يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 359 نتيجة بحث عن '"цифровые устройства"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.59s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Наука телевидения, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 171-215 (2024)

    وصف الملف: electronic resource

  2. 2
    Academic Journal

    المساهمون: The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 24-28-01653: Psycho-physiological indicators of decoding graphic communication means in users with cognitive disabilities, https://rscf.ru/ en/project/24-28-01653/, Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 24-28-01653 «Психофизиологические показатели декодирования графических средств коммуникации у лиц с нарушением интеллекта», https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-01653/

    المصدر: SibScript; Том 26, № 5 (2024); 782-794 ; СибСкрипт; Том 26, № 5 (2024); 782-794 ; 2949-2092 ; 2949-2122

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.sibscript.ru/jour/article/view/5705/4709; Ахренова Н. А., Зарипов Р. И. Лингвопрагматические характеристики современного поликодового мультимодального медиатекста в контексте информационно-психологического воздействия. Медиалингвистика. 2023. Т. 10. № 4. С. 428–449. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2023.401; Безгодова С. А., Микляева А. В. Цифровые трансформации психологии человека. СПб.: РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена. 2023. 176 с. https://elibrary.ru/vawhfi; Большакова Л. С. О содержании понятия «поликодовый текст». Вестник Самарского государственного университета. 2008. № 4. С. 19–24. https://elibrary.ru/iukdsp; Вольфсон Ю. Р., Вольчина А. Е. Визуальное восприятие в современном обществе или куда движется галактика Гуттенберга? Современные исследования социальных проблем (электронный научный журнал). 2015. № 4. С. 177–189. https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2015-4-18; Воронцова Т. А., Артамонова А. Г. Лицо VS фигуры: особенности конструирования возраста незнакомого человека на основе восприятия его портретной и ростовой фотографий. Экспериментальная психология. 2023. Т. 16. № 3. С. 34–52. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2023160303; Восканян Ш. Р. Англоязычные интернет-мемы и специфика их перевода на русский язык. Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2022. № 4. С. 111–113. https://elibrary.ru/xfdsjk; Галяшина Е. И. Семиотика эмотиконов и анимационных картинок в аспекте судебной лингвистической экспертизы. Вестник Университета имени О. Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). 2022. № 2. С. 41–48. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.90.2.041-048; Дмитриева В. А. Социально-психологический анализ «клипового мышления» активных пользователей сети Интернет как феномена современности. Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена. 2021. № 202. С. 151–161. https://doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2021-202-151-161; Защиринская О. В., Белимова П. А. Нарушение интерпретации пиктографических систем подростками с легкой умственной отсталостью. Российский психиатрический журнал. 2022. № 1. С. 46–54. https://doi.org/10.47877/1560-957X-2022-10106; Канашина С. В. Интернет-мем как медиатекст. Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия Филология. Журналистика. 2019. Т. 19. № 1. С. 107–112. https://elibrary.ru/zdykzf; Князева Е. Н. Визуальные образы на службе когнитивной науки. Праксема. Проблемы визуальной семиотики. 2020. № 1. С. 58–75. https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2020-1-58-75; Копусь Т. Л. К вопросу об исследовании цифрового языка. Сервис plus. 2021. Т. 15. № 2. С. 13–23. https://doi.org/10.24412/2413-693X-2021-2-13-23; Космарская И. В. Формирование строевых элементов письменной интернет-речи (на материале смайлика и эмодзи). Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2021. № 3. С. 110–121. https://doi.org/10.52070/2542-2197_2021_3_845_110; Купчинская М. А., Юдалевич Н. В. Клиповое мышление как феномен современного общества. Бизнес-образование в экономике знаний. 2019. № 3. С. 66–71. https://elibrary.ru/tnijlr; Лазарева М. М., Одекова Ф. Р. Смайлы в современной коммуникации: содержание, форма, функции в общении. Вестник науки. 2020. Т. 4. № 8. С. 15–18. https://elibrary.ru/vxpxwr; Лангуев К. А., Лангуева Е. В. Изучение окуломоторных реакций учащихся в условиях цифровой среды. Universum: психология и образование. 2023. № 2. С. 19–22. https://elibrary.ru/qjabuc; Роговец А. Ю., Мазуркевич А., Суворова И. Ю., Винник М., Приходько А. А. Чат-бот как способ поддержки жертв школьной травли. Современная зарубежная психология. 2023. Т. 12. № 3. С. 103–114. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2023120310; Романова Е. В., Двигубский А. В. Чат-боты как элемент управления системой. Хроноэкономика. 2019. № 7. С. 94–99. https://elibrary.ru/oqacfu; Рохлина Т. А. Семантика мема и репрезентация ситуации (на материале немецкого языка). Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2021. Т. 14. № 8. С. 2507–2511. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil210382; Сабадин С. Т. М. Ж. П. Смешанные тексты: креолизованный vs поликодовый vs мультимодальный. Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2022. Т. 15. № 6. С. 2017–2023. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220297; Сальников В. С. Влияние интернет-мемов на процесс коммуникации в социальных сетях. Исследовательский потенциал молодых ученых: взгляд в будущее: XVI Регион. науч.-практ. конф. (Тула, 20 февраля – 13 марта 2020 г.) Тула: ТГПУ им. Л. Н. Толстого, 2020. С. 171–173. https://elibrary.ru/lvdwoi; Симелин В. А., Никитина Е. А. Интерфейс мозг-компьютер как символ коэволюции человека и техники. Философия науки и техники. 2022. Т. 27. № 1. С. 49–58. https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2022-27-1-49-58; Скуратова К. А., Защиринская О. В. Паттерны глазодвигательной активности младших школьников с дислексией при чтении текстов различного визуального формата. Научные исследования выпускников факультета психологии СПбГУ. 2022. Т. 8. С. 85–93. https://elibrary.ru/iesptl; Фарахутдинов Ш. Ф., Панова А. В. Айтрекинг в маркетинговых и социологических исследованиях. Социология. 2019. № 5. С. 189–198. https://elibrary.ru/otuppt; Ягодкина М. В. «Агрессивные точки» в современной интернет-коммуникации. Art Logos. 2021. № 3. С. 55–60. https://doi.org/10.35231/25419803_2021_3_55; Akram U., Drabble J., Cau G., Hershaw F., Rajenthran A., Lowe M., Trommelen C., Ellis J. G. Exploratory study on the role of emotion regulation in perceived valence, humour, and beneficial use of depressive internet memes in depression. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57953-4; Akram U., Irvine K., Allen S. F., Stevenson J. C., Ellis J. G., Drabble J. Internet memes related to the COVID-19 pandemic as a potential coping mechanism for anxiety. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00857-8; Aldunate N., González-Ibáñez R. An integrated review of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. Frontiers in psychology, 2017, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02061; Assad A. The relationship between the use of emoticons and virtual engagement on Facebook among the expatriates in the UAE. Information Sciences Letters, 2022, 11(2): 439–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/isl/110214; Baggia A., Žnidaršič A., Tratnik A. Emoticons in student-professor email communication. Comunicar, 2022, 30(73): 119–133. https://doi.org/10.3916/C73-2022-10; Bai Q., Dan Q., Mu Z., Yang M. A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in psychology, 2019, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221; Baig M. Z., Kavakli M. A survey on psycho-physiological analysis & measurement methods in multimodal systems. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2019, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3020037; Beattie A., Edwards A. P., Edwards C. A bot and a smile: Interpersonal impressions of chatbots and humans using emoji in computer-mediated communication. Communication Studies, 2020, 71(3): 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1725082; Blunden H., Brodsky A. Beyond the emoticon: Are there unintentional cues of emotion in email? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2021, 47(4): 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220936054; Bok S. Y. The influence of emoticons on new product evaluation. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 2023, 17(1): 76–86. https://doi.org/10.33423/jmdc.v17i1.6026; Boutet I., LeBlanc M., Chamberland J. A., Collin C. A. Emojis influence emotional communication, social attributions, and information processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106722; Brean A. From ELIZA to ChatGPT. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening, 2023, 143(6). https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.23.0279; Brito P. Q., Torres S., Fernandes J. What kind of emotions do emoticons communicate? Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 2020, 32(7): 1495–1517. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2019-0136; Brody N., Cullen S. Meme sharing in relationships: The role of humor styles and functions. First Monday, 2023, 28(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i5.12789; Cao H. Analysis of the differences of emoticons in intercultural online communication. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Communication and Culture Studies (ICLCCS 2021). Atlantis Press, 2021, 253–258. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211025.041; Chen Y., Yang X., Howman H., Filik R. Individual differences in emoji comprehension: Gender, age, and culture. PloS ONE, 2024, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297379; Cherbonnier A., Michinov N. The recognition of emotions conveyed by emoticons and emojis: A systematic literature review. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2022, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000067; Dalle Nogare L., Proverbio A. M. Emojis vs. facial expressions: An electrical neuroimaging study on perceptual recognition. Social Neuroscience, 2023, 18(1): 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2023.2203949; Dergaa I., Fekih-Romdhane F., Hallit S., Loch A. A., Glenn J. M., Fessi M. S., Aissa M. B., Souissi N., Guelmami N., Swed S., El Omri A., Bragazzi N. L., Saad H. B. ChatGPT is not ready yet for use in providing mental health assessment and interventions. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2024, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1277756; Du Y., Masood M. A., Joseph K. Understanding visual memes: An empirical analysis of text superimposed on memes shared on Twitter. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 2020, 14(1): 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7287; Fagan S. E., Wade L., Hugenberg K., Kapadia A., Bertenthal B. I. Sharing photos on social media: Visual attention affects real-world decision making. Advances in Human Factors in Robots, Unmanned Systems and Cybersecurity: Proceedings of the AHFE 2021 Virtual Conferences on Human Factors in Robots, Drones and Unmanned Systems, and Human Factors in Cybersecurity, USA, 25–29 Jul 2021, eds. Zallio M., Raymundo Ibañez C., Hernandez J. H. Springer, Cham., 2021, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79997-7_25; Ferré P., Haro J., Pérez-Sánchez M. Á., Moreno I., Hinojosa J. A. Emoji-SP, the Spanish emoji database: Visual complexity, familiarity, frequency of use, clarity, and emotional valence and arousal norms for 1031 emojis. Behavior Research Methods, 2023, 55(4): 1715–1733. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01893-6; Hasan R., Bertenthal B. I., Hugenberg K., Kapadia A. Your photo is so funny that I don’t mind violating your privacy by sharing it: Effects of individual humor styles on online photo-sharing behaviors. CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445258; Huntington H. E. Partisan cues and internet memes: Early evidence for motivated skepticism in audience message processing of spreadable political media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 2020, 28(3): 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1614589; Iarygina O. Investigating the influence of users personality on the ambiguous emoji perception. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media. Seattle, 2022, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emoji-1.6; Iqbal L., Safi F., Ullah I. The use of symbols (emoticons) in social media: A shift of language from words to symbols. Global Mass Communication Review, 2020, V(III): 124–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-III).10; Jo M., Ho S. M., Burnett G. Do you speak meme? A dynamic digital language for the information society. Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity: Proc. 18th Intern. Conf., iConference 2023, Virtual Event, 13–17 Mar 2023. Springer, Cham., 2023, pt. I, 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_39; Kath L. M., Schmidt G. B., Islam S., Jimenez W. P., Hartnett J. L. Getting psyched about memes in the psychology classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 2024, 51(3): 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221085908; Kaye L. K., Schweiger C. R. Are emoji valid indicators of in-the-moment mood? Computers in Human Behavior, 2023, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107916; Kędras M., Sobecki J. What is hidden in clear sight and how to find it – a survey of the integration of artificial intelligence and eye tracking. Information, 2023, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/info14110624; Kennison S. M., Fritz K., Hurtado Morales M. A., Chan-Tin E. Emoji use in social media posts: Relationships with personality traits and word usage. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1343022; Leśniak E., Grzybowski S. J. The role of emoticons in the comprehension of emotional and non-emotional messages in dyslexic youth – a preliminary study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693287; Li Y., Shin H. Should a luxury Brand’s Chatbot use emoticons? Impact on brand status. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2023, 22(3): 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2104; Ling Ch., AbuHilal I., Blackburn J., De Cristofaro E., Zannettou S., Stringhini G. Dissecting the meme magic: Understanding indicators of virality in image memes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2021, 5(CSCW1). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.06535; Liu S., Sun R. To express or to end? Personality traits are associated with the reasons and patterns for using emojis and stickers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01076; Malodia S., Dhir A., Bilgihan A., Sinha P., Tikoo T. Meme marketing: How marketers can drive better engagement using viral memes? Psychology & Marketing, 2022, 39(9): 1775–1801. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21702; Marder B., Houghton D., Erz A., Harris L., Javornik A. Smile(y) – and your students will smile with you? The effects of emoticons on impressions, evaluations, and behaviour in staff-to-student communication. Studies in Higher Education, 2020, 45(11): 2274–2286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1602760; Marko K. "Depends on who i'm writing to" – the influence of addressees and personality traits on the use of emoji and emoticons, and related implications for forensic authorship analysis. Frontiers in Communication, 2022, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.840646; McShane L., Pancer E., Poole M., Deng Q. Emoji, playfulness, and brand engagement on Twitter. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2021, 53(1): 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.06.002; Nguyen M. H., Gruber J., Fuchs J., Marler W., Hunsaker A., Hargittai E. Changes in digital communication during the COVID-19 global pandemic: Implications for digital inequality and future research. Social Media + Society, 2020, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948255; Orazi D. C., Ranjan B., Cheng Y. Non-face emojis in digital marketing: Effects, contingencies, and strategic recommendations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2023, 51(3): 570–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00917-z; Park J. R., El Mimouni H. Emoticons and non-verbal communications across Arabic, English, and Korean Tweets. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 2020, 69(8/9): 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2020-0021; Pitt K. M., Brumberg J. S., Pitt A. R. Considering augmentative and alternative communication research for brain-computer interface practice. Assistive technology outcomes and benefits, 2019, 13(1): 1–20.; Ridge R. D., Hawk C. E., Hartvigsen L. D., McCombs L. D. To meme or not to meme? Political social media posts and ideologically motivated aggression in job recommendations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2316619; Rivin D., Shcherbakova O. Understanding of comical texts in people with different types of attitudes towards humour: Evidence from Internet memes. The European Journal of Humour Research, 2021, 9(2): 112–131. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2021.9.2.456; Saha S., Mamun K. A., Ahmed K., Mostafa R., Naik G. R., Darvishi S., Khandoker A. H., Baumert M. Progress in brain computer interface: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2021, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.578875; Saramandi A., Au Y. K., Koukoutsakis A., Zheng C. Y., Godwin A., Bianchi-Berthouze N., Jewitt C., Jenkinson P. M., Fotopoulou A. Tactile emoticons: Conveying social emotions and intentions with manual and robotic tactile feedback during social media communications. PLoS ONE, 2024, 19(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304417; Shaari A. H. Accentuating illocutionary forces: Emoticons as speech act realization strategies in a multicultural online communication environment. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 2020, 26(1): 135–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2601-10; Smith A., Hachen S., Schleifer R., Bhugra D., Buadze A., Liebrenz M. Old dog, new tricks? Exploring the potential functionalities of ChatGPT in supporting educational methods in social psychiatry. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2023, 69(8): 1882–1889. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640231178451; Smutny Z., Hancsics N., Sulc Z. Estimating emotions from emojis and their use in computer-mediated communication. 2020 International Conference Engineering Technologies and Computer Science (EnT), Moscow, 2020, 140–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/EnT48576.2020.00033; Soriano A. J. T. Facebook meme as an avenue for discussing serious problems and issues. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 2021, 9(1): 129–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10968666; Sun J., Lasser S., Lee S. K. Understanding emojis: Cultural influences in interpretation and choice of emojis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 2023, 16(3): 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2022.2036790; Szeto M. D., Barber C., Ranpariya V. K., Anderson J., Hatch J., Ward J., Aguilera M. N., Hassan S., Hamp A., Coolman T., Dellavalle R. P. Emojis and emoticons in health care and dermatology communication: Narrative review. JMIR dermatology, 2022, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/33851; Tabatabaei S., Ivanova E. I. The role of memes on emotional contagion. Elementary Education Online, 2021, 20(5): 6028–6036.; Teh P. L., Boon O. P., Gill C. M. H. D. Relationships between emoticon usage and recipient groups in students' text messages. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications & Services, 2020, 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429127; Togans L. C. J., Holtgraves T., Kwon G., Morales Zelaya T. E. Digitally saving face: An experimental investigation of cross-cultural differences in the use of emoticons and emoji. Journal of Pragmatics, 2021, 186: 277–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.016; Upadhyay S. S. N., Gunraj D. N., Phillips N. C. Mad or mad-mad: Conveying subtle emotion with face emoji. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183299; Weiser R., Alam N. Meme culture and suicide sensitivity: A quantitative study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2022, 9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01320-3; Wong E. F., Holyoak K. J. Cognitive and motivational factors driving sharing of internet memes. Memory & Cognition, 2021, 49: 863–872. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01134-1; Xu L., Yang X., Tian S. A study on the role of Internet emoticons in business communication from the perspective of symbolic interactionism. Athens Journal of Mass Media & Communications, 2023, 9(3): 161–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.9-3-2; Yang G. Using funny memes for social media marketing: The moderating role of bandwagon cues. Journal of Promotion Management, 2022, 28(7): 944–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2022.2054904; Zhang B., Gearhar Sh. It’s obviously funny to be a meme: Viewing, sharing, and creating memes for political entertainment and observation. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 2022, 11(2): 53–76.; Zashchirinskaia O. V. Patterns of interrelation between perception and understanding of images and texts with different degree of blur. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 2020a, 82(3): 1368–1377. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01811-7; Zashchirinskaia O. V. Specific features of the comprehension of texts and story pictures by adolescents with intellectual disturbances. Acta Neuropsychologica, 2020b, 18(2): 221–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1404; Zashchirinskaia O., Nikolaeva E., Udo H. Features of the perception and understanding of emoji by adolescents with different levels of intelligence. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2020, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/mjcp-2417; Zidani S. Messy on the inside: Internet memes as mapping tools of everyday life. Information, Communication & Society, 2021, 24(16): 2378–2402. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1974519; 이다은, 신상은. 정상 성인의 정서어휘에 대한 AAC 그림상징과 SNS 이모티콘의 인식 연구. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 2020, 25(2): 334–342. https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.20721; 이국희. 미소인가? 조소인가?: 온라인 게임에서 지위가 높은 청소년과 낮은 청소년의 웃음 이모티콘 긍정성 이해 차이. 한국감성과학회. 2021, 24(3): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2021.24.3.3; https://www.sibscript.ru/jour/article/view/5705

  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Report
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Наука телевидения, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp 179-209 (2021)

    وصف الملف: electronic resource

  8. 8
    Report

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: KAZAK, Artur, SAVA, Lilia, GRIȚCO, Roman et al. Цифровая электроника: Полупроводниковые запоминающие устройства: Лекционный курс. Fac. Electronică și Telecomunicații, Dep. Telecomunicații și Sisteme Electronice: Tehnica UTM, 2023, 28 p. ISBN 978-9975-45-892-4.; http://repository.utm.md/handle/5014/22488

  9. 9
    Report

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: KAZAK, Artur, NISTIRIUC, Pavel, SAVA, Lilia et al. Цифровая электроника: Последовательностные цифровые устройства: Лекционный курс. Fac. Electronică și Telecomunicații, Dep. Telecomunicații și Sisteme Electronice: Tehnica UTM, 2023, 40 p. ISBN 978-9975-45-891-7.; http://repository.utm.md/handle/5014/22480

  10. 10
    Report

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: KAZAK, Artur, SAVA, Lilia, SOROCHIN, Serafima et al. Цифровая электроника: Алгебра логики и комбинационные цифровые устройства: Лекционный курс. Fac. Electronică și Telecomunicații, Dep. Telecomunicații și Sisteme Electronice: Tehnica UTM, 2023, 40 p. ISBN 978-9975-45-890-0.; http://repository.utm.md/handle/5014/22479

  11. 11
    Book

    جغرافية الموضوع: Минск

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Будько, А. А. Синтез цифровых автоматов. Схемотехника цифровых устройств. Курсовое проектирование : пособие / А. А. Будько, Т. Н. Дворникова. – Минск : БГУИР, 2024. – 81 с. : ил.; https://libeldoc.bsuir.by/handle/123456789/56103

  12. 12
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Pedagogy, Psychology, Society; ; Педагогика, психология, общество: от теории к практике

    وصف الملف: text/html

    Relation: https://phsreda.com/e-articles/10371/Action10371-101204.pdf; Буданцев Д.В. Цифровизация в сфере образования: обзор российских научных публикаций [Текст] / Д.В. Буданцев // Молодой ученый. – 2020. – №27 (317). – С. 120–127 [Электронный ресурс]/ – Режим доступа: http://moluch.ru/archive/317/72477/; Воробьев И.А. Плюсы и минусы цифровизации в образовании / И.А. Воробьев, А.В. Жукова, К.А. Минакова // Педагогические науки. – 2021. – №1 (103). – С. 110–118.; Уваров А.Ю. Трудности и перспективы цифровой трансформации образования [Текст] / А.Ю. Уваров, Э. Гейбл, И.В. Дворецкая [и др.]; под ред. А.Ю. Уварова, И.Д. Фрумина; Нац. исслед. ун-т «Высшая школа экономики», Ин-т образования. – М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2019. – 343 с.; https://phsreda.com/files/Books/621ca66765d99.jpeg?req=101204; https://phsreda.com/article/101204/discussion_platform

  13. 13
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Current Pediatrics; Том 20, № 6 (2021); 506-520 ; Вопросы современной педиатрии; Том 20, № 6 (2021); 506-520 ; 1682-5535 ; 1682-5527

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://vsp.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/2809/1133; Wilmer HH, Sherman LE, Chein JM. Smartphones and Cognition: A Review of Research Exploring the Links between Mobile Technology Habits and Cognitive Functioning. Front Psychol. 2017;8:605. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605; Baumgartner SE, Lemmens JS, Weeda WD, Huizinga M. Measuring media multitasking: development of a short measure of media multitasking for adolescents. J Media Psychol. 2017;29(4): 188–197. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000167; Byrne R, Terranova CO, Trost SG. Measurement of screen time among young children aged 0-6 years: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2021;22(8):e13260. doi:10.1111/obr.13260; Anderson DR, Subrahmanyam K. Digital Screen Media and Cognitive Development. Pediatrics. 2017;140(Suppl 2):S57–S61. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1758C; Reid Chassiakos YL, Radesky J, Christakis D, et al. Children and Adolescents and Digital Media. Pediatrics. 2016;138(5):e20162593. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2593; Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA. Children’s television viewing and cognitive outcomes: a longitudinal analysis of national data. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(7):619–625. doi:10.1001/archpedi.159.7.619; Schmidt ME, Rich M, Rifas-Shiman SL, et al. Television viewing in in-fancy and child cognition at 3 years of age in a US cohort. Pediatrics. 2009;123(3):e370–e375. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3221; Lin LY, Cherng RJ, Chen YJ, et al. Effects of television exposure on developmental skills among young children. Infant Behav Dev. 2015;38:20–26. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.005; Aishworiya R, Cai S, Chen HY, et al. Television viewing and child cognition in а longitudinal birth cohort in Singapore: the role of maternal factors. ВМС Pediatr. 2019;19(1):286. doi:10.1186/s12887-019-1651-z; Madigan S, Browne D, Racine N, et al. Association Between Screen Time and Children’s Performance on a Developmental Screening Test. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(3):244–250. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5056; Liu W, Wu Х, Huang К, et al. Early childhood screen time as а predictor of emotional and behavioral problems in children at 4 years: а birth cohort study China. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021;26(1):3. doi:10.1186/s12199-020-00926-w; Cespedes EM, Gillman MW, Kleinman K, et al. Television viewing, bedroom television, and sleep duration from infancy to midchildhood. Pediatrics. 2014;133(5):e1163–e1171. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-3998; Chen B, van Dam RM, Таn CS, et al. Screen viewing behavior and sleep duration among children aged 2 and below. ВМС Public Health. 2019;19(1):59. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6385-6; Pagani LS, Fitzpatrick C, Barnett TA, Dubow E. Prospective associations between early childhood television exposure and academic, psychosocial, and physical well-being by middle childhood. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(5):425–431. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.50; Hutton JS, Dudley J, Horowitz-Kraus T, et al. Associations Between Screen-Based Media Use and Brain White Matter Integrity in Preschool-Aged Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(1):e193869. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3869; Tomopoulos S, Dreyer BP, Berkule S, et al. Infant media exposure and toddler development. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010; 164(12):1105–1111. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.235; Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Associations between media viewing and language development in children under age 2 years. J Pediatr. 2007;151(4):364–368. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.071; Martinot P, Bernard JY, Peyre H, et al. Exposure to screens and children’s language development in the EDEN mother-child cohort. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11863. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90867-3; Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Television and DVD/ video viewing in children younger than 2 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(5):473–479. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.5.473; Kourlaba G, Kondaki K, Liarigkovinos T, Manios Y. Factors associated with television viewing time in toddlers and preschoolers in Greece: the GENESIS study. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009;31(2): 222–230. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdp011; Pons M, Bennasar-Veny M, Yañez AM. Maternal Education Level and Excessive Recreational Screen Time in Children: A Mediation Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):8930. doi:10.3390/ijerph17238930; De Decker E, De Craemer M, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Influencing factors of screen time in preschool children: an exploration of parents’ perceptions through focus groups in six European countries. Obes Rev. 2012;13 Suppl 1:75–84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00961.x; Khan KS, Purtell KM, Logan J, et al. Association Between Television Viewing and Parent-Child Reading in the Early Home Environment. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017;38(7):521–527. doi:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000465; WHO. Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. World Health Organization; 2019. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311664/9789241550536-eng.pdf. Accessed on December 27, 2021.; AAP COUNCIL ON COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA. Media and Young Minds. Pediatrics. 2016;138(5):e20162591. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2591; Dumuid D. Screen time in early childhood. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(3):169–170. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30005-5; Cheng S, Maeda T, Yoichi S, et al. Early television exposure and children’s behavioral and social outcomes at age 30 months. J Epidemiol. 2010;20(Suppl 2):S482–S489. doi:10.2188/jea.je20090179; Common Sense Media. Zero to eight. Children’s media use in America. San Francisco, CA; 2013.; Soares PSM, de Oliveira PD, Wehrmeister FC, et al. Screen time and working memory in adolescents: A longitudinal study. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;137:266–272. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.066; Vohr BR, McGowan EC, Bann C, et al. Association of High Screen-Time Use With School-age Cognitive, Executive Function, and Behavior Outcomes in Ex-tremely Preterm Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(10):1025–1034. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2041; Paulich KN, Ross JM, Lessem JM, Hewitt JK. Screen time and early adolescent mental health, academic, and social outcomes in 9- and 10-year old children: Utilizing the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0256591. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256591; MacGowan TL, Schmidt LA. Preschoolers’ Social Cognitive Development in the Age of Screen Time Ubiquity. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021;24(2):141–144. doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0093; Beland L, Murphy RJ. Ill Communication: Mobile Phones & Student Performance. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2014.; van den Eijnden R, Koning I, Doornwaard S, et al. The impact of heavy and disordered use of games and social media on adolescents’ psychological, social, and school functioning. J Behav Addict. 2018;7(3):697–706. doi:10.1556/2006.7.2018.65; Kirschner PA, Karpinski AC. Facebook® and academic performance. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26:1237–1245. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024; Bravo-Sánchez A, Morán-García J, Abián P, Abián-Vicén J. Association of the Use of the Mobile Phone with Physical Fitness and Academic Performance: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1042. doi:10.3390/ijerph18031042; Peiró-Velert C, Valencia-Peris A, González LM, et al. Screen media usage, sleep time and academic performance in ado lescents: clustering a self-organizing maps analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e99478. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099478; Howie EK, Joosten J, Harris CJ, Straker LM. Associations between meeting sleep, physical activity or screen time behaviour guidelines and academic performance in Australian school children. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):520. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08620-w; Ishii K, Aoyagi K, Shibata A, et al. Joint Associations of Leisure Screen Time and Physical Activity with Academic Performance in a Sample of Japanese Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):757. doi:10.3390/ijerph17030757; Mineshita Y, Kim HK, Chijiki H, et al. Screen time duration and timing: effects on obesity, physical activity, dry eyes, and learning ability in elementary school children. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):422. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10484-7; Choi M, Park S. The Mediating Effects of Academic Performance between Screen Time, Executive Function Difficulty and School Adjustment. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2020;43(4):334–347. doi:10.1080/24694193.2019.1675805; Huang X, Zeng N, Ye S. Associations of Sedentary Behavior with Physical Fitness and Academic Performance among Chinese Students Aged 8-19 Years. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(22):4494. doi:10.3390/ijerph16224494; Möβle T, Kleimann M, Rehbein F, Pfeiffer C. Media use and school achievement — boys at risk? Brit J Dev Psychol. 2010; 28(Pt 3):699–725. doi:10.1348/026151009x475307; Royant-Parola S, Londe V, Tréhout S, Hartley S. The use of social media modifies teenagers’ sleep-related behavior. Encephale. 2018;44(4):321–328. doi:10.1016/j.encep.2017.03.009; Hale L, Guan S. Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic literature review. Sleep Med Rev. 2015;21:50–58. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2014.07.007; Adelantado-Renau M, Diez-Fernandez A, Beltran-Valls MR, et al. The effect of sleep quality on academic performance is mediated by Internet use time: DADOS study. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2019;95(4): 410–418. doi:10.1016/j.jped.2018.03.006; Liu J, Riesch S, Tien J, et al. Screen Media Overuse and Associated Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional/Behavioral Outcomes in Children and Adoles-cents: An Integrative Review. J Pediatr Health Care. 2021:S0891-5245(21)00126-7. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2021.06.003; García-Hermoso A, Marina R. Relationship of weight status, physical activity and screen time with academic achievement in adolescents. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2017;11(1):44–50. doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2015.07.00; Vedechkina M, Borgonovi F. A Review of Evidence on the Role of Digital Technology in Shaping Attention and Cognitive Control in Children. Front Psychol. 2021;12:611155. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611155; Баранов А.А., Намазова-Баранова Л.С., Каркашадзе Г.А. Новые нейробиологические подходы к профилактике и лечению перинатальных поражений ЦНС. — М.: РАН; 2017. — 106 с.; Visser SN, Danielson ML, Bitsko RH, et al. Trends in the parent-report of health care provider-diagnosed and medicated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: United States, 2003–2011. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(1):34–46.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.09.001; Tandon PS, Sasser T, Gonzalez ES, et al. Physical Activity, Screen Time, and Sleep in Children With ADHD. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16(6):416–422. doi:10.1123/jpah.2018-0215; Tamana SK, Ezeugwu V, Chikuma J, et al. Screen-time is associated with inattention problems in preschoolers: Results from the CHILD birth cohort study. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0213995. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213995; Xie G, Deng Q, Cao J, Chang Q. Digital screen time and its effect on preschoolers’ behavior in China: results from a cross-sectional study. Ital J Pediatr. 2020;46(1):9. doi:10.1186/s13052-020-0776-x; Thoma VK, Schulz-Zhecheva Y, Oser C, et al. Media Use, Sleep Quality, and ADHD Symptoms in a Community Sample and a Sample of ADHD Patients Aged 8 to 18 Years. J Atten Disord. 2020; 24(4):576–589. doi:10.1177/1087054718802014; Thornton B, Faires A, Robbins M, Rollins E. The mere presence of a cell phone may be distracting implications for attention and task performance. Soc Psychol. 2014;45(6): 479–488. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000216; Leiva L, Böhmer M, Gehring S, Krüger A. Back to the app: the costs of mobile appication interruptions. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services — Mobile HCI’12. San Francisco, CA; 2012. pp. 291–294.; Levy EC, Rafaeli S, Ariel Y. The effect of online interruptions on the quality of cognitive performance. Telemat Inform. 2016;33(4): 1014–1021. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.03.003; Monk CA, Trafton JG, Boehm-Davis DA. The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008;14(4):299–313. doi:10.1037/a0014402; Stothart C, Mitchum A, Yehnert C. The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015;41(4):893–897. doi:10.1037/xhp0000100; Jiang K, Ling F, Feng Z, et al. Effects of mobile phone distraction on pedestrians’ crossing behavior and visual attention allocation at a signalized intersection: An outdoor experimental study. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;115:170–177. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.019; Caird JK, Johnston KA, Willness CR, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;71:311–318. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.005; Lillard AS, Peterson J. The immediate impact of different types of television on young children’s executive function. Pediatrics. 2011;128(4):644–649. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-1919; Rhodes SM, Stewart TM, Kanevski M. Immediate impact of fantastical television content on children’s executive functions. Br J Dev Psychol. 2020;38(2):268–288. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12318; Christakis DA, Zimmerman FJ, DiGiuseppe DL, McCarty CA. Early television exposure and subsequent attentional problems in children. Pediatrics. 2004;113:708–713. doi:10.1542/peds.113.4.708; Foster EM, Watkins S. The value of reanalysis: TV viewing and attention problems. Child Dev. 2010;81:368–375. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01400.x; Obel C, Henriksen TB, Dalsgaard S, et al. Does children’s watching of television cause attention problems? Retesting the hypothesis in a Danish cohort. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1372–1374; author reply 1373-4. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0954; Levelink B, van der Vlegel M, Mommers M, et al. The Longitudinal Relationship Between Screen Time, Sleep and a Diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Childhood. J Atten Disord. 2021;25(14):2003–2013. doi:10.1177/1087054720953897; Corkin MT, Peterson ER, Henderson AME, et al. Preschool screen media exposure, executive functions and symptoms of inattention/hyperactivity. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2021;73(2):101237. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101237; Ophir E, Nass C, Wagner AD. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(37):15583–15587. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903620106; Monsell S. Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7(3): 134–140. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00028-7; Moisala M, Salmela V, Hietajärvi L, et al. Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults. Neuroimage. 2016;134:113–121. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.011; Uncapher MR, K Thieu M, Wagner AD. Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016;23(2):483–490. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0907-3; Yap JY, Lim SWН. Media multitasking predicts unitary versus splitting visual focal attention. J Cogn Psychol. 2013;25(7): 889–902. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.835315; Loh KK, Kanai R. How Has the Internet Reshaped Human Cognition? Neuroscientist. 2016;22(5):506–520. doi:10.1177/1073858415595005; Minear M, Brasher F, McCurdy M, et al. Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013;20(6):1274–1281. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0456-6; Ralph BC, Thomson DR, Seli P, et al. Media multitasking and behavioral measures of sustained attention. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015;77(2):390–401. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0771-7; Lui KF, Wong AC. Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012;19(4):647–653. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0245-7; Elbe P, Sörman DE, Mellqvist E, et al. Predicting attention shifting abilities from self-reported media multitasking. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019;26(4):1257–1265. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-01566-6; Baumgartner S, Weeda W, Huizinga M. The Relationship Between Media Multitasking and Executive Function in Early Adolescents. J Early Adolescence. 2014;34(8):1120–1144. doi:10.1177/0272431614523133; Cain MS, Leonard JA, Gabrieli JD, Finn AS. Media multitasking in adolescence. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016;23(6):1932–1941. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1036-3; Martín-Perpiñá MM, Viñas Poch F, Malo Cerrato S. Media multitasking impact in homework, executive function and academic performance in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema. 2019;31(1): 81–87. doi:10.7334/psicothema2018.178; Swing EL, Gentile DA, Anderson CA, Walsh DA. Television and video game exposure and the development of attention problems. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):214–221. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1508; Gentile DA, Swing EL, Lim CG, Khoo A. Video game playing, attention problems, and impulsiveness: evidence of bidirectional causality. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2012;1(1):62–70. doi:10.1037/a0026969; Parkes A, Sweeting H, Wight D, Henderson M. Do television and electronic games predict children’s psychosocial adjustment? Longitudinal research using the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(5):341–348. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-301508; Pujol J, Fenoll R, Forns J, et al. Video gaming in school children: How much is enough? Ann Neurol. 2016;80(3):424–433. doi:10.1002/ana.24745; Cain MS, Prinzmetal W, Shimamura AP, Landau AN. Improved control of exogenous attention in action video game players. Front Psychol. 2014;5:69. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00069; Wu S, Spence I. Playing shooter and driving videogames improves top-down guidance in visual search. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013;75(4):673–686. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0440-2; Samson AD, Rohr CS, Park S, et al. Videogame exposure positively associates with selective attention in a cross-sectional sample of young children. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257877. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257877; Mishra J, Zinni M, Bavelier D, Hillyard SA. Neural basis of superior performance of action videogame players in an attentiondemanding task. J Neurosci. 2011;31(3):992–998. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4834-10.2011; Chisholm JD, Kingstone A. Improved top-down control reduces oculomotor capture: the case of action video game players. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012;74(2):257–262. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0253-0; Chisholm JD, Kingstone A. Action video games and improved attentional control: Disentangling selection- and response-based processes. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015;22(5):1430–1436. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0818-3; Hubert-Wallander B, Green CS, Sugarman M, Bavelier D. Changes in search rate but not in the dynamics of exogenous attention in action videogame players. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011;73(8):2399–2412. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0194-7; Pohl C, Kunde W, Ganz T, et al. Gaming to see: action video gaming is associated with enhanced processing of masked stimuli. Front Psychol. 2014;5:70. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00070; Bavelier D, Green CS. Enhancing Attentional Control: Lessons from Action Video Games. Neuron. 2019;104(1):147–163. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.031; Green CS, Bavelier D. Learning, attentional control, and action video games. Curr Biol. 2012;22(6):R197–R206. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.012; Green CS, Bavelier D. Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006;32(6):1465–1478. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1465; Strobach T, Frensch PA, Schubert T. Video game practice optimizes executive control skills in dual-task and task switching situations. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012;140(1):13–24. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.001; Oei AC, Patterson MD. Enhancing perceptual and attentional skills requires common demands between the action video games and transfer tasks. Front Psychol. 2015;6:113. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00113; Subrahmanyam K, Renukarya B. Digital games and learning: identifying pathways of influence. Educ Psychol. 2015;50(4): 335–348. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1122532; De Pasquale C, Chiappedi M, Sciacca F, et al. Online Videogames Use and Anxiety in Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Children (Basel). 2021;8(3):205. doi:10.3390/children8030205; Teng Z, Pontes HM, Nie Q, et al. Depression and anxiety symptoms associated with internet gaming disorder before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study. J Behav Addict. 2021;10(1):169–180. doi:10.1556/2006.2021.00016; Fazeli S, Mohammadi Zeidi I, Lin CY, et al. Depression, anxiety, and stress mediate the associations between internet gaming disorder, insomnia, and quality of life during the COVID-19 outbreak. Addict Behav Rep. 2020;12:100307. doi:10.1016/j.abrep.2020.100307; Bado P, Schafer J, Simioni AR, et al. Screen time and psychopathology: investigating directionality using cross-lagged panel models. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;1–3. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s00787-020-01675-5; Frith J, Kalin J. Here, I used to be: mobile media and practices of place-based digital memory. Space Cult. 2015;19(1):43–55. doi:10.1177/1206331215595730; Özkul D, Humphreys L. Record and remember: memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media. Mob Media Commun. 2015;3(3):351–365. doi:10.1177/2050157914565846; Sparrow B, Liu J, Wegner DM. Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science. 2011;333(6043):776–778. doi:10.1126/science.1207745; Henkel LA. Point-and-shoot memories: the influence of taking photos on memory for a museum tour. Psychol Sci. 2013;25(2): 396–402. doi:10.1177/0956797613504438; Zauberman G, Silverman J, Diehl K, Barasch A. Photographic memory: the effects of photo-taking on memory for auditory and visual information. Adv Consum Res. 2015; 43:218–223.; Burnett G, Lee K. The effect of vehicle navigation systems on the formation of cognitive maps. Int J Psychol. 2005;40:27–35. doi:10.1016/B978-008044379-9/50188-6; Wang Z, Tchernev JM. The “Myth” of media multitasking: reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, Personal Needs, and Gratifications. J Commun. 2012;62(3):493–513. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.x; Sherman LE, Payton AA, Hernandez LM, et al. The Power of the Like in Adolescence: Effects of Peer Influence on Neural and Behavioral Responses to Social Media. Psychol Sci. 2016; 27(7):1027–1035. doi:10.1177/0956797616645673; Sherman LE, Greenfield PM, Hernandez LM, Dapretto M. Peer Influence Via Instagram: Effects on Brain and Behavior in Adolescence and Young Adulthood. Child Dev. 2018;89(1):37–47. doi:10.1111/cdev.12838; Schutten D, Stokes KA, Arnell KM. I want to media multitask and I want to do it now: Individual differences in media multitasking predict delay of gratification and system-1 thinking. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):8. doi:10.1186/s41235-016-0048-x; Wilmer HH, Chein JM. Mobile technology habits: patterns of association among device usage, intertemporal preference, impulse control, and reward sensitivity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016;23(5): 1607–1614. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1011-z; Sanbonmatsu DM, Strayer DL, Medeiros-Ward N, Watson JM. Who multi-tasks and why? multi-tasking ability, perceived multitasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54402. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054402; Hadar AA, Eliraz D, Lazarovits A, et al. Using longitudinal exposure to causally link smartphone usage to changes in behavior, cognition and right prefrontal neural activity. Brain Stimul. 2015;8(2):318. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.032; Huber B, Yeates M, Meyer D, et al. The effects of screen media content on young children’s executive functioning. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018;170:72–85. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.006; Barr N, Pennycook G, Stolz JA, Fugelsang JA. The brain in your pocket: evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;48:473–480. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.029; Солдатова ГУ., Вишнева А.Е. Особенности развития когнитивной сферы у детей с разной онлайн-активностью: есть ли золотая середина? // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. — 2019. — Т. 27. — № 3. — С. 97–118. doi:10.17759/cpp.2019270307; Солдатова Г.У., Рассказова Е.И. Многозадачность как одновременное выполнение и как переключение между заданиями: подходы к диагностике медиамногозадачности у детей и подростков // Экспериментальная психология. — 2020. — Т. 13. — № 4. — С. 88–101. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2020130406; Разварина И.Н., Калачикова О.Н. Информационнокоммуникационные технологии. Влияние на познавательные процессы школьников // Society and Security Insights. — 2020. — Т. 3. — № 4. — С. 148–163. doi:10.14258/ssi(2020)4-12; Безруких М.М., Комкова Ю.Н. Особенности интеллектуального развития детей 15–16 лет с разным опытом работы за компьютером // Экспериментальная психология. — 2010. — № 3. — C. 110–122.; Кузнецова А.В. Когнитивные способности интернет-активных школьников 14–16 лет: автореф. дис. … канд. психол. наук. — М.; 2011. — 27 с.; Регуш Л.А., Алексеева Е.В., Веретина О.Р. и др. Особенности мышления подростков, имеющих разную степень погруженности в интернет-среду // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена. — 2019. — № 194. — С. 19–29.; https://vsp.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/2809

