sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 49(5), 103978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978 Schmidt, V. A. (2012). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘Throughput.’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011 Schumpeter, J. A. (1947a). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (2nd ed., p. 84). Harper. Schumpeter, J. A. (1947b). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (2nd ed., p. 269). Harper. Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392880 Sen, A. (2001). Development and freedom. Oxford University Press. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/229967 Shahbaz, M. (2013). Linkages between inflation, economic growth and terrorism in Pakistan. Economic Modelling, 32, 496-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.02.014 Shaikh, I. A., & Randhawa, K. (2022). Industrial R&D and national innovation policy: An institutional reappraisal of the US national innovation system. Industrial and Corporate Change, 31(5), 1152-1176. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtac01 Sharif, N. (2006). Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept. Research Policy, 35(5), 745-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001 Sharma, A., Sousa, C., & Woodward, R. (2022). Determinants of innovation outcomes: The role of institutional quality. Technovation, 118, 102562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102562 Shi, X., Liang, X., & Luo, Y. (2023). Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies. Research Policy, 52(6), 104783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104783 Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. In P.B. Evans, & D. Ruschemeyer (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3-38). Cambridge University Press. Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. University of Oklahoma Press. Smith-Doerr, L. (2010). Flexible organizations, innovation and gender equality: Writing for the US film industry, 1907-27. Industry and Innovation, 17(1), 5-22. http://doi.org/10.1080/13662710903573810 Söderholm, P., Hellsmark, H., Frishammar, J., Hansson, J., Mossberg, J., & Sandström, A. (2019). Technological development for sustainability: The role of network management in the innovation policy mix. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.010 Sofka, W. (2008). Globalizing domestic absorptive capacities. MIR: Management International Review, 48(6), 769-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0106-9 Song, Y., Gnyawali, D. R., Srivastava, M. K., & Asgari, E. (2018). In search of precision in absorptive capacity research: A synthesis of the literature and consolidation of findings. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2343-2374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318773861 Steward, F. (2012). Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(4), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663959 Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Leaders and followers: Perspectives on the Nordic model and the economics of Innovation. Journal of Public Economics, 127, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.09.005 Su, Z., Ahlstrom, D., Li, J., & Cheng, D. (2013). Knowledge creation capability, absorptive capacity, and product innovativeness. R&D Management, 43(5), 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12033 Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 Švarc, J., & Dabić, M. (2021). Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries, Technology in Society, 67,101705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101705 Taylor, M. Z. (2004). Empirical evidence against varieties of capitalism's theory of technological innovation. International Organization, 58(3), 601-631. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304583066 Taylor, M. Z. (2007). Political decentralization and technological innovation: Testing the innovative advantages of decentralized states. Review of Policy Research, 24(3), 231-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00279.x Taylor, M. Z. (2009). International linkages and national innovation rates: An exploratory probe. Review of Policy Research, 26(1-2), 127-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00372.x Taylor, M. Z., & Wilson, S. (2012). Does culture still matter?: The effects of individualism on national innovation rates. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 234-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.10.001 Taylor, M. Z. (2016). The politics of innovation: Why some countries are better than others at science & technology. Oxford University Press. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z Ter Wal, A. L. J., Criscuolo, P., & Salter, A. (2017). Making a marriage of materials: The role of gatekeepers and shepherds in the absorption of external knowledge and innovation performance. Research Policy, 46(5), 1039-1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.003 Thierstein, A., & Willhelm, B. (2001). Incubator, technology, and innovation centres in Switzerland: Features and policy implications. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 13(4), 315-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620110074469 Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774-786. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275513 Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443 Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852 Van Bueren, E. M. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug017 Van Oudheusden, M. (2014). Learning in, through, and about participatory technology assessment: The case of Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow's Society (NanoSoc). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(7), 825-836. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.902436 Van Rensburg, N. J., Telukdarie, A., & Dhamija, P. (2019). Society 4.0 applied in Africa: Advancing the social impact of technology. Technology in Society, 59, 101125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.001 Van Rooij, A., Berkers, E., Davids, M., & Veraart, F. (2008). National innovation systems and international knowledge flows: An exploratory investigation with the case of the Netherlands. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(2), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320801931291 Varsakelis, N. C. (2006). Education, political institutions and innovative activity: A cross-country empirical investigation. Research Policy, 35(7), 1083-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.06.002 Vega‐Jurado, J., Gutiérrez‐Gracia, A., & Fernández‐de‐Lucio, I. (2008). Analyzing the determinants of firm’s absorptive capacity: Beyond R&D. R&D Management, 38(4), 392-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00525.x Vehviläinen, M., & Valaskivi, L. (2022). Situated gender equality in regional research and innovation: Collaborative knowledge production. Science and Public Policy, 49(4), 561-572. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac007 VINNOVA. (2015). National research and innovation councils as an instrument of innovation governance: Characteristics and challenges. https://www.vinnova.se/contentassets/4da13cc174a448d1a3f0b816c6b74366/va_15_07t.pdf Viotti, E. B. (2002). National learning systems: A new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(7), 653-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00167-6. Wagle, U. (2000). The policy science of democracy: The issues of methodology and citizen participation. Policy Sciences, 33, 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026500906034 Wang, Y., & Guo, B. (2020). Managing external knowledge search: The multiple and contingent roles of absorptive capacity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1632821 Wang, L., Luo, G., Sari, A., & Shao, X.-F. (2020). What nurtures fourth industrial revolution? An investigation of economic and social determinants of technological innovation in advanced economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120305 Wang, Q.-J., Feng, G.-F., Wang, H.-J., & Chang, C.-P. (2021). The impacts of democracy on innovation: Revisited evidence. Technovation, 108, 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102333 Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature. Research Policy, 44(8), 1407-1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.004 Weaver, K. (2010). Paths and forks or chutes and ladders?: Negative feedbacks and policy regime change. Journal of Public Policy, 30(2), 137-162. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X10000061 Weber, K. M. & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015 Weber, M. (2004a). The three pure types of legitimate rule. In S. Whimster (Ed.), The essential Weber: A reader. (pp. 133-145). Routledge. Weber, M. (2004b). Bureaucracy. In S. Whimster (Ed.), The essential Weber: A reader. (pp. 245-249). Routledge. Weber, M. (2004c). The vocation of politics. In S. Whimster (Ed.), The essential Weber: A reader. (pp. 257-269). Routledge. Weidner, N., Som, O., & Horvat, D. (2023). An integrated conceptual framework for analysing heterogeneous configurations of absorptive capacity in manufacturing firms with the DUI innovation mode. Technovation, 121, 102635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102635 Wen, J., Zheng, M., Feng, G.-F., Chen, S.-W., & Chang, C.-P. (2020). Corruption and innovation: Linear and nonlinear investigations of OECD countries. The Singapore Economic Review, 65(01), 103-129. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590818500273 Wen, J., Qualls, W. J., & Zeng, D. (2021). To explore or exploit: The influence of inter-firm R&D network diversity and structural holes on innovation outcomes. Technovation, 100, 102178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102178 Wen, J., Yin, H.-T., Jang, C.-L., Uchida, H., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). Does corruption hurt green innovation? Yes-global evidence from cross-validation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122313 Whetsell, T. A., Dimand, A.-M., Jonkers, K., Baas, J., & Wagner, C. S. (2021). Democracy, complexity, and science: Exploring structural sources of national scientific performance. Science and Public Policy, 48(5), 697-711. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab036 Wilson, C. A. (2000). Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy, 20(3), 247-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00000842 Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning Wyndow, P., Li, J., & Mattes, E. (2013). Female empowerment as a core driver of democratic development: A dynamic panel model from 1980 to 2005. World Development, 52, 34-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.06.004 Xiao, P., Zhang, H., Sun, X., Zhang, F., Du, X., & Liu, G. (2022). International ambidexterity and innovation performance: The moderating role of the host country’s institutional quality. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100218 Yoo, S. (2020). Innovation in practice: The "Technology Drive Policy" and the 4Mb DRAM R&D consortium in South Korea in the 1980s and 1990s. Technology and Culture, 61(2), 385-415. http://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2020.0047 Yousaf, M., Ihsan, F., & Ellahi, A. (2016). Exploring the impact of good governance on citizens’ trust in Pakistan. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.001 Yu, Y., Yuan L., & Li, J. (2019). Knowledge search modes and innovation performance: The moderating role of strategic R&D orientation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(6), 625-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1541172 Yu, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, M., & Fan, F. (2022). Cross-national knowledge transfer, absorptive capacity, and total factor productivity: The intermediary effect test of international technology spillover. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(6), 625-640. http://doi.org./10.1080/09537325.2021.1915476 Yun, J. J., & Liu, Z. (2019). Micro-and macro-dynamics of open innovation with a quadruple-helix model. Sustainability, 11(12), 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123301 Zahavi, A., & Breznitz, D. (2017). Distribution sensitive innovation policies: Conceptualization and empirical examples. Research Policy, 46(1), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.007 Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351 Zakari, A., Tawiah, V., Oyewo, B., & Alvarado, R. (2023). The impact of corruption on green innovation: The case of OECD and non-OECD countries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(6), 1336-1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2027234 Zang, J. (2018). Structural holes, exploratory innovation and exploitative Innovation. Management Decision, 56(8), 1682-1695. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2017-0485 Zang, L., Xiong, F., Lao, X., & Gao, Y. (2019). Does governance efficiency matter for national innovative capacity? One tale from different countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1493450 Zecca, E., & Nicolli, F. (2021). Inequality, democracy and green technological change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, 127061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127061 Zeng, J., Liu, Y., Wang, R., & Zhan, P. (2019). Absorptive capacity and regional innovation in China: An analysis of patent applications, 2000-2015. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 12, 1031-1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-019-09300-y Zhao, Q., & Su, C.-W. (2023). Does anti-corruption facilitate or hinder technological innovation? The Singapore Economic Review, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590823500297 Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galán, J .I. (2014). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 36-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00738.x; G0108364504; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152640; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/152640/1/450401.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152640
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/152640/1/450401.pdf

