نتائج البحث - "男同志"

1

Academic Journal

從愛河左岸邂逅到行動數位化妝舞會：高雄年長男同志的地緣社會網絡關係演進之初探 ; From An Encounter on the Left Bank of the Love River to A Digital Mobile Masquerade: An Exploratory Study on the Evolution of the Geo-social Relationships of Elderly Gay Men in Kaohsiung

المؤلفون: 侯政男, Hou, Cheng-Nan

المساهمون: 新聞學研究

مصطلحات موضوعية: 年長男同志, 地緣社會網絡關係, 社會支持, 社會網絡型社交應用程式, 高雄, Scruff, elderly gay men, geo-social relationships, Kaohsiung, social networking app, social support

وصف الملف: 11828513 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 新聞學研究, 146, 1-52; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/137940; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/137940/1/250.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/137940
https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202101.0001
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/137940/1/250.pdf

View record in BASE

2

Dissertation/ Thesis

未能言喻的驕傲：臺灣未成年男同志性經驗的歷程 ; The unspoken pride: The processes of the minor gay’s sexual experiences in Taiwan

المؤلفون: 陳緯安, Chen, Wei-An

المساهمون: 李淑菁, Lee, Shu-Ching

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多元性別, 男同志, 未成年, 性經驗, 性教育, Gender diversity, Gay, Minor, Sexual experiences, Sexuality education