  14. 14
    Conference

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Наука. Информатизация. Технологии. Образование : материалы XIV международной научно-практической конференции. - Екатеринбург, 2021; Баранов, А. В. Использование смартфонов при организации проектно-исследовательской деятельности школьников в элективном курсе физики / А. В. Баранов, Н. Ю. Петров // Наука. Информатизация. Технологии. Образование : материалы XIV международной научно-практической конференции, г. Екатеринбург, 1-5 марта 2021 г. - Екатеринбург : Издательство РГППУ, 2021. - С. 10-16.; https://elar.rsvpu.ru/handle/123456789/34893

  15. 15
    Academic Journal
  16. 16
    Academic Journal

    جغرافية الموضوع: Минск

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Ахремчик, О. Л. Состав и использование программного обеспечения при проектировании цифровых устройств в ходе гибридного обучения = Software composition and using in digital device design under gibrid training / О. Л. Ахремчик, А. Р. Хабаров // Инженерное образование в цифровом обществе : материалы Международной научно-методической конференции, Минск, 14 марта 2024 г. : в 2 ч. Ч. 1 / Белорусский государственный университет информатики и радиоэлектроники; редкол.: Е. Н. Шнейдеров [и др.]. – Минск, 2024. – С. 243–245.; https://libeldoc.bsuir.by/handle/123456789/54837

  17. 17
    Academic Journal

    جغرافية الموضوع: Минск

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Луцик, Ю. А. Использование устройств на основе ПЛИС в процессе изучения аппаратных дисциплин = Use of FLD-based devices in the process hardware studies / Ю. А. Луцик, А. И. Стракович // Инженерное образование в цифровом обществе : материалы Международной научно-методической конференции, Минск, 14 марта 2024 г. : в 2 ч. Ч. 2 / Белорусский государственный университет информатики и радиоэлектроники; редкол.: Е. Н. Шнейдеров [и др.]. – Минск, 2024. – С. 166–167.; https://libeldoc.bsuir.by/handle/123456789/55013

  18. 18
    Academic Journal

    جغرافية الموضوع: Минск

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Ахремчик, О. Л. Использование программного обеспечения при проектировании цифровых устройств в ходе гибридного обучения = Software Using in Digital Design Under Hybrid Training / О. Л. Ахремчик, А. Р. Хабаров // Цифровая трансформация. – 2024. – Т. 30, № 2. – С. 16–23.; https://libeldoc.bsuir.by/handle/123456789/56431; http://dx.doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2024-30-2-16-23

  19. 19
    Report

    المساهمون: Солдатов, Алексей Иванович

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Асочаков А. С. Разработка резервированных цифровых устройств управления для энергопреобразующих устройств космических аппаратов : научный доклад / А. С. Асочаков; Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ), Управление магистратуры, аспирантуры и докторантуры (УМАД), Отделение электроэнергетики и электротехники (ОЭЭ); науч. рук. А. И. Солдатов. — Томск, 2022.; http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/70887

  20. 20
    Conference

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: Современные технологии, экономика и образование : сборник материалов II Всероссийской научно-методической конференции, г. Томск, 2-4 сентября 2020 г.; Кочетов Д. И. Концепт-проект цифрового спекл-флуориметрического дерматоскопа / Д. И. Кочетов, Г. В. Арышева // Современные технологии, экономика и образование : сборник материалов II Всероссийской научно-методической конференции, г. Томск, 2-4 сентября 2020 г. — Томск : Изд-во ТПУ, 2020. — [С. 254-256].; http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/64602