نتائج البحث - "整合科技接受模型"

1

Academic Journal

外籍勞工的跨境匯款—由誰出線？ ; Cross-border Remittances of Foreign Workers--Which Company Should Apply?

المساهمون: 資管博六

مصطلحات موضوعية: 監理沙盒, 顧客價值, 整合科技接受模型, Regulatory sandbox, Customer value, UTAUT

وصف الملف: 111 bytes; text/html

Relation: MIS Review, Vol.23, No.1/2, pp.21-36; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/147945; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/147945/1/index.html

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/147945
https://doi.org/10.6131/MISR.2021.2301.02
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/147945/1/index.html

View record in BASE

2

Dissertation/ Thesis

差評如潮、銷量激增？以UTAUT2及情感依附探討《寶可夢》遊戲之持續使用現象 ; Exploring the Continuous Intention of Playing Pokémon Games A Research Based on UTAUT2 Model and Emotional Attachment

المؤلفون: 賈天擇, JIA, TIANZE

المساهمون: 陳聖智, Sheng-Chih Chen

مصطلحات موضوعية: 寶可夢, 滿意度, 持續使用意圖, 延伸型整合科技接受模型, 情感依附, 網路口碑, Pokémon, Satisfaction, Continuous Intention, UTAUT2, Emotional Attachment, E-WOM