وصف الملف: 2402412 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 中文文獻\n人體研究法（民國108年01月02日）\n中選會（2018）。全國性公民投票案：第7案至第16案公投公報。取自：https://web.cec.gov.tw/preview/cms/29032\n王家豪（2001）。娘娘腔男同性戀者的社會處境及其自我認同（未出版之碩士論文）。世新大學，臺北市。\n王素貞、陳住銘、洪耀釧(2014)。民眾對於同性戀的認知與接受程度之探討。工程科技與教育學刊，11(1)，30-42。doi:10.6451/JETE\n台灣同志諮詢熱線（2015）。認識同志。取自：https://hotline.org.tw/book/10\n台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟(2012)。「台灣同志壓力處境問卷」調查結果初步分析。取自：https://tapcpr.org/hot-news/press-release/2012/04/17/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E5%90%8C%E5%BF%97%E5%A3%93%E5%8A%9B%E8%99%95%E5%A2%83%E5%95%8F%E5%8D%B7-%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E7%B5%90%E6%9E%9C%E5%88%9D%E6%AD%A5%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90\n台灣性別平等教育協會（2004年6月4日）。性別教育新里程──性別平等教育法三讀通過。取自：https://www.tgeea.org.tw/advocacy/commentary/950/\n台灣性別平等教育協會(2013)。真愛聯盟事件大事記。取自：https://www.tgeea.org.tw/advocacy/commentary/6515/\n史倩玲 (2011年6月28日)。性侵修法「兩小無猜」狀況難解。臺灣立報。取自：https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%80%A7%E4%BE%B5%E4%BF%AE%E6%B3%95-%E5%85%A9%E5%B0%8F%E7%84%A1%E7%8C%9C-%E7%8B%80%E6%B3%81%E9%9B%A3%E8%A7%A3-160000207.html\n成令方(2004)。都是異性戀父權惹的禍。性別平等教育季刊，27，131-139。\n何春蕤（2017）。性別治理。桃園市：國立中央大學性／別研究室。\n吳政杰、南玉芬（2013）。陰柔同志遭受霸凌經驗之探討。社區發展季刊，142，214-226。取自：https://cdj.sfaa.gov.tw/Journal/Content?gno=2850\n李宇文（2020）。從具陰柔特質的男同志之生命故事探討台灣男同志圈的陽剛霸權意識（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\n李淑菁（2015）。性別教育：政策與實踐。台北市：學富。\n林本炫（2007）不同質性方法的資料分析比較。載於周平、楊弘任（編），質性研究方法的眾聲喧嘩（頁127-150）。嘉義：南華教社所。\n林冠廷（2019）。論男同志手機交友app的機會與限制（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。\n林純德（2009）。成為一隻「熊」台灣男同志「熊族」的認同型塑與性/性別/身體展演。台灣社會研究季刊，76，57-117。doi:10.29816/TARQSS.200912.0002\n法務部(2019)。108年11月1日之新聞稿。取自：https://www.moj.gov.tw/2204/2795/2796/37822/\n社團法人台灣同志諮詢熱線協會(2016)。認識同志。取自：https://hotline.org.tw/book/10\n邱珍琬（2002）。青少年男同志認同過程與實際。彰化師大輔導學報，23，77-107。doi:10.7040/GJ.200206.0077\n柯乃熒（2008）。網路、搖頭與性的交錯青少年男同志感染HIV的風險。愛之關懷季刊，63，34-40。\n胡幼慧（2008）。轉型中的質性研究：演變、批判和女性主義研究觀點。載於胡幼慧（編），質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（頁3-19）。高雄市：巨流圖書。\n晏涵文、劉潔心、李思賢、馮嘉玉（2009）。臺灣國小、國中、高中職學校性教育成果調查研究。臺灣性學學刊，15（2），65-80。doi： 10.6784/FJS.200910.0065\n國民健康署(2018)。子宮頸癌防治。取自：https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=614&pid=1125\n國民健康署(2020)。認識HPV。取自：https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=1799\n國立臺灣歷史博物館（無日期）。1988年1月9日救援雛妓華西街大遊行。臺灣女人。取自：https://women.nmth.gov.tw/?p=2155。\n國立臺灣歷史博物館（無日期）。推動兩性平等教育與性別平等教育法。臺灣女人。取自：https://women.nmth.gov.tw/?p=2144\n國家教育研究院(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校─健康與體育領域。取自：https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52\n國家教育研究院(2020)。議題融入說明手冊。取自：https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=53\n張秀鴛、胡木蘭（2016）。兒童權利再提升──從兒少性交易防制到兒少性剝削防制。社區發展季刊，156，16-25。\n張瑞楨(2019年12月21日)。用同志軟體「約砲」高中生，大叔宣稱「男學生最喜歡中年人」。自由時報。取自： https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/3015831\n張德勝、游家盛、呂宗晉(2014)。異性戀高中職生對異性戀、男同志和女同志人際關係態度之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，39，91-116。doi：10.7082/CJGC\n教育部（2008）。健康與體育學習領域。取自：https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=9&mid=269\n教育部（2008）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題（性別平等教育）。取自：https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=9&mid=131\n教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要：國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校健康與體育領域。取自：https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52\n教育部（2018年11月25日）。教育部回應公民投票結果之說明。取自：https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&sms=169B8E91BB75571F&s=16207382218F8B73\n教育部(2019)。修正「性別平等教育法施行細則」第13條條文。行政院公報，25(60)。取自：https://gazette.nat.gov.tw/egFront/detail.do?metaid=106013&log=detailLog\n教育部(2019)。預告「性別平等教育法施行細則」第13條修正草案。行政院公報，25(54)。取自：https://gazette.nat.gov.tw/egFront/detail.do?metaid=105825&log=detailLog\n教育部、趙淑珠、郭麗安、劉安真(2008)。認識同志教育資源手冊。台北：教育部。取自：https://www.airitibooks.com/detail.aspx?PublicationID=P20110713005\n曹馥年(2019)。玫瑰少年的痛不曾遠離：世新宿舍性霸凌事件，後來呢。報導者。取自：https://www.twreporter.org/a/feminine-male-students-school-sexual-bullying\n畢恆達（2000）。從兩性平等到性別平等：記葉永鋕。性別平等教育季刊，13，125-132。取自：https://www.gender.edu.tw/web/index.php/m5/m5_04_01_index\n畢恆達(2000)。從兩性平等到性別平等：記葉永鋕。載於教育部，性別平等教育季刊，13，125-132。取自：https://www.gender.edu.tw/web/index.php/m5/m5_04_01_index\n畢恆達（2008）。詮釋學與質性研究。載於胡幼慧（編），質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（頁21-36）。高雄市：巨流圖書。\n莊育碩（2016）。「肌」不可失──男同志身體及情慾之初探（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北大學，臺北市。\n許文英、江崇源、何妤蓁（2012）。臺北市同志權益保障制度之研究。臺北市政府民政局委託之專題研究成果報告。臺北市：臺北市政府。\n陳宏銘(2010)。同窗2少女燒炭殉情，疑同性戀情「難忍異樣眼光決定一起走」。蘋果新聞網。取自：https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/20101201/QTUPY7XS5UPYB7HZCPSHIHFVEU/\n陳志賢(2019年9月22日)。擋不住13歲少年求歡，約砲男被判3年半。自由時報。取自：https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20190922000921-260402?chdtv\n喀飛（2009）。糾葛愛滋污名的男同志轟趴風潮。載於何春蕤（主編），酷兒新聲（頁181－196）。桃園市：中央大學性／別研究室。取自： http://sex.ncu.edu.tw/publication/book_common_37.html\n彭琬馨(2020年12月25日)。立院三讀通過下修民法成年年齡，滿18歲可自主結婚。自由時報。取自：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/3392270\n曾本馨(2011)。來自現場的教學「驚」驗國小高年級教師的性教育焦慮與教學實作(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統(系統編號099STU05734009)。\n曾治乾、黃禎貞、葉國樑、蘭淑貞、胡嘉容、石玲如、周維倫、李映秋(2015)。探討台灣地區高中生性知識來源與其性知識、性態度之關係。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌，39，1-17。取自：https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=15613852-201506-201601070015-201601070015-1-17\n曾珮瑛、吳慧芬(2020年3月9日)。媽，這按摩棒怎麼用？寶雅賣情趣品挨罰！業者駁「忽略女性性歡愉」。蘋果新聞網。取自：https://tw.appledaily.com/local/20200309/GLP7B45VC6OYVVFH3D52SKQVLA/\n曾晴（2013）。男同志胴體性引力之研究（碩士論文）。取自華藝線上圖書館。doi:10.6829/STU.2013.00077\n游美惠（2017）。「異性戀霸權」是什麼。載於戴伯芬（主編），性別作為動詞──巷仔口社會學2：性別如何形塑，又如何在行動中翻轉（頁16－22）。新北市：大家出版。\n甯應斌（2011）。極端保護觀：透過兒少保護的新管制國家與階級治理。台灣社會學研究季刊，83，277-291。\n馮玉兒（2011）。男同志愛戀健美體魄與健身文化之初探。休閒與社會研究，3，143-154。doi:10.29947/LSR.201106.0010\n黃子柔（2019）。我們在微光中前進──男同志使用交友APP之困境與抉擇（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。\n黃厚銘（2002）。網路上探索自我認同的遊戲。教育與社會研究，3，65-105。doi:10.6429/FES.200202.0065\n鄒川雄（2003）。生活世界與默會知識：詮釋學觀點的質性研究。載於齊力、林本炫（編），質性研究方法與資料分析（頁19-53）。嘉義市：南華教社所。\n臺灣社會學會（無日期）。臺灣社會學會研究倫理守則。取自：https://www.tsatw.org.tw/page.php?menu_id=78&p_id=126\n劉育豪(2018年11月6日)。家長們！性教育不可怕，健康地面對孩子的「好奇」吧。ETtoday新聞雲。取自：https://forum.ettoday.net/news/1299529\n衛生福利部（2017）。向陽雛菊──從救援雛妓、兒少性交易防制到兒少性剝削防制的回顧。臺北市：衛福部。\n駱俊宏、林燕卿、王素女、林蕙瑛 (2005)。從異性戀霸權、父權體制觀看同性戀者之處境與污名。台灣性學學刊，11(2)，61-73。doi:10.6784/FJS.200509.0061\n謝小芩、李淑菁（2008）。性別教育政策的形成：從行政院教改會到九年一貫課程改革。研究台灣，4，117-145。doi:10.6456/JTS.200806.0117\n鍾道詮、李大鵬（2018）。臺灣未成年男同志性行為實踐初探。愛之關懷季刊，103，17-30。doi:10.29826/AJGHJK\n顏正芳、柯乃熒、李昆樺(2018)。性取向屬少數之男性族群在兒童青少年期遭受霸凌經驗：從量性和質性調查到介入研究。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(計畫編號MOST 104-2314-B-037-024-MY3)。\n顏國樑、簡安茹（2006）。性別平等教育法的立法背景、過程、內涵及啟示。學校行政，46，279-299。doi:10.6423/HHHC.200611.0279\n魏羽辰(2013)。大學生之同志接受度、同志婚姻合法化接受度及相關因素之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。朝陽科技大學，臺中市。\n鏡週刊編務組(2019年4月25日)。每天遭霸凌嘲笑「AIDS GAY」，國三生求救師長無門跳樓。鏡週刊。取自：https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20190425edi010/?utm_source=feed_related&utm_medium=line\n寶智華(2010)。男大生燒炭亡，留書「恨為男兒身」。蘋果新聞網。取自：https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/20101230/HJ3PQ2ALB7YXRT3YO7RG53PBK4/\n顧長欣（2016）。台灣現行研究倫理規範政策與實務──未成年人研究（上篇）：法令規範。doi:10.6916/STPIRP.2016-08-24\n\n\n翻譯書\nCalhoun, C.（1997）。同女出走(張娟芬譯)。台北市：女書出版。（原著出版年：1997）\nGoffman, E.（2016）。汙名：管理受損身分的筆記（曾凡慈譯）。新北勢：群學出版。（原著出版年：1963）\nJohnson, A. (2008)。性別打結：拆除父權違建(成方令、王秀雲、游美惠、邱大昕、吳嘉苓譯)。臺北市：群學。（原著出版年：2003）\n\n英文文獻\nArrington-Sanders, R., Harper, G. W., Morgan, A., Ogunbajo, A., Trent, M., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2015). The role of sexually explicit material in the sexual development of same-sex-attracted black adolescent males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(3), 597–608. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0416-x\nEnns, Carol & Sinacore, Ada. (2005). Diversity feminisms: Postmodern, women-of-color, antiracist, lesbian, third-wave, and global perspectives. In C. Enns, & A. Sinacore (Eds.). Teaching and social justice: Integrating multicultural and feminist theories in the classroom (pp.41-68). doi:10.1037/10929-000.\nGonsiorek, J. C., & Rudolph, J. R. (1991)。引自劉安真（2001）。「女同志」性認同形成歷程與污名處理之分析研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。\nHerek, G. M. (1986). On heterosexual masculinity: Some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. The American behavioral scientist, 29(5), 563-577. doi:10.1177/000276486029005005\nLaMar, L. & Kite, K. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective. The joural of sex reseach, 35(2), 189-196. doi:10.1080/00224499809551932\nMiles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nPennell, S. M. (2020). Queer theory/pedagogy and social justice education. In R. Papa (Ed.), Handbook on promoting social justice in education (pp. 2291-2311). Switzerland, Cham: Springer.\nRubin, G. S. (2007). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In R. Parker, P. Aggleton (Eds), Culture, society, and sexuality (pp. 143-179). England: Routledge.\nSavin-Williams, R. C. (1994). Verbal and physical abuse as stressors in the lives of lesbian, gay male, and bisexual youths: Associations with school problems, running away, substance abuse, prostitution, and suicide. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 62(2), 261-269. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.2.261\nStotzer, R. L. (2012). Comparison of hate crime rates across protected and unprotected groups – An update. The William institute. Retrieved from https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/\nSullivan, M., & Wodarski, J. S. (2002). Social alienation in gay youth. Journal of human behavior in the social environment, 5(1), 1-17. doi:10.1300/J137v05n01_01\nThe National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html\nUnited Nations Population Fund. (2018). International technical guidance on sexuality education: An evidence-informed approach. Retrieved from https://www.unfpa.org/publications/international-technical-guidance-sexuality-education\nWHO Regional Office for Europe and BZgA. (2010). Standards for sexuality education in Europe: A framework for policy makers, educational and health authorities and specialists. Retrieved from https://www.bzga-whocc.de/en/publications/standards-for-sexuality-education/\nYbarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). A national study of lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB), and non-LGB youth sexual behavior online and in-person. Archives of sexual behavior, 45, 1357-1372. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0491-7; G0108152002; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/145821; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/145821/1/200201.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/145821
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/145821/1/200201.pdf

