يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 2,778 نتيجة بحث عن '"робот"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.52s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
    Academic Journal
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Conference
  6. 6
  7. 7
    Academic Journal
  8. 8
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Pain medicine; Vol. 9 No. 1-2 (2024): Pain Medicine; 25-35 ; Medicina bolu; Том 9 № 1-2 (2024): Pain Medicine; 25-35 ; 2519-2752 ; 2414-3812

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Surgery and Oncology; Том 14, № 3 (2024); 35-42 ; Хирургия и онкология; Том 14, № 3 (2024); 35-42 ; 2949-5857

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/737/474; Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71(3):209–49. DOI:10.3322/caac.21660; Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2021 году. Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России. 2022. 239 c. .; Давыдов М.И., Чиссова В.И. Онкология: национальное руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2008. 1072 c.; Park J.S., Choi G.S., Lim K.H. et al. S052: a comparison of robotassisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2011;25:240–8. DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1166-z; Chan C.L.H, Bokey E.L., Chapuis P.H. et al. Local recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer is associated with anterior position of the tumour. Br J Surg 2006;93(1):105–12. DOI:10.1002/bjs.5212; Van der Pas M.H., Haglind E., Cuesta M.A. et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(3):210–8. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0; Федянин М.Ю., Артамонова Е.В., Барсуков Ю.А. и др. Практические рекомендации по лекарственному лечению рака прямой кишки. Злокачественные опухоли 2020;10(3S2-1): 392–439. DOI:10.18027/2224-5057-2020-10-3s2-23; Yang J., Luo Y., Tian T. et al. Effects of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on postoperative complications in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Oncol 2022;2022:8197701. DOI:10.1155/2022/8197701; Dominguez J.M., Jakate S.M., Speziale N.J. et al. Intestinal anastomotic healing at varying times after irradiation. J Surg Res 1996;61(1):293–9. DOI:10.1006/jsre.1996.0119; Jahnson S., Christofferson R.H., Gerdin B. Reduced mucosal perianastomotic capillary density in rat small intestine with chronic radiation damage. Radiat Res 1998;150(5):542–8.; Carr N.D., Pullen B.R., Hasleton P.S., Schofield P.F. Microvascular studies in human radiation bowel disease. Gut 1984;25(5):448–54. DOI:10.1136/gut.25.5.448; Hasleton P.S., Carr N., Schofield P.F. Vascular changes in radiation bowel disease. Histopathology 1985;9(5):517–34. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2559.1985.tb02833.x; Zhou S., Jiang Y., Pei W. et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer patients: A retrospective study of its safety and indications. J Surg Oncol 2021;124(3):354–60. DOI:10.1002/jso.26509; Hemandas A.K., Abdelrahman T., Flashman K. et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Annals of surgery 2010;252(1):84–9. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e45b66; Senagore A.J., Stulberg J., Byrnes J. et al. A national comparison of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52(2):183–6. DOI:10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ad4a4; Scarpinata R., Aly E.H. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56(2):253–62. DOI:10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182694595; Kang S.B., Park J.W., Jeong S.Y. et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11(7):637–45. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5; Van der Pas M.H., Haglind E., Cuesta M.A. et al. Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (Color II) Study group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(3):210–8. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0; Jeong S.Y., Park J.W., Nam B.H. et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(7):767–74. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0; Jayne D., Pigazzi A., Marshall H. et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318(16):1569– 80. DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.7219; Kim J.Y., Kim N.K., Lee K.Y. et al. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19(8):2485–93. DOI:10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1; Yamaguchi T., Kinugasa Y., Shiomi A. et al. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Surg Today 2016;46(8):957–62. DOI:10.1007/s00595-015-1266-4; Debakey Y., Zaghloul A., Farag A. et al. Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer surgery, first Egyptian academic center experience. RCT Minim Invasive Surg 2018;2018:5836562. DOI:10.1155/2018/5836562; Huang Y.M., Huang Y.J., Wei P.L. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and the effect of learning curve. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96(40):e8171. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000008171; Kang J., Yoon K.J., Min B.S. et al. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison–open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 2013;257(1):95–101. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182686bbd; Li X., Wang T., Yao L. et al. The safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic TME in patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96(29):e7585. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000007585; Law W.L., Foo D.C.C. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2017;31(7):2798–807. DOI:10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8; Sun Y., Xu H., Li Z. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2016;14:61. DOI:10.1186/s12957-016-0816-6; Xiong B., Ma L., Huang W. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19(3):516–26. DOI:10.1007/s11605-014-2697-8; Cho M.S., Baek S.J., Hur H. et al. Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(11):e522. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000000522; Kim M.J., Park S.C., Park J.W. et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2018;267(2):243–51. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002321; Bonjer H.J., Deijen C.L., Abis G.A. et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;372(14):1324–32. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1414882; Fleshman J., Branda M., Sargent D.J. et al. Effect of laparoscopicassisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314(13):1346–55. DOI:10.1001/jama.2015.10529; Denoya P., Wang H., Sands D. et al. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Surg Endosc 2010;24(4):933–8. DOI:10.1007/s00464-009-0702-1; Serin K.R., Gultekin F.A., Batman B. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of shortterm outcomes. J Robot Surg 2015;9(3):187–94. DOI:10.1007/s11701-015-0514-3; https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/737