وصف الملف: 4854298 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 中文部分\nDeloitte（2022年5月11日）。2022數位媒體趨勢:向元宇宙邁進。勤業眾信聯合會計師事務所。2022年10月取自：https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/about-deloitte/articles/pr20220511-2022-digital-media-trends-report.html\nFunglr Games（2021）。到底哪裡不一樣？各款Nintendo Switch性能統整！Funglr Games。2022年10月取自：https://funglr.games/zh/other/nintendo-switch-spec-comparison/\nLiao Lorry（2018）。為什麼 Nike 找來 Colin Kaepernick 宣傳「Just Do It」會引發這麼大的騷動？GQ。2023年4月取自：https://www.gq.com.tw/fashion/content-37172\nMBA智庫（2023）。品牌效應。MBA智庫。2023年4月取自：https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C%E6%95%88%E5%BA%94\nMr. Figurant（2022年7月4日）。娛樂產業論文筆記14：電子遊戲產業的價值創造。知乎。2022年10月取自：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/537240373\nNintendo HK官方頻道（製作人）（2019年11月22日）。『寶可夢劍/盾』介紹影片（台灣）【影片】。YouTube。2022年10月取自：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP4N7lJGgb8\nNintendo HK官方頻道（製作人）（2019年11月22日）。『寶可夢劍/盾』介紹影片（香港）【影片】。YouTube。2022年10月取自：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuFTw6IbLaQ\nNoboru昇（製作人）（2022年5月30日）。寶可夢遊戲歷代主角合集｜ポケモンゲーム歴代の主人公｜Pokémon Game : Main Character (1996-2022)【影片】。2022年10月取自：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KHkB4mlcPE&t=12s\nPwC Taiwan（2020年7月20日）。2020全球消費者洞察報告。資誠聯合會計師事務所。2022年10月取自：https://pwc.to/2BdZXx9\nShower Language（2022年2月16日）。【Switch】誰說老任不給退款？——記一次任天堂美服switch成功退款經歷！3樓貓。2022年10月取自：https://game.3loumao.org/36346?language=zh-tw\nTedros（2020年4月22日）。世衛組織總幹事2020年4月22日在2019冠狀病毒病(COVID-19)疫情媒體通報會上的講話。世界衛生組織。2022年10月取自：https://www.who.int/zh/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19--22-april-2020\nTNL Research（2021）。聚焦家用遊戲機的台灣市佔率及玩家感受台灣2021 年七月最新狀況。TNL Research。2022年10月取自：https://www.thenewslens.com/article/154242\nWang Yen（2019）。“負面行銷”真的有效？思考負面行銷的運作方式。Medium。2023年4月取自：https://medium.com/%E6%84%9F%E6%80%A7%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88%E7%9A%84%E5%AF%A6%E8%B8%90/%E8%B2%A0%E9%9D%A2%E8%A1%8C%E9%8A%B7-%E7%9C%9F%E7%9A%84%E6%9C%89%E6%95%88%E5%97%8E-4fa7ea7dabd9\nWebley B.（2019）。遊戲中是否存在「價值」問題？Facebook Gaming。2022年10月取自：https://www.facebook.com/fbgaminghome/blog/marketers/is-there-a-value-problem-in-gaming?locale=zh_TW\nポケモン公式YouTubeチャンネル（製作人）（2019年6月5日）【公式】『ポケットモンスターソード・シールド』プロモーション映像【影片】。YouTube。2022年10月取自：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNOI_ZxZwIg&t=11s\n任天堂官網（2022）。Nintendo Switch家族功能。任天堂。2022年10月取自：https://www.nintendo.tw/hardware/switch/compare/\n任天堂（2021年11月5日）。2022年3月期第2四半期決算説明會兼經營方針説明會。任天堂株式會社。\n任天堂（2022）。主要販賣業績。任天堂。2023年3月取自：https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/finance/software/index.html\n任天堂（2023）。寶可夢系列最新作品《寶可夢朱/紫》。任天堂。2023年3月取自：https://www.pokemon.co.jp/ex/sv_dlc/sc/news/\n任天堂（製作人）（2022年7月14日）。新垣結衣出演,《Nintendo Switch運動》夏日遊戲宣傳影片 Nintendo Switch Sports - Official Summer Trailer【影片】。YouTube。2023年7月取自：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utPt3a0SIRY\n何恭齊（2018）。應用結構方程式於擴增實境遊戲之社會行為分析-個案研究。國立臺灣科技大學工業管理系未出版碩士論文。\n何采錚（2021）。臺灣熟齡族對Pokémon GO遊戲的黏著度分析。國立臺灣科技大學設計系未出版碩士論文。\n佰態（2022年2月28日）。當“獨占遊戲”失去意義。界面財經號。2022年10月取自：https://m.jiemian.com/article/7150159.html\n倪爽（2021年3月31日）。遊戲行業深度報告——在科技與流量變遷中演進的遊戲行業。太平洋證券。\n劉美倫（2019）。影響手機遊戲玩家的持續使用意願之研究-以Pokémon Go為例。華梵大學資訊管理學系碩士班未出版碩士論文。\n吳培瑜（2017）。臺中市太平區國小高年級學童沉迷於“精靈寶可夢GO”之形成原因及其影響。大葉大學工業工程與管理學系未出版碩士論文。\n吳采倪（2021）。不同世代者參與數位遊戲行為之研究：以寶可夢為例。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系未出版碩士論文。\n周志民（2007）。品牌關係型態之本土化研究。南開管理評論，10（2），69-75。\n唐淑珍（2021）。中高齡玩家之遊戲吸引要素分析—以寶可夢GO為例。國立雲林科技大學設計學研究所未出版碩士論文。\n姜岩、董大海（2008）。品牌依戀的概念架構及其理論發展。心理科學進展，16（4），606-617。\n寶可夢官方（2019）。『寶可夢』系列簡介。寶可夢官方。2022年10月取自：https://game.portal-pokemon.com/sword_shield/tc/story/02.html\n寶可夢官方（製作人）（2019年6月5日）【官方】『寶可夢劍』『寶可夢盾』宣傳影片【影片】。YouTube。2022年10月取自：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aym-gRLkNkM&t=1s\n張巧真、陳筠惠（2014）。應用延伸型整合科技接受模式探討線上購買意願以雙媒介之觀點。電子商務研究，12（2），143-168。\n張白苓（2014）。數位遊戲的美學。台灣藝術教育網。2023年4月取自：https://ed.arte.gov.tw/ch/content/m_periodical_content_1.aspx?AE_SNID=3309&mytype=1\n張高禎（2017）。影響使用Pokémon GO遊戲的關鍵因素。