المؤلفون: 葉皓勤, Marcin Mateusz Jerzewski, Jerzewski, Marcin Mateusz

المساهمون: 蘇彥斌, Su, Yen-Pin

مصطلحات موضوعية: 社會政策, 次國家政治, 恩庇侍從主義, 有條件現金轉移支付, 阿根廷, 印尼, social policy, subnational politics, patron-clientelism, Conditional Cash Transfers, Argentina, Indonesia

وصف الملف: 1567177 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: New York: Oxford University Press.\nHossain, Naomi. 2010. “School Exclusion as Social Exclusion: The Practices and Effects of a Conditional Cash Transfer Programme for the Poor in Bangladesh.” Journal of Development Studies 46(7): 1264–82.\nHuber, Evelyn. 2003. “Letter from the President: The Role of Cross-Regional Comparison.” American Political Science Association - Comparative Politics Newsletter 14(2): 1–6.\nHuber, Evelyn, and John D. Stephens. 2005. “Welfare States and the Economy.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, eds. Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.\nHuber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2012. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\nHuda, Karishma et al. 2020. An Inclusive Child Grant in Papua: Lessons Learnt from Implementing Cash Transfers in Remote Contexts. Jakarta, Indonesia: MAHKOTA Program. https://socialprotection.org/sites/default/files/publications_files/An%20Inclusive%20Child%20grant%20in%20Papua%20Lessons%20Learnt%20from%20Implementing%20Cash%20Transfers%20in%20Remote%20Contexts.pdf.\nHujo, Katja. 2021. “Social Protection and Inequality in the Global South: Politics, Actors and Institutions.” Critical Social Policy 41(3): 343–63.\nHumas Jabar. 2018. “KPU Jabar Tetapkan Gubernur & Wakil Gubernur Terpilih Hasil Pilkada Serentak 2018.” Biro Humas dan Protokol Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat. http://humas.jabarprov.go.id/kpu-jabar-tetapkan-gubernur-wakil-gubernur-terpilih-hasil-pilkada-serentak-2018/965.\nIskandar, Zahrotul Addawiyah. 2020. “Challenging Policy Monopolies: Strategies of Governor Ridwan Kamil in Contesting the Response of The Central Government to COVID-19 Pandemic.” International Institute of Social Studies.\nJæger, Mads Meier. 2006. “Welfare Regimes and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited.” European Sociological Review 22(2): 157–70.\nJones, Bruce, and Torrey Taussig. 2019. “Democracy and Disorder: The Struggle for Influence in the New Geopolitics.” Foreign Policy at Brookings Institution Report. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/FP_20190226_democracy_report_WEB.pdf.\nJones, David K. 2017. Exchange Politics: Opposing Obamacare in Battleground States. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.\nJuegen, Francisco. 2016. “Jubilados y Beneficiarios de La AUH, Con Menos IVA a Los Alimentos.” La Nación. https://www.lanacion.com.ar/politica/jubilados-y-beneficiarios-de-la-auh-con-menos-iva-a-los-alimentos-nid1872029/.\nJurado, Ignacio. 2014. “Party System Nationalisation and Social Spending: Party System Nationalisation and Social Spending.” European Journal of Political Research 53(2): 288–307.\nKalleberg, Arne L., and Steven P. Vallas, eds. 2018. Precarious Work. First edition. Bingley, England: Emerald Publishing.\nKemahlıoğlu, Özge, and Reşat Bayer. 2021. “Favoring Co-Partisan Controlled Areas in Central Government Distributive Programs: The Role of Local Party Organizations.” Public Choice 187(3–4): 301–19.\nKian, Kwee Hui. 2008. “HOW STRANGERS BECAME KINGS: Javanese-Dutch Relations in Java 1600–1800.” Indonesia and the Malay World 36(105): 293–307.\nKim, Eunju, and Jayoung Yoo. 2015. “Conditional Cash Transfer in the Philippines: How to Overcome Institutional Constraints for Implementing Social Protection: Conditional Cast Transfer in the Philippines.” Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 2(1): 75–89.\nKleider, Hanna. 2018. “Redistributive Policies in Decentralised Systems: The Effect of Decentralisation on Subnational Social Spending.” European Journal of Political Research 57(2): 355–77.\nvan Klinken, Gerry. 2009. “Patronage Democracy in Provincial Indonesia.” In Rethinking Popular Representation: Governance, Security, and Development, eds. Olle Törnquist, Neil Webster, and Kristian Stokke. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 141–60.\nKoehler, Gabriele. 2020. Creative Coalitions in a Fractured World: An Opportunity for Transformative Change? Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.\nKomansilan, Rine, Jeane Elisabeth Langkai, and Lexi Lumingkewas. 