  11. 11
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Urology Herald; Том 12, № 4 (2024); 82-90 ; Вестник урологии; Том 12, № 4 (2024); 82-90 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-4

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/923/591; Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. DOI:10.3322/caac.21660; Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):243-262. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042; Рамазанов К.К., Колонтарев К.Б., Генс Г.П., Говоров А.В., Васильев А.О., Садченко А.В., Алавердян А.И., Строганов Р.В., Скрупский К.С., Ким Ю.А., Ширяев А.А., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Долгосрочные онкологические и функциональные результаты робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Онкоурология. 2021;17(3):121-128. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-3-121-128; Fujimoto N, Shiota M, Tomisaki I, Minato A, Yahara K. Reconsideration on Clinical Benefit of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection during Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Urol Int. 2019;103(2):125-136. DOI:10.1159/000497280; Колонтарев К. Б., Пушкарь Д. Ю., Ахвледиани Н.Д., Велиев Е.И., Говоров А.В., Дружинина Н.К., Дьяков, В.В., Зингеренко М.Б., Зырянов А.В., Ковылина М.В., Медведев В.Л., Мосоян М.С., Павлов В.Н., Серёгин А.А., Шептунов С.А. Робот-ассистированная урология: национальное руководство. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2023. DOI:10.33029/9704-7511-9-ROB-2023-1-464; Abdollah F, Cozzarini C, Suardi N, Gallina A, Capitanio U, Bianchi M, Tutolo M, Salonia A, La Macchia M, Di Muzio N, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Indications for pelvic nodal treatment in prostate cancer should change. Validation of the Roach formula in a large extended nodal dissection series. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(2):624-629. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.2014; Dell’Oglio P, Abdollah F, Suardi N, Gallina A, Cucchiara V, Vizziello D, Zaffuto E, Cantiello F, Damiano R, Shariat S, Montorsi F, Briganti A. External validation of the European association of urology recommendations for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014;28(4):416-423. DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0571; Hinev AI, Anakievski D, Kolev NH, Hadjiev VI. Validation of nomograms predicting lymph node involvement in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Urol Int. 2014;92(3):300-305. DOI:10.1159/000354323; Gandaglia G, Martini A, Ploussard G, Fossati N, Stabile A, De Visschere P, Borgmann H, Heidegger I, Steinkohl F, Kretschmer A, Marra G, Mathieu R, Surcel C, Tilki D, Tsaur I, Valerio M, Van den Bergh R, Ost P, Gontero P, Montorsi F, Briganti A; EAU-YAU Prostate Cancer Working Group. External Validation of the 2019 Briganti Nomogram for the Identification of Prostate Cancer Patients Who Should Be Considered for an Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. Eur Urol. 2020;78(2):138-142. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.023; Cacciamani GE, Maas M, Nassiri N, Ortega D, Gill K, Dell’Oglio P, Thalmann GN, Heidenreich A, Eastham JA, Evans CP, Karnes RJ, De Castro Abreu AL, Briganti A, Artibani W, Gill I, Montorsi F. Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Its Extent on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(2):134-149. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001; Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A, Suardi N, Gallina A, Da Pozzo LF, Roscigno M, Zanni G, Valiquette L, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI. Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2006;50(5):1006-1013. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.015; Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Vickers AJ, Parwani AV, Reuter VE, Fine SW, Eastham JA, Wiklund P, Han M, Reddy CA, Ciezki JP, Nyberg T, Klein EA. A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):428-435. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046; Mottrie A, Van Migem P, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Fonteyne E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur Urol. 2007;52(3):746-750. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.029; Stolzenburg JU, Wasserscheid J, Rabenalt R, Do M, Schwalenberg T, McNeill A, Constantinides C, Kallidonis P, Ganzer R, Liatsikos E. Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration. World J Urol. 2008;26(6):581-586. DOI:10.1007/s00345-008-0327-3; Lebeis C, Canes D, Sorcini A, Moinzadeh A. Novel Technique Prevents Lymphoceles After Transperitoneal Robotic-assisted Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Peritoneal Flap Interposition. Urology. 2015;85(6):1505-1509. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.034; Lee M, Lee Z, Eun DD. Utilization of a Peritoneal Interposition Flap to Prevent Symptomatic Lymphoceles After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Endourol. 2020;34(8):821-827. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0073; Stolzenburg JU, Arthanareeswaran VKA, Dietel A, Franz T, Liatsikos E, Kyriazis I, Ganzer R, Yaney K, Do HM. Four-point Peritoneal Flap Fixation in Preventing Lymphocele Formation Following Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(5):443-448. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.004; Dal Moro F, Zattoni F. P.L.E.A.T.-Preventing Lymphocele Ensuring Absorption Transperitoneally: A Robotic Technique. Urology. 2017;110:244-247. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.031; Bründl J, Lenart S, Stojanoski G, Gilfrich C, Rosenhammer B, Stolzlechner M, Ponholzer A, Dreissig C, Weikert S, Burger M, May M. Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(14):243-250. DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2020.0243; Student V Jr, Tudos Z, Studentova Z, Cesak O, Studentova H, Repa V, Purova D, Student V. Effect of Peritoneal Fixation (PerFix) on Lymphocele Formation in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Results of a Randomized Prospective Trial. Eur Urol. 2023;83(2):154-162. Erratum in: Eur Urol. 2024;85(3):e95. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.027; Gloger S, Ubrig B, Boy A, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Siemer S, Arndt M, Stolzenburg JU, Franz T, Oelke M, Witt JH. Bilateral Peritoneal Flaps Reduce Incidence and Complications of Lymphoceles after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection-Results of the Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial ProLy. J Urol. 2022;208(2):333-340. DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000002693; Котов С.В., Простомолотов А.О., Неменов А.А. Факторы риска развития лимфогенных осложнений после радикальной простатэктомии с тазовой лимфаденэктомией. Урология. 2021;(3):114-121. DOI:10.18565/urology.2021.3.114-121.; Grande P, Di Pierro GB, Mordasini L, Ferrari M, Würnschimmel C, Danuser H, Mattei A. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Titanium Clips to Bipolar Coagulation in Sealing Lymphatic Vessels During Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2017;71(2):155-158. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.006; Abaza R, Henderson SJ, Martinez O. Robotic Vessel Sealer Device for Lymphocele Prevention After Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial. J Laparoendosc ADV Surg Tech A. 2022;32(7):721-726. DOI:10.1089/lap.2021.0531; Basourakos SP, Zhu A, Lewicki PJ, Ramaswamy A, Cheng E, Dudley V, Yu M, Karir B, Hung AJ, Khani F, Hu JC. Clipless Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Impact on Outcomes. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1176-1185. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.06.010; Waldert M, Remzi M, Klatte T, Klingler HC. FloSeal reduces the incidence of lymphoceles after lymphadenectomies in laparoscopic and robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25(6):969-973. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0635; Simonato A, Varca V, Esposito M, Venzano F, Carmignani G. The use of a surgical patch in the prevention of lymphoceles after extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: a randomized prospective pilot study. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2285-2290. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.033; Gilbert DR, Angell J, Abaza R. Evaluation of Absorbable Hemostatic Powder for Prevention of Lymphoceles Following Robotic Prostatectomy With Lymphadenectomy. Urology. 2016;98:75-80. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.071; Garayev A, Aytaç Ö, Tavukcu HH, Atug F. Effect of Autologous Fibrin Glue on Lymphatic Drainage and Lymphocele Formation in Extended Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2019;33(9):761-766. DOI:10.1089/end.2018.0853; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/923