View record in BASE

3

Academic Journal

客家「村姑」要進城：臺灣客家男同志的認同型塑及其性／別、族群與城鄉的交織展演與政略 ; Hakka Rural 'Sissies' Go to Big Cities: The Identity Formation and Intersectionality of Gender, Sexual, Ethnic and Urban-Rural Performativities and Politics among Taiwanese Hakka Male Queers

المؤلفون: 林純德

المساهمون: 大眾傳播系

مصطلحات موضوعية: 客家, 男同志, 城鄉, 離散, 交織性, 羞恥, 感曝, Hakka, Male queer, Urban-rural, Diaspora, Intersectionality, Shame, Camp

وصف الملف: 293 bytes; text/html

Relation: 臺灣社會研究季刊 105 2016.12[民105.12] 頁1-60; http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw//handle/987654321/38765; http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/38765/2/index.html

الاتاحة: http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw//handle/987654321/38765
http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/38765/2/index.html

View record in BASE

4

Dissertation/ Thesis

以拒絕為名的愛：華人父母抗拒男同志出櫃之心理機制 ; Love in The Name of Rejection: The Psychological Mechanisms of Chinese Parents' Resistance to Gay Sons' Coming out.

المؤلفون: 王健豪

المساهمون: 心理學系

مصطلحات موضوعية: 自大法官釋憲釋字748號後，而今已推行同志婚姻專法，但社會上難以接受同志的聲量仍舊存在。華人社會以家為傳承單位，父母扮演重要的角色，擁有家庭的權力，同時亦受到社會文化評價。倘若兒子為同志，則父母親將夾在文化與親情間，以親子衝突引發抗拒。本研究目的為探詢與建構父母方對兒子出櫃的觀點，及其抗拒心理機制。以紮根理論佐詮釋學觀點為研究典範，深度訪談為研究方法，進行形式與實質理論的雙重詮釋。受訪者共計4位，男性1位，女性3位，年齡介於52至62歲間。研究結果發現：父母對同志出櫃之抗拒來源於三個機制「權威性孝道」、「道德臉面」及「宗教觀點」；緩衝機制則為其相對模式「相互性孝道」、「社會臉面」及「宗教觀點」。抗拒又分作情緒及策略，「抗拒情緒」包含：「外顯情緒」、「內在自責」及「後設式的感受」；「抗拒策略」將依循歷程有三種變化，包含理解、挽回及尋求協助。在情緒逐漸緩和，與策略無效的情況下將轉向「自我調節」，透過自我分化及調整對兒子的期待，減低出櫃議題帶來的影響。最後對本土理論中呈現雙面效果的「教養義務」提出討論，並提供男同志、父母及研究者三方面建議，與分析本研究限制。, Since the Supreme Court's interpretation of the constitution and interpretation of word 748, the referendum and legislation have been passed, and now a special law on gay marriage has been implemented, but the voices that are difficult to accept gays in the society still exist. Chinese society regards the family as the unit of inheritance, in which parents play an important role, have the power of the family, and are also evaluated by society and culture. If the son is gay, the parents will be caught between culture and kinship, causing resistance due to parent-child conflict. The purpose of this study is to explore and construct parents' views on their son's coming out of the closet and its psychological mechanism of resistance. Taking grounded theory and hermeneutics as the research model, and in-depth interviews as the research method, the dual interpretation of formal and substantive theories is carried out. A total of 4 respondents, 1 male and 3 females, were between the ages of 52 and 62. The results of the study found that parents' resistance to gay coming out comes from three mechanisms: "authoritative filial piety", "moral face", and "religious view", the buffer mechanism is its relative modes "reciprocal filial piety", "social face", and "Religious Views". Resistance is divided into emotions and strategies. "Resistance emotions", include: "exposed emotions", "internal self-blame", and "metaphysical feelings", "resistance strategies", will follow the process and have three changes, including understanding, recovery and seeking. assist. When the mood gradually eases and the strategy is ineffective, he will turn to "self-regulation", through self-differentiation and adjusting expectations for his son, to reduce the impact of the issue of coming out. Finally, it discusses the two-sided effect of "parenting obligation"

Relation: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/113659

الاتاحة: http://asiair.asia.edu.tw/ir/handle/310904400/113659

View record in BASE

5

Dissertation/ Thesis

台灣男同志 That Bitch 迷因文化之批評論述分析 ; The Meming of “That Bitch” Failure: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Queer Identity Performance on Taiwanese Instagram Memes

المؤلفون: 灝明杰, Morgan, Sebastian Michael

المساهمون: 王淑美, Wang, Su-Mei

مصطلحات موضوعية: 台灣男同志, Instagram迷因文化, 批判論述分析, Taiwanese gay men, Instagram memes, critical discourse analysis