輔仁大學資訊管理學系碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文。\n徐瑞縈（2018）。遊戲動機與網路社群資訊分享對精靈寶可夢GO玩家遊戲體驗滿意度探索-皮卡丘效應的驗證。育達科技大學行銷與流通管理所未出版碩士論文。\n戚嘉惠（2020）。延伸型整合型科技接受模式探討旅客對於機場自助報到服務之關係研究。輔仁大學餐旅管理學系碩士班未出版碩士論文。\n掌遊寶（2019）。寶可夢劍盾銷量破了紀錄，那它是最好的寶可夢遊戲嗎？騰訊內容開放平台。2022年10月取自：https://page.om.qq.com/page/ORBaWmx5swGmOgm-M2c4JMjw0\n曾堃祁（2018）。探討各代遊戲系統使用者喜好及族群分佈比例之研究-精靈寶可夢主系列遊戲為例。建國科技大學創意生活應用設計研究所未出版碩士論文。\n曾柏鈞（2020）。探討影響消費者對線上影音串流平台使用行為之研究以延伸性整合型科技接受模型為例。國立屏東科技大學企業管理系所未出版碩士論文。\n李傳薇（2021）。中高齡寶可夢遊戲玩家的遊戲經驗研究。佛光大學傳播學系未出版碩士論文。\n李可人（2021）。玩遊戲還能賺錢，可靠嗎？從遊戲平均壽命，看幣圈新話題GameFi的暗藏風險。風傳媒。2023年4月取自：https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/3938971?page=2\n李康樂（2018）。互聯網時代的“頭部效應”。人民網。2023年4月取自：http://media.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0718/c40628-30155445.html\n李金銓（2017）。傳播研究的時空脈絡。開放時代：215-231。\n林亮妤（2022）。以延伸型整合性科技接受模型與網路特性探討線上募資課程之使用與購買意圖。國立政治大學數位內容碩士學位學程未出版碩士論文。\n林姿旻（2011）。數位遊戲之行動載具使用者行為與開發分析─以智慧型手機為例。國立政治大學數位內容碩士學位學程未出版碩士論文。\n林少龍、紀婉萍（2018）。品牌態度及情緒依附對聯合品牌行為意圖之影響。全球管理與經濟，14（2），1-16。\n林育則、陳奕奇（2014）。正負面網路口碑對購買意願之影響：探討產品特性與產品涉入之調節效果。電子商務研究，13（2），167-193。\n林采臣（2021）。社群體驗價值、品牌社群承諾與品牌忠誠度關係之研究以全家便利商店為例。嶺東科技大學行銷與流通管理系未出版碩士論文。\n榮泰生、林建宏（2008）。負面口碑傳播與消費者轉換意願之關係探討。數據分析，3（5），83-108。\n武修硯（2018）。“精靈寶可夢GO”之台灣中高齡玩家研究：特質、活躍程度及遊戲態度。東海大學日本語言文化學系未出版碩士論文。\n王威翰（2022年2月5日）。【遊戲設計藝術】毫無藝術細胞，美學對於我們來說意味著什麼？知乎。2022年10月取自：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/464153960\n王映舜（2022）。手機遊戲玩家之人格特質、遊戲行為與基本需求滿意度相關研究：以寶可夢GO為例。國立高雄師範大學諮商心理與復健諮商研究所未出版碩士論文。\n王本正、許富榕（2016）。以延伸型整合性科技接受模式探討行動醫療App協助照護任務之接受度。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，4（4），483-494。\n疯癫的A兵者（2021年11月26日）。如何看待《寶可夢晶燦鑽石/明亮珍珠》日本首周銷量排名 Switch 第二，超越劍盾？知乎。2022年10月取自：https://www.zhihu.com/question/501449403/answer/2243789799\n瘋癲的A兵者（2016）。【回顧】一個普通口袋迷眼中的2016年。知乎。2022年10月取自：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/24662856\n瘋癲的A兵者（2018）。【回顧】一個普通口袋迷眼中的2018年：盛名之下，其實難副。知乎。2022年10月取自：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/55651887\n瘋癲的A兵者（2019）。如何評價 Game Freak 這家公司？知乎。2022年10月取自：https://www.zhihu.com/question/308120383/answer/603834145\n瘋癲的A兵者（2021）。為什麼我覺得《精靈寶可夢：劍與盾》沒有記憶中的黑白畫質好玩？知乎。2022年10月取自：https://www.zhihu.com/question/360809823\n百度百科（2023）。爆款。百度百科。2023年4月取自：https://baike.baidu.hk/item/%E7%88%86%E6%AC%BE/2277177\n神奇寶貝百科（2022）。寶可夢劍/盾。神奇寶貝百科。2022年10月取自：https://wiki.52poke.com/wiki/%E5%AF%B6%E5%8F%AF%E5%A4%A2_%E5%8A%8D%EF%BC%8F%E7%9B%BE\n神奇寶貝百科（2022）。版本限定寶可夢。神奇寶貝百科。2022年10月取自：https://wiki.52poke.com/zh-hans/%E7%89%88%E6%9C%AC%E9%99%90%E5%AE%9A%E5%AE%9D%E5%8F%AF%E6%A2%A6\n維基百科（2022）。Metacritic。維基百科。2022年10月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacritic\n維基百科（2022）。任天堂Switch。維基百科。2022年10月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BB%BB%E5%A4%A9%E5%A0%82Switch\n維基百科（2022）。塑化劑。維基百科。2023年5月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A1%91%E5%8C%96%E5%8A%91\n維基百科（2022）。寶可夢 GO。維基百科。2023年5月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/Pok%C3%A9mon_GO\n維基百科（2022）。寶可夢系列電子遊戲列表。維基百科。2022年10月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%AF%B6%E5%8F%AF%E5%A4%A2%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%97%E9%9B%BB%E5%AD%90%E9%81%8A%E6%88%B2%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8\n維基百科（2022）。暢銷任天堂Switch遊戲列表。維基百科。2022年10月取自：https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-hans/%E7%95%85%E9%94%80%E4%BB%BB%E5%A4%A9%E5%A0%82Switch%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8\n維基百科（2022）。暢銷電子遊戲系列列表。維基百科。2022年10月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%95%85%E9%94%80%E7%94%B5%E5%AD%90%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%97%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8\n維基百科（2022）。第八世代遊戲機。維基百科。2022年10月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%AC%AC%E5%85%AB%E4%B8%96%E4%BB%A3%E9%81%8A%E6%88%B2%E6%A9%9F\n維基百科（2022）。精靈寶可夢中文版命名爭議。維基百科。2022年10月取自：https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh/%E7%B2%BE%E9%9D%88%E5%AF%B6%E5%8F%AF%E5%A4%A2%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87%E7%89%88%E5%91%BD%E5%90%8D%E7%88%AD%E8%AD%B0\n維基百科（2022）。