View record in BASE

10

Dissertation/ Thesis

探討金融科技創新多樣性對績效的影響：美國銀行的實證分析 ; Exploring the Influence of Fintech Innovation Diversity on Performance: An Empirical Analysis of U.S. banks

المؤلفون: 唐芸飛, Tang, Yun-Fei

المساهمون: 張欣綠

مصطلحات موضوعية: 金融科技創新, 銀行績效, 專利多樣性, Fintech innovation, Banking performance, Patent diversity

Relation: Ameme, B., & Wireko, J. (2016). Impact of technological innovations on customers in the banking industry in developing countries. The Business & Management Review, 7(3), 388. Appio, F. P., De Luca, L. M., Morgan, R., & Martini, A. (2019). Patent portfolio diversity and firm profitability: A question of specialization or diversification? Journal of Business Research, 101, 255-267. Arte, P., & Larimo, J. (2022). Moderating influence of product diversification on the international diversification-performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1408-1423. Assadi, D. (2015). Strategic approaches to successful crowdfunding: IGI Global. Boot, A. W. (2017). The Future of Banking: From Scale & Scope Economies to Fintech 29. European Economy(2), 77-95. Caner, T., Bruyaka, O., & Prescott, J. E. (2018). Flow signals: Evidence from patent and alliance portfolios in the US biopharmaceutical industry. Journal of Management Studies, 55(2), 232-264. Chang, S.-C., & Wang, C.-F. (2007). The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance. Journal of world business, 42(1), 61-79. Chen, Y.-M., Yang, D.-H., & Lin, F.-J. (2013). Does technological diversification matter to firm performance? The moderating role of organizational slack. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1970-1975. Cheng, C. C., Yang, C.-l., & Sheu, C. (2014). The link between eco-innovation and business performance: A Taiwanese industry context. Journal of cleaner production, 64, 81-90. Chiao, Y. C., Yu, C. M. J., Li, P. Y., & Chen, Y. C. (2008). Subsidiary size, internationalization, product diversification, and performance in an emerging market. International Marketing Review, 25(6), 612-633. Chuluun, T., Prevost, A., & Upadhyay, A. (2017). Firm network structure and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 193-214. Citi, G. (2016). Digital disruption: how FinTech is forcing banking to a tipping point. Global Perspectives and Solutions, 2016, 1-112. Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 45-65. Devlin, J. F. (1995). Technology and innovation in retail banking distribution. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 13(4), 19-25. FSB. (2017). Financial Stability Implications from FinTech Supervisory and Regulatory Issues that Merit Authorities’ Attention. from https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/R270617.pdf FSB. (2019). FinTech and market structure in financial services: Market developments and potential financial stability implications. from https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P140219.pdf FSB. (2022, 5 May 2022). FinTech. Financial innovation and structural change. Retrieved 26 Sep 2023, 2023, from https://www.fsb.org/work-of-the-fsb/financial-innovation-and-structural-change/fintech/ Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research policy, 35(2), 230-246. Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: why they have “distributed” rather than “distinctive core” competencies. California management review, 39(4), 8-25. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of management review, 32(4), 1199-1228. Hoehle, H., Scornavacca, E., & Huff, S. (2012). Three decades of research on consumer adoption and utilization of electronic banking channels: A literature analysis. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 122-132. Huo, D., Motohashi, K., & Gong, H. (2019). Team diversity as dissimilarity and variety in organizational innovation. Research policy, 48(6), 1564-1572. Hway‐Boon, O., & Ming Yu, C. (2003). Success factors in e‐channels: the Malaysian banking scenario. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(6/7), 369-377. IMF, & Bank, W. (2019). Fintech: The Experience So Far—Executive Summary: International Monetary Fund Washington, DC. Jalal, A., Al Mubarak, M., & Durani, F. (2023). Financial technology (fintech) Artificial Intelligence and Transforming Digital Marketing (pp. 525-536): Springer. Kabra, N., Bhattacharya, P., Tanwar, S., & Tyagi, S. (2020). MudraChain: Blockchain-based framework for automated cheque clearance in financial institutions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 102, 574-587. Kumari, N., & Khanna, J. (2017). Cashless payment: A behaviourial change to economic growth. Qualitative and Quantitative Research Review, 2(2). Leong, K., & Sung, A. (2018). FinTech (Financial Technology): What is it and how to use technologies to create business value in fintech way? International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 9(2), 74-78. Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2007). Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 567-579. Lettl, C., Rost, K., & Von Wartburg, I. (2009). Why are some independent inventors ‘heroes’ and others ‘hobbyists’? The moderating role of technological diversity and specialization. Research policy, 38(2), 243-254. Lin, B.-W., Chen, C.-J., & Wu, H.-L. (2006). Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 53(1), 17-26. Martínez‐Ros, E., & Labeaga, J. M. (2009). Product and process innovation: Persistence and complementarities. European Management Review, 6(1), 64-75. Meyer, J., & Subramaniam, M. (2014). Appropriating innovation's technical value: Examining the influence of exploration. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2860-2866. MR, A., & Mitra, A. (2016). Effect of information content and form on customers’ attitude and transaction intention in mobile banking: Moderating role of perceived privacy concern. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(7), 1092-1113. Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2008). Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research policy, 37(3), 492-507. Ramasubbu, N., Bharadwaj, A., & Tayi, G. K. (2015). Software process diversity. Mis Quarterly, 39(4), 787-808. Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448): Routledge. Suzuki, J., & Kodama, F. (2004). Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research policy, 33(3), 531-549. Vives, X. (2017). The impact of FinTech on banking. European Economy(2), 97-105. Wang, H., Ma, S., Dai, H.-N., Imran, M., & Wang, T. (2020). Blockchain-based data privacy management with nudge theory in open banking. Future Generation Computer Systems, 110, 812-823. Weller, C. E., & Zulfiqar, G. (2013). Financial market diversity and macroeconomic stability. Working Paperswp332, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Zhu, K., Malhotra, S., & Li, Y. (2022). Technological diversity of patent applications and decision pendency. Research policy, 51(1), 104364.; G0111356004; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152408

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152408

View record in BASE

11

Academic Journal

San José State University圖書資訊學線上碩士班科技創新之研究 ; Technological Innovation on Online Education of the San José State University`s Master Program of Library and Information Science

المؤلفون: 王梅玲, Wang, Mei-Ling

المساهمون: 圖檔所

مصطلحات موضوعية: 線上教育, 圖書資訊學, 數位學習, 科技創新, Online Education, Library and Information Science, E-learning, Technology Innovation

وصف الملف: 1749069 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 圖書館學與資訊科學, 46(2), 4-34; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/140196; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/140196/1/5.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/140196
https://doi.org/10.6245/JLIS.202010_46(2).0001
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/140196/1/5.pdf

View record in BASE

12

Report

构建科技创新“双循环”新发展格局

المؤلفون: 杨中楷, 高继平, 梁永霞

مصطلحات موضوعية: 技术科学, 自立自强, 科技创新, “双循环”

Relation: 中国科学院院刊; http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/11856; http://www.bulletin.cas.cn/publish_article/2021/5/20210504.htm; http://dx.doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20210227101

الاتاحة: http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/11856
http://www.bulletin.cas.cn/publish_article/2021/5/20210504.htm
https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20210227101

View record in BASE

13

Report

坚持科技发展正确理念实现科技自主自立自强

المؤلفون: 武张志强

مصطلحات موضوعية: 科技创新, 科技竞争发展, 科技自主自立自强, 科技开放发展, 科技系统发展, 科技安全发展, 科技与创新政策, 管理学::图书情报与档案管理