  12. 12
    Academic Journal
  13. 13
    Academic Journal
  14. 14
    Academic Journal

    المؤلفون: Pogosyan, Rima

    المصدر: Bulletin of Yerevan University G: Economics; Vol. 14 No. 3 (42) (2023); 76-85 ; Բանբեր Երևանի համալսարանի. Տնտեսագիտություն; Vol. 14 No. 3 (42) (2023); 76-85 ; Вестник Ереванского Университета: Экономика; Том 14 № 3 (42) (2023); 76-85 ; 2738-2648 ; 2579-2946 ; 10.46991/BYSU:G/2023.14.3

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  15. 15
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Proceedings of the international scientific conference " MODERN CHALLENGES IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS "; 2024: Proceedings of the XVІІІ International Scientific and Technical Conference "MODERN CHALLENGES IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS - 2024"; 209-211 ; Збірник матеріалів Міжнародної науково-технічної конференції «ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ ТЕЛЕКОМУНІКАЦІЙ»; 2024: Матеріали XVІІІ Міжнародної науково-технічної конференції "Перспективи телекомунікацій - 2024"; 209-211 ; 2664-3057 ; 2663-502X

  16. 16
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies; Vol. 3 No. 9 (129) (2024): Information and controlling system; 60-69 ; Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies; Том 3 № 9 (129) (2024): Інформаційно-керуючі системи; 60-69 ; 1729-4061 ; 1729-3774

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

  17. 17
    Academic Journal
  18. 18
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Urology Herald; Том 12, № 1 (2024); 98-107 ; Вестник урологии; Том 12, № 1 (2024); 98-107 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-1

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/834/538; Gandaglia G, Leni R, Bray F, Fleshner N, Freedland SJ, Kibel A, Stattin P, Van Poppel H, La Vecchia C. Epidemiology and Prevention of Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(6):877-892. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2021.09.006; Seo HJ, Lee NR, Son SK, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH. Comparison of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57(5):1165-1177. DOI:10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1165; Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1415-1424. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1606220; Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2009;104(7):991-995. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x; Хирургия предстательной железы. Под ред. С.Б. Петрова. СПб., 2004.; Liatsikos EN, Assimakopoulos K, Stolzenburg JU. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2008;80(3):226-230. DOI:10.1159/000127331; Trost L, Elliott DS. Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:287489. DOI:10.1155/2012/287489; Tang K, Jiang K, Chen H, Chen Z, Xu H, Ye Z. Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):32237-32257. DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.13332; Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Bjartell A, Björholt I, Carlsson S, Hugosson J, Marlow T, Stinesen-Kollberg K, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wiklund P, Wilderäng U, Haglind E. Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial. Eur Urol. 2018;74(6):816-824. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.038; Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405-417. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045; Шведов А.М., Колонтарев К.Б., Бормотин А.В., Дьяков В.В., Витославский А.А., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Факторы риска недержания мочи у пациентов, перенесших радикальную робот-ассистированную простатэктомию. Вестник урологии. 2023;11(1):150-158. DOI:10.1038/s41585-021-00445-5; Mungovan SF, Carlsson SV, Gass GC, Graham PL, Sandhu JS, Akin O, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Patel MI. Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18(5):259-281. DOI:10.1038/s41585-021-00445-5; Parry MG, Skolarus TA, Nossiter J, Sujenthiran A, Morris M, Cowling TE, Berry B, Aggarwal A, Payne H, Cathcart P, Clarke NW, van der Meulen J. Urinary incontinence and use of incontinence surgery after radical prostatectomy: a national study using patient-reported outcomes. BJU Int. 2022;130(1):84-91. DOI:10.1111/bju.15663; Novara G, Ficarra V, D'elia C, Secco S, Cioffi A, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1028- 1033. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.069; Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, Katz MH, Thong AE, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL, Zagaja GP, Zorn KC. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73(2):316-322. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.493; Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A. Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 2008;179(5):1907-1911. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.036; Juszczak K, Ostrowski A, Adamowicz J, Maciukiewicz P, Drewa T. Urinary bladder hypertrophy and overactive bladder determine urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28(10):1329-1337. DOI:10.17219/acem/104532; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/834

  19. 19
    Academic Journal
  20. 20
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Agricultural Machinery and Technologies; Том 18, № 1 (2024); 30-37 ; Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии; Том 18, № 1 (2024); 30-37 ; 2073-7599

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.vimsmit.com/jour/article/view/556/505; Цой Ю.А. Становление и развитие исследований по механизации и автоматизации животноводства в России // Вестник ВИЭСХ. 2008. N1(3). С. 39-49.; Лачуга Ю.Ф., Кирсанов В.В. Анализ цикличности развития техники и технологий в различных технологических укладах на примере молочного животноводства // Российская сельскохозяйственная наука. 2021. N2. С. 54-58. DOI:10.31857/S2500262721020113. EDN: XPCDXT.; Морозов Н.М. Направления развития системы машин для животноводства // Вестник ВНИИМЖ. 2019. N4(36). С. 7-11.; Тесленко И.И., Тесленко И.Н., Тесленко И.И. Стационарная поточно-конвейерная доильная установка ДКТ-50 // Вестник академии знаний. 2016. N17(2). С. 6-9.; Морозов Н.М. Развитие механизации и автоматизации выполнения процессов в животноводстве // Техника и технологии в животноводстве. 2021. N2 (42). С. 93-101. DOI:10.51794/27132064-2021-2-93. EDN: ILECCB.; Стребков Д.С., Молоснов Н.Ф., Коршунов А.Б. История Всероссийского научно-исследовательского института электрификации сельского хозяйства // Альтернативная энергетика и экология. 2013. N2 (119). С.10-16. EDN: PXCYMN.; Кормановский Л.П. Опыт применения поточно-конвейерной технологии обслуживания коров (из истории отечественной науки) // Вестник ВНИИМЖ. 2019. N2 (34). С. 28-32.; Текучев И.К., Кормановский Л.П. Модернизация ферм – основа технической политики в молочном скотоводстве // Вестник ВНИИМЖ. 2018. N1 (29). С. 74-88. EDN: YTESVC.; Цой Ю.А. К 115-летию Валериана Семеновича Краснова – основоположника науки об электромеханизации животноводства // Инновации в сельском хозяйстве. 2016. N2(17). С. 8-11. EDN: WFCBPT.; Цой Ю.А., Баишева Р.А., Танифа В.В. и др. Ретроспективный анализ и сравнительная оценка беспривязного и привязного содержания коров. Мифы и реалии // Вестник ВНИИМЖ. 2018. N3(31). С. 37-43. EDN: UZPLLW.; Морозов Н.М., Кирсанов В.В., Ценч Ю.С. Историко-­аналитическая оценка развития процессов автоматизации и роботизации в молочном животноводстве // Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии. 2023. Т. 17. N1. С. 11-18. DOI:10.22314/2073-7599-2023-17-1-11-18. EDN: BJDTTU.; Кирсанов В.В., Павкин Д.Ю., Шилин Д.В. и др. Концепция, модели и схемы дифференцированного управления в роботизированном манипуляторе доения // Аграрная наука Евро-Северо-Востока. 2021. Т. 22. N1. С. 128-135. DOI:10.30766/2072-9081.2021.22.1.128-135.; https://www.vimsmit.com/jour/article/view/556