餿水油。維基百科。2023年5月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%9C%B0%E6%B2%9F%E6%B2%B9\n維基百科（2023）。台北女子圖鑑。維基百科。2023年4月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%97%E5%A5%B3%E5%AD%90%E5%9C%96%E9%91%91\n維基百科（2023）。寶可夢遊戲機制。維基百科。2023年3月取自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/%E5%AF%B6%E5%8F%AF%E5%A4%A2%E9%81%8A%E6%88%B2%E6%A9%9F%E5%88%B6\n網易遊戲頻道（2019）。寶可夢劍盾評分解禁遊戲簡化褒貶不一。網易新聞。2022年10月取自：https://www.163.com/game/article/ETUKJLI3003198EF.html\n艾希頓（2020）。策略行銷與財務分析案例研究：以臺灣Pokémon Go為例。國立政治大學國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA) 未出版碩士論文。\n蔡佩珊（2017）。消費者對於Pokémon GO手機遊戲接受行為之研究-情感依附與從眾行為的干擾效果。台中科技大學企業管理系碩士班未出版碩士論文。\n蔡嘉明（2019）使用者對手機遊戲不持續使用意願之研究-以寶可夢為例。淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文。\n蕭岳展（2016）。手機遊戲對人際關係之影響-以寶可夢為例。義守大學資訊管理學系未出版碩士論文。\n裴培（2019年5月9日）。遊戲主機戰爭史：持續四十年、價值千億美元的巨人對決。國金證券研究所。\n謝芝庭（2017）。寶可夢無所不在：探討擴增實境手機遊戲之享樂感及其對地方依附之影響。國立中山大學行銷傳播管理研究所未出版碩士論文。\n遲毓珊（2020）。寶可夢玩家自戀特質與遊戲持續參與研究：以心流經驗為調節變項。銘傳大學諮商與工商心理學系碩士班未出版碩士論文。\n邵鈺珊（2021年7月30日）。台灣 2021年七月最新遊戲產業狀況 - 家用遊戲機的台灣市佔率及玩家感受。TNL research。2022年10月取自：https://research.tnlmedia.com/article/6\n郭曉凌（2007）。消費者品牌敏感：模型與實證。北京：對外經濟貿易大學出版社。\n錢宛青（2019）。中高齡玩家在精靈寶可夢 GO 的社會互動與連結。國立交通大學客家學院傳播與科技學系碩士班未出版碩士論文。\n鏡週刊（2018）。黑糖非手炒還摻色素！“老虎堂”全認了。鏡週刊。2023年4月取自：https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E9%BB%91%E7%B3%96%E9%9D%9E%E6%89%8B%E7%82%92%E9%82%84%E6%91%BB%E8%89%B2%E7%B4%A0-%E8%80%81%E8%99%8E%E5%A0%82-%E5%85%A8%E8%AA%8D%E4%BA%86-061023799.html\n陳郁文（2022）。2022年熱搜台劇/《台北女子圖鑑》僅第四冠軍“連紅2年”不退燒。TVBS新聞網。2023年3月取自：https://news.tvbs.com.tw/entertainment/1998264\n雷莉、馬謀超（2003）。品牌延伸中母品牌的作用機制。心理科學進展，11（3），350-354。\n黃翠雯（2018）。寶可夢對台灣遊戲類股績效之影響。大葉大學管理學院碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文。\n黄偉倫（2017）。探討玩家在線上遊戲的持續使用意圖：以 Pokémon GO 為例。國立嘉義大學資訊管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文。\n\n英文部分\nAaker J. L. (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 45-57.\nBenbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for In¬formation Systems, 8(4). doi:10.17705/1jais.00126\nBhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expec¬tation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 351-370.\nBlackson, M. (1992). Observation: Building brand equity by managing the brand’ s relationship. Journal of Advertising Research, 32, 101-105.\nBlythe, J., & Sethna, Z. (2019). Consumer Behavior. London, UK: Sage Publications.\nBodker, M., Gimpel, G., and Hedman, J. (2009, Nov 13). The User Experience of Smart Phones: A Consumption Values Approach. 8th. Global Mobility Roundtable (GMR 2009): Transformation through Mobility. Cairo, Egypt.\nBowlby J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Vol.2. Separation. New York: Basic Books.\nBrown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 399-426.\nBuchholz, K. (2021, Feb 24). The Pokémon Franchise Caught `Em All. Retrieved from: https://www.statista.com/chart/24277/media-franchises-with-most-sales/\nChen, L. S. L., Kuan, C. J., Lee, Y. H., & Huang, H. L. (2011). Applicability of the UTAUT Model in Playing Online Game through Mobile Phones: Moderating Ef¬fects of User Experience. IEEE International Technology Management Confer¬ence. Taipei, R.O.C.\nChen, Y. C., Shang, R. A., & Lin, A. K. (2008). The Intention to Download Music Files in A P2P Environment: Consumption Value, Fashion, and Ethical Decision Perspectives. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 411-422.\nDavis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information system: Theory and results. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Sloan School of management, Cambridge, MA.\nDe Moura, V. F., de Souza, C. A., & Viana, A. B. N. (2021). The use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS) in blended learning courses and the functional value perceived by students. Computers & Education, 161, 1-14.\nDodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers` product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.