يعرض 1 - 20 نتائج من 242 نتيجة بحث عن '"Álvaro Estramiana, José Luis"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.90s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    Academic Journal
  2. 2
    Academic Journal
  3. 3
  4. 4
    Academic Journal
  5. 5
    Academic Journal
  6. 6
    Academic Journal
  7. 7
    Academic Journal
  8. 8
    Academic Journal
  9. 9
    Academic Journal
  10. 10
  11. 11
    Academic Journal
  12. 12
    Electronic Resource
  13. 13
    Electronic Resource
  14. 14
    Electronic Resource
  15. 15
  16. 16
    Academic Journal
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
    Academic Journal

    المصدر: Revista Colombiana de Psicología; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2020); 13 - 24 ; Revista Colombiana de Psicología; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2020); 13 - 24 ; Revista Colombiana de Psicología; v. 29 n. 2 (2020); 13 - 24 ; 2344-8644 ; 0121-5469

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    Relation: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/80004/75997; Albiston, C. (2007). Institutional Perspectives on Law, Work, and Family. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112803; Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty. Gender & Society, 24, 616–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210383142; Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744; Burgess, N. (2013). The Motherhood Penalty: How Gender and Parental Status Influence Judgements of Job-Related Competence and Organizational Commitment. Seminar Research Paper Series, Paper 32. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/lrc_paper_series/32/?utm_source=digitalcommons.uri.edu%2Flrc_paper_series%2F32&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages; Bygren, M., Erlandsson, A., & Gähler, M. (2017). Do employers prefer fathers? Evidence from a field experiment testing the gender by parenthood interaction effect on callbacks to job applications. European Sociological Review, 33, 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx051; Castillo-Mayén, R., & Montes-Berges, B. (2014). Analysis of Current Gender Stereotypes. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1044-1060. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.138981; Connor, R. A., Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2016). Ambivalent Sexism in the Twenty-First Century. In C. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice, 295 – 320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297-1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799; Cuadrado, I., López-Rodríguez, L., & Navas, M. (2016). La perspectiva de la minoría: estereotipos y emociones entre grupos inmigrantes. Anales de Psicología, 32, 535-544. http://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.2.205341; Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x; Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.P., …., & Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X314935; Cundiff, J. L., & Vescio, T. K. (2016). Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace. Sex Roles, 75, 126 – 138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0593-2; Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender,123-174. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.; Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275 – 298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719; Etaugh, C., & Folger, D. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018850404838; Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128; Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878; Flaquer, L., & Escobedo, A. (2014). Licencias parentales y política social de la paternidad en España. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 32, 69-99. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CRLA.2014.v32.n1.44714; Garrido-Luque, A., Álvaro-Estramiana, J. L., & Rosas-Torres, A. R. (2018). Estereotipos de género, maternidad y empleo: un análisis psicológico, Pensando Psicología, 14. https://doi.org/10.16925/pe.v14i23.2261; Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491; Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109 – 118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109; Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544212; González, M. J., Cortina, C., & Rodríguez, J. (2019). The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Hiring: A Field Experiment. European Sociological Review, 35, 187 -204. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy055; Gungor, G., & Biernat, M. (2009). Gender Bias or Motherhood Disadvantage? Judgments of Blue Collar Mothers and Fathers in the Workplace. Sex Roles, 60, 232- 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9540-1; Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, (32), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003; Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same Behavior, different consequences: Reactions to Men’s and Women’s Altruistic Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431; Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189; Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2011). Gender-fair language in job advertisements and hiring decisions. In S. Sczesny (Chair), Gender-fair language use from a social psychological perspective. Symposium conducted at the 16th General meeting of the European association of social psychology, Stockholm.; Johansson, E. (2010). The effect of own and spousal parental leave on earnings, IFAU Working Paper 2010:4. ifau – Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Swedish Ministry of Employment. Uppsala, Sweden. Accessed May 1, 2017: http://www.ifau.se/ ISSN 1651-1166; Kricheli-Katz, T. (2012). Choice, Discrimination, and Motherhood Penalty. Law & Society Review, 46, 557–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00506.x; Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234; Livermore, T., Rodgers, J., & Siminski, P. (2011). The Effect of Motherhood on Wages and Wage Growth: Evidence for Australia. The Economic Record, 87, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00745.x; López-Rodríguez, L., Cuadrado, I., & Navas, M. (2013). Extended application of the Stereotype Content Model (scm) towards three immigrant groups in Spain. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913806751375; Lyness, K. S., & Judiesch, M. K. (2014). Gender egalitarianism and work–life balance for managers: Multisource perspectives in 36 countries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63, 96-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12011; Michinov, N., Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., & Méot, A. (2005). Social dominance orientation, prejudice, and discrimination: A new computer-based method for studying discriminatory behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206402; Morales, M. & Aguirre, E. (2018). Involucramiento parental basado en el hogar y desempeño académico en la adolescencia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 27, 137-160. https://doi.org/10.15446/ rcp.v27n2.66212; Pedregosa, P. R., & Díaz, R. M. (2016). Sexismo hostil y benevolente en adolescentes. Una aproximación étnico-cultural. Género y Educación, 72, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie72126; Pereira, M., Álvaro, J. L. & Garrido, A. (2016). Procesos de esencialización de hombres y mujeres: Un estudio comparado Brasil-España. Anales de psicología, 32(1), 190-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.190841; Plickert, G., & Sterling, J. (2017). Gender still matters: Effects of workplace discrimination on employment schedules of young professionals. Laws, 6, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6040028; Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personal variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741; Sterling, J., & Reