المؤلفون: 陳宏棋, CHEN, HUNG-CHI

المساهمون: 于卓民 巫立宇

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業, 台灣網通業, 國際市場經營模式, 母子公司關係, 子公司角色, Multinational enterprise, Taiwanese networking communications industry, International market operation model, Parent-subsidiary relationship, Subsidiary role

Relation: 一、中文文獻: 1.于卓民 (2014)，國際企業環境與管理，第四版，台北 : 華泰文化。 2.于卓民 (2023)，台灣產業創生平台「跨國在地經營菁英班」。https://www.tw-ren.com/renaissance/828，2023/7/5. 3.中山大學企業管理系 (2005)，管理學，第十八章國際企業。台北 : 前程圖書。 4.朱柔若（譯）（2000）。社會研究方法：質化與量化取向。臺北：揚智。 5.曲惠雯 (2004)。轉投資策略、集團管理機制對集團經營績效之影響-以IC設計集團為例。實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 6.周旭華譯 (2010)，Michael E. Porter著。競爭策略：產業環境及競爭者分析，台北 : 天下文化。 7.林全興 (2006)，「台灣電線電纜業海外獨資進入模式與價值鏈活動整合程度之個案研究」，銘傳大學管理學院為出版碩士論文。 8.胡幼慧、姚美華 (1996)，質性研究方法集：本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流圖書。 9.段思安 (2015)，多國企業子公司高階主管任用決策之研究-資源基礎觀點. 中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 10.郭國湞 (2005)，台灣高科技廠商關鍵成功因素對競爭策略選擇及執行之影響研究-以台灣蘭娃無線通訊產業為例，國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班管理科學組碩士學位論文。 11.郭書言，(2023)，異軍突起-IC載板產業廠商之輕盈與發展策略分析: 以景碩公司為例。國立台灣大學管理學院商學研究所碩士論文。 12.陳省三 (2003)，國際市場進入模式評估程序之研究-以機車產業為例，國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理所碩士論文。 13.陳兆麟 (2011)，少數股權股東管理地主國合資子公司之研究。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程論文。 14.黃錫欽 (2014)，隱形冠軍的競爭策略個案分析。國立清華大學科技管理學院高階主管經營管理碩士在職專班論文。 15.董旭英、黃怡娟譯 (2000)，次級資料研究法，台北: 弘智文化。 16.蕭瑞麟 (2017)，不用數字的研究:質性研究的思辯脈絡，第四版，台北:五南圖書。 二、英文文獻: 1. Bartlett & Ghoshal (1989). Managing Across Borders, Boston,MA: Harvard Business School 2. Bartlett & Ghoshal, (1989). Organizational typology. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(3), 449-464. 3. Bergen et al., (1992). (Bergen, M., Dutta, S. & Walker, Jr. O.C.) (1992). Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories. The Journal of Marketing, 1-24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786321000739 4. Birkinshaw, J. M., & Hood, N., (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolutions: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773-795. 5. Bitektine, A. & Haack, P. (2015). The macro and micro of legitimacy: Towards a multi-level theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49-75. 6. Chatfield, S.L. (2020). Recommendations for secondary analysis of qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 833-842. 7. Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345-376. 8. Dunning, J. H., (1993). How should national governments respond to globalization? The International Executive, 35(3), 187-198. 9. Dunning, T. (1988). Expaining International Production. Harper Collins Publishers. 10. Erramilli, K. M. (1991). The experience factors in foreign market entry behavior of service firms. Journal of International Business Studies. 22, 479-501. 11. Heenan, D.A. & Perlmutter, H. V., (1979). Multinational Organization Development, NY: Addison-Wesley. 12. Hill C.W.L. & Jones G.R., (1998). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach, Fourth Edition, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 13. Hill C.W.L., Hwang P., & Kim W.C., (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry model, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 117-128. 14. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.E., (1977). Internationalization process of firm-model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32. 15. Kim, W.C. and Hwang, P. (1992). Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode Choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23, 29-53. 16. Kogut, B. & Singh, H. (1988). Joint venture: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319-332. 17. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. 18. Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, New York: McGraw-Hill. 19. Neill, S. and Rose G. M., (2006). The effect of strategic complexity on marketing strategy and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 1-10. 20. Onkvisit, S. & Shaw, J. (1993). International Marketing: Analysis and Strategy. New York : Macmillan Pub. Co. 21. Paterson, S.L., & Brock, D.M. (2002). The development of subsidiary-management research: review and theoretical analysis. International Business Review, 11(2), 139-163. 22. Porter, E. Michael, (1980). Competitive Strategy, NY: The Free Press. Porter, E. Michael, (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy, Harvard Business Review, January 2008. 23. Prahalad, C.K., & Doz, Y.L. (1981). An approach to strategic control in MNCs. Sloan Management Review, 22, 5-13. 24. Slater, S. F., E. M. Olson, & G. T. M. Hult (2006). The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability – Performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1221-1231. 25. Slater, S. F. & J. C. Narver (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization, Journal of Business Research, 59 (July), 63-74. 26. Sundaram, A.K. & Black, J.S. (1992). The environment and internal organization of multinational enterprises. Academy of Management Review, 17, 729-757. 27. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 509-533. 28. Verreynne, M. L. (2006). Strategy-making process and firm performance in small firms, Journal of Management and Organization, 12(3), 209-222. 29. Vissak, T., & Francioni, B. (2013). Serial nonlinear internationalization in practice: A case study. International Business Reviews, 22(6), 951-962. 30. Yin, R.K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 31. Yin, R.K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 32. Zhao, H. & Levary, R. R. (2002). Evaluation of country attractiveness for foreign direct investment in the E-retail industry, Multinational Business Review, Spring, 1-10. 三、網路資料: 1. Vishal Malhotra (2012). Presto Participated at Plastindia 2012- A grand success. Presto Stantest Pvt. Ltd. https://www.prestogroup.com/news/prestos-participation-at-plastindia-2012-a-grand-success/; G0110932026; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/150099; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/150099/1/index.html

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/150099
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/150099/1/index.html

المؤلفون: 廖明坤, 于卓民, 司徒達賢

المساهمون: 企管系

مصطلحات موضوعية: 決策品質, 多國企業, 交易成本, 代理理論, 資源基礎觀點, Decision quality, Multinational corporations, Transaction cost, Agency theory, Resources-based view

وصف الملف: 175 bytes; text/html

Relation: 創新與管理, 4(1), 165-188; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/64736; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/64736/1/index.html

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/64736
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/64736/1/index.html

المؤلفون: 廖明坤, 于卓民, 司徒達賢, Yu, Chwo-Ming, Liao, Ming-Kung Joseph, Seetoo, D. H. William

المساهمون: 企管系

مصطلحات موضوعية: 代理理論, 交易成本, 多國企業, 自主權, 資源基礎觀點, multinational corporations, autonomy, transaction cost economics, agency theory, resources-based view

وصف الملف: 552792 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 中山管理評論, 14(2), 397-427+310; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/64253; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/64253/1/397427.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/64253
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/64253/1/397427.pdf

المؤلفون: 喬友慶

المساهمون: 行政院國家科學委員會, 國立中興大學企業管理學系(所)

مصطلحات موضوعية: 基礎研究, Global competitive action, 經濟學, 全球競爭性行動, 競爭性律動, 多國企業績效, competitive rhythm, MNCs performance

Relation: http://grbsearch.stpi.narl.org.tw/GRB/result.jsp?id=1878828& plan_no=NSC98-2410-H005-016& plan_year=98& projkey=PF9807-1850& target=plan& highStr=*& check=0& pnchDesc=%E5%A4%9A%E5%9C%8B%E4%BC%81%E6%A5%AD%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E7%AB%B6%E7%88%AD%E6%80%A7%E8%A1%8C%E5%8B%95%E8%88%87%E7%B8%BE%E6%95%88%E4%B9%8B%E9%97%9C%E8%81%AF%E6%80%A7-%E7%AB%B6%E7%88%AD%E6%80%A7%E5%BE%8B%E5%8B%95%E4%B9%8B%E8%AA%BF%E7%AF%80%E6%95%88%E6%9E%9C; NSC98-2410-H005-016; http://hdl.handle.net/11455/54121

الاتاحة: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/54121

المؤلفون: 于卓民

المساهمون: 政治大學企業管理系, 行政院國家科學委員會

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業, 子公司自主權, 資源基礎觀點, 網絡理論, 機構理論

وصف الملف: 500770 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 基礎研究; 學術補助; 研究期間:9408 ~ 9507; 研究經費:659仟元; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/52987; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/52987/-1/942416H007.pdf

الاتاحة: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/52987
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/52987/-1/942416H007.pdf

المؤلفون: 劉佳玟, Liu, Chia-Wen

المساهمون: 譚丹琪, Tan, Danchi

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業, 子公司管理, 控制方法, Multinational enterprises, Subsidiary management, Control system

Relation: G1043631052; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/118772; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/118772/1/105201.pdf

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/118772
https://doi.org/10.6814/THE.NCCU.MBA.041.2018.F08
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/118772/1/105201.pdf

المؤلفون: 卓怡岑, Cho, Yi-Tsen

المساهمون: 陳靜怡, 管理學院:國際企業學系

مصطلحات موضوعية: 區位優勢, 國外直接投資, 經營績效, 多國企業, 研發能力, 行銷能力, Ownership Advantages, FDI, Performance, Multiple, Marketing, Research

وصف الملف: 149 bytes; text/html

Relation: http://ir.ncnu.edu.tw:8080/handle/310010000/11297; http://ir.ncnu.edu.tw:8080/bitstream/310010000/11297/1/index.html

الاتاحة: http://ir.ncnu.edu.tw:8080/handle/310010000/11297
http://ir.ncnu.edu.tw:8080/bitstream/310010000/11297/1/index.html

المؤلفون: 陳柏菁, Chen, Po-Ching

المساهمون: 淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士在職專班, 蕭瑞祥, Shaw, Ruey-Shiang

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業, 本國企業, 集中化, 資訊科技管理, Multinational Companies, local Companies, centralization, information technology management

Relation: 一、 中文文獻 1. 中央銀行經濟研究處（2012）。中華民國金融統計月報。9月版。 2. 吳統雄（1984）。電話調查：理論與方法。台北市：聯經出版事業公司。 3. 邱皓政（2005）。量化研究法（二）：「統計原理與分析技術」。台北市：雙葉書廊。 4. 林彩梅（1994）。多國籍企業論。台北市：五南書局。 5. 李志宏（1994）。跨兩岸資訊系統─以資訊產業為例。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 6. 李基永（1994）。影響在台多國籍企業資訊管理績效之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 7. 李淑慧（2012年1月20日）。金管會：外銀的消費金融資料，不准跨境委外辦理。經濟日報。2012年1月20日，取自http://edn.udn.com/article/view.jsp?aid=474629&cid=47'' 8. 周文賢（2002）。多變量統計分析─SAS／STAT之應用。台北市：智勝文化。 9. 梁昇凱（1998）。跨國企業與本國企業資訊科技分散程度影響因素。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 10. 劉文雄（1997）。企業競爭策略與資訊集中化程度關係之研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 二、 英文文獻 11. Ahituv, N., Neumann, S., & Zviran, M. (1989). Factors Affecting the Policy for Distributing Computing Resources. MIS Quarterly, 13(4), 389-401. 12. Australia Prudential Regulation Authority. (2010). Prudential Practice Guide PPG 234 – Management of security risk in information and information technology. Canberra, APRA: Author. 13. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Border. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 14. Blanpain, R. (1979). The OECD guildiness for multinational enterprise and labor relations 1976-1979. Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher. 15. Brown, C. V., & Magill, S. L. (1994). Alignment of the IS Function With the Enterprise:Toward a Model of Antecedents. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 371-403. 16. Clark, T. D. (1992). Corporate Systems Management: An Overview and Research Perspective. Communication of the ACM, 35(2), 61-75. 17. Deans, P. C., Karwan, K. R., Goslar, M. D., Ricks, D. A., & Toyne, B. (1991). Identification of Key International Information Systems Issues in U.S.-Based Multinational Corporations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(4), 27-50. 18. DeVellis, R. F. (1998). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. NewBury Park, CA: Sage. 19. Dunning, J. H. (1973). Explining changing Patterns of International Production: In Support of the Eclectic Theory. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41, 269-295. 20. George, J. F., & King, J. L. (1991). Examining the Computing and Centralization Debate. Communication of the ACM, 34(7), 63-72. 21. Martin, J. (1981). Computer networks and distributed processing, software, techniques, and architecture. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall. 22. Leifer, R. (1988). Matching Computer-Based Information Systems with Organizational Structures. MIS Quarterly, 12(1), 63-73. 23. Lilienthal, D. E. (1960). Management of the multinational corporations. New York:Mcgraw-Hill. 24. Moynihan, T. (1990). What Chief Executives and Senior Managers Want From Their IT Departments. MIS Quarterly, 14(1), 15-25. 25. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: Mcgraw-Hill. 26. Olson, M. H., & Chervany, N. L. (1980). The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and The Structure of The Informaiton Services Function. MIS Quarterly, 4(2), 57-68. 27. Palvia, P. C., Palvia, S., & Zigli. R. M. (1992). Global Information Technology Environment : Key MIS Issues in Advanced and Less-Developed Nations. Idea Group Publishing, 2-34. 28. Robinson, R. D. (1984). Internationalization of businesss: An introduction. Chicago:The Dryden Press. 29. Roche, E. M. (1992). Managing Information Technology in Multinational Corporations. New York:Macmillan. 30. Selig, G. J. (1982). A Framework for Multinational Information Systems Planning. Information and Management, 5, 95-115. 31. Tractinsky, N., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). Information Systems Design Decisions in a Global Versus Domestic Context. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 507-534. 32. Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of U.S. enterprise. New York: Basic Books. 33. Watson, R. T., & Brancheau, J. C. (1991). Key Issues in Information Systems Management:An International Perspective. Information & Management, 20, 213-223.; U0002-1903201315333700; http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/87737; http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/bitstream/987654321/87737/-1/index.html

الاتاحة: http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/87737
http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/bitstream/987654321/87737/-1/index.html

المؤلفون: 王敏惠

المساهمون: 于卓民

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業, 網路遊戲, 稅務管理, 智財中心, 租稅考量

Time: 97

وصف الملف: 1227751 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 一、中文 1.中國稅務總局譯，Brian J.Arnold & Michael J. McIntyre著， 2008，國際稅收基礎，北京。 2.全球台商服務網，http://twbusiness.nat.gov.tw/home.do。 3.行政院賦稅改革委員會，2009，所得稅反避稅制度研究報告，台北:財政部台北國稅局。 4.邱國晉,2008, 「跨國智財交易租稅效益之研究」, 政治大學智財所碩士論文。 5.遊戲橘子2012年財務報告。 6.資誠全球聯盟組織 ( PwC Global),2012, 2012-2016全球娛樂及媒體行業展望報告,美國。 7.資誠聯合會計師事務所，2010，智慧財產權全方位管理策略，台北。 8.資誠聯合會計師事務所，2010，通曉智慧財產權，台北。 9.陳香梅、黃明聖,2004, 「從電子商務看傳統所得稅制度的適用性」，經社法制論叢，第33期，頁148-172。 10.楊雅齡,2006, 「現行網路交易課稅問題之探討-以奇摩拍賣網站為例」,大葉大學企管所碩士論文。 11.賈智豪，2000, 「電子商務與其衍生租稅問題之研究」,政治大學財稅所碩士論文。 12.詹聰哲,2010, 「智慧財產控股公司之研究」, 政治大學智財所碩士論文。 二、英文 1.PwC Global Website, http://www.pwc.com.taxsummaries. 2.Tax Advisory Group on Treaty Characterization of E-Commerce Payments, The OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs , 2000 , Electronic commerce: Taxation Framework.; G0100932029; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/59346

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/59346

المؤلفون: 林以婷, Lin, I-Ting

المساهمون: 于卓民

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業組織結構, 子公司角色, 地主國環境, 區位優勢

Relation: 中文部份; 1.于卓民，國際企業環境與管理，台北：華泰，2008年。; 2.于卓民，「迎接具實權區域總部的到來」，經理人月刊，第47期，2008年10月，頁146-157。; 3.巴利德（Christopher A. Bartlett），戈夏勒（Sumantra Ghoshal)著，李宛蓉譯，無國界管理 : 全球化競爭下新管理處方，台北市：遠流，1990年。; 4.尹懷鹿，「多國公司子公司的策略密碼：創新與整合」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所經營管理學程碩士論文，2007年7月。; 5.中國節能服務網，http://www.emca.cn/BG/index.html， 2011年4月檢索。; 6.司徒達賢，策略管理新論，台北：智勝，2001年。; 7.司徒達賢，管理學的新世界，台北：天下，2005年。; 8.李貴惠、于卓民、司徒達賢，「多國公司執行區域策略對子公司的影響：貢獻型子公司組織角色的改變」，管理評論，第28卷第2期，2009年4月，頁1-23。; 9.李貴惠，「多國企業次區域總部的興起與任務－以大中華次區域總部為例」，第六屆全球化經營策略論壇，國立政治大學，2004年12月。; 11.吳育璋，「多國籍企業子公司角色類型與影響演變因素之研究—以多國籍企業在台子公司為例」，國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2000年6月。; 12.邱子瑜、王皓正，「品牌悍將，讓老外服氣」，經濟日報，A3版，2011年04月。; 13.楊岱諺，「後ECFA時代台灣科技業創新佈局─兩岸開創黃金十年」，拓墣產業產業研究所，http://www.topology.com.tw/tri/，2010年10月檢索。; 14.范榮靖，「台商如何搶食七大新興產業」，遠見雜誌，第294期，2010年12月，頁180-182。; 15.翁良杰，「多國籍企業在大中華區域策略研究－以兩岸子公司間關係為焦點」，國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文，2004年7月。; 16.陳建清，「探討多國籍企業子公司策略角色之演變與發展—以粉末冶金超硬合金泰登公司為例」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士在職專班論文，2003年12月。; 17.陳信宏，「研發國際化與地主國區位優勢：旗艦級跨國企業，在兩岸研發中心之比較」，台灣管理學刊，第4卷第3期，2004年8月，頁289-316。; 18.曾志弘，「多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究—以多國籍企業在台子公司為例」，國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文，2001年。; 19.焦慧萍，「跨國企業子公司的角色演化及擴展─以奇異塑膠台灣子公司為例」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所經營管理學程碩士論文，1999年7月。; 20.葉揚，「新興市場中的進入與擴張模式：以土耳其市場中的台灣工業電腦公司為例」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2008年6月。; 21.趙郁竹，「無線傳感網，全面啟動」，數位時代，第201期，2011年02月，頁125。; 22.劉常勇，「集團企業的創新策略」，劉常勇管理學習知識庫，研究論文，http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu/index.htm，2010年3月檢索。; 23.廖明坤、于卓民、司徒達賢，「台商大陸子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究」，中山管理評論，第14卷第2期，2006年6月，頁397-427。; 英文部份; 1.Asakawa, K., “Evolving headquarters-subsidiary dynamics in international R&D: the case of Japanese multinationals”, R&D Management, 31(1), 2001, pp. 1-14.; 2.Baliga, B. R. and A. M. Yaeger, “Multinational Corporations: Control Systems and Delegation Issues”, Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2), 1984, pp. 25-40.; 3.Benito, G., B. Grøgaard and R. Narula, “Environmental Influences on MNE Subsidiary Roles: Economic Integration and the Nordic Countries”, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(5), 2003, pp. 443–456.; 4.Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood, Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development, Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998.; 5.Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood, “Multinational Subsidiary Evolution：Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies”, Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 1998, pp. 773–795; 6.Birkinshaw, J., N. Hood and S. Jonsson, “Building Firm-Specific Advantages in Multinational Corporations: The Role of Subsidiary Initiative”, Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 1998, pp. 221-241.; 7.Birkinshaw, J. and Hood, N., “Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Clusters”, Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 2000, pp. 141-154.; 8.Bartlett C., “Building and managing the transnational: the new organizational Challenge”, in Michael E. Porter, ed., Competition in Global Industries, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, 1986.; 9.Bartlett, C. and S. Ghoshal, “Tap Your Subsidiaries for the Global Reach,” Harvard Business Review, 64(6), 1986, pp. 87-94.; 11.Bartlett, C. and S. Ghoshal, Transnational Management, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1998.; 12.Crookell, H., “Managing Canadian Subsidiaries in a Free Trade Environment”, Sloan Management Review, 29(1), 1987, pp. 71-76.; 13.Doh, J. P., G. K. Jones, R. Mudambi and H. Teegen, “Foreign Research and Development and Host Country Environment: An Empirical Examination of U.S. International R&D”, Management International Review, 45(2), 2005, pp. 121-154.; 14.Daniels, J., R. A. Pitts and M. J. Tretter, “Strategy and Structure of U.S. Multinationals: An Exploratory Study”, Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 1984, pp. 292-307.; 15.Dunning, J. H., Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Reading, Berkshire: Addison Wesley, 1992.; 16.Egelhof, W. G., “Strategy and Structure in Multinational Corporation: A Revision of the Stopford and Wells Model”, Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 1988, pp. 1-14.; 17.Enright, M. J. and E. E. Scott, “The RHQ question”, Business Asia, 32(25), 2000, pp. 1-4.; 18.Forsgren, M., U. Holm, and J. Johanson, “Division Headquarters Go Abroad — A Step in the Internationalization of the Multinational Corporation”, Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 1995, pp. 475–491.; 19.Gupta, A.K. and V. Govindarajan, “Knowledge flows within multinational corporation”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 2000, pp. 473-496.; 20.Ghoshal, S. and C. A. Bartlett, “Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovation by Subsidiaries”, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 1988, pp. 365-388.; 21.Herbert, T., “Strategy and Multinational Organization Structure: An Interorganizational Relationships Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 1984, pp. 259-270.; 22.Hedlund, G., “Autonomy of Subsidiaries and Formalization of Headquarters Subsidiary Relationships in Swedish MNCs.”, in Otterbeck, L, ed., The Management of Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in Multinational Corporations, NY: St Martin Press, 1981.; 23.Jarillo, J.C. and J. I. Martinez, “Different Roles for Subsidiaries: the Case of Multinational Corporations in Spain”, Strategic Management Journal, 11(7), 1990, pp. 501-512.; 24.Johnston, S., Headquarters and Subsidiaries in Multinational Corporations: Strategies, Tasks, and Coordination, Australia: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.; 25.Kumar, N., “Determinants of Location of Overseas R&D Activity of Multinational Enterprises: The Case of the U.S. and Japanese Corporation”, Research Policy, 30(2), 2001, pp. 159-174.; 26.Li, G., C. J. Yu and D. Seetoo, “Toward a Theory of Regional Organization”, Management International Review, 50(1), pp. 5-33.; 27.Lu, T., L. Chen and W. Lee, “Subsidiary Initiatives in Subsidiary Role Changing – In the Case of the Bartlett and Ghoshal Typology”, Journal of American Academy of Business, 11(1), 2007, pp. 280-284.; 28.Lasserre, P., “Regional headquarters: the sprearhead for Asia Pacific markets: understanding the rules if the game”, Long Range Planning, 29(1), 1996, pp. 30-37.; 29.Lasserre, P. and J. Probert, “Competing in Asia Pacific: Understanding the Rules of the Game”, Long Range Planning, 31(1), 1998, pp. 30-50.; 30.Lasserre, R., Regionalism, Multilateralism and Deeper Integration. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 1996.; 31.Malnight, T., “Globalization of an Ethnocentric Firm: An Evolution Perspective”, Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), 1995, pp. 119-141.; 32.Niosi, J., “Fourth Generation R&D”, Journal of Business Research, N. York, Elsevier, 45(4), 1999, pp.100-117.; 33.Paterson, S. L. and D. M. Brock, “The Development of Subsidiary-Management Research: Review and Theoretical Analysis “, International Business Review, 11(2), 2002, pp. 139-163.; 34.Prahalad, C.K. and Y. L. Doz, “An Approach to Strategic Control in MNCs”, Sloan Management Review, 22(4), 1981, pp.5-13.; 35.Perry, M., H. Yeung and J. Poon, “Regional Office Mobility: the Case of Corporate Control in Singapore and Hong Kong”, Geoforum, 29(3), 1998, pp. 237-255.; 36.Paik, Y. and J. H. d. Sohn, “Striking a Balance between Global Integration and Local Responsiveness: The Case of Toshiba Corporation in Redefying Regional Headquarters Role”, Organizational Analysis, 12(4), 2004, pp. 347-359.; 37.Pla-Barber, J., “From Stopford and Well’s Model to Bartlett and Ghoshal’s Typology: New Empirical Evidence”, Management International Review, 42(2), 2002, pp. 141-156.; 38.Roth, K. and A. J. Morrison, “Implementing Global Strategy: Characteristics of Global Subsidiary Mandates”, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 1992, pp. 715-735.; 39.Rugman, A. M. and A. Verbeke, “Liabilities of Regional Foreignness and the Use of Firm-level versus Country-level Data: A Response to Dunning et al.”, Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 2007, pp. 200-205.; 40.Sun S., H. Qu, and G. Evans, “China's Next Five Year Plan- What It Means for Equities”, http://www.hsbcnet.com/, 2010 downloaded.; 41.Schutte, H., “ Between Headquarters and Subsidiaries: the RHQ Solution”, in Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood (ed.), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development, Hampshire, England: Macmillan Press., 1998.; 42.Schutte, H., “Strategy and Organization: Challenges for European MNCs in Asia”, European Management Journal, 115(4), 1997, pp. 436-445.; 43.Stopford, J. and L. Wells, Managing the Multinational Enterprise, NY: Basix Books, 1972.; 44.Yeung, H. W., C. J. Poon and M. Perry, “Towards a Regional Strategy: The role of Regional Headquarters of Foreign Firms in Singapore”, Urban Studies, 38(1), 1998, pp. 157-183.; 45.Zou, S. and M. B. Myers, “The R&D, Manufacturing, and Marketing Competencies and the Firm’s Global Competitive Position: An Empirical Study”, Journal of Global Marketing, 1999, 12(3), pp. 5-21.; G0098355028; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/50740

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/50740

المؤلفون: 江衍宏, Chiang, Yen-Hung

المساهمون: 臺灣大學: 國際企業管理組, 林修葳

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業轉型, 全球化策略, 新五力競爭理論, IBM企業轉型, 全球性整合企業, IBM的轉型策略, 工業電腦產業五力分析, The International Corporation, IC, The Multinational Corporation, MNC, The Globally Integrated Enterprises, GIE, Michael Porter, IBM

وصف الملف: 4142979 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/256461; http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/256461/1/ntu-99-P96746008-1.pdf

الاتاحة: http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/256461
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/256461/1/ntu-99-P96746008-1.pdf

المؤلفون: 蔡政安, Tsai, Cheng-An

المساهمون: 溫肇東

مصطلحات موضوعية: 關係鑲嵌性, 創業精神, 公司興業精神, 社會網絡, 多國企業子公司, relational embeddedness, entrepreneurship, cioporate entrepreneurship, social netwok, multinational enterprise subsidiary