\nEngel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1986). Consumer Behavior (5th ed.). NY: Dryden Press.\nFishbein, M. & Ajzen, L. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduc¬tion to theory and research (pp. 53-89). MA: Addison-Wesley.\nFiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based af¬fective responses: developments in schema-triggered effect. In Sorrentino R. M., & Higgins E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition (pp. 167-204). New York: Guilford Press.\nFournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationships theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343- 373.\nGelb, B. & Sundaram, S. (2002). Adapting to “word of mouse”. Business Horizons, 45(4), 21-25.\nHeijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28 (4), 695-704.\nHennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.\nHerr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). The effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 454-462.\nHolbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consump¬tion: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2),132-140.\nHouston, M. B., & Walker, B. A. (1996). Self-relevance and purchase goals: Mapping a consumer decision. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 232-245.\nIGN (Producer) (2019, Jun 6). Pokémon Sword and Shield Trailer - New Pokémon, Legendries, Dynamax [Motion picture]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBYORdr_TY8&t=2s\nIGN (Producer) (2019, Nov 13). Pokémon Sword and Pokémon Shield Review [Mo¬tion picture]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSX_kvdV9o0&t=275s\nInfluencer Marking Hub (2023). Facebook Gaming. Influencer Marking Hub. Re¬trieved from: https://influencermarketinghub.com/glossary/facebook-gaming/\nLacoeuilhe, J. & Samy, B. (2007). Quelle(s) mesure(s) pour l’attachement de la marque ? Revue Française Du Marketing, 213(7), 7-25.\nLee, Y., Kim, J., Lee, I., & Kim, H. (2002). A Cross-cultural Study on the Value Struc¬ture of Mobile Internet Usage: Comparison between Korea and Japan. Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(4), 227-239.\nLeo, Y. M. S., Stella L. M. S., Oliver, H. M. Y. & Kwong, K. (2001). Chinese women at the crossroads: an empirical study on their role orientations and consumption values in Chinese society. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(4), 348-367.\nLutz, R. J. (1975). Changing Brand Attitudes Through Modification of Cognitive Structure. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.1, 49-59.\nMaheswaran, Durairaj, & Joan, Meyers-Levy (1990). The Influence of Message Framing and Issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 27 (August), 361-367.\nMarchand, A., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2013). Value Creation in the Video Game Indus¬try: Industry Economics, Consumer Benefits, and Research Opportunities. Jour¬nal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3), 141-157.\nMcEwen, W. J. (2005). Married to the brand: Why consumers bond with some brands for life. Gallup Press, 66-68.\nMiserski, R. W. (1982). An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, 301-310.\nMorosan, C. (2016). An empirical examination of US travelers’ intentions to use bio-metric e-gates in airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 55, 120-128.\nMugge, R., & Govers, P. C. M. (2004). I love my jeeps, because it’ s tough like me-the effect of product-personality congruence on product attachment. In Kurtgözü, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Design and Emotion (pp. 1-15). Ankara.\nNintendo of America (Producer) (2019, Nov 16). Pokémon Sword & Pokémon Shield - Overview Trailer - Nintendo Switch [Motion picture]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPO2ouGn0lA\nNintendo UK (Producer) (2019, Jun 8). Pokémon Sword and Pokémon Shield - Wel¬come to the Galar region! (Nintendo Switch) [Motion picture]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYtxkcs0DWE\nNunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.\nOliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of antecedents and consequences of satisfac¬tion decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.\nOllie Ambience (2023). The Most Relaxing Pokémon Video Ever %7C Casseroya Lake Ambience & Music [Motion picture]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNuY9rbGUio\nPark, B. W., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Exploring the Value of Purchasing Online Game items. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2178-2185.\nPark, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.\nPark, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., & Prester, J. (2006). Beyond attitudes: Attachment and consumer behavior. Seoul Journal Business, 12(2), 3-35.\nPark, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., & Priester, J. (2007). Brand Attachment and Manage¬ment of a Strategic Example. In Schmitt, B. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Brand Expe¬rience Management (pp. 1-36). MA: Elgar Publishing.\nPatricio R.-C., Francisco J. R.-C., Jorge A.-G., & Félix M.-V. (2019). Analyzing the acceptation of online games in mobile devices: An application of UTAUT2. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 85-93.\nRichins, M. L. (1984). Negative Word-of Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot Study. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47, 68-78.\nSchepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & management, 44(1), 90-103.\nSheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A the¬ory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.\nSirgy M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical reviews. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 531-547.\nSkowronski, J. J. & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue dignosticity in negativity, positivity and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 689-690.\nSung, K. S., & Lee, S. (2022). Customer brand co-creation behavior and brand sincer¬ity through CSR interactivity: The role of psychological implications in service-dominant logic. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108. Re¬trieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103388\nThach, E. C., & Olsen, J. (2006). The role of service quality in influencing brand at¬tachment at winery visitor center. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 7(3), 59-77.\nThe Official Pokémon YouTube channel (Producer) (2019, Jun 5). UK: Get Ready for Dynamax in Pokémon Sword and Pokémon Shield! [Motion picture]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uklE71iEMA\nThomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2005). The ties that bind: The strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psycholo¬gy, 15(1), 77-91.\nThong, J. Y., Hong, S. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. In¬ternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64 (9), 799-810.\nVenkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology ac¬ceptance model: Four longitude field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.\nVenkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478.\nVenkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of infor¬mation technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of tech¬nology. MIS Quarterly, 157-178.\nWright, P. (1974). The Harassed Decision Maker: Time Pressures, Distractions, and the Use of Evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 59 (May), 555-561.\nZeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-end Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.; G0109464063; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/146595; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/146595/1/406301.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/146595
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/146595/1/406301.pdf