وصف الملف: 19281746 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: Abad-Santos, A. (2017, June 25). How the Babadook Became the LGBTQ Icon We Didn’t Know We Needed. Vox. Retrieved from www.vox.com\nAlozie, N. O., Thomas, K., & Akpan-Obong, P. (2017). Global liberalization on homosexuality: Explaining the African gap. The Social Science Journal, 54(2), 120-131.\nAlvarez, E. (2010). Muscle boys: Gay gym culture. Routledge.\nAsk, K., & Abidin, C. (2018). My life is a mess: Self-deprecating relatability and collective identities in the memification of student issues. Information, Communication & Society, 21(6), 834-850.\nAyoub, P. M., & Garretson, J. (2017). Getting the message out: Media context and global changes in attitudes toward homosexuality. Comparative political studies, 50(8), 1055-1085.\nBandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Media effects (pp. 110-140). Routledge.\nBaudinette, T. (2021). Regimes of Desire. Michigan University Press.\nBayerl, P. S., & Stoynov, L. (2014). Revenge by photoshop: Memefying police acts in the public dialogue about injustice. New Media & Society, 18(6), 1006-1026.\nBeh, L. (2019, July, 24). Boys can wear skirts under Taiwan school`s gender-neutral uniform plan. Reuters. Retrieved from www.reuters.com\nBerghe, W. V., Dewaele, A., Cox, N., & Vincke, J. (2010). Minority‐specific determinants of mental well‐being among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(1), 153-166.\nBerlant, L. (2008). The Female Complaint. Duke University Press.\nBerzonsky, M. D. (2005). Ego identity: A personal standpoint in a postmodern world. Identity, 5(2), 125-136.\nBillig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. Sage.\nBlackPast. (2012, August 12). (1982) Audre Lorde, “Learning from the 60s”. BlackPast. https://www.blackpast.org/\nBostwick, W. B., Boyd, C. J., Hughes, T. L., West, B. T., & McCabe, S. E. (2014). Discrimination and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84(1), 35.\nBrainer, A. 2018. “New Identities or New Intimacies? Rethinking ‘Coming Out’ in Taiwan through Cross-Generational Ethnography.” Sexualities 21 (5–6): 914–931.\nBrowne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 47-60.\nBrubaker, J. R., Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2016). Departing glances: A sociotechnical account of ‘leaving’Grindr. New Media & Society, 18(3), 373-390.\nCai, S. (2016). Television Drama in Contemporary China: Political, social and cultural phenomena. Routledge.\nCavalcante, A. (2016). “I Did It All Online:” Transgender identity and the management of everyday life. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(1), 109-122.\nCavalcante, A. (2019). Tumbling into queer utopias and vortexes: Experiences of LGBTQ social media users on Tumblr. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(12), 1715-1735.\nChen, C. (2012). The creation and meaning of Internet memes in 4chan: Popular Internet culture in the age of online digital reproduction. Habitus, 3(1), 6-19.\nChen, S. X., & Kanai, A. (2021). Authenticity, uniqueness and talent: Gay male beauty influencers in post-queer, postfeminist Instagram beauty culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 25(1), 97-116.\nCheng, C., & Yang, K. (2011). Internet, computer-mediated communications and gay rights movements in Taiwan. Human Rights and Media Studies in Communications. 6, 161–179.\nConnell, C. (2012). Fashionable resistance: Queer" fa (t) shion" blogging as counterdiscourse. Women`s Studies Quarterly, 41(1/2), 209-224.\nConner, C. T. (2019). The gay gayze: Expressions of inequality on Grindr. The Sociological Quarterly, 60(3), 397-419.\nCosta Rica Supreme Court rules gay marriage ban unconstitutional. (2018, October 8). DW. Retrieved from www.dw.com\nCraig, S. L., & McInroy, L. (2014). You can form a part of yourself online: The influence of new media on identity development and coming out for LGBTQ youth. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 18(1), 95-109.\nDawkins, R., & Davis, N. (2017). The selfish gene. Macat Library.\nDeCook, J. R. (2018). Memes and symbolic violence:# proudboys and the use of memes for propaganda and the construction of collective identity. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(4), 485-504.\nDeLaure, M., & Fink, M. (2017). Culture Jamming. New York: New York University Press.\nDrakett, J., Rickett, B., Day, K., & Milnes, K. (2018). Old jokes, new media–Online sexism and constructions of gender in Internet memes. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 109-127.\nDuggan, L. (2002). The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neoliberalism. In Catronovo, R. & Nelson, D. (Eds.). Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics. Duke University Press.\nDuguay, Stefanie. (2016). “ ‘He Has a Way Gayer Facebook than I Do:’ Investigating Sexual Identity Disclosure and Context Collapse on a Social Networking Site.” New Media Society 18(6):891–907.\nDuguay, S. C., Burgess, J., & Light, B. (2017). Mobile dating and hookup app culture. In Messaris, P. & Humphreys, L. (Eds.) Digital media: Transformations in human communication (2nd edition) (pp. 213-221). Peter Lang Publishing.\nEhrenreich, B. (2009). Bright-sided: How Positive Thinking is Undermined America. Metropolitan Books.\nD’Emilio, J. (1983). Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nEverington, K. (June 18, 2019). Taiwan sees first same-sex divorce less than 1 month since legalization. Taiwan News. Retrieved from www.taiwannews.com.tw\nEynon, R., Fry, J. & Schroder, R. (2017). The ethics of online research. In N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 19-37). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.\nFoucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. David M. Halperin, Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography.\nFox, J., & Ralston, R. (2016). Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 635-642.\nGage, S. (2002). Queer: The Ultimate User`s Guide. Unanimous.\nGal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2016). “It gets better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1698-1714.\nGarber, E. (1989). A spectacle in color: The lesbian and gay subculture of jazz age Harlem. Hidden from history: Reclaiming the gay and lesbian past, 318-31.\nGeiger, A., & Graf, N. (2019). About one-in-five U.S. adults know someone who goes by a gender-neutral pronoun. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: www.pewresearch.org\nGhaziani, A. (2011). Post-gay collective identity construction. Social Problems, 58(1), 99-125.\nGhaziani, A. (2014). There goes the gayborhood? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.\nGiano, Z. (2021). The influence of online experiences: the shaping of gay male identities. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(5), 872-886.\nGibson, L. (October 22, 2021). Taiwan graduates face tough start to working lives. Taiwan News. Retrieved from https://www.taiwannews.com.tw\nGill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & psychology, 18(1), 35-60.\nGilson, E. (2011). Vulnerability, ignorance, and oppression. Hypatia, 26(2), 308-332.\nGLAAD Media Institute. (2022). Where we are on TV 2021–2022. https://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/GLAAD%20202122%20WWATV.pdf\nGramsci, A. (2011). Prison Notebooks, Volumes 1-3.\nGras-Velázquez, A., & Maestre-Brotons, A. (2021). Spanish gay male subjectivity, body, intimacy, and affect on Instagram. Sexualities, 13634607211031418.\nDe Greef, K. (2019, July 2). The unfulfilled promise of LGBTQ rights in South Africa. The Atlantic. Retrieved from: www.theatlantic.com\nGross, L. (2003). The gay global village in cyberspace. In Contesting media power: Alternative media in a networked world, 259-272.\nGuilbert, G. C. (2018). Gay Icons: The (Mostly) Female Entertainers Gay Men Love. McFarland.\nHalberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Duke University Press.\nHall, S. (2004). Encoding/decoding. In Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis P. (Ed.). Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79. Routledge.\nHall, S. (1990). Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. In Morley D. & Chen, K. (Ed.). Critical Dialogies in Cultural Studies. Routledge.\nHarlow, S., Rowlett, J. T., & Huse, L. K. (2020). ‘Kim Davis be like…’: a feminist critique of gender humor in online political memes. Information, Communication & Society, 23(7), 1057-1073.\nHeylighen, F. (2000, November, 29). What makes a meme successful? Selection criteria for cultural evolution. Congress on Cybernetics, Brussels.\nhooks, B. (1991). Theory as liberatory practice. Yale JL & Feminism, 4, 1.\nhooks, B. (2004). The will to change: Men, masculinity, and love. Atria.\nHootsuite (2022). Digital 2022: Global Overview Report.\nhootsuite.widen.net/s/gqprmtzq6g/digital-2022-global-overview-report\nHou, C. N., & Lu, H. Y. (2013). Online networks as a venue for social support: A qualitative study of married bisexual men in Taiwan. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(9), 1280-1296.\nHristova, S. (2013). Occupy wall street meets occupy Iraq: On remembering and forgetting in a digital age. Radical History Review, 2013(117), 83-97.\nHuang, H. T. M. (2011). Queer politics and sexual modernity in Taiwan (Vol. 1). Hong Kong University Press.\nInfluencer Tiers for the Influencer Marketing Industry. (n.d.) Retrieved from mediakix.com\nJagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. NYU Press.\nJhuo, C. (2020). I Take Selfies, Therefore I Am: Gay Men’s Gym Selfies as Body Presentation on Social Media. [Masters thesis, National Chengchi University]. NCCU Institutional Respository. http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw\nJohnson, P. (2013). Homosexuality and the European court of human rights. Routledge.\nJones, A. (2013). A Critical Inquiry into Queer Utopias. Springer.\nKam, L. Y. L. (2013). Shanghai Lalas: Female Tongzhi Communities and Politics in Urban China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.\nKam, L. Y. L. (2019). “Coming Out and Going Abroad: The Chuguo Mobility of Queer Women in China.” Journal of Lesbian Studies, 1–14.\nKao, Y. C., & Bih, H. D. (2014). Masculinity in ambiguity: Constructing Taiwanese masculine identities between great powers. In Masculinities in a Global Era (pp. 175-191). Springer, New York, NY.\nKearney, M. C. 2006. Girls Make Media. New York, NY: Routledge.\nKoltrowitz, S., & Hughes, B. (2021, September 22). Divided Swiss to vote on same-sex marriage. Reuters. Retrieved from www.reuters.com\nKong, T. S. (2010). Chinese male homosexualities: Memba, tongzhi and golden boy. Routledge.\nKrammer, S. (2020) Polygamy is rare around the world and mostly confined to a few regions. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: www.pewresearch.org\nKuipers, G. (2015). Good Humor, Bad Taste. De Gruyter Mouton.\nLai, Y. (2021). No Loss of Masculinity? The Analysis of the Male Sneak-Snapped Victims’ Accounts. [Masters thesis, National Chengchi University]. NCCU Institutional Respository. http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw\nLaing, B. (2013). An Exploratory Study of Identity Construction amongst Married Gay Men in Same-Sex Marriage: A Discourse Analysis. [Masters thesis, University of Johannesburg]. University of Johannesburg Institutional Repository. https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/\nLawrence, E., & Ringrose, J. (2018) @Notofeminism, #Feministsareugly, and Misandry Memes: How Social Media Feminist Humor is Calling out Antifeminism. In Keller, J. & Ryan, ME. (Eds.) Emergent Feminisms: Complicating a Postfeminist Media Culture. (pp. 211-232). Routledge.\nLeaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. John Wiley & Sons.\nLin, D. C. (2006). Sissies online: Taiwanese male queers performing sissinesses in cyberspaces. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 7(2), 270-288.