2021. “Implementation of the Program Keluarga Harapan in Ratahan District, Southeast Minahasa Regency of Indonesia.” Technium Social Science Journal 2021(1): 148–57.\nKornacki, Blase. 2005. “Conditional Cash Transfers: Progress Towards the Millennium Development Goals.” Sustainable Development Law and Policy 6(1): 26.\nKorpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London, England: Routledge.\nKuznets, Simon. 1955. “Economic Growth and Income Inequality.” The American Economic Review 45(1): 1–28.\nKwon, Huck-ju, and Woo-rim Kim. 2015. “The Evolution of Cash Transfers in Indonesia: Policy Transfer and National Adaptation: Evolution of Cash Transfers in Indonesia.” Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 2(2): 425–40.\nLa Nación. 2009. “‘Es El Sistema Más Redistributivo y Más Justo’, Dijo Cristina Kirchner.” La Nación. https://www.lanacion.com.ar/politica/es-el-sistema-mas-redistributivo-y-mas-justo-dijo-cristina-kirchner-nid1191981/.\n———. 2016. “Ya Rige La Devolución Del IVA Para Jubilados.” La Nación. https://www.lanacion.com.ar/economia/ya-rige-la-devolucion-del-iva-para-jubilados-nid1919774/.\nLaurell, Asa Cristina. 2015. “Three Decades of Neoliberalism in Mexico: The Destruction of Society.” International Journal of Health Services 45(2): 246–64.\nLebdioui, Amir. 2021. “Forever Unequal? Mould-Breaking Strategies to Reduce Inequality in Latin America.” London School of Economics. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/latamcaribbean/2021/04/29/forever-unequal-mould-breaking-strategies-to-reduce-inequality-in-latin-america/#:~:text=In%20Latin%20America,%20the%20richest,to%20sustainably%20reduce%20income%20inequality.\nLee, Sang-Hyop, and Donghyun Park. 2014. Fiscal Policy and Inclusive Growth in Latin America: Lessons for Asia. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.\nLeisering, Lutz. 2020. “The Calls for Universal Social Protection by International Organizations: Constructing a New Global Consensus.” Social Inclusion 8(1): 90–102.\nLevitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press.\nLlanos, Mariana, and Jayane Maia. 2019. Argentina 2019: Broken Economy, Strengthened Democracy. Hamburg, Germany: German Institute for Global and Area Studies. GIGA Focus Latin America.\nLobao, Linda M., Gregory Hooks, and Ann R. Tickamyer, eds. 2007. The Sociology of Spatial Inequality. Albany: State University of New York Press.\nLondon, Jonathan D. 2018. Welfare and Inequality in Marketizing East Asia. 1st ed. 2018. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK : Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan.\nLuccisano, Lucy, and Laura Macdonald. 2014. “Mexico and Social Provision by the Federal Government and the Federal District: Obstacles and Openings to a Social Protection Floor.” Global Social Policy 14(3): 333–51.\nLuna, Juan Pablo, and Hillel David Soifer. 2017. “Capturing Sub-National Variation in State Capacity: A Survey-Based Approach.” American Behavioral Scientist 61(8): 887–907.\nLupu, Noam. 2015. “Nacionalización e Institucionalización de Partidos En La Argentina Del Siglo XX.” In Sistemas de Partidos En América Latina: Causas y Consecuencias de Su Equilibrio Inestable, ed. Mariano Torcal. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Anthropos/Siglo XXI, 183–202.\nMAHKOTA. 2020. Strengthening Economic Opportunitie for Program Keluarga Harapan Families: A Case Study of Four Districts in Java. Jakarta, Indonesia: MAHKOTA Program.\nMainwaring, Scott. 1998. “Party Systems in the Third Wave.” Journal of Democracy 9(3): 67–81.\n———. 2016. “Party System Institutionalization, Party Collapse and Party Building.” Government and Opposition 51(4): 691–716.\nMainwaring, Scott, and Timothy R. Scully. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nMarshall, Thomas Humphrey. 1992. Citizenship and Social Class. London, England: Pluto Press.\nMarzuki, Masnur. 2012. “Toward Federalism: A Constitutional Solution for Indonesia?” UNISIA 34(76): 100–112.\nMason-Deese, Liz. 2019. “A Changing Tide in Argentina?: Mauricio Macri’s Election Was Supposed to Herald the End of the Pink Tide and the Rise of the Right in Latin America. After a Disastrous Mandate Marked by Deep Austerity and Widespread Unrest, Does His Defeat—and Peronism’s Return—Signal a New Leftist Wave?” NACLA Report on the Americas 51(4): 316–22.\nMas’udi, Wawan. 2019. “Continuity and Change after Indonesia’s Reforms: Contributions to an Ongoing Assessment.” In ed. Max Lane. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, 113–27.\nMauro, Vincent. 2021. “Party Systems, Political Competition, and Inequality in Subnational Brazil.” Latin American Research Review 56(4): 797–813.\nMazzola, Roxana. 2012. Nuevo Paradigma. La Asignación Universal Por Hijo En La Argentina. 2a Edición. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Prometeo Editores.\nMboi, Nafsiah et al. 2018. “On the Road to Universal Health Care in Indonesia, 1990–2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.” The Lancet 392(10147): 581–91.\nMcGuire, James W. 1997. Peronism without Perón: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Orig. print. Stanford, Calif: Stanford Univ. Press.\nMead, Lawrence M. 1997. “Citizenship and Social Policy: T. H. Marshall and Poverty.” Social Philosophy and Policy 14(2): 197–230.\nMesa-Lago, Carmelo. 1978. Social Security in Latin America: Pressure Groups, Stratification and Inequality. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.\nMinistry of Social Affairs, Republic of Indonesia. 2022. “Family Hope Program (PKH).” Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. https://pusdatin.kemensos.go.id/en/program-keluarga-harapan-pkh.\nMishra, Prem Shankar, Pradeep Kumar, and Shobhit Srivastava. 2021. “Regional Inequality in the Janani Suraksha Yojana Coverage in India: A Geo-Spatial Analysis.” International Journal for Equity in Health 20(1): 24.\nMolyneux, Maxine. 2008. “The ‘Neoliberal Turn’ and the New Social Policy in Latin America: How Neoliberal, How New?: The Neoliberal Turn and the New Social Policy in Latin America.” Development and Change 39(5): 775–97.\nMontes, Laura Beatriz. 2014. “El Impacto de La Asignación Universal Por Hijo Para La Protección Social En Las Instituciones Escolares de Mendoza.” MILLCAYAC - Revista Digital de Ciencias Sociales 1(1): 177–87.\nMoscovich, Lorena, and Valeria Brusco. 2018. “Political Alignments and Distributive Politics at the Municipal Level in Federal Countries.” Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política (26): 63–105.\nMoynihan, D., P. Herd, and H. Harvey. 2015. “Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1): 43–69.\nMubin, Fauzul, and Ali Roziqin. 2018. “Meritocracy of Bureaucracy in Indonesia.” International Journal of Social Science and Humanit 8(8): 241–46.\nMuhtadi, Burhanuddin. 2018. “Buying Votes in Indonesia: Partisans, Personal Networks, and Winning Margins.” PhD dissertation. Australian National University. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/144529/1/Burhanuddin_Muhtadi_Thesis_2018.pdf.\nMusgrave, Michael K., and Sam Wong. 2016. “Towards a More Nuanced Theory of Elite Capture in Development Projects. The Importance of Context and Theories of Power.” Journal of Sustainable Development 9(3): 87.\nNagel, Jack. 1974. “Inequality and Discontent: A Nonlinear Hypothesis.” World Politics 26(4): 453–72.\nNarassimhan, Easwaran, Stefan Koester, and Kelly Sims Gallagher. 2022. “Carbon Pricing in the US: Examining State-Level Policy Support and Federal Resistance.” Politics and Governance 10(1). https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4857 (May 20, 2022).\nNicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Tucker Staley. 2012. “Competitive Federalism and Race to the Top Application Decisions in the American States.” Educational Policy 26(1): 160–84.\nNiedzwiecki, Sara. 2016. “Social Policies, Attribution of Responsibility, and Political Alignments: A Subnational Analysis of Argentina and Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 49(4): 457–98.\n———. 2018a. Uneven Social Policies: The Politics of Subnational Variation in Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108588225 (July 15, 2019).\n———. 2018b. Uneven Social Policies: The Politics of Subnational Variation in Latin America. 1st ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108588225/type/book (May 6, 2022).\nNiedzwiecki, Sara, and David Nunnally. 2017. “Mixed-Methods Research in the Study of Welfare States.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50(04): 1028–31.\nNiedzwiecki, Sara, and Jennifer Pribble. 2017. “Social Policies and Center-Right Governments in Argentina and Chile.” Latin American Politics and Society 59(3): 72–97.\nNishijima, M., F.M. Sarti, I. Vodenska, and G. Zhang. 2019. “Effects of Decentralization of Primary Health Care on Diabetes Mellitus in Brazil.” Public Health 166: 108–20.\nÑopo, Hugo, ed. 2012. New Century, Old Disparities: Gender and Ethnic Earnings Gaps in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, D.C: Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank.\nObinger, Herbert, Stephan Leibfried, and Francis G. Castles, eds. 2005. Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.\nOECD. 2015. Households’ Economic Well-Being: Methodological Note. Paris, France: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/sdd/na/OECD-Household-dashboard-methodological-note.pdf.\nOrhan, Sebnem Gumuscu, and Isik Gurleyen. 2014. “Clientelism in Contemporary Turkish Politics.” In Salamanca, Spain. https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/16559.\nOstrom, Elinor. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997.” American Political Science Review 92(1): 1–22.\nOstrom, Vincent, and International Center for Economic Growth, eds. 1988. Rethinking Institutional Analysis and Development: Issues, Alternatives, and Choices. San Francisco, Calif: ICS Pr.\nOtero-Bahamon, Silvia. 2016. “When the State Minds the Gap: The Politics of Subnational Inequality in Latin America.” Northwestern University.\nPacheco, Juliana, Jake Haselswerdt, and Jamila Michener. 2020. “The Affordable Care Act and Polarization in the United States.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 6(2): 114.\nPalazzolo, Daniel, Vincent G. Moscardelli, Meredith Patrick, and Doug Rubin. 2007. “Election Reform after HAVA: Voter Verification in Congress and the States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38(3): 515–37.\nParker, Susan W., and Petra E. Todd. 2017. “Conditional Cash Transfers: The Case of Progresa/Oportunidades.” Journal of Economic Literature 55(3): 866–915.\nPeluffo, Santiago. 2011. “Quién Es Claudio Poggi, El Sucesor de Los Rodríguez Saá.” La Nación. https://www.lanacion.com.ar/politica/quien-es-claudio-poggi-el-sucesor-de-los-rodriguez-saa-nid1415986/.\nPeriodistas en la Red. 2011. “Poggi Pidió Que Votaran La Boleta Completa.” Periodistas en la Red. http://www.periodistasenlared.info/octubre11-21/nota4.html.\nPermanyer, Iñaki, and Jereon Smits. 2018. “The Subnational Human Development Index: Moving beyond Country-Level Averages.” United Nations Development Program Human Development Reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/subnational-human-development-index-moving-beyond-country-level-averages.\nPierson, Paul. 1995. “Fragmented Welfare States: Federal Institutions and the Development of Social Policy.” Governance 8(4): 449–78.\nPrensa Gobierno de Mendoza. 2011. “El Desarrollo Social Como Pilar de Los Derechos Para Todos.” Gobierno de Mendoza. https://www.mendoza.gov.ar/prensa/el-desarrollo-social-como-pilar-de-los-derechos-para-todos/.\nPrzeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America.\nPutnam, Robert D., Robert Leonardi, and Raffaella Nanetti. 1994a. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. 5. print., 1. Princeton paperback print. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.\n———. 1994b. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. 5. print. and 1. Princeton paperback print., [Nachdr.]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.\nQuiroga, Sergio Ricardo. 2021a. “Argentina’s Social and Economic Crisis Is Actually a Crisis of Democracy.” The Loop: uropean Consortium for Political Research’s Political Science Blog. https://theloop.ecpr.eu/argentinas-social-and-economic-crisis-is-actually-a-crisis-of-democracy/.\n———. 2021b. “Political Personalism and Democratic Culture in San Luis, Argentina.” European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 10(1): 1–18.\nRaquiza, Maria Victoria R. 2018. “The Allure of Pantawid Pamilya: The Conditional Cash Transfer Program.” In Routledge Handbook of the Contemporary Philippines, eds. Mark R. Thompson and Eric Vincent C. Batalla. London, England: Routledge, 273–83.\nRasmussen, Magnus B., and Carl Henrik Knutsen. 2021. “Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development.” British Journal of Political Science 51(3): 1203–29.\nRegan, Priscilla M., and Christopher J. Deering. 2009. “State Oppositioni to REAL ID.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39(3): 476–505.\nReid, Lindsey. 2019. “The Generations of Human Rights.” UAB Institute for Human Rights Blog, The University of Alabama at Birmingham. https://sites.uab.edu/humanrights/2019/01/14/the-generations-of-human-rights/#:~:text=Second%20generation%20rights%20are%20based,UDHR%20focus%20on%20these%20rights.\nRigby, Elizabeth, Jennifer Hayes Clark, and Stacey Pelika. 2014. “Party Politics and Enactment of ‘Obamacare’: A Policy-Centered Analysis of Minority Party Involvement.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 39(1): 57–95.\nRigby, Elizabeth, and Jake Haselswerdt. 