View record in BASE

3

Conference

網路購物推薦系統消費者接受意願之研究

المؤلفون: 黃謙順, 蘇意晴, 蔣培瑜

المساهمون: 資管系

مصطلحات موضوعية: 推薦系統, 整合科技接受模型, 接受意願

وصف الملف: 738284 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: KC 2013第九屆知識社群研討會論文集 p.772-783; http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw//handle/987654321/25060; http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/25060/2/KC01.pdf

الاتاحة: http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw//handle/987654321/25060
http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/25060/2/KC01.pdf

View record in BASE

4

以文字探勘與偏最小平方法結構方程推衍影響消費者接受汽車自動駕駛系統之關鍵要素 ; Derivations of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Automated Driving Systems by Text Mining and PLS-SEM

المؤلفون: 梁秉宏, LIANG, Ping-Hung

المساهمون: 呂有豐, Lue, Yeou-Feng

مصطلحات موضوعية: 自動駕駛系統, 整合科技接受模型, 文字探勘, 偏最小平方法結構方程式, Automated Driving Systems, UTAUT, Text Mining, PLS-SEM, info, manag

Relation: http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/117881

الاتاحة: http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/117881
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12235/117881

View record in BASE

5

以文字探勘與偏最小平方法結構方程推衍影響消費者接受汽車自動駕駛系統之關鍵要素 ; Derivations of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Automated Driving Systems by Text Mining and PLS-SEM

المؤلفون: 梁秉宏, LIANG, Ping-Hung

المساهمون: 呂有豐, Lue, Yeou-Feng

مصطلحات موضوعية: 自動駕駛系統, 整合科技接受模型, 文字探勘, 偏最小平方法結構方程式, Automated Driving Systems, UTAUT, Text Mining, PLS-SEM

Relation: 008702314-40537; https://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/thesis/detail/3d43cd82fc0f593397c3f98bcceba76c/; http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/117881

الاتاحة: http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/117881
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12235/117881
https://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/thesis/detail/3d43cd82fc0f593397c3f98bcceba76c/

View record in BASE

6

Dissertation/ Thesis

擁抱它還是抗拒它?金融產品運用區塊鏈技術與消費者使用意圖 ; Embrace it or Reject it ?Applying Blockchain Technology in Banking and Customer Behavioral Intentions

المؤلفون: 賴潔怜

المساهمون: 國際貿易學系

مصطلحات موضوعية: 金融科技, 區塊鏈技術, 整合科技接受模型, 從眾行為, 消費者使用意圖, FinTech, Blockchain, UTAUT2, conformity, customer behavioral intentions

وصف الملف: 99 bytes; text/html

Relation: http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw//handle/987654321/51357; http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/51357/2/index.html

الاتاحة: http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw//handle/987654321/51357
http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/51357/2/index.html

View record in BASE

7

Dissertation/ Thesis

以TPE結合UTAUT2及HBM評估使用健康智慧手環之關鍵因素 ; Critical Factors of Adopting Smart Health Bracelet: The Perspectives of TPE, UTAUT2 and HBM

المؤلفون: 劉育誠, Liu, Yu-Cheng

المساهمون: 洪叔民, Horng, Shwu-Min

مصطلحات موضوعية: 智慧手環, 健康, 科技-個人-環境, 延伸整合科技接受模型, 健康信念模型, Smart Bracelet, Health, TPE, UTAUT2, HBM