\nLin, C. (2022, February 28). Singapore`s top court dismisses attempt to overturn gay sex ban. Reuters. Retrieved from www.reuters.com\nLiu, J, & Ding, N. (2005). Reticent politics, queer politics. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 6(1), 30–55.\nLivingstone, J. (Director). (1990). Paris is Burning [Film]. Off-White Productions.\nLouie, K. (2002). Theorising Chinese Masculinity: Society and Gender in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nLove, H. (2007). Feeling backward: Loss and the politics of queer history. Harvard University Press.\nLowder, B. (2017, June 6). Why the “Gay Babadook” Meme Is So Bewitching. Slate. Retrieved from slate.com\nLuthar, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), 857-885.\nMachin, D., & Mayer, A. (2012). How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. Sage.\nMartin, F. (2003). Situating Sexualities: Queer Representation in Taiwanese Fiction, Film, and Public Culture. Hong Kong University Press.\nMazariegos, M. (2022, March 4). LGBTQ refugees fleeing Ukraine face discrimination in countries with anti-gay laws. NPR. Retrieved from www.npr.org\nMcLean, N. (2018, June 24). The trouble with making LGBTIAQ people live on heterosexuals’ terms. The Conversation. Retrieved from: www.theconversation.com\nMcLuhan, M., & Powers, B. R. (1989). The global village: Transformations in world life and media in the 21st century. Communication and society.\nMcNair, B. (2013). Porno? Chic!: How pornography changed the world and made it a better place. Routledge.\nMcRobbie, A., & Garber, J. (1981). “Girls and Subcultures.” In Bennet, T., Martin, G., Mercer, C., & Woollacott J. (Ed.). Culture, Ideology and Social Progress: A Reader. The Open University Press.\nMerriam-Webster. (n.d.a). Femme. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved April 15, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/femme\nMerriam-Webster. (n.d.b). Queer. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved April 15, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/queer\nMeyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.\nMiddlemost, R. (2019). Babashook: The Babadook, gay iconography and Internet cultures. Australasian Journal of Popular Culture, 8(1), 7-26.\nMiltner, K. M. (2014). “There’s no place for lulz on LOLCats”: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme. First Monday. 19(8).\nMirzoeff, N. (2011). The Right to Look. Duke University Press.\nMongelli, F., Perrone, D., BaLDUcci, J., Sacchetti, A., Ferrari, S., Mattei, G., & Galeazzi, G. M. (2019). Minority stress and mental health among LGBT populations: An update on the evidence. Minerva Psichiatrica. 60(1), 27–50.\nMoradi, B., Tebbe, E. A., Brewster, M. E., Budge, S. L., Lenzen, A., Ege, E., . & Flores, M. J. (2016). A content analysis of literature on trans people and issues: 2002–2012. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(7), 960-995.\nMiller, V. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence, 14(4), 387–400.\nMilner, R. A. (2013). Hacking the Social: Internet Memes, Identity Antagonism, and the Logic of Lulz. The Fibreculture Journal, 22.\nMoritz, E. (1990): Memetic Science: I - General Introduction. Journal of Ideas, 1 (1):3-23.\nMuñoz, J. E. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of color and the performance of politics (Vol. 2). U of Minnesota Press.\nMuñoz, J. E. (2006). Feeling brown, feeling down: Latina affect, the performativity of race, and the depressive position. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(3), 675-688.\nMuñoz, J. E. (2019). Cruising Utopia. New York University Press.\nNavarre, B, & Trimble, M. (2021). Same-sex marriage legalization by country. U.S. News. Retrived from www.usnews.com\nNewport, F. (2020, June 26). Understanding the increase in moral acceptability of polygamy. Gallup. Retrieved from news.gallup.com\nNissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2017). Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s/b/board. New Media & Society, 19(4), 483-501.\nNguyen, H. T. (2014). A view from the bottom: Asian American masculinity and sexual representation. University of California, Berkeley.\nNyong’o, T. (2005). Punk`d theory. Social Text, 23(3-4), 19-34.\nPachankis, J. E., Clark, K. A., Burton, C. L., Hughto, J. M. W., Bränström, R., & Keene, D. E. (2020). Sex, status, competition, and exclusion: Intraminority stress from within the gay community and gay and bisexual men’s mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 713.\nParker, I. (2014). Discourse Dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. Routledge.\nPeng, H. Y. (2019). Dealing with heteronormativity in everyday practice: Nuanced resistance of Taiwanese Nutongzhis. China Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 155-173.\nPew Research Center. (2015). “Section 1: Changing Views of Same-Sex Marriage.” Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/\nPetherbridge, D. (2016). What`s critical about vulnerability? Rethinking interdependence, recognition, and power. Hypatia, 31(3), 589-604.\nPlummer, K. (2010). Foreword. In Kong, T. Chinese Male Homosexualities: Memba, Tongzhi and Golden Boy. (pp. xiii-xix). Routledge.\nPoushter, J., & Kent, N. (2020). The Global Divide on Homosexuality Persists. Pew Research Center. www.pewresearch.org\nRamirez, J. (2021, July 7). How @versfirst Gets to the Bottom of Top-Shaming. Into. Retrieved from www.intomore.com\nRendueles, C. (2017). Sociophobia: Political change in the digital utopia. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.\nRentschler, C. A., & Thrift, S. C. (2015). Doing feminism in the network: Networked laughter and the ‘Binders Full of Women’meme. Feminist Theory, 16(3), 329-359.\nRevill, J. (2021, November 21). Swiss to allow same-sex weddings from July 2022. Reuters. Retrieved from: www.reuters.com\nRingrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2018). Remixing misandry, manspreading, and dick pics: Networked feminist humour on Tumblr. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 686-704.\nRoberts, L. (2019). Changing worldwide attitudes toward homosexuality: The influence of global and region-specific cultures, 1981–2012. Social science research, 80, 114-131.\nRobinson, B. A. (2016). The Quantifiable-Body Discourse: “Height-Weight Proportionality” and Gay Men’s Bodies in Cyberspace. Social Currents, 3(2), 172-185.\nRodriguez, S. (2021, December 14). Instagram surpasses 2 billion monthly users while powering through a year of turmoil. CNBC. cnbc.com\nRogers, B. (2020). #Biguys and #Biboys: The Discursive Production of Bisexual Men through Instagram’s Homonormative Visual Culture. Journal of Bisexuality, 20(4), 361-382.\nSchwartz, A. J. (2020a). Low Femme, Low Theory: An Ethno-Archive of Femme Internet Culture. [Doctoral Dissertation, York University]. YorkSpace. yorkspace.library.yorku.ca\nSchwartz, A. (2020b). Low Femme, low theory: memes and the new bedroom culture. Feminist Media Studies, 1-16.\nSchwartz, J., & Andsager, J. (2011). Four decades of images in gay male-targeted magazines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1): 76–98.\nScott, J. C. (2008). Weapons of the Weak. Yale University Press.\nShiau, H. (2022). Networked Collective Symbolic Capital Revisited: Selfies Sharing and Identity Negotiation Among Taiwanese Gay Men. In Research Anthology on Inclusivity and Equity for the LGBTQ+ Community (pp. 426-440). IGI Global.\nShifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT press.\nShifman, L., & Lemish, D. (2010). Between Feminism and Fun(ny)mism. Information, Communication & Society. 13:6, 870-891.\nSloan, L. (2019). "From Backstage to Digital Front Stage: Online Queer Community, Identity, and Emotion Management." in Bodinger-DeUriarte, C. (Ed.). Interfacing Ourselves: Living in the Digital Age. Routledge.\nSong, G., & Hird, D. (2013). Men and masculinities in contemporary China. Brill.\nSontag, S. (1964). Notes on Camp. In Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the performing subject: A Reader, edited by F. Cleto. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 53-65.\nStatista. (2022). Distribution of Instagram users worldwide as of January 2022, by age group.\nwww.statista.com/statistics/325587/instagram-global-age-group/\nSuganuma, K. (2012). Contact Moments. Hong Kong University Press.\nTraue, B., Blanc, M., & Cambre, C. (2019). Visibilities and visual discourses: Rethinking the social with the image. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(4), 327-337.\nUseem, R. H., & Downie, R. D. (1976). Third-Culture Kids. Today`s Education, 65(3), 103-5.\nVisser, G. (2015). Thinking beyond exclusionary gay male spatial frames in the developing world. In P. L. Doan (Ed.), Planning and LGBTQ communities: The need for inclusive queer spaces (pp. 81–93). Routledge.\nWang, A. & Lee, Y. (2018, November, 2018). Taiwan`s same-sex marriage vote divides families. Reuters. www.reuters.com\nWang, F. T. Y., Bih, H. D., & Brennan, D. J. (2009). Have they really come out: gay men and their parents in Taiwan. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(3), 285-296.\nWang, J. (2014). To explore the physical workout experiences in the gym of the gays in Kaohsiung with reference on the viewpoint of Environment Behavior. [Master’s thesis, Shu-Te University]. Shù dé kējì dàxué bó shuòshì lùnwén xìtǒng. ndltd.ncl.edu.tw\nWarner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.\nWen, H. (2021). Gentle yet manly: Xiao xian rou, male cosmetic surgery and neoliberal consumer culture in China. Asian Studies Review, 45(2), 253-271.\nWeston, K. (1995a). Get thee to a big city: Sexual imaginary and the great gay migration. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 2(3), 253-277.\nWeston, K. (1995b). Theory, Theory, whos got the Theory? Or, why I`m Tired of that Tired Debate. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 2(4), 347-349.\nWillingham, AJ. (2021, June 5). Whether It`s Rainbow Capitalism or Bad Design, LGBTQ People Are Calling Out Disingenuous Pride Merchandise. CNN. Retrieved from edition.cnn.com\nWiseman, M., & Davidson, S. (2012). Problems with binary gender discourse: Using context to promote flexibility and connection in gender identity. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(4), 528-537.\nWittman, C. (1970). Refugees from Amerika: A gay manifesto (pp. 157-71). Council on Religion and the Homosexual.\nYan Qi, Y., Ye Haobin, B., Fan, F., & Wen, S. (2020). Why is contemporary China still courting concubines? Exploring the reasons for Chinese audiences’ fascination with concubines’ infighting in television dramas. Leisure Studies, 39(3), 444-453.\nYang, H. C. (2014). Flower boys on campus: Performing and practicing masculinity. Journal of Gender Studies, 23(4), 391-408.\nYbarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Palmer, N. A., & Reisner, S. L. (2015). Online social support as a buffer against online and offline peer and sexual victimization among US LGBT and non-LGBT youth. Child abuse & neglect, 39, 123-136.\nYu, T. F. (2021). Queer migration across the Sinophone world: queer Chinese Malaysian students’ educational mobility to Taiwan. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(15), 3549-3563.\nZemke, K., & Mackley-Crump, J. (2018). “I’ma school that bitch”: Gay rappers defying binaries and expressing fierceness. In Rethinking Difference in Gender, Sexuality, and Popular Music (pp. 131-149). Routledge.\nZidani, S. (2021). Messy on the inside: internet memes as mapping tools of everyday life. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2378-2402.; G0109461019; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/141204; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/141204/1/101901.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/141204
https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202200940
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/141204/1/101901.pdf