2013. “Hybrid Federalism, Partisan Politics, and Early Implementation of State Health Insurance Exchanges.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43(3): 368–91.\nRobles, Marcos, Marcela G. Rubio, and Marco Stampini. 2015. “Have Cash Transfers Succeeded in Reaching the Poor in Latin America and the Caribbean?” Washington DC. Inter-American Development Bank report. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/17026/have-cash-transfers-succeeded-reaching-poor-latin-america-and-caribbean.\nRogers, Melissa. 2021. “Federalism and the Welfare State in Latin America.” Regional & Federal Studies 31(1): 163–84.\nRogers, Todd, Noah J. Goldstein, and Craig R. Fox. 2018. “Social Mobilization.” Annual Review of Psychology 69(1): 357–81.\nRubinstein, Adolfo, María Clara Zerbino, Cintia Cejas, and Analía López. 2018. “Making Universal Health Care Effective in Argentina: A Blueprint for Reform.” Health Systems & Reform 4(3): 203–13.\nSaguin, Kidjie. 2018. “Why the Poor Do Not Benefit from Community-Driven Development: Lessons from Participatory Budgeting.” World Development 112: 220–32.\nSanchez, Omar. 2008. “Transformation and Decay: The de-Institutionalisation of Party Systems in South America.” Third World Quarterly 29(2): 315–37.\nSandberg, Johan, and Engel Tally. 2015. “Politicisation of Conditional Cash Transfers: The Case of Guatemala.” Development Policy Review 33(4): 503–22.\nSaragi, Siswati, Maria Ulfa Batoebara, and Nur Ambia Arma. 2021. “Analisis Pelaksanaan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Di Desa Kota Rantang Kecamatan Hamparan Perak.” PUBLIK: Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Adminsitrasi dan Pelayanan Publik Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Bina Taruna Gorontalo 8(1): 1–10.\nScarlato, Margherita, and d’Agostino, Giorgio. 2016. The Political Economy of Cash Transfers: A Comparative Analysis of Latin American and Sub-Saharan African Experiences. Bonn, Germany: German Development Institute.\nSchmidt-Catran, Alexander W. 2016. “Economic Inequality and Public Demand for Redistribution: Combining Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence.” Socio-Economic Review 14(1): 119–40.\nSeawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\nSeawright, Jason, and John Gerring. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 294–308.\nSetiawan, Koresworo. 2020. “Risma: Early 2021, Three Social Assistance Services Channels Simultaneously Throughout Indonesia.” Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. https://kemensos.go.id/en/risma-early-2021-three-social-assistance-services-channels-simultaneously-throughout-indonesia.\nSilva, Ismael Deyber Oliveira. 2019. “Financiamento Da Política de Assistência Social Em Contextos Federativos: Os Casos Da Argentina e Do Brasil (2003-2015).” Master’s Thesis. Departamento de Ciência Política. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.\nSimandjuntak, Deasy. 2021. Direct Elections, Patronage and the Failure of Party Cadre-Ship: Dynastic Politics in Indonesia. Heinrich Boell Stiftung: Bangkok, Thailand. https://th.boell.org/en/2021/07/21/dynastic-politics-indonesia.\nSkocpol, Theda, and Margaret Somers. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22(2): 174–97.\nStokes, Susan C. 2009. “Political Clientelism.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, eds. Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199566020-e-25 (May 11, 2022).\nSuahasil Nazara, and Sri Kusumastuti Rahayu. 2013. Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH): Program Bantuan Dana Tunai Bersyarat Di Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: International Policy Center for Inclusive Growth.\nSugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2011. “The Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in the Americas.” Global Social Policy 11(2–3): 250–78.\nSung, Ming-Hsi, and Hary Abdul Hakim. 2019. “Unitary, Federalized, or Decentralized?: The Case Study of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta as the Special Autonomous Regions in Indonesia.” Indonesian Comparative Law Review 1(2). http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/iclr/article/view/6930 (May 7, 2022).\nSuri, Evsa Wulan, and Yuneva. 2020. “Strategi Optimalisasi Electoral Credibility Oleh Election Stakeholders Dalam Memaksimalkan Voter Turnout Dan Cegah Vote Buying Pada Pilkada New Normal 2020: Studi Di Provinsi Bengkulu.” Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Politik 9(2): 137–47.