وصف الملف: 44084 bytes; 146211 bytes; 78286 bytes; 86943 bytes; 205809 bytes; 325546 bytes; 327536 bytes; 289156 bytes; 297774 bytes; 164450 bytes; 200218 bytes; 246250 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 一、中文部分; 1. 工商時報，2005，大陸台商1000大，台北：工商時報出版。; 2. 王存國與王凱，2001，「影響電子資料交換使用效益因素之研究─由社會關係與組織因素探討」，管理學報，第18卷第1期，頁99-134。; 3. 王克陸、劉亮君（1997），「我國創業投資公司投資活動之個案分析」，科技管理學刊，第4卷第1期，頁1-15。; 4. 方世杰，2001，「以網絡個體分析法探討我國中小企業之國際化與績效─中衛體系電子訊業廠商之實證研究」，管理學報，第18卷第1期，頁49-74。; 5. 司徒達賢、于卓民與曾紀幸，1997，「環境特性與公司特性隊多國籍企業網絡關係之影響─在台外商子公司之實證研究」，管理學報，第14卷第2期，頁155-176。; 6. 林志宏、賴其勛、蔡翠旭、簡倍祥（2001），「台灣創業投資事業之控制策略及其先行因子之研究」，科技管理學刊，第6卷第1期，頁71-102。; 7. 林家五、黃國隆、鄭伯壎（2004），「從認同到開創：創業家的動態釋意歷程」，中山管理評論，第12卷第2期，頁337-397。; 8. 邱正仁、陳文進、高蘭芬（2001），「影響創業投資事業報酬因素之研究」，中山管理評論，第9卷第1期，頁11-35。; 9. 吳思華，1996，策略九說，台北：麥田出版社。; 11. 洪廣朋、史習安、廖珮如（2001），「公司內部創業統治機制選擇之實證研究 ─ 交易成本之觀點」，中山管理評論，第9卷第2期，頁271-291。; 12. 徐守德、陳宗民、王毓敏（2001），「投資創投事業對高科技產業上市上櫃之影響」，中山管理評論，第9卷第4期，頁655-690。; 13. 莊立民，2002，組織創新模式建構與時證之研究──以台灣資訊電子業為例，國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。; 14. 溫肇東，2005，創業家精神的典範學習，2005/08/10工商時報經營知識版。; 15. 張世佳與林能白，2001，「環境因素不確定性對製造彈性能力之影響關係研究─以台灣資訊產業為例」，中山管理評論，第9卷第1期，頁111-133。; 16. 曾志弘，2001，多國籍企業子公司自主性與主導行為影響因素之研究─以多國及企業在台子公司為例，國立中山大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。; 17. 曾紀幸，1996，多國籍企業在台子公司網絡組織型態及其母公司管理機制選擇之關係，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。; 18. 陳禹辰，1999，創新負擔與新興資訊科技的採用及實施--電子銀行的實證研究，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所博士論文。; 19. 趙必孝，1994，國際企業子公司的人力資源管理：策略、控制與績效，國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。; 20. 劉世南、袁建中、羅達賢、高宜君（2003），「創業行為之模式建立」，科技管理學刊，第8卷第1期，頁61-78。; 21. 盧瑞陽（2005），「創投公司對投資公司的增資決定之研究」，中山管理評論，第13卷第2期，頁589-616。; 22. 賴宏誌，2003，網絡關係對新創企業發展影養之研究─以台灣高科技廠商為例，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。; 23. 經濟部，2005，「上市櫃公司赴中國大陸投資名錄(歷年至93年)」，中華民國行政院經濟部投資審議委員會出版。; 24. 廖明坤，2003，台商大陸子公司決策自主性影響因素之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。; 25. 羅達賢、劉世南、袁建中（2002），「從科技人到創業家 ─ 由台灣積體電路引進團隊的發展分析」，管理與系統，第9卷第1期，頁1-10。; 二、英文部分; 1. Aldrich, H.E.& Reese, P.R. 1993. Does networking pay off ? A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle. In Churchill N.S. et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 325-339; 2. Aldrich, H.E.& Zimmer, C. 1986. Entrepreneurship through social network. In Sexton D.L. & Smilor R.W. (Eds.) The Art of Science of Entrepreneurship, 2-23, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA; 3. Amabile, T.M. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organization. In Barry M. Staw &. Cummings L. L (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.; 4. Andersson, U. & Forsgren, M. 1996. Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review, 5(5): 487-508.; 5. Andersson, U. & Forsgren, M. 2000. In search of centre of excellence: network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40(4): 329-350; 6. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979-996.; 7. Ang, S.H. & Leong, S.M. 2000. Out of mouth of babes: Business ethics and younths in Asia. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2): 129-144; 8. Antoncic, B. & Hisrich, R.D. 2004. Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation. The Journal of Management Developemnt, 23(5/6): 518-550; 9. Armstrong, J.S. & Overton, T.S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 11: 396-402; 11. Bantel, K.A. 1998. Technology-based adolescent firm configurations: strategy identification, context and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 205-230; 12. Bantel, K. A. & Jackson, S. E. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of top management team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, Summer: 107-124; 13. Barret, H., Balloon, J.L. & Weinstein, A. 2000. Marketing mix factors as moderators of the corporate entrepreneurship-business performance relationship – a multistage, multivariable analysis. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 8(2): 50-62; 14. Barringer, B.R. & Bluedorn, A.C. 1999. The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 421-444; 15. Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. 1986.Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Review, 64(4): 87-94; 16. Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, Boston, MA.; 17. Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. 1991. Global strategic management: Impact on the new frontiers of strategy research. Strategic Management Journal,12: 5-16.; 18. Batjargal, B. 2003. Social capital and entrepreneurual performance in Russia: A longitudinal study. Organozation Study: 24(4): 535-556; 19. Beacherer, R.C. & Maurer, J.G. 1997. The moderating effect of environmental variables on the entrepreneurial & marketing orientation of entrepreneur-led firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 22(1): 47-58; 20. Bell, G.G. 2005. Clusters, networks and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 287-295; 21. Birkinshaw, J. 1995. Entreprenrurship in multinational corporations: The Initative Pprocesses in Canadian Subsidiaries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Business School, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.; 22. Birkinshaw, J. 1996.How multinational subsidiary m&ates are gained & lost. Journal of International Business Studies: 467-495.; 23. Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3): 207-229.; 24. Birkinshaw, J. 1998. Corporate entrepreneurship in network organizations: How subsidiary initiative drives internal market efficiency. European Management Journal, 16(3): 355-365.; 25. Birkinshaw, J. 1999.The determinants and consequences of subsidiary initiative in multinational corporations. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 24(1): 9-36; 26. Birkinshaw, J. & Hood, N. 1998a. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773-795.; 27. Birkinshaw, J. & Hood, N. 1998b. Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development. MacMillan Press Inc.: London.; 28. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. & Jonsson, S. 1998. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 221-241.; 29. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. & Young, S. 2005. Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review,14: 227-248; 30. Birkinshaw, J. & Ridderstrale, J. 1999. Fighting the corporate immune system：A process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations. International Business Review, 8: 149-180.; 31. Blalock, H.M. 1982. Conceptualization and Measurement in the Social Science. Sage: Berverly Hill, CA; 32. Brown, T.E., Davisson, P. & Wiklund, J. 2001. An operationalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10): 953-968; 33. Buckley, P. J. & Casson, M. 1976. The Future of the Multinational Enterprises, Macmillan: London.; 34. Burgelman, R.A. 1983a. Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Inside from a process study. Management Science, 29: 1349-1364.; 35. Burgelman, R.A. 1983b. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8: 61-70.; 36. Burgelman, R.A. 1984. Design for corporate entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 26(2): 154-166; 37. Burt, R.S. 1992. The social structure of competition. In Nohria N.& Eccles R.G. (Eds.) Networks and Organizations, 57-91; 38. Christensen, C. M. & Rayor, M.E., 2003, The Innovator’s Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.（李芳齡、李田樹譯，2004，創新者的解答，台北：天下出版）; 39. Cooper, A.C. 1986. Entrepreneurship and high technology. In Sexton D. & Smilor R (Eds.). The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. Ballinger: Cambigde, MA; 40. Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 75-87; 41. Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 16(1): 7-25; 42. Covin, J.G. , Slevin, D. & Heeley, M.B. 1999. Pioneers and followers: Competitive atctics, environment & firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 175-210; 43. Daft, R.L. 1978. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2): 193-210.; 44. Daily, C. M. & Dalton, D. R. 1992. The relationship between goverance structure and corporate performance in entrepreurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7: 375-386; 45. Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 555-590.; 46. Damanpour, F. 1996. Organizational complexity & innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5): 693-716.; 47. Damanpour, F. & Evan, W. M. 1984. Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3): 392-409.; 48. Danneels, E. 2002. The dynamics of product innovation & firm competences. Srtaegic Management Journal, 23(12): 1095-1211; 49. Danneels, E. 2003. Tight-loose coupling with customers: The enactment of customer orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 559-576; 50. Daneels, E. 2004. Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21: 246-258; 51. Deeds, D.L. & Hill, C.W. 1996. Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1): 41-55; 52. Dess, G.G. Ireland, R.D., Zahra, S.A., Floyd, S.W., Janney, J.J. & Lane, P.J. E. 2003. Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3): 351-378; 53. Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T. & Covin, J.G. 1997. Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: test of contingency & configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 677-695; 54. DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. 1983. The iron cage revisted: Institutional isomorphisim and collective rationality in orgznizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160; 55. Dimitratos, P., Lioukas, S. & Carter, S. 2004. The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: the importance of domestic environment. International Business Review, 13: 19-41; 56. Dougherty, D. & Bowman, E.H. 1995. The effects of organizational downsizing of product innovation. California Management Review, 37(4): 28-44; 57. Downey, H.K., Hellriegel, D. & Slocum, J.W. 1975. Environment uncertainty: The construct and its application. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4): 562-577; 58. Duncan, R.B. 1972. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environment uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3): 313-327; 59. Dunning, J.H. 1981. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, Allen and Unwin: London.; 60. Dunning, J.H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19:1-31.; 61. Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, third quarter: 461-491.; 62. Dyer, J.H. & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660-679; 63. Farh, J.L. abd Behling, O. 1998. Doing business in China: The what, the why & - most important - the how of guanxi. Working Paper . Hong Kong University ofScience of Technology; 64. Farh, J.L., Tsui, A.S., Xin, K.R. & Cheng, B.S. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4): 471-488; 65. Fowler, F.J. 1988. Survey Research Methods. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.; 66. Frankfort-Nachmias, C. & Nachmias, D. 1996. Research Method in the Social Science. Martin’s College Publishing Group INC.（潘明宏與陳志瑋譯，2001，社會科學研究方法，韋伯文化: 台北）; 67. Freeman, C. 1991. Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5): 499-514; 68. Frosgrent, M. 1990. Managing the international multi-centre firms: Case studies from Sweden. European Management Journal, 8: 261-267; 69. Frost, T.S., Birkinshaw, J.M., & Ensign, P.C. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 997-1018; 70. Gartner, W.B. 1985. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomanon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 696-706; 71. Gartner, W.B. 1990. What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5: 15-28; 72. Ghoshal, S. 1987. Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5): 425-440.; 73. Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. 1988. Creation, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 365-387.; 74. Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett,C. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4):603-625.; 75. Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. 1994. Linking organizational context anf managirail action: the dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Summer special): 91-112.; 76. Ghoshal, S. & Nohria, N. 1989. Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4): 323-337.; 77. Ghoshal, S. & Westney, D.E. 1991. Introduction and overview. In Ghoshal S. & Westney (Eds.). Organization Theory and the Multinational Cooperation, St. Martin’s Press: New York.; 78. Grabher, G. 1993. The Embedded Firm: On the Socieconomics of Industrial Networks. London, England: Routledge; 79. Granovettor, M.S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481-510; 80. Granovettor, M.S. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In Nohria N. & Eccles R. (Eds.), Networks and Organizations, 25-56. Harvard Business School Press, Boston; 81. Gulati, R. 1998. Alliance & networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293-317; 82. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on allliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 397-420; 83. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 203-215; 84. Gupta, A.K. & Govindarajan, V. 1994. Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs. International Business Reviews, 3（4）：443-457.; 85. Guth, W.D. & Ginsberg, A. 1990. Guest editors’ introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(summer): 5-15; 86. Hakansson, H. 1989. Corporate Technological Behavior: Cooperations and Networks. Routledge: London.; 87. Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.; 88. Hansen, E.L. 1995. Entrepreurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreurship Theory & Practice, 19(4): 7-19; 89. Hayton, J.C. 2005. Competing in the new economy: the effect of intellectual capital on corporate entrepreneurship in high-technology new venture. R&D Management, 35(2): 137-155; 90. Hedlund, G. 1986. The hypermodern MNC—a heterarchy? Human Resource management, 25: 9-26.; 91. Hennart, J.F. 1982. A Theory of Multinational Enterprise. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.; 92. Hite, J.M. 2003. Patterns of multidimentionalality among embedded networl ties: A typology of relational embeddedness in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organization, 1(1): 9-49; 93. Hite, J.M. 2005. Evolutionary processes and paths of relational embeddednetwork ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice,29(1): 113-144; 94. Hoang, H. & Antoncic B. 2003. Network-based research in entreprenurshp: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 165-187; 95. Hoetker, G. 2005. How much you know versus how well I know you: Selecting a supplier for a technically innovative componet. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 75-96; 96. Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D.F. & Zahra, S.A. 2002. Middle manager’s perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17: 253-273; 97. Hymer, S.H. 1976. The International Operations of National Firms：A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.; 98. Jarillo, J.C.1988. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1): 31-41; 99. Jarillo, J.C. & Martinez, J.I. 1990. Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7): 501-512; 100. Jennings, D.F. & Lumpkin, J.R. 1989. Funtioning modeling corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical integrative analysis. Journal of Management, 15(3): 485-502; 101. Johannisson, B. 1996. The dynamics of entrepreneurial networks. In Reynolds P. et al.(Eds.) Frontier of Entrepreneurship Research, 253-267; 102. Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J.E. 1977. Internationalisation process of the firm: a model of knowledge development & increasing foreign commitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 8: 23-32; 103. Johanson, J. & Mattsson, L-G. 1987. Internationalization in industrial systems: A network approach. The International Executive, 29(2): 19-21; 104. Jones, M. V. & Coviello, N. E. 2005. Internationalisation: conceptualizing an entrepreneurial process of behavior in time. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 284-303.; 105. Kanter, R.M. 1983. The Change Masters. Simon & Schuster: New York; 106. Katz, R. 1982. The effects of group longity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(1): 81-104; 107. Kelloway, K.E. 1995. Structural equation modeling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 215-224; 108. Kirzner, I.M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL; 109. Knickererbocker, F.T. 1973. Oligopolistic Reaction and the Multinational Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 110. Knight, G.A.1997. Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Busisness Venturing, 12(3): 213-225; 111. Kotter, J.P. 1995. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail.Harvard Business Review, 71(11): 3-11; 112. Kogut, B. 1985. Designing global strategies: Profiting from operational flexibility. Sloan Management Review, 27(1): 27-38; 113. Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397; 114. Kohli, A. K. & Jaworski, B. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implication. Journal of Marketing, 54(April): 1-18; 115. Krackhardt, D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition and power in networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 342-369; 116. Krackhardt, D. 1992. The strength of stong ties: The importance of Philios in organization. In Nohria, N. & Eccles, G. （eds.）, Networks and Organizations: structure, form and action: p216-239. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.; 117. Kuratko, D.F., Ireland, R. D. & Hornsby, J.S. 2001. Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial action: Acordia’s corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4): 60-71; 118. Kuratko, D.F., Montagno, R.V. & Hornsby, J.S. 1990. Developing an irapreneurial assessment instrument. Strategic Management Journal, 11(Summer): 49-58; 119. Lant, T. K. & Mezias, S. J. 1990. Managing discontinuous change: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51: 123-140; 120. Larson, A.1992. Networks dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1): 76-104; 121. Lee, J. & Chen, J. 2003. Internationalization, local adaption & subsidiary’s entrepreneurship: an exploratory study on Taiwanese manufacturing firms in Indonesia and Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(1): 51-72; 122. Lee, C., Lee, K. & Pennings, J.M. 2001. Internal capabilities, enternal networks and performance: A study of on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 615-640; 123. LiLi,. 2005. The effects of trust and shared visin on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries’ intra- and inter-organizational relationship. International Business Review, 14: 77-95; 124. Lorenzoni, G. & Lipparini, A. 1999. The leveraging of inter-firm relationships as distinctive organizational capabilities: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4): 317-338; 125. Low, M.B. 2001. The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: specification of purpose. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(4): 17-25; 126. Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G.1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(3): 135-172; 127. Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. 2001. Linking two dimension of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 429-451; 128. Lyon, D.W., Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. 2000. Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing & measuring a key strategic decision process. Journal of Management, 26(5): 1055-1085; 129. Madhok, A. 1997. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Mmanagement Journal, 18: 39-61.; 130. Malnight, T.W. 1995. Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: An evolutionary perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 16( ): 119-141.; 131. March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87; 132. Marsden, P.V. & Friedkin, N.E. 1993. Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods& Research, 22: 127-18-51; 133. Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J.T. & Ozsomer, A. 2002. The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. Journal of Marketing, 66(3): 18-32; 134. McEvily, B. & Marcus, A. 2005. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1033-1055; 135. Mckern, B. 1993. An evolutionary approach to strategic management in the international firm. In Lorange, Chakravarthy, Roos & Van de Ven（Eds.）, Implementing Strategic Processes: Change, Learning and Co-operation. Blackwell.; 136. Miles, R.E. & Snow, C.C. 1978. Organization Strategy, Structure and Process. McGrawHill, New York; 137. Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29: 770-791; 138. Miller, K.D. 1992. A framework for integrated risk management in international business, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2): 311-331; 139. Miller, K.D. 1993. Industry and country effects on managers’ perception of environmental uncertainties. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 693-714; 140. Morris, M.H. 1998. Entrepreneurial intensity: Sustainable advantages for individuals, organizations and societies. West-port, CT: Ouorum Books.; 141. Naman, J.L. & Slevin, D.P. 1993. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model of empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2): 137-153; 142. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Socila capital, intellectual capital and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2):242-266; 143. Nobel, R. & Birkinshaw, J. 1998. Innovation in multinational corporations: Control and communication patterns in international R&D operations. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 479-496; 144. Nohria, N. & Ghoshal, S. 1994. Differentiated fit and shared values. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6): 491-502; 145. North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press（制度、制度變遷與經濟成就，1994，劉瑞華譯，台北：時報出版）; 146. Oliver, C.1990. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Intergratiom and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2): 241-265; 147. Park, S. H. & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese. Strstegic Management Journal, 22(5): 455-477; 148. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organization：A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row: New York; 149. Pinchott, G. III. 1985. Intrapreneuring. Harper & Row: New York; 150. Podolny, J.M. 1994. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic change. Aderministrative Science Quarterly, 39: 458-483; 151. Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive Advantage. Free Press: New York.; 152. Powell, W.W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In Cumming L.L. & Staw B.M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 10-20; 153. Powell, W.W., Koput ,K.W. & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quasrterly, 41: 116-145; 154. Rodan, S. & Galunic, C. 2004. More than network structure : How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 541-562; 155. Roger, E. 1983. Diffusion of Innovation. 3th Eds., Free Press:.New York; 156. Roger, E. M. & Shoemaker, F.F. 1971. Communication of Innovations. New York: Free Press.; 157. Roth, K. & Morrison, A. J. 1992. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandate. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 715-735; 158. Sapienza, H.J. & Grimm, C.M. 1997. Founder characteristics, start-up process and strategy/structure variables as predictors of shortline railroad performance. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 22(1):5-24; 159. Saxenian, A. 1991. The origin and dynamics of productionnetworks in sillicon valley. Research Policy, 20(5): 423-437; 160. Schollhammer, H. 1982. Internal corporate entrepreneurship. In Kent C.A. Sexton D. L. & Vesper K. H.(Eds) Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. 202-229. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Printice Hall; 161. Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick, NJ; 162. Shame, S. & Vakatraraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217-226; 163. Sharma, P. & Chrisman, J.J. 1999. Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23(3): 11-27; 164. Simon, H. A. 1960. The New Science of Management Decision, New York: Harper & Row; 165. Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M.H. & Floyd, S.W. 2003. Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurual behavior: A structural embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3): 427-442; 166. Smith-Doerr, L., Owen-Smith, J., Koput, K.W. & Powell, W.W., 1999. Networks and Knowledge production: Collaborating and patenting in biotechnology. In Leenders R etal. (Eds.) Corporate Social Capital and Liability. 390-408. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Boston; 167. Steams, T.M. 1996. Strategic alliances and performance of high technology new firms. In Reynolds P. et al.(Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 268-281; 168. Stevenson, H.H. & Jarillo, J.C. 1990. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(summer): 17-27; 169. Stopford, J.M. & Baden-Fuller, C.W.F. 1994. Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(summer): 521-536; 170. Stuart, T.E., Hoang, H. & Hybels, R. 1999. Interorganizational endosements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 44(2): 315-349; 171. Sutcliffe, K.M. & Zaheer, A. 1998. Uncertainty in the transaction environment: An empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 19(1): 1-23; 172. Taggart, J.M. 1998. Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 19(7): 663-681.; 173. Teece, D. 1986. Transaction cost economics and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, l.7: 21-45.; 174. Thorelli, H.B. 1986. Networks: Between markets and hierachies, Strategic Management Journal, 7(1): 37-51.; 175. Tosi, H., Aldag, R. & Storey, R. 1973. On the measurement of environment: An assessment of the Lawrence and lorsch environmental uncertainty subscale. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(1): 27-36; 176. Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 464-476; 177. Tsang, W.K. 1998. Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in Chana? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2): 64-73; 178. Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4): 674-698; 179. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Scince Quarterly, 42: 35-67; 180. Van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M.S. 1995. Explaining development and change in organization. Academy of Management Review, 20: 510-540.; 181. Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product life cycle. Quality Journal of economics, 80: 190-207.; 182. Vesper, K.H. 1984. Three faces of corporate entrepreneurship: A pilot study. In Horaday ,J.A. Tarpley, F. Timmons J.A. & Vsper, K.H (Eds.) Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson College, Wellesley, MA; 183. von Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Pres, New York; 184. Wiklund ,J. & Shpherd D. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 71-91; 185. Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational contracts. Free Press, New York; 186. Yamin, M. 2002. Subsidiary entrepreneurship and advantage of multinationality. In Havila, V., Forsgren, M. & Hakosson, H. （Eds.）Critical perspectives on Internationalisation. Pergamon Press: Oxford; 187. Zahra, S. A. 1991. Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 259-286; 188. Zahra, S. A. 1993a. Conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior: a critique and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 14(4): 5-21; 189. Zahra, S. A. 1993b. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: a taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 319-340; 190. Zahra, S. A. 1995. Corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: the case of management leverage buyouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(3): 225-247; 191. Zahra, S. A. 1996a. Goverance, ownership and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1713-1735; 192. Zahra, S. A. 1996b. Technology strategy and performance: a study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4): 289-321; 193. Zahra, S. A. & Covin J. 1995. Contextual influences on the corporate financial performance-company performance relationship in established firms: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10: 43-58; 194. Zahra, S. A. & Garvis, S. 2000. International corporate entrepreneurship and company performance. The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 469-492; 195. Zahra, S. A. & George, C. 2002. International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field & the future research agenda. In Hitt, M., Ireland, D., Sexton, D. & Camp, M. （Eds.）Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating an integrated mindset. Strategic Management series. Blackwell Publishers: Oxford; 196. Zahra, S. A., Jennings, D.F. & Kuratko, D. 1999. Guest Editors’ introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship in a global economy. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 24(1): 5-8; 197. Zahra, S. A., Nielsen, A.P. & Bogner, W.C. 1999. Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, competence development. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Spring: 169-189; 198. Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D.O. & Huse, M. 2000. Entrepreneurship in medium size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance system. Journal of Management, 26(5): 947-976; 199. Zenger, T.R. & Lawrence, B.S. 1989. Organization demography: The difference effects of age and tenure distributins on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2): 353-376; 200. Zhao, L. & Aram, J.D. 1995. Networking and growth of young technology-intensive ventures in China. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(5): 349-370; 201. Zmud, R.W. 1984. An examination of “pull-push” theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Management Science, 30(6): 727-738; G0893595011; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/34358; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/1/59501101.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/2/59501102.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/3/59501103.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/4/59501104.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/5/59501105.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/6/59501106.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/7/59501107.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/8/59501108.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/9/59501109.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/10/59501110.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/11/59501111.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/12/59501112.pdf

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/34358
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/1/59501101.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/2/59501102.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/3/59501103.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/4/59501104.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/5/59501105.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/6/59501106.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/7/59501107.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/8/59501108.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/34358/9/59501109.pdf

المؤلفون: 李穎貞, Lee, Ying-Chen

المساهمون: 司徒達賢, Seetoo, Ta Hsien

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業組織架構, 區域化, 區域總部, 子公司角色, 伊士曼柯達六大管理元素, 主軸輔軸, 金百利克拉克, 雀巢, 惠普科技, Multinational corporation organizational structure, Regionalization, Regional head quarter, Multinational subsidiary's role, Kimberly-Clark, Eastman Kodak, Hewlett & Packard, Nestle

وصف الملف: 23478 bytes; 32654 bytes; 35215 bytes; 47244 bytes; 401634 bytes; 151249 bytes; 555961 bytes; 331636 bytes; 168552 bytes; 70975 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 中文部分; 1.2002-2003年中國數碼相機市場研究年度報告、2003-2004年中國數碼相機市場研究年度報告、2004-2005年中國數碼相機市場研究年度報告，中國北京時代計世資訊有限公司; 2.Bartlett and Ghoshal著，李宛蓉譯，無國界管理，1990年; 3.MIC「全球IT Spending發展現況與趨勢」，產業研究報告，資策會，2005年1月; 4.MIC「全球資訊服務市場發展趨勢」產業研究報告，資策會，2004年5月; 5.上海市外商投資企業協會網站（http://www.saefi.org.cn/syqy/fwnr_qy_qc.asp）, 2005年5月4日; 6.于卓民，區域製造中心的成立與台灣中小企業的因應策略，經濟情勢暨評論季刊－創刊號， 1995年5月; 7.大前研一著、李宛蓉譯，「民族國家的終結」，立緒文化，1996年2月; 8.司徒達賢，「策略管理新論」，智勝文化，2001年; 9.司徒達賢，「管理學的新世界」，天下文化，2005年; 11.李貴惠，多國企業次區域總部的興起與任務－以大中華次區域總部為例，第六屆全球化經營策略論壇，2004年12月; 12.杜世娟，國際企業佈局策略與子公司溝通模式之研究，國立政治大學國際貿易學系碩士論文，1998年; 13.亞太資訊服務市場概況與未來展望，Gartner Group出版、資策會翻譯， 2004年11月; 14.柯秋霜，多國籍企業經營大陸市場對台灣子公司知識資源依賴程度之探討，國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文，2001年; 15.柯達的推廣策略，中國廣告原動力網站（http://member.netease.com/~pcmouse/dianzi/brand.html），2005年4月27日; 16.翁良杰，多國籍企業在大中華區域策略研究－以兩岸子公司間關係為焦點，國立中山企研所博士論文，2004年7月; 17.陳文宏，多國籍企業產業技術特性、知識管理與全球佈局策略之相關研究，國立中山人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，2003年8月; 18.陳向明，「社會科學質的研究」，五南圖書，2002年2月; 19.陳克名，在台外商子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究，臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，2000年; 20.陳建清，探討多國籍企業子公司策略角色之演變與發展－以粉末冶金超硬合金泰登公司為例，國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班論文，2003年; 21.陳耿彬，多國籍企業之台灣子公司對母公司赴大陸投資之中介角色，國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班論文，2003年7月; 22.曾志弘，多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究—以多國籍企 業在台子公司為例，中山大學企業管理學系博士論文，2000年; 23.電子中國（Electronic China）網站（http://www.ednchina.com/Cstmf/yearbook/home.asp），2004年9月21日; 24.廖明坤，台商大陸子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究，政治大學企業管理學系博士論文，2002年; 英文部分; 1.Andersson & Forsgren, "In Search of Centre of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles In Multinational Corporations", Management International Review, Fourth Quarter 2000, Vol.40, 329-350; 2.Bartlett, C. and S. Ghoshal, Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business School Press, Boston: MA, 1989; 3.Benito, Gr□gaard and Narula, "Environmental Influences on MNE Subsidiary Roles: Economic Integration and the Nordic Countries", Journal of International Business Studies, 2003, Vol.34, 443-456; 4.Birkinshaw & Hood, "Multinational Corporate Evolution And Subsidiary Development", Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, 1998; 5.Birkinshaw & Hood, “Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies”, The Academy of Management Review, 1998, Vol,23, NO.4, 773-795; 6.Birkinshaw & Morrison, "Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries Of Multinational Corporations", Journal of International Business Studies, Fourth Quarter 1995, 729-953; 7.Birkinshaw & Morrison, "Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations", Journal of International Business Studies, Fourth Quarter 1995,729-953; 8.Birkinshaw, "Entrepreneurship In Multinational Corporations: The Characteristics of Subsidiary Initiatives", Strategic Management Journal, Mar 1997, Vol.183, 207-229; 9.Birkinshaw, Hood and Jonsson, "Building Firm Specific Advantages In Multinational Corporations: The Role Of Subsidiary Initiative", Strategic Management Journal, Mar 1998, Vol.19, 221-241; 11.Brock, "Multinational Corporate Evolution And Subsidiary Development", The Academy Of Management Review, Jan 2000, Vol.25, 259-261; 12.Chiang & Yu, "The Relationship Between Multinationality and The Performance of Taiwan Firms", Journal Of American Academy Of Business, Mar 2005, Vol.6, 130-134; 13.Costello, "Corporate Governance in Multinational Corporations: Aligning The Interests of Subsidiaries and Headquarters", Ph. D Dissertation in Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2002; 14.Dan Meek (Director of Kodak Global Manufacturing & Logistics), Investor Overview (Presentation Slides), Kodak, Feb 28, 2005; 15.Daniels & Radebaugh, International Business－Environments and Operations, Prentice－Hall, Inc., 1998 9th edition; 16.Daniels, J., R. A. Pitts, and M. J. Tretter, “Strategy and Structure of U.S. Multinationals: An Exploratory Study,” Academy of Management Journal, 1984, Vol.27, 292-315; 17.Dunning, J. H., "The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: Past, Prestent and Future, Journal of International Business Studies, Jul. 2001, Vol. 81, 173; 18.Edwards, Ahmad and Moss, "Subsidiary Autonomy: The Case of Multinational Subsidiaries in Malaysia", Journal Of International Business Studies, First Quarter 2002, Vol. 33, 183-191; 19.Egelhoff, W. G. “Information-Processing Theory and the Multinational Corporation, in S. Ghoshal and E. Westney (eds.),” Organization Theory and The Multinational Corporation, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993; 20.Egelhoff, W. G. “Strategy and Structure in Multinational Corporations: A Revision of the Stopford and Wells Model,” Strategic Management Journal, 1988, Vol. 9, 1-14; 21.Enright, "Regional Management Centers in the Asia-Pacific", Management International Reivew, 2005, Vol.45, 59-82; 22.Eteman & Dulude, Managing The Multinational Subsidiary: Response To Environmental Changes And Host Nations R&D Policies, London: Croom Helm, 1986; 23.Farmer, Richard N & Richman, Barry M, International business : An Operational Theory, Cedarwood Press, 1966; 24.Forsgren, Managing The Internationalization Process: The Swedish Case, Routledge, London, 1989; 25.Ghoshal & Bartlett, “The Multinational Corporation As An Interorganizational Network”, The Academy Of Management Review, Oct 1990, 603-625; 26.Ghoshal & Westney, Organization Theory And The Multinational Corporation, St. Martins Press, NewYork, 1993; 27.Ghoshal, S. and N. Nohria, “Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations,” Strategic Management Journal, 1989, Vol. 10, 323-337; 28.Gupta & Govindarajan, "Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations", Strategic Management Journal, Apr 2000, 473-496; 29.Herbert, T. T., “Strategy and Multinational Organization Structure: An Interorganizational Relationships Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 1984; 30.Howard V Perlmutter, The international enterprise: Three conceptions, Institut pour l'etude des methodes de direction de l'enterprise, 1965; 31.HP Annual Report 2003, Hewlett-Packard, 2004; 32.Hymer, Stephen, The multinational corporation : A Radical Approach, Cambridge, New York : Cambridge University Press, 1979; 33.Jarillo & Martinez, "Different Roles For Subsidiaries: The Case of MNC In Spain", Strategic Management Journal, Nov/ Dec 1990, Vol.11, 501-512; 34.John H Dunning, The Determinants of International Production; Introduction, Oxford Economic Papers, Nov 1973; 35.Kidger, “Management Structure In Multinational Enterprises Responding To Globalization”, Employee Relations, 2002,Vol.24, 69-85; 36.Kimberly-Clark 2004 Annual Report, Kimberly-Clark, 2005; 37.Kimberly-Clark Fact Sheet, Kimberly-Clark, Feb 2005; 38.Kindleberger, Charles Poor, Multinational excursions, Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 1984; 39.Kodak Strategy Review (Presentation Slides), Kodak, Sep 24, 2003; 40.Minbaeva, Pedersen, Bj□rkman, Fey And Park, "MNC Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity and HRM", Academy of Management Proceedings, 2002, Vol.34, 586-599; 41.Nestl□ Management Report 2004, Nestl□, 2005; 42.Peng, "Subregional Economic Zones And Integration In East Asia", Political Science Quarterly, Winter 2002/2003, Vol. 17, 613-641; 43.Pla-Barber, J. “From Stopford and Well’s Model to Bartlett and Ghoshal’s Typology: New Empirical Evidence,” Management International Review, 2002, Vol.42, 141-156; 44.Porter, Competitive Advantage, 1985; 45.Porter, The Competitive Advantage Of Nations, 1990; 46.Richard D. Robinson, Internationalization of business : An Introduction, Chicago, Ill. : Dryden Press, 1984; 47.Root, Franklin R, Entry strategies for international markets, Lexington, Mass. : Lexington Books, 1987; 48.Rugman & Verbeke, "Foreign Subsidiaries And Multinational Strategic Management: An Extension On Porter's Diamond System", Management International Review, Second Quarter 1993, Vol.33, 71-84; 49.Rugman, Alan M, International business : Firm and Environment, New York : McGraw-Hill, c1985; 50.Rugman, Alan M, New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: An Assessment of Internalization Theory, Bulletin of Economic Research, 1986; 51.Stopford, J. and L. Wells, Managing the Multinational Enterprise, London: Longmans, 1972; 52.Sundaram, Anant K. & Black, J. Stewart, “The Environment and Internal Organization of Multinational Enterprises,” The Academy of Management Review, 1992 , Vol.17, 729-757; 53.Tavares, "Multinational Subsidiary Evolution And Public Policy: Two Tales From The European Periphery", Journal Of Industry, Competition And Trade, Sep 2002, Vol.2:3, 195-213; 54.The Fortune 2004 Global 500, July 26, 2004; 55.Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design And Methods, Beverty Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1989 revised edition; G0923550281; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/35055; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/1/55028101.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/2/55028102.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/3/55028103.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/4/55028104.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/5/55028105.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/6/55028106.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/7/55028107.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/8/55028108.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/9/55028109.pdf; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/10/55028110.pdf

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/35055
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/1/55028101.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/2/55028102.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/3/55028103.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/4/55028104.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/5/55028105.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/6/55028106.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/7/55028107.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/8/55028108.pdf
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35055/9/55028109.pdf

المؤلفون: 譚志澄, TAN， CHIH-CHENG

المساهمون: 于卓民

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業, 跨文化管理, 競爭優勢, 文化傳輸, 本土化

Time: 97

وصف الملف: 82916 bytes; 77298 bytes; 142627 bytes; 244440 bytes; 121504 bytes; 355491 bytes; 130769 bytes; 125654 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 一 中文部份; 1.于卓民，國際企業環境與管理，台北：華泰文化事業公司，2000。; 2.王健，｢跨國公司本土化淺析｣，對外經濟貿易大學學報，2003年第3期，頁 18-20。; 3.加里• 德斯勒，人力資源管理，第六版，北京：中國人民大學出版社，2000。; 4.李宗紅，朱洙,企業文化：勝敵於無形,北京：中國紡織出版社，2003; 5.李喻軍 吳桐，｢本土化，任何一家國際企業都不能回避的“坎”—訪西門子家電集團中國區域總裁博法蘭｣，南方經濟 , 2001年第5期，頁 12-18。; 6.宋小敏，｢美國在華國際企業當地化問題研究｣，機械管理與開發，第二期(總第58期) 2000年5月，頁10-12。; 7.吳成豐，｢中國台商全球企業理論之初探｣，管理科學，第16卷第1期， 2003年2月。; 8.吳先明，｢跨國公司當地化：動因，特徵與影響｣，經濟理論與經濟管理 2003年第2期，頁42-47。; 9.林平凡，詹向明等著，企業文化創新－２１世紀企業競爭戰略與策略，廣州：中山大學出版社，2002。; 11.林國建編著，現代企業文化的理論和實踐，哈爾濱：哈爾濱工程大學出版社，2004。; 12.彼得•聖吉，郭進隆譯，第五項修煉，上海：上海三聯書店，1994。; 13.胡永銓，｢外資零售企業在中國的經營戰略探析｣，經濟與管理研究， 2002年第2期，頁71-73。; 14. 馬光秋，｢對跨國公司本土化趨勢的分析｣，中國煤炭經濟學院學報，第16卷第1期 ，2003年3月，頁31-48。; 15.許麗卿，｢人力資源系統若完整 外商在中國較易成功｣，聯合早報，2000年2月14日，12版。; 16.梁紹川，企業文化與管理方式，廣州：暨南大學出版社，2003。; 17.椼林，｢全球化意味著什麼–跨國零售業沃爾瑪超高速發展的啟示｣，中外管理學報，2001年第2期。; 18.張仁德，霍洪喜，企業文化概論，天津：南開大學出版社，2001。; 19.張正忠 韓迎紅，｢人力資源的戰略選擇｣，Price and Market， 2003年3月。; 20.張鵬，｢身邊的戰爭 --- 跨國公司在中國｣，IT經理世界，2000年1月，頁32-34。; 21.鄒衛東，聶軼：沃爾瑪－美國造，廣州：廣東旅遊出版社，2002。; 22.郭建平 鄭勝會，｢跨國企業的企業文化特徵｣，天津商學院學報， 第23卷第2期， 2003年3月，頁34-37。; 23.普哈拉等著；李芳齡譯，企業策略 終結企業帝國主義，臺北：天下遠見，2001。; 24.舒琝，｢北歐在滬企業調查報告(二)–兼論外資企業運作的幾個問題｣，復旦大學調查研究，2000年。; 25.劉冬銀，｢全球化背景下跨國公司本土化的動因及其對我國經濟發展的作用分析｣，科技進步與對策，2002年12月，頁127-128。; 26.蔣懷明,｢外商進入中國零售業影響分析及對策｣，北方經貿，2002年2 期。; 27.廖勇凱，｢多國企業在滬子公司戰略性國際人力資源管理模型建構與實證研究｣，復旦大學未出版博士論文，2005年。; 28.韓睿 田志龍，｢聯合利華的全球化與本土化｣，Economic Management，2003年5月。; 29.嚴文華等編著，跨文化企業管理心理學，大連：東北財經大學出版社，2000。; 30.邁克爾.茨威爾著，創造基於能力的企業文化，北京：華夏出版社，2002。; 二 英文部分; 1. Albert, Michael, “Cultural Development Through Human Resource Systems Integration,” Training and Development Journal, September 1985, pp.76-81; 2. Barney, Jay B. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage” Journal of Management, 17(1), 1991, pp.99 –120; 3. Bartlett, Christopher and Ghoshhal, Sumantra, Managing Across Borders：The Transnational Solution, Boston, MA,: Harvard Business Press, 2002.; 4.Chan, Andrew and Clegg, Stewart, “History, Culture and Organization Studies,” Culture and Organization, 2002, Vol,8(4), pp.259-273; 5.Gamble, Jos, “Localizing management in foreign-invested enterprises in China: practical, cultural, and strategic perspectives,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, October 2000, pp.883-903.; 6. Hamel, Gary and Prahalad, C. K., “Competing for the Future,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, 1984, pp.122 – 128.; 7. Hetrick, Susan, “Transferring HR ideas and practices: globalization and convergence in Poland,” Human Resource Development International, HRDI 5:3(2002), pp.333-357.; 8. Janssens, Maddy, ”Developing a Culturally Synergistic Approach to International Human Resource Management,” Journal of World Business, Vol. 36, pp.429-450.; 9. Kedia, Ben L. and Mukherji, Ananda, “Golbal Managers: Developing A Mindset for Global competitiveness,” Journal of World Business,/34(3) / 1999, pp.230-251.; 11.Levitt, T., ”The Globalization of Markets,” Harvard Business Review, (May-June 1983), pp.92-102.; 12. Pfeffer, J., Competitive Advantage Trough People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press, 1994.; 13. Prahalad, C. K. and Doz, Y. L. The Multinational Mission－Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision, New York：The Free Press, 1987.; 14. Rhinesmith, Stephen H., “Going Global From The Inside Out,” Training & Development, November 1991, pp.42-47.; 15.Scott, W.R., Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.; 16.Selmer, Jan, and Leon, Corinna T. de, “Parent cultural control of foreign subsidiaries through organizational acculturation: a longitudinal study,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13:8, December 2002, pp.1147-1165; 17. Schneider, S. National VS Corporate Culture：Implications for Human Resource Management，Human Resource Management，（1988）Vol. 27，No. 2; 18.Taylor, Robert; Cho, Yong-doo and Hyun, Jae-Hoon, “Korean Companies in China: Strategies in the Localization of Management,” Managing Korean Business, 2002, pp.161-181.; 19. Ulrich, Dave and Lake, Dale, Organizational capability: Competing from the inside out, New Your: Wiley, 1990.; 20.Wackins, John, ”HR Stages for The Localization Launch Pad,” Employee Benefit News, October 2003, pp.39-63.; 21.Wellins, Rich and Rioux, Sheila, “ The Growing Pains of Globalizing HR,” Training & Development, May 2000, pp.79-85.; 22. Wong, Chi-Sum; Law, Kenneth S., “ Managing Localization of Human /resources in the PRC: A Practical Model,” Journal of world Business,/ 34(1) / 1999, pp.26-40.; 23. Yip, G. S., “Global Strategy—in a World of Nations?” Sloan Management Review,(Fall 1989), pp.24-41.; G0090932526; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/36978

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/36978

المؤلفون: 劉武雄

المساهمون: 譚丹琪

مصطلحات موضوعية: 台商多國企業, 控制策略, 社會控制, 行為控制, 產出控制

Time: 97

وصف الملف: 77145 bytes; 121866 bytes; 123837 bytes; 153872 bytes; 227283 bytes; 172094 bytes; 323857 bytes; 251666 bytes; 171575 bytes; 505024 bytes; 120368 bytes; application/pdf

Relation: 參考文獻─中文部分; 1. 于卓民，國際企業環境與管理，台北，華泰文化事業公司出版，2002年9 月。; 2. 何江俊，『國際分工策略、組織結構與國際人力資源管理作為之研究－以三家台商資訊電子廠為例』，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程全球經營與貿易組未出版碩士論文，2002年5月。; 3. 余明助，『多國籍企業組織、策略與控制關係之研究-以台商海外子公司為例』，國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文，2000年5月。; 4. 吳青松，國際企業管理理論與實務，台北，智勝書局出版，2000年6月。; 5. 李智賢，『多國籍企業對海外子公司施行控制機制之研究－以台灣赴大陸投資之企業為例』，國立中央大學資訊管理學系未出版碩士論文，1997年6月。; 6. 周鴻均，『國際企業的組織結構與控制之研究』，國立政治大學企業管理研究未出版碩士論文，1994年6月。; 7. 林雅惠，『影響母公司對子公司控制機制選擇因素之研究─以大陸台商為例』，大葉大學國際企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。2003年6月。; 8. 許宗哲，『多國企業整合與協調之研究─以宏□集團之主從架構為例』，國立政治大學國際貿易學系未出版碩士論文，1998年6月。; 9. 陳信宏，『東南亞與大陸台商之投資與營運比較』，中華民國工商協進會委託中華經濟研究院研究計畫，中華民國工商協進會，2003年8月。; 11. 曾紀幸，司徒達賢，于卓民『多國籍企業網路組織型態與管理機制選擇之關係─在台外商公司之產品交易之實證研究』，管理學報，第十五卷，第一期，1998年3月。p.1-26; 12. 廖明坤，『台商大陸子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究』，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文，2002年10月。; 13. 黎維山，『影響海外子公司協調控制機制之研究』，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文，1999年6月。; 參考文獻＿英文部份; 1. Andersson, U. and M. Forsgren (1996), “ Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation,” International Business Review, 5(5), pp.487-508。; 2. Baliga, B. R. and A. M. Jaeger (1984), “ Multinational corporation: Control systems and delegation issues,” Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2), pp.25-39。; 3. Birkinshaw, J. M., and A. J. Morrision (1995) “ Configuration of strategy and structure in the subsidiaries of multinational corporations” Journal of International Business Studies 26(4), pp.729-753。; 4. Boardman A. E., D. M. Shaprio and A. R. Vining (1997), “The role of agent costs in explaining the superior performance of foreign MNE subsidiaries”, International Business Review, 6(3), pp.295-317。; 5. Brooke, M. Z. (1984), “ Autonomy and centralization in multinational firms”, International Studies of Management & Organization, 14(1), pp.3-22。; 6. Chang, E. and M.S. Taylor (1999) “ Control in multinational corporations: The case of Korean manufacturing subsidiaries”, Journal of Management , 25(4), pp.541-565。; 7. Doz Y. L. and C. K. Prahalad (1981), “ Headquarters Influence and Strategic control in MNCs” , Sloan Management Review, 22(4), pp.15-29.。; 8. Edstrom, A. & J Galbraith (1977), “ Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(2), pp.248-263。; 9. Edstrom, A., Ahmad, A. and Moss, S. (2002), “ Subsidiary Autonomy : The case of multinational subsidiaries in Malaysia,” Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), pp.183-191。; 11. Ghoshal, S. and C. A. Bartlett (1988), “ Cration, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporation,” Journal of International Business Studies , 19(3), pp.365-387。; 12. Hawkins, R.G. and I. Walter (1981), “ Planning Multinational Operations”, In Handbooks of W. H. Starbuck, NY : Oxford University Press, p. 253-267.; 13. Hedlund, G. (1986), “ The hypermodern MNC: A hierarchy ? ” Human Resource Management Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp.9-36。; 14. Malnight T. W. (1996), “ The transition from decentralized to network-based MNC structures : An evolutionary,” Journal of International Business Studies , 27(1), pp.43-65。; 15. Martinez , J.I. & J.C. Jarillo (1991), “Coordination Demands of International Strategies ”, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, p.429-444。; 16. Nobel, R. and J. Birkinshaw (1988), “ Innovation in multinational corporation: Control and communication pattern in international R&D operation,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), pp.479-496。; 17. Ouchi, W. G.(1979), “A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanism”, Management Science ,25(9),pp.833-945; 18. Ouchi, W. G.(1980), “Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clan ”, Administrative Science Quarterly ,25,pp.129-141; 19. Sugiura H. (1990) “ How Honda localizes its global strategy,” Sloan Management Review, 31(Fall), pp.77-82。; 20. Taggart, J. H. and N. Hood (1999), “Determinants of autonomy in multinational corporation subsidiaries, ” European Management Journal , 17(2), pp.226-236。; G0090932117; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/35330

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/35330

المؤلفون: 鍾國生, Chung,Kuo-Sheng

المساهمون: 張逸民, Chang,Yegmin

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業, 核心流程, 動態演化, 創新, 子公司, 主動創新力, 給定任務, 策略流程, 營運流程, 人員流程, MNC, Core Process, Dynamic Evolution, Innovation, Subsidiary, Initiatives, Charter, Strategic process, Operational process, Human Resource process

Relation: G0929325141; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/30800; http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/30800/1/index.html

الاتاحة: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/30800
http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/30800/1/index.html

المؤلفون: 蔣志堅, 林孟璋, 龔昶元

المساهمون: 資訊管理技術系

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國虛擬企業, 行銷管理, 多國企業, 虛擬組織, 物流管理, Multinational virtual enterprise, Marketing management, Multinational enterprise, Virtual organization, Logistics management

وصف الملف: 415 bytes; text/html

Relation: http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/handle/310901800/752; http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/bitstream/310901800/752/1/index.html

الاتاحة: http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/handle/310901800/752
http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/bitstream/310901800/752/1/index.html

المؤلفون: 王敏惠

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業, 網路遊戲, 稅務管理, 智財中心, 租稅考量

الاتاحة: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0100932029%22.

المؤلفون: 林以婷, Lin, I-Ting

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業組織結構, 子公司角色, 地主國環境, 區位優勢

الاتاحة: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0098355028%22.

المؤلفون: 鍾國生, Chung,Kuo-Sheng

مصطلحات موضوعية: 多國企業, 核心流程, 動態演化, 創新, 子公司, 主動創新力, 給定任務, 策略流程, 營運流程, 人員流程, MNC, Core Process, Dynamic Evolution, Innovation, Subsidiary, Initiatives, Charter, Strategic process, Operational process, Human Resource process

الاتاحة: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cdrfb3/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&i=sid=%22G0929325141%22.