View record in BASE

6

Dissertation/ Thesis

多重認同困境的創傷與療癒歷程－一位原漢雙族裔基督教牧家子女男同志的自我敘說 ; The trauma and healing process of multiple Identity dilemma - a self-narrative of a Han-indigenous and homosexual son of a pastor

المؤلفون: 高約翰, Gao, Yue-Han

المساهمون: 楊佩榮, Yang, Pei-Jung

مصطلحات موضوعية: 自我認同, 自我敘事, 自我敘說, 宗教, 性別, 族群, 基督教, 原住民, 原漢雙族裔, 牧家子女, 男同志, Self-identity, Self-narritive, Religion, Gender, Ethnicity, Christianity, Indigenous people, Gay, Homosexual

وصف الملف: 2609540 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 林哲立、邱曉君、顏菲麗（譯）（2007）。人類行為與社會環境二版。臺北市：雙葉。（Ashford, J.B., LeCroy, C.W., & Lortie, K.L.)(原著出版年：2001)\n\nCiwang Teyra、黃炤愷、謝宛蓉（2020）。只想好好地生活：原住民同志之交織處境與因應策略。臺大社會工作學刊，43，1-54。\n\n陳張培倫(2013)。族群發展導向積極賦權行動與原住民族。政治與社會哲學評論，47，1-64。http://dx.doi.org/10.6523/168451532013120047001\n\n楊慧姿(2017)。土水工頭長女的越界行動－用身體穿越性別與階級的自我敘說。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學社會工作研究所。; G0103264009; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/139268; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/139268/1/400901.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/139268
https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202200333
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/139268/1/400901.pdf

View record in BASE

7

Dissertation/ Thesis

彩虹的光影─男同志的諮商歷程經驗與感受之研究 ; Rainbow Shadow--A study on the Experience and Feelings of Gay Men in the Counseling Process

المؤلفون: 莊瀚宇, ZHUANG, HAN-YU

المساهمون: 生死學系碩博士班, 陳增穎, CHENG, TSENG-YING

مصطلحات موضوعية: 男同志當事人, 諮商風格, 移情與反移情, 多重關係, Gay male clients, counseling styles, transference and countertransference, multiple relationships

وصف الملف: 4847324 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/29700; http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/29700/1/111NHU00672003-001.pdf; http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/29700/-1/index.html

الاتاحة: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/29700
http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/29700/1/111NHU00672003-001.pdf
http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/29700/-1/index.html