وصف الملف: 4179239 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 1. Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. (1993). Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Academy of management review, 18(3), 487-517.\n2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.\n3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prince Hall, 249-259.\n4. Alalwan, A. A. (2020). Mobile food ordering apps: An empirical study of the factors affecting customer e-satisfaction and continued intention to reuse. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 28-44.\n5. Al-Gahtani, S. S., Hubona, G. S., & Wang, J. (2007). Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT. Information & management, 44(8), 681-691.\n6. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.\n7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.\n8. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.\n9. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986, 23-28.\n10. Becker, M. H. (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health education monographs, 2, 324-473.\n11. Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS quarterly, 399-426.\n12. Chau, P. Y., & Hui, K. L. (1998). Identifying early adopters of new IT products: A case of Windows 95. Information & management, 33(5), 225-230.\n13. Chen, D., Lin, Z., & Lai, F. (2010). Crossing the chasm-understanding china`s rural digital divide. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13(2), 4-36.\n14. Colquitt, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., & Sheppard, L. (2002). Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: The moderating effect of openness to experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 402.\n15. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211.\n16. Darley, W. K., & Smith, R. E. (1995). Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity model in advertising response. Journal of advertising, 24(1), 41-56.\n17. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.\n18. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.\n19. Deaux, K. and Kite, M. E. (1987) “Thinking About Gender.” in Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research. B. B. Hess and M. M. Ferree, (eds.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 92–117.\n20. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160.\n21. Emdad, A. F., Badamas, M., & Mouakket, S. (2009). Factors and impacts of low utilization of Internet: The case of Arab countries. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 18(3), 2.\n22. Fadil, P., Smatt, C., Segrest, S. L., & Owen, C. (2009). The moderating effects of technology on career success: can social networks shatter the glass ceiling?. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 18(3), 8.\n23. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, 5, 177-189.\n24. Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.). (2008). Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. John Wiley & Sons.\n25. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ.\n26. Grein, J., Ohmagari, N., Shin, D., Diaz, G., Asperges, E., Castagna, A., . & Flanigan, T. (2020). Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(24), 2327-2336.\n27. Harcourt, M., Lam, H., & Harcourt, S. (2005). Discriminatory practices in hiring: Institutional and rational economic perspectives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(11), 2113-2132.\n28. Harrison, J. A., Mullen, P. D., & Green, L. W. (1992). A meta-analysis of studies of the health belief model with adults. Health education research, 7(1), 107-116.\n29. Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative science quarterly, 472-500.\n30. IDC. (2015). Fueled by Growing Demand for Smart Wearables, IDC Forecasts Worldwide Wearable Shipments to Reach 173.4 Million, Retrieved from https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150914005126/en/Fueled-by-Growing-Demand-for-Smart-Wearables-IDC-Forecasts-Worldwide-Wearable-Shipments-to-Reach-173.4-Million-by-2019\n31. IDC. (2019)Worldwide Wearables Shipments Surge 94.6% in 3Q 2019 Led by Expanding Hearables Market, Says IDC. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS45712619\n32. IDC. (2020). Shipments of Wearable Devices Reach 118.9 Million Units in the Fourth Quarter and 336.5 Million for 2019, According to IDC. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS46122120\n33. IDC. (2020). Worldwide Quarterly Wearables Tracker.\n34. IDC. (2020). Worldwide Wearables Market to Top 300 Million Units in 2019 and Nearly 500 Million Units in 2023, Says IDC. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS45737919\n35. Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health education quarterly, 11(1), 1-47.\n36. Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & management, 35(4), 237-250.\n37. Kim, S. S., Malhotra, N. K., & Narasimhan, S. (2005). Research note—two competing perspectives on automatic use: A theoretical and empirical comparison. Information systems research, 16(4), 418-432.\n38. Lee, H. J., Cho, H. J., Xu, W., & Fairhurst, A. (2010). The influence of consumer traits and demographics on intention to use retail self‐service checkouts. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28(1), 46-58.\n39. Lee, S. W., Sung, H. J., & Jeon, H. M. (2019). Determinants of continuous intention on food delivery apps: extending UTAUT2 with information quality. Sustainability, 11(11), 3141.\n40. Lee, Y., & Kozar, K. A. (2008). An empirical investigation of anti-spyware software adoption: A multitheoretical perspective. Information & Management, 45(2), 109-119.\n41. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual review of sociology, 14(1), 319-338.\n42. Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American journal of sociology, 44(6), 868-896.\n43. Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS quarterly, 59-87.\n44. Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS quarterly, 59-87.\n45. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 140, 44–53.\n46. Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS quarterly, 705-737.\n47. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods, 1(2), 130.\n48. Martinez‐Lopez, L., Martinez‐Lopez, F. J., Murray, K. B., Liang, J., & Häubl, G. (2010). ACT 2.0: the next generation of assistive consumer technology research. Internet Research, 20(3), 232-254.\n49. Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation, Retrive from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1942-00109-000\n50. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research, 2(3), 192-222.\n51. Owusu Kwateng, K., Osei Atiemo, K., & Appiah, C. (2019). Acceptance and use of mobile banking: an application of UTAUT2. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(1), 118-151.\n52. Palau-Saumell, R., Forgas-Coll, S., Sánchez-García, J., & Robres, E. (2019). User acceptance of mobile apps for restaurants: An expanded and extended UTAUT-2. Sustainability, 11(4), 1210.\n53. Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International journal of electronic commerce, 7(3), 101-134.\n54. Pender, N. J. (1975). A conceptual model for preventive health behavior. Nursing outlook, 23(6), 385.\n55. Ralston, A. (1976). Encyclopedia of computer science. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.\n56. Raman, A., & Don, Y. (2013). Preservice teachers` acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model. International Education Studies, 6(7), 157-164.\n57. Ramírez-Correa, P., Rondán-Cataluña, F. J., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Martín-Velicia, F. (2019). Analysing the acceptation of online games in mobile devices: An application of UTAUT2. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 85-93.\n58. Rogers, E. (1983). M.; Diffusion of Innovations(3rd ed.), Free Press, New York.\n59. Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences / John T. Roscoe(2nd ed.), Rinehart and Winston, New York : Holt.\n60. Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health education monographs, 2(4), 328-335.\n61. Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health education quarterly, 15(2), 175-183.\n62. Rosenwald, M. (2020). History’s Deadliest Pandemics, from Ancient Rome to Modern America. Washington Post–April 7, 2020,.\n63. Saunders, G. H., Frederick, M. T., Silverman, S., & Papesh, M. (2013). Application of the health belief model: Development of the hearing beliefs questionnaire (HBQ) and its associations with hearing health behaviors. International Journal of Audiology, 52(8), 558-567.\n64. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner`s guide to structural equation modeling(2nd ed.), Psychology Press, New York.\n65. Shaw, N., & Sergueeva, K. (2019). The non-monetary benefits of mobile commerce: Extending UTAUT2 with perceived value. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 44-55.\n66. Sheeran, P., & Abraham, C. (1996). The health belief model. Predicting health behaviour, 2, 29-80.\n67. Shi, W., Shambare, N., & Wang, J. (2008). The adoption of internet banking: An institutional theory perspective. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 12(4), 272-286.\n68. Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management science, 42(1), 85-92.\n69. Tauber, E. M. (1972). Marketing notes and communications: why do people shop?. Journal of marketing, 36(4), 46-49.\n70. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.\n71. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS quarterly, 125-143.\n72. Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, (1), 28-45.\n73. Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of technological innovation, Lexington, Mass. : Lexington Books.\n74. Toth, N., & Schick, K. (2007). Overview of paleolithic archaeology. Handbook of paleoanthropology, 3, 1943-1964.\n75. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.\n76. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.\n77. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.\n78. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.\n79. W. Richard SCOTT (1995), Institutions and Organizations. Ideas, Interests and Identities. M@ n@ gement, 17(2), 136-140.\n80. Yang, S. (2013). Understanding undergraduate students` adoption of mobile learning model: A perspective of the extended UTAUT2. Journal of convergence information technology, 8(10), 969.\n81. 工研院產業經濟與趨勢究中心. (2015). 穿戴式裝置的發展趨勢與機會. https://ieknet.iek.org.tw/iekppt/ppt_more.aspx?sld_preid=4384\n82. 呂珮如. (2019).全球智慧穿戴裝置市場分析. 台灣雲端物聯網產業協會. http://www.twcloud.org.tw/files/file_pool/1/0j211517917521474259/2019.07-%E9%9B%B2%E5%8D%94%E6%A1%88%E4%BE%8B%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90-%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E7%A9%BF%E6%88%B4%E8%A3%9D%E7%BD%AE%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90.pdf\n83. 拓譜研究. (2019). 穿戴裝置產業2019年回顧與2020年展望. https://www.topology.com.tw/DataContent/report/%E7%A9%BF%E6%88%B4%E8%A3%9D%E7%BD%AE%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD2019%E5%B9%B4%E5%9B%9E%E9%A1%A7%E8%88%872020%E5%B9%B4%E5%B1%95%E6%9C%9B/14982\n84. 紀佳佑. (2013). 運用整合性科技接受模式探討教師使用互動式電子白板的影響因素-以桃園縣國小為例.（未出版之碩士論文）.萬能科技大學.桃園。\n85. 陳弘仁. (2014). 迎向智慧穿戴科技的大未來. 微系統暨奈米科技協會會刊, (31), 16-24.\n86. 黃美玲. (2015). 穿戴裝置技術與市場趨勢. 證券服務, (634), 100-102.\n87. 熊彼得. (1942). 資本主義，社會主義與民主.左岸文化。\n88. 鄭怡秀. (2017). 利用健康信念模式探討民眾使用智慧型手機健康管理應用程式行為之研究.; G0105363007; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/134205; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/134205/1/300701.pdf