\nSuryadinata, Leo. 2007. “The Decline of the Hegemonic Party System in Indonesia: Golkar after the Fall of Soeharto.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 29(2): 333–58.\nSyah, Moch Harun. 2015. “Ketua KPU: Pilkada Serentak Sejarah Sekaligus Tantangan.” Liputan 6. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/2244960/ketua-kpu-pilkada-serentak-sejarah-sekaligus-tantangan.\nSyamsulhakim, Ekki, and Nurzanty Khadijah. 2020. Graduating from a Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Indonesia : Results of a Household Survey of Prosperous-Independent Graduates of the Family Hope Program in 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36784.\nTan, Page Johnson. 2015. Party System Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past. eds. Allen Hicken and Erik Martinez Kuhonta. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107300385 (May 6, 2022).\nTan, Paige Johnson. 2006. “Indonesia Seven Years after Soeharto: Party System Institutionalization in a New Democracy.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 28(1): 88–114.\nTillin, Louise. 2022. “Does India Have Subnational Welfare Regimes? The Role of State Governments in Shaping Social Policy.” Territory, Politics, Governance 10(1): 86–102.\nTillin, Louise, and Anthony W. Pereira. 2017. “Federalism, Multi-Level Elections and Social Policy in Brazil and India.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 55(3): 328–52.\nTomsa, Dirk. 2014. “Party System Fragmentation in Indonesia: The Subnational Dimension.” Journal of East Asian Studies 14(2): 249–78.\nTruex, Rory. 2016. Making Autocracy Work: Representation and Responsiveness in Modern China. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781316771785/type/book (July 11, 2022).\nUbaidillah, Achmad. 2017. “A Study of Good Governance Index in Yogyakarta Special Region Between 2012 and 2016.” Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik 21(1): 13–28.\nUN ESCAP. 2019. “Indonesia’s Unified Database (UDB) Social Registry.” Social Protection Toolbox, Social Development Division, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. https://www.socialprotection-toolbox.org/practice/indonesias-unified-database-udb-social-registry.\nValentim, Vicente, Ana Ruipérez Núñez, and Elias Dinas. 2021. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Hands-on Guide for Practice.” Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 51(2): 250–68.\nVOI. 2022. “Jakarta Social Services Agency Starts Disbursing Welfare Program Social Assistance Gradually.” VOI. https://voi.id/en/news/155607/jakarta-social-services-agency-starts-disbursing-welfare-program-social-assistance-gradually.\nVoronchikhina, Ekaterina. 2018. “Features and Problems of Using Gross Regional Product as an Integral Indicator of Economic Development.” Reforma 1(77): 13–17.\nWasim, Babur, Astri Sri Sulastri, Agnes Salyanty, and Karthick Morchan. 2019. Operations Assessment and Impact Evaluation of Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). Jakarta, Indonesia: Microsave Consulting. https://www.microsave.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Report-on-Findings-of-Impact-Evaluation-of-Program-Keluarga-Harapan-PKH.pdf.\nWeissheimer, Marco Aurélio. 2006. Bolsa Família: Avanços, Limites e Possibilidades Do Programa Que Está Transformando a Vida de Milhões de Famílias No Brasil. 1a ed. São Paulo, SP, Brasil: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.\nWeitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2014. Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139683579 (May 6, 2022).\nWooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2016. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Sixth edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.\nYin, Robert K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sixth edition. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.; G0107862010; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/141832; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/141832/1/201001.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/141832
https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202201353
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/141832/1/201001.pdf

المؤلفون: 宋映泉, 罗朴尚, 黄晓婷, 曾育彪, 张林秀, 罗斯高

المساهمون: 北京大学中国教育财政科学研究所 100871, 香港青年发展基金, 中国科学院农业政策研究中心, 斯坦福大学

المصدر: 万方

مصطلحات موضوعية: 民办打工子弟学校 有条件现金转移支付方式 流动儿童教育 随机控制实验

Relation: 2011年中国教育经济学年会论文集中国教育学会.; 1179187; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/275232

الاتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/275232