View record in BASE

8

Conference

雙重生活的面具卸載—已婚中年男同志情慾的展現與流動

المؤلفون: 張銘峰, 謝臥龍, Vincent Shieh

المساهمون: 性別教育研究所

مصطلحات موضوعية: 男同志, 情慾

Relation: 兩性平等教育學術研討會 / 教育部與杏陵基金會主辦，台北市：台北市青少年育樂中心，2002年11月4-6日，頁181-188; http://ir.nknu.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/4233

الاتاحة: http://ir.nknu.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/4233

View record in BASE

9

Academic Journal

跨越世代相遇：看見「老年男同志」 ; Breaking through Ageism: Understanding Elderly Gay Men in Taiwan

المؤلفون: 王增勇

المساهمون: 政大社工所

مصطلحات موضوعية: 老年男同志, 老化, 老年歧視, 同志社群, 行動研究

وصف الملف: 1449593 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 生命教育研究, 3(1), 169-231; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/61093; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/61093/1/169231.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/61093
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/61093/1/169231.pdf

View record in BASE

10

Dissertation/ Thesis

復原力與男同志被霸凌經驗之輔導研究 ; Counseling Research on Resilience and Gay Men’s Bullying Experience

المؤلفون: 許哲豪, Hsu, Che-Hao

المساهمون: 教育研究所, 饒夢霞, Rao, Meng-Xia

مصطلحات موضوعية: 男同志, 霸凌, 創傷後成長, 反彈復甦, 因應策略, 正向心理學, gay, bullying, rebound recovery（resilience）, post-traumatic growth, coping strategies, Positive psychology, psy, edu

Relation: http://ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/206008

الاتاحة: http://ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/206008

View record in BASE

11

Dissertation/ Thesis

男同志於青少年時期的學校場域經驗對其同志認同影響之探究 ; The Influence of Homosexual Self-identity through Gay Adolescents’ Experiences in School