Relation: 世界科技研究与发展; http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/11807 ;科技开放发展;科技竞争发展;科技系统发展;科技安全发展;科技与创新政策

الاتاحة: http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/11807

View record in BASE

14

Academic Journal

网络治理视角下农业科技创新发展的路径研究——基于农业试验示范站的实践分析

المؤلفون: 吴建忠, 吴欣, 詹圣泽

مصطلحات موضوعية: 网络治理, 农业科技创新, 农业试验示范站, 技术传播, 农户

Relation: 中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(06):121-127; https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/177733

الاتاحة: https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/177733

View record in BASE

15

Academic Journal

论国有经济在我国经济社会中的地位与作用

المؤلفون: 余郄

مصطلحات موضوعية: 国有企业, 科技创新, 社会责任, 国际化

Relation: 现代经济信息,2019,(24):13-14; https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/174506

الاتاحة: https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/174506

View record in BASE

16

Academic Journal

金融科技監理與我國金融監理沙盒制度之檢視 ; FinTech Regulation and A Review of Taiwan's Financial Regulatory Sandbox Framewor

المؤلفون: 臧正運, Tsang, Cheng-Yun, 彭金隆, Peng, Jin-Lung

المساهمون: 法律系

مصطلحات موضوعية: 金融科技, 金融科技監理, 金融監理沙盒, 金融科技創新實驗, FinTech, FinTech Regulation, Financial Regulatory Sandbox, FinTech Innovative Experimentation, droit, scipo

Relation: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/127720

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/127720

View record in BASE

17

Report

成渝国家科技创新中心建设模式与政策研究

المؤلفون: 张志强, 熊永兰, 韩文艳

مصطلحات موضوعية: 成渝地区双城经济圈, 科创走廊, 政策体系, 成渝科技创新中心, 综合性科学中心, 科学城, 产业创新基地, 管理学

Relation: 中国西部; http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/11778

الاتاحة: http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/11778

View record in BASE

18

Academic Journal

科技创新的双重生态意蕴及其整合路径 ; Dual Ecological Implications for Scientific and Technological Innovationand its Integration Path

المؤلفون: 詹志华, 董皓

مصطلحات موضوعية: 科技创新, 生态化科技创新, 科技创新生态系统, 互动关系, 整合路径, Integration Path

Relation: 科技进步与对策,2017,(3); https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/164103

الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2016070521
https://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/164103

View record in BASE

19

Dissertation/ Thesis

台灣微藻固碳科技創新發展研究-以科技創新系統與創新生態系統觀點 ; Exploring the Technological Innovation of Microalgae-based Carbon Capture in Taiwan: Perspectives from Technological Innovation System and Innovation Ecosystem

المؤلفون: 曾鈺婷, Tseng, Yu-Ting

المساهمون: 柯玉佳, Ko, Yu-Chia

مصطلحات موضوعية: 科技創新系統, 創新生態系統, 微藻固碳與固碳後再利用, Technological innovation system, Innovation ecosystem, Microalgae carbon capture, storage and utilization