المؤلفون: 陳品妤, Chen, Pin-Yu

المساهمون: 陳婉真, Chen, Wan-Chen

مصطلحات موضوعية: 男同志青少年, 同志自我認同, Gay adolescent, Gay self-identity

وصف الملف: 1539172 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 王守玉（2012）。簡介紮根理論研究法。護理雜誌，59（1），90-94。\n王怡元（2004）。在學校體制中女同志族群與非同志族群間族群關係之研究（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n王則雅（2011）。同志議題在報紙的出現及其報導內涵之演變（1970-2000）。新北大史學，10，17-35。\n王素真、陳住銘、洪耀釧（2014）。民眾對於同性戀的認知與接受程度之探討。工程科技與教育學刊，11（1），30-42。\n朱偉誠（1998）。台灣同志運動的後殖民思考：論”現身”問題。台灣社會研究季刊，30，35-62。\n江守峻、許立亞、劉宗幸、陳婉真（2020）。青少年憂鬱的代間傳遞：個人、家庭與學校保護性因子之相關研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊，22，59-84。\n江守峻、陳婉真（2017）。經濟弱勢青少年的家庭凝聚力、教師支持、同儕支持與心理資本之關係：台灣貧窮兒少資料庫分析。當代教育研究季刊，25（4），11-50。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2017.2504.01\n江守峻、陳婉真、郭瓈灔（2017）。迂迴的置身處境：東南亞新住民諮商的多元文化省思與挑戰。臺東大學教育學報，28（2），61-96。\n江守峻、陳婉真、陳羽柔、洪逸珊、彭秀玲（2020）。與心理師跨專業合作在輔導教師角色壓力與工作滿意度的中介角色。中華輔導與諮商學報，57，121-148。https://doi.org/10.3966/172851862020010057005\n江思穎（2002）。基督男同志生命故事之敘說—信仰與性傾向衝突的認同歷程。中原大學心理所碩士論文，桃園線。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c43692\n自由時報（2011年11月1日）。〈被笑娘娘腔跳樓〉國中生留書泣訴無宣洩出口選擇消失。取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/paper/535843\n呂欣潔（2016）。同志社群所面對的網路性霸凌現象初探。婦研縱橫，105，38-43。\n李承達（2013）。高中生「性認同」與「性別特質」初探。性學研究，4（2）， 75-96。\n李淑菁（2011）。性別教育的論述角力：教師的詮釋與想像。教育與社會研究，22，39-92。\n周曉禎（2012）。支持多元性別學生－在高中成立性別研究社的經驗分享。性別平等教育季刊，60，63-65。\n林良齊（2017）。政治凌駕專業？雲林縣禁教「多元性別意識」，聯合新聞網。取自https://udn.com/news/story/7314/2701001\n林怡君、林安邦（2017）。高中學生對同志及實施同志教育態度之研究。性別平等教育季刊，79，118-125。\n林家新（2015）。青春無敵：淺談青少年同志的性別經驗與認同。愛之關懷，93，16-19。\n林淑馨（2010）。質性研究理論與實務。新北市：巨流圖書公司。\n社團法人中華民國諮商心理師公會（2012）。諮商心理師專業倫理守則。取自http://www.tcpu.org.tw/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=law006&Category=411913\n邱珍琬（2002）。青少年男同志認同過程與實際。彰化師大輔導學報，23，77-107。\n姜兆眉（2017）。涵納差異與攜手前行：同志友善與性別敏感諮商教育之反思與在地實踐。輔導與諮商學報，39（1），1-18。\n洪培忻、李明峰（2016）。校園網路性霸凌的概念、迷思與處遇。婦研縱橫，105， 30-37。\n徐巧玲、周幸儀（2016）。基督徒同志教師生命衝突與轉化之敘說研究。人文社會科學研究，10（1），86-113。\n徐湘君（2018）。教養風格、認同形塑：女同志如何在出櫃歷程中協商親子關係（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n高志薇、邱一航、江守峻、陳婉真（2017）。關係取向心理治療處理社交焦慮症患者之歷程研究。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，31，71-102。https://doi.org/10.6308/JCPRC.201711_(31).0003\n高美娟（2017）。男同志出櫃歷程污名化之研究（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n高智龍、賴念華（2016）。從多元文化諮商觀點探討男同志諮商實務。中華輔導與諮商學報，46，31-62。\n張可妮、陳姵君（2014）。青少年同志認同與現身壓力之輔導因應策略。諮商與輔導，345，23-26。\n張芬芬（2010）。質性資料分析的五步驟：在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊，35，87-120。\n張芬芬（譯）（2006）。質性研究資料分析（原作：M. B. Miles, 和 A. M. Huberman）。台北市：雙葉書廊有限公司。\n張德勝、游家盛、呂宗晉（2014）。異性戀高中職生對異性戀、男同志和女同志人際關係態度之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，39，91-116。\n張曉佩、李宜蓉（2018）。多元性別議題諮商能力：訓練方案對知識、覺察與技能影響之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，52，51-80。\n教育部（2013）。性別平等教育法。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL030508\n梁天麗、李采君、李毓君、柯燕婷、許芳菁、許雅雯、程筠、林冠品（2016）。男同志向父母現身之心理歷程。弘光學報，77，61-79。\n畢恆達（2000）。走入歧途的男性氣概養成過程。兩性平等教育季刊，12，44-46。\n畢恆達（2003）。男同性戀與父母：現身的考量、策略、時機與後果。女學學誌，15，37-78。\n畢恆達、吳昱廷（2000）。男同志同居伴侶的住宅空間體驗：四個個案。應用心理研究，8，121-147。\n莊瑞君（2018）。學校同志諮商輔導的實況與困境探究。輔導與諮商學報，40（1），45-68。\n郭豐慶（2010）。何不迎向陽光？－以同志現身經驗探討青少年同志性取向認同。諮商與輔導，295，29-34。\n郭麗安、陳宇平、王大維、劉安真、張歆祐（2017）。青少年性教育與情感教育內涵之探究：教師、學生與家長觀點之比較。學生事務與輔導，56（2）， 28-49。\n陳彤昀（2014）。同性戀壓力源、壓力因應策略與心理健康狀態之調查研究－以身份認同程度高低者為例（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n陳欣悌（2016）。與神對話：同志神職人員自我認同之探討（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n陳婉真、江守峻、林傳陽、洪雅鳳（2021）。心理師在學校輔導跨專業合作的現況與信念：應然面與實然面的落差。中華心理衛生學刊，34（1），55-84。https://doi.org/10.30074%2fFJMH.202103_34(1).0003\n陳婉真、黃禎慧、侯瑀彤、江守峻、洪雅鳳（2018）。心理師與學校輔導合作經驗初探：北部地區心理師之觀點。輔導與諮商學報，40（1），25-44。\n陳逸駿（2014）。從男同志學生的霸凌生命經驗省思多元性別友善校園（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n陳瀅劼（2016）。衝突或融合？同志基督徒的雙重認同之路（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n游美惠（2011）。推動同志教育，營造友善校園：一些初步構想。性別平等教育季刊，64，38-47。\n楊幸真、游美惠（2014）。臺灣性別與情感教育研究之回顧分析：知識生產的挑戰與展望。臺灣教育社會學研究，14（2），109-163。\n管仁健（2010年4月28日）。一個明星女中的資優生自殺以後。取自http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/kuan0416/post/1320901966\n趙淑珠、郭麗安、劉安真（2008）。認識同志教育資源手冊。台灣：教育部。\n劉安真（2000）。對同性戀輔導的反思。諮商與輔導，171，23-27。\n劉安真（2011）。從同志分手經驗談校園中的同志情感教育。性別平等教育季刊，55，46-51。\n劉安真（2018）。同志學生需要什麼樣的情感教育？。性別平等教育季刊， 82，55-59。\n劉宜欣（2015）。台灣地區同志認同調查（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n劉淑慧、田秀蘭、陳淑琦、張勻銘、黃莉惟、廖書䌍、陳慧甄（譯）（2008）。商研究法（原作者：P. P. Heppner, B. E. Wampold 和 D. M. Kivlighan）。台北市：學富文化事業有限公司。\n劉慧屏（2011）。多元文化諮商師的覺察與省思。諮商與輔導，310，21-24。\n蔡宏富（2012）。同志教育進/出校園之間：以台灣同志諮詢熱線的實作方式為例。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，30，83-136。\n鄭智偉（2014）。國中小校園現場更需推動同志教育。性別平等教育季刊，67，30-34。\n蕭燕婷（2004）。同志青少年人際互動的主觀知覺與因應（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n賴佳樺（2013）。男同志身份認同狀態、伴侶關係滿意度與其所知覺的社會支持之研究（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。\n駱俊宏、林燕卿、王素女、林蕙瑛（2005）。從異性戀霸權、父權體制觀看同性戀者之處境與污名。臺灣性學學刊，11（2），61-73。\n謝文宜（2006）。台灣同志伴侶親密關係發展的挑戰與因應策略。中華輔導學報，20，83-120。\n鍾道詮、李大鵬（2017）。社會排除經驗對男同志心理健康的影響。中華心理衛生學刊，30（1），37-68。\nAlderson, K. G., Orzeck, T. L., & McEwen, S. C. (2016). Alberta high school counsellors’ knowledge of homosexuality and their attitudes toward gay males. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(1), 87-117.\nBeckmson, A. N., Amalu, M. N., Mgban, A. N., & Kinsley, A. B. (2020). Interest in extra curricular activities and self efficacy of senior secondary school students in cross river state, Nigeria. International Education Studies, 13(8), 79-87.\nBernheim, B., D. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 841-877.\nBinder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., & Mummendey A. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843-856.\nCakirpaloglu, S. D., Lemrova, S., Kvintova, J., & Vevodova, S. (2016, November 14-16). Conformity, peer pressure, popularity and risk behavior among adolescents. [Paper presentation]. ICERI 2016 Conference, Seville, Spain.\nCass, V. C. (1984). Homosexual identity formation: Testing a theoretical model. The Journal of Sex Research, 20(2), 143-167.\nColeman, E. (1982). Development stages of the coming-out process. American Behavioral Scientist, 25(4), 469-482.\nD’Augelli, A. R., Hershberger, S. L., & Pilkington, N. W. (1998). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth and their family: Disclosure of sexual orientation and its consequences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(3), 361-371.\nDiamond, L. M. (1998). Development of sexual orientation among adolescent and young adult women. American Psychological Association, 34(5), 1085-1095.\nGuay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 124–136.\nHall, W. J., & Rodgers, G. K. (2018). Teachers’ attitudes toward homosexuality and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer community in the United States. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 23-41.\nHarrison, T. W. (2003). Adolescent homosexuality and concerns regarding disclosure. Journal of School Health, 73(3), 107-112.\nHerek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). ‘’Some of my best friends’’: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbian. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 412-424.\nHerek, G. M., & Garnets, L. D. (2007). Sexual orientation and mental health. Sexual Orientation and Mental Health, 3, 353-375.\nHershberger, S. L., & D`Augelli, A. R. (1995). The impact of victimization on the mental health and suicidality of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths. Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 65-74.\nHunter, J., & Schaecher, R. (1987). Stresses on lesbian and gay adolescents in schools. Children & Schools, 9(3), 180-190.\nKosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Palmer, N. A., & Boesen, M. J. (2014). The 2013 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York, NY: GLSEN.\nLasser, J., & Tharinger, D. (2003). Visibility management in school and beyond: A qualitative study of gay, lesbian, bisexual youth. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 233-244.\nLewis, R. J., Derlega, V. J., Griffin, J., & Krowinski C. (2003). Stressors for gay men and lesbians: Life stress, gay-related stress, stigma consciousness, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(6), 716-729.\nLink, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2011). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363-385.\nMa, X. (2010). Sense of belonging to school: Can schools make a difference? The Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 340-349.\nMeyer, I. H. (2013). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1, 3-26.\nMonroe, S. M., Rohde, P., Seely, J. R., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1999). Life events and depression in adolescence: Relationship loss as a prospective risk factor for first onset of major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(4), 606-614.\nNadal, K. L., Issa, M., Leon, J., Meterko, V., Wideman, M., & Wong, Y. (2011). Sexual orientation microaggressions: “Death by a thousand cuts” for lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, 8(3), 234-259.\nSandfort, T. G. M., Bos, H. M. W., Collier, K. L., & Metselaar, M. (2010). School environment and the mental health of sexual minority youths: A study among Dutch young adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1696-1700.\nSue, D. W., Bucceri, J., Lin, A. I., Nadal, K. L., & Torino, G. C. (2007). Racial microaggressions and the Asian American experience. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(1), 72-81.\nTroiden, R. R. (1988). Homosexual identity development. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 9, 105-113.\nWaldner, L. K., & Magruder, B. (1999). Coming out to parents: Perceptions of family relations, perceived resources, and identity expression as predictors of identity disclosure for gay and lesbian adolescents. Journal of Homosexuality, 37(2), 83-100.\nWilson, N. (2009). Impact of Extracurricular Activities on Students. [Master thesis, University of Wisconsin-Stout]. UW-Stout eSpace. https://www2.ustout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2009/2009wilsonn.pdf\nWoodford, M. R., Howell, M. L., Kulick, A., & Silverschanz, P. (2009). “That’s so gay”: Heterosexual male undergraduates and the perpetuation of sexual orientation microaggressions on campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(2), 416-435.; G0106172006; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/136014; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/136014/1/200601.pdf