وصف الملف: 2727956 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 一、中文部分周興平。2020。Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16 (2015) 51–64 。國立清華大學科技管理研究所博士論文。張書豪。2014。創新生態系統下研發成果產業化模型與實踐機制。科技管理學刊第十九卷第三期 103年9月 1-32 楊佩芬。2019。微藻生質能源基因工程技術發展盧文章、王振諧。2009。藻類培養之光合生物反應器發展現況。化工資訊與商情 77 期20-25 潘淑滿。2022。質性研究：理論與應用（第二版）二、英文部分 Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333. Adner, R. (2012). The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation(Vol. 34, No. 9). Penguin Uk. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2005, June). Analyzing the dynamics and functionality of sectoral innovation systems–a manual. In DRUID tenth anniversary summer conference (pp. 27-29). Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research policy, 37(3), 407-429. Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 16, 51- 64. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Breslin, D., Kask, J., Schlaile, M., & Abatecola, G. (2021). Developing a coevolutionary account of innovation ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 59-68. Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of evolutionary economics, 1, 93-118. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research policy, 31(2), 233-245. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098. Hellsmark, H., & Jacobsson, S. (2009). Opportunities for and limits to academics as system builders—the case of realizing the potential of gasified biomass in Austria. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5597-5611. Ho, S. H., Chen, C. Y., Lee, D. J., & Chang, J. S. (2011). Perspectives on microalgal CO2- emission mitigation systems—a review. Biotechnology advances, 29(2), 189-198. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard business review, 82(3), 68-78. Iansiti, M, & Levien, R. (2004b), “The Keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean or strategy, innovation, and sustainability”, Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press. Jacobsson, S., & Johnson, A. (2000). The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy policy, 28(9), 625-640. Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., & Augier, M. (2006). Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research policy, 35(8), 1200-1221. James F. Moore.(1993) Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harv Bus Rev. 1993 May-Jun;71(3):75-86 James F. Moore.(2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm, The Antitrust Bulletin:Vol.51, No.1/Spring 2006 31-75 Kebede, K. Y., & Mitsufuji, T. (2017). Technological innovation system building for diffusion of renewable energy technology: A case of solar PV systems in Ethiopia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 242-253. Musiolik, J., & Markard, J. (2011). Creating and shaping innovation systems: Formal networks in the innovation system for stationary fuel cells in Germany. Energy Policy, 39(4), 1909-1922. Neuman, W.L. (1997) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 59-87. Shaw, D. R., & Allen, T. (2018). Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 88-102. Silverman, L. (1985). The Ideological Mediation of Party‐political Responses to Social Change. European Journal of Political Research, 13(1), 69-93. Singh, J., & Dhar, D. W. (2019). Overview of carbon capture technology: microalgal biorefinery concept and state-of-the-art. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 29. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319- 1350. de Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Salerno, M. S., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. R. (2018). How entrepreneurs manage collective uncertainties in innovation ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 164-185. Weil, H. B., Sabhlok, V. P., & Cooney, C. L. (2014). The dynamics of innovation ecosystems: A case study of the US biofuel market. Energy strategy reviews, 3, 88- 99. 三、網路資料李幸宜。以減碳創造新收益、新經濟微藻變身生質金礦。工業技術與資訊月刊。最後檢索日期：2023年2月20日，檢自： https://www.itri.org.tw/ListStyle.aspxDisplayStyle=18_content&SiteID=1& MmmID=1036452026061075714&MGID=711302240625714532 李洵穎。從排碳大戶到養生專家微藻固碳助水泥業走永續之路。工業技術與資訊月刊332期2019年08月號。最後檢索日期：2023年8月20日。檢自： https://www.itri.org.tw/ListStyle.aspx?DisplayStyle=18_content&SiteID=1&MmmID=1036452026061075714&MGID=1036250477610254775 許旭昇。科研成果產業化，他們怎麼做? 最後檢索日期：2023年3月1號。檢自： https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/pdfdownloadfilePath=lV8OirTfsslWcCxIpLbUfpBFnr50DaCpDeDnz5UaYHEkegzhDkBAsvsxgJXR66er&imgType=Bn5sH4BGpJw=&key=ymcTTlMn-wwaY8ZRIYlwe1Uj6FvspNS8PB2d7g6_hfMeVVU9OyINO4qBZJhLTxWd&xmlId=0006960531 張嘉修、陳俊延、林志生、楊勝仲、周德珍、郭子禎、顏宏偉、李澤民。2015。二氧化碳再利用 ─ 微藻養殖。科學發展 2015 年 6 月│ 510 期賴允政。2020。微藻的減碳循環經濟，檢自：https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/report/13381777 闕壯群。2009。微藻類固碳工程。科學發展 2009年1月，433期工研院技術研究院官網。【碳捕捉、利用與封存減碳解決方案】綠色捕手－微藻固碳及利用技術。檢自：https://www.itri.org.tw/ListStyle.aspx?DisplayStyle=01_content&SiteID=1&MmmID=1162127241711441152&MGID=1162130537112316003 最後檢索日期：2024/05/25 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，微藻生質能源整合型技術開發研究成果報告。2009。計畫主持人:張嘉修《臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明》。2022。國家發展委員會、行政院環境保護署、經濟部、科技部、交通部、內政部、行政院農業委員會、金融監督管理委員會研究機構能源科技專案 103 年度執行報告，微藻綠能科技發展計畫。2014。經濟部財團法人食品工業發展研究所研究機構能源科技專案 105 年度執行報告，永續生質能源關鍵技術研發計畫。2017。經濟部財團法人工業技術研究院國立成功大學新聞中心，成大「新型態藻菌廢水處理技術」傳統與高科技產業均青睞。2019。網址：https://news-secr.ncku.edu.tw/p/404-1037-197992.php 國立成功大學能源科技與策略研究中心。最後檢索日期：2023/08/28 網址：https://cets.ncku.edu.tw/index.php?inter=technology&id=105&tabid=175 國立成功大學能源科技與策略研究中心，微藻固碳及水淨化。網址： https://cets.ncku.edu.tw/index.php?inter=technology&id=105&tabid=167。最後檢索日期：2023/08/28 節約能源專區官網。2008。取自台灣電力公司，最後檢索日期：2023/08/28 網址：https://www.energypark.org.tw/news/news/15-promotion-activities/282-2018-08-24%2010-29-16-282.html 台泥公司永續報告書。2021。台泥公司官網台泥公司永續報告書。2022。台泥公司官網中鋼公司永續報告書。2022。中鋼公司官網 World Energy Outlook 2022, WEO2022，International Energy Agency, IEA; G0110364119; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152137; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/152137/1/411901.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/152137
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/152137/1/411901.pdf

View record in BASE

20

Dissertation/ Thesis

以整編創新網絡理論探討我國金融監理沙盒對於金融科技創新的影響 ; Exploring the Effect of Taiwan`s Financial Regulatory Sandbox on the Financial Technology Innovation: A Perspective from the Orchestration of Innovation Network Theory

المؤلفون: 陳楷文, Chen, Kai-Wen

المساهمون: 柯玉佳, KE, YU-JIA

مصطلحات موضوعية: 金融監理主管機關, 金融科技創新, 金融監理沙盒, 整編創新網絡, Financial Supervision Commission, Financial Technology Innovation, Financial Regulatory Sandbox, Orchestrating Innovation Networks

وصف الملف: 2956200 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 第一節中文文獻（按筆畫順序）\n一、書籍\n1. 王文宇(2019)，金融法，台北：元照出版社，10 版，3月，頁21。\n2. 谷湘儀、臧正運(2017)，金融科技發展與法律，台北:五南。\n3. 谷湘儀、臧正運(2019)，變革中的金融科技法制，台北:五南。\n4. 谷湘儀、陳國瑞(2017)，從「監理沙盒」制度展望我國 FinTech 監理思維，收於：谷湘儀、臧正運編審，金融科技發展與法律，頁 17-35，台北: 五南。\n5. 翁禮祺(2020)，金融科技基礎與應用，雙葉書廊出版社，初版，2月，頁 12-340。\n\n二、官方文件\n1. 金融監督管理委員會（2016），「金融科技發展策略白皮書」，出版日期：2016年5月12日，https://tinyurl.com/y4zk8dnf，擷取日期：2022年6月23日。\n\n三、碩博士論文\n1. 黃劭敏（2020），金融科技發展與創新之監理問題與挑戰-以我國監理沙盒發展為中心，國立政治大學法律科際整合研究所未出版碩士論文，頁 6-120。\n\n四、期刊、評論文章\n1. 王儷容（2017），金融監理沙盒之美麗與哀愁，經濟前瞻-國際經濟，3月，頁72-73。\n2. 李瑞倉（2017)，金融科技發展與監理，管理與法遵，第 2 卷，第 1 期，頁 4-10。\n3. 張冠群（2017），自金融監理原則與金融消費者保護觀點論金融科技監理沙盒制度──兼評行政院版「金融科技創新實驗條例草案」，月旦法學雜誌 266 期，7月，頁 5-34。\n4. 彭金隆、臧正運（2019），金融科技監理與我國金融監理沙盒制度之檢視，管理評論，10月，第38 卷，第 4 期，頁 15-31。\n\n五、網頁文章\n1. 王昫（2017），新加坡金融創新策略可供借鏡，國家政策研究基金會，出版日期：2017年9月7日，https://www.npf.org.tw/3/17364 ，擷取日期：2022年6月6日。\n2. 行政院新聞傳播處（2015），毛揆：打造數位化金融環境 3.0 推動金融創新，出版日期：2015年7月9日，https://tinyurl.com/ybqewpso，擷取日期：2022年6月23日。\n3. 行政院新聞傳播處（2018），《金融科技發展與創新實驗條例》—鼓勵創新，提升金融競爭力，出版日期：2018年1月31日，https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/aa4a0c9d-14be-4664-ac59-fc74a056d1fd，擷取日期：2022年7月3日。\n4. 黃彥宏（2021），又是中資！易安聯停辦移工小型匯兌成金管會要求退場首例，壹傳媒，出版日期：2023年09月03日，https://yimedia.com.tw/\neconomic/145786/，擷取日期：2022年8月26日。\n5. 睿富者（2017) ，世界經濟論壇－未來的金融服務，STOCKFEEL股感，出版日期：2017年12月15日，https://www.stockfeel.com.tw/2015年世界經濟論壇－未來的金融服務/，擷取日期：2022年9月20日。\n6. 魏喬怡、彭禎伶（2023），暌違二年金融監理沙盒終破蛋，工商時報，出版日期：2023年02月10日，https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/\n20230210000184-260205?chdtv，擷取日期：2022年4月30日。\n\n\n第二節外文文獻（按字母順序，作者相同以年份早優先）\n一、書籍\n1. Arrow, K. (1974). The limits of organization. New York: Norton.\n2. Fahie, J. J. (1899). A History of Wireless Telegraphy, 1838-1899: Including Some Bare-wire Proposals for Subaqueous Telegraphs. Blackwood.\n3. Kogut, B. (1988). A study of the life cycle of joint ventures, In F. K. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business: 169-186, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.\n4. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy, New York: Harper.\n5. Swanson, D. & Bhadwal, S. (2009), Creating Adaptive Policies: A Guide for Policy-Making in an Uncertain World. Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd.\n二、官方文件\n1. Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2016). ‘Fintech: ASIC’s Approach and Regulatory Issues’, June, / on May 13, 2022.\n2. Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2016), ‘ASIC Releases World-first Licensing Exemption for Fintech Businesses’ (Media release, 16-440MR, December 15 ) / on May 14, 2022.\n3. Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2017). REGULATORY GUIDE 257 - Testing fintech products and services without holding an AFS or credit licence, August, pp.16, / on May 16, 2022.\n4. Autoriti Monetari Brunei Darussalam(AMBD), ‘Clarification on the Fintech Regulatory Sandbox Guidelines’ (Press Release, 260, 29 March 2017) / on June 12, 2022.\n5. Bank for International Settlements (2018), “Sound Practices, Implications of fintech developments for banks and bank Supervisors”, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, available at pp. 39 and the FSB, supra, note 7, pp. 3 / on June 17, 2022.\n6. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2018). Sound Practices: Implications of Fintech Developments for Banks and Bank Supervisors, February 19, p.8, [available at https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d431.htm] / on June 14, 2022.\n7. European Supervisory Authorities (2019). FinTech: Regulatory Sandboxes and Innovation Hubs, para 28 / on May 26, 2022.\n8. Financial Conduct Authority (2014). Project Innovate: Call for input, / on July 4, 2022.\n9. Financial Conduct Authority (2014), Project Innovate: Call for input-Feedback Statement, October, pp.33-37, / on June 22, 2022.\n10. Financial Conduct Authority (2015). Regulatory sandbox, London, UK, November, pp.9, Retrieved from https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/regulatory-sandbox.pdf / on June 13, 2022.\n11. Financial Stability Board (2017). Financial Stability Implications from Fintech: Supervisory and Regulatory Issues that Merit Authorities’ Attention, June 27,p.7, https://www.fsb.org/wp- content/uploads/R270617.pdf / on June 18, 2022.\n12. Financial Conduct Authority (2018). Hand Book Notice No.56, < https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/handbook/handbook-notice-56.pdf> / on June 25, 2022.\n13. International Organization of Securities Commission (IOSCO). IOSCO Research Report on Financial Technologies (FinTech) (Feb 2017), https://tinyurl.com/ycfhw938 / on June 27, 2022.\n14. Monetary Authority of Singapore (2015). MAS sets up new FinTech & Innovation Group, MAS Website, July 27, Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y8ox63da / on June 14, 2022.\n15. Monetary Authority of Singapore (2020). MAS Website - Organisation Chart, July 1, Retrieved from https://www.mas.gov.sg/who-we-are/Organisation-Structure & Fintech and Innovation Group, MAS Website, https://tinyurl.com/yb7s3xfx / on June 14, 2022.\n16. Monetary Authority of Singapore (2016). New FinTech Office: A One-Stop Platform to Promote Singapore as a FinTech Hub, MAS Website, Apr. 01, Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/ydcagk2n / on June 15, 2022.\n17. Monetary Authority of Singapore (2016). Consultation Paper on FinTech Regulatory Sandbox Guidelines, MAS Website, June 06, Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y9qvp6vw / on June 15, 2022.\n18. Monetary Authority of Singapore (2016). MAS Issues "Regulatory Sandbox" Guidelines for FinTech Experiments, MAS Website, Nov.16, Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/r5yqa7a / on June 15, 2022.\n19. Monetary Authority of Singapore (2016). Sandbox, Retrieved from https://www.mas.gov.sg/development/fintech/sandbox / on June 16, 2022.\n20. Singapore Economy (2022), Department of Statistics Singapore, Retrieved from https://www.singstat.gov.sg/modules/infographics/economy / on June 6, 2022.\n21. World Economic Forum (2018). Agile Governance: Reimagining Policy-making in the Fourth Industrial Revolution’, January, / on June 6, 2022.\n\n三、期刊文章\n1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425-455.\n2. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2015). The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm. Georgetown Journal of International Law 47, pp.1271- 1319.\n3. Baum, J. A. C, Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don`t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups` performance in Canadian biotechnology, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 267-294.\n4. Beamish, P. W., & Banks, J. C. (1987). Equity joint ventures and the theory of the multinational enterprise, Journal of International Business Studies, 18(2): 1-16.\n5. Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior, Academy of Management Journal, 36: 441-470.\n6. Bromberg L., Godwin A., and Ramsay I., 2017. Fintech sandboxes: Achieving a balance between regulation and innovation, Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice 28.4: 314-336, 2.\n7. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.\n8. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective, Organization Science, 12: 198-213.\n9. Charles Dhanasai and Arvind Parkhe ( 2006 ). Orchestrating Innovation Networks, The Academy of Management Review , Jul., 2006, Vol. 31, No. 3 (Jul., 2006), pp. 659-669.\n10. Child, J. (1972). Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice, Sociology, 6: 1-22.\n11. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D, Economic Journal, 99:569-596.\n12. Cumming, D.J., Schwienbacher (2018). A. Fintech venture capital. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev., 26, 374–389 [CrossRef].\n13. Deirdre Ahern (2020). Regulators Nurturing FinTech Innovation: Global Evolution of the Regulatory Sandbox as Opportunity Based Regulation, EBI Working Paper Series, no. 60, pp.4.\n14. Dhanaraj, C, Lyles, M., Steensma, H. K., & Tihanyi, L. (2004). Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: The role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance, Journal of International Business Studies.35: 428-443.\n15. Dollinger, M. J., Golden, P. A., & Saxton, T. (1997). The effect of reputation on the decision to joint venture. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 127-140.\n16. Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning process? Strategic Management Journal, 17: 55-83.\n17. Doz, Y. L., Oik, P. M., & Ring, P. S. (2000). Formation processes of R&D consortia: Which path to take? Where does it lead? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 239-266.\n18. Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 345-368.\n19. Ebers, M., & Grandori, A. (1999). The forms, costs, and development dynamics of inter-organizational networking, In M. Ebers (Ed.), The formation of inter-organizational networks: 265-286, London: Oxford University Press.\n20. Eisenhardt, K. M., (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.\n21. Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.\n22. Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues, Research Policy, 20: 499-514.\n23. Gomes-Casseres, B. (1994). Group versus group: How alliance networks compete, Harvard Business Review, 72(4): 62-74.\n24. Grandori, A., & Kogut, B. (2002). Dialogue on organization and knowledge. Organization Science, 13: 224-231.\n25. Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination uncertainty and interdependence in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 781-814.\n26. Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influences of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation, Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397-420.\n27. Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1439-1493.\n28. Hacki, R., & Lighton, J. (2001). The future of the networked company, McKinsey Quarterly, 3: 26-39.\n29. Hagedoorn, J. (1995). A note on international market leaders and networks of strategic technology partnering, Strategic Management Journal, 16: 241-250.\n30. Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82-111.\n31. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 716-749.\n32. Inkpen, A. C, & Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 7: 211-220.\n33. Jarillo, C. (1988). On strategic networks, Strategic Management Journal, 9: 31-41.\n34. Jayoung James Goo & and Joo-Yeun Heo (2020). The Impact of the Regulatory Sandbox on the Fintech Industry with a Discussion on the Relation between Regulatory Sandboxes and Open Innovation, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Published: 18 June 2020, pp.2-16.\n35. JinHyo, J.Y.; Won, D.; Park, K. (2018). Entrepreneurial cyclical dynamics of open innovation. J. Evol. Econ. Heidelb., 28, 1151–1174. [CrossRef]\n36. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 217-237.\n37. Kenis, P., & Knoke, D. (2002). How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates, Academy of Management Review, 27: 275-293.\n38. Khanna, T., Gulati R., & Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope, Strategic Management Journal, 19: 193-210.\n39. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1998). Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy, Strategic Management Journal, 19: 324-338.\n40. Knoke, D. (1994). Networks of elite structure and decision making, In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis: 274-294. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.\n41. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning, Organization Science, 7: 502-518.\n42. Kogut, B. (2000). The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 405-425.\n43. L. Bromberg, A. Godwin & I. Ramsay (2017). Fintech sandboxes: Achieving a balance between regulation and innovation, Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, 28(4), pp.314-336.\n44. Lev Bromberg, Andrew Godwin and Ian Ramsay (2017). Fintech sandboxes: Achieving a balance between regulation and innovation, the Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, Vol.28, No. 4, pp. 314‐336.\n45. Lorenzoni, G., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). Creating a strategic center to manage a web of partners, California Management Review, 37(3): 146-163.\n46. Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 317-338.\n47. Lyles, M. A., & Salk, J. E. (1996). Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2): 154-174.\n48. Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study, American Sociological Review, 28: 55-69.\n49. Madhavan, R., Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (1998). Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm rivalry, Strategic Management Journal, 19: 439-460.\n50. Magnuson, W. (2018). Regulating Fintech. Vanderbilt Law Rev., 71, pp.1167–1226.\n51. Makhija, M. V., & Ganesh, U. (1997). The relationship between control and partner learning in learning-related joint ventures, Organization Science, 8: 508-527.\n52. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340-363.\n53. Michelet, R. (1992). Forming successful strategic marketing alliances in Europe. Journal of European Business, 4(1): 11-15.\n54. Mowery, D. C, Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer, Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 77-91.\n55. Muller, Simone (2010). The Transatlantic Telegraphs and the `Class of 1866` - the Formative Years of Transnational Networks in Telegraphic Space, 1858- 1884/89, Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, vol. 35, no. 1 (131), pp. 237-259.\n56. Nonaka, L, & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.\n57. Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization, Academy of Management Review, 15: 203-223.\n58. P. SIRONI (2016). FITECH INNOVATION:FROM ROBO - ADVISORS TO GOAL BASED INVESTING AND GAMIFICATION.\n59. Park, S. H., & Russo, M. V. (1996). When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure, Management Science, 42: 875-890.\n60. Péter Fáykiss, Dániel Papp, Péter Sajtos, and Ágnes Tőrös (2018). Regulatory Tools to Encourage FinTech Innovations: The Innovation Hub and Regulatory Sandbox in International Practice. Financial and Economic Review, Vol. 17 Issue 2, June, pp. 43–67.\n61. Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 153-176.\n62. Podolny, J. M., & Stuart, T. E. (1995). A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100: 1224-1260.\n63. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-145.\n64. Provan, K. G. (1983). The federation as an interorganizational linkage network, Academy of Management Review, 8: 79-89.\n65. R. Jesse McWaters (2015). The Future of Financial Services - How disruptive innovations are reshaping the way financial services are structured, provisioned and consumed, World Economic Forum report, < https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_future__of_financial_services.pdf>.\n66. R Romano (2014). “Regulating in the Dark and a Postscript Assessment of the Iron Law of Financial Regulation”, 43 Hofstra Law Review 28.\n67. Rafael La Porta, FlorencioLopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer (2008). The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins, Journal of economic literature 46.2, pp.285-332.\n68. Ross P. Buckley, Douglas W. Arner, Robin Veidt & Dirk A. Zetzsche (2019). ‘Building FinTech Ecosystems: Regulatory Sandboxes, Innovation Hubs and Beyond’, European Banking Institute Working Paper No. 53.\n69. Sakakibara, M. (2002). Formation of R&D consortia: Industry and company effects, Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1033-1050.\n70. Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\n71. Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 15: 387-394.\n72. Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 20: 595-623.\n73. Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 791-811.\n74. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy, 15: 285-305.\n75. Teece, D. J. (2000). Managing intellectual capital: Organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions, London: Oxford University Press.\n76. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35-67.\n77. Vives, X. (2017). The Impact of Fintech on Banking. Eur. Econ., 2, pp.97–105.\n78. W. Magnuson(2018). Regulating fintech. Vanderbilt Law Review, 71(4), pp.1167-1226.\n79. W. E. Walker, S. A. Rahman & J. Cave, Adaptive policies (2001). policy analysis, and policy-making, European journal of operational Research, 128(2), pp.282-289.\n80. W.G. Ringe and C. Ruof (2018). ‘A Regulatory Sandbox for Robo Advice’ European Banking Institute Working Paper No.26, pp.52.\n81. W.G. Ringe and C. Ruof (2018). ‘A Regulatory Sandbox for Robo Advice’ European Banking Institute Working Paper No.39, pp.7.\n82. Wasserman, S., & Galaskiewicz, J. (Eds.). (1994). Advances in social network analysis, London: Sage.\n83. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 1-19.\n84. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, New York: Free Press.\n85. Wolf-Georg RINGE and Christopher RUOF (2020). Regulating Fintech in the EU: the Case for a Guided Sandbox, European Journal of Risk Regulation, November, pp. 604–629.\n86. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.\n四、網頁資料\n1. Aileen Lee (2013). Welcome To The Unicorn Club: Learning From Billion-Dollar Startups, TechCrunch, Nov. 3, Retrieved from https://ecorner.stanford.edu/videos/unicorn-lessons / on June 26, 2022.\n2. Andy C. M. Chen (2019). Regulatory Sandbox and Competition of Financial Technologies in Taiwan, Jan 31, Retrieved from https://dev.competitionpolicyinternational.com/regulatory-sandbox-and-competition-of-financial-technologies-in-taiwan / on 5 July 2022.\n3. Diemers, D., Lamaa, A., Salamat, J., Steffens, T., (2015). Developing a FinTech ecosystem in the GCC; PWC: Abu Dhabi, UAE. Retrieved from https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/m1/en/reports/developing-a-fintech-ecosystem-in-the-gcc.pdf / on 5 July 2022.\n4. Greg Medcraft - ASIC Chairman (2016). ‘Fintech: Opportunities, Risks and Challenges’ - speech delivered to the Group of 100, National Executive Dinner, Sydney, Australia, December 14, .\n5. Lee Hsien Loong (2016). "PM Lee Hsien Loong at launch of Smart Nation, 24 November", Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, Mar.18, Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/ya2ssjre / on June 6, 2022.\n6. Mark D. Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal Ph.D. & Erik P.M. Vermeulen (2017). “Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology is Faster than the Law”, No.6, American University Business Law Review, pp.561, < https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=aublr >.\n7. Martin Wheatley (2014). Innovation: The regulatory opportunity, FCA Speeches Oct. 28, Retrieved from https://www.fca.org.uk/news/speeches/innovation-regulatory-opportunity / on July 20, 2022.\n8. Ravi Menon - Managing Director (2015). "A Smart Financial Centre", Monetary Authority of Singapore, Global Technology Law Conference 2015, June 29, Retrieved from https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/speeches/2015/a-smart-financial-centre / on June 6, 2022.\n9. Ravi Menon - Managing Director (2018), Remarks at the MAS Annual Report 2017/18 Media Conference, July 04, Retrieved from https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/20180704006/Remarks%20by%20MD%20at%20MAS%20Annual%20Report%20201718%20Media%20Conference%204%20July%202018.pdf / on June 16, 2022; G0109364128; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/146605; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/146605/1/412801.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/146605
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/146605/1/412801.pdf

View record in BASE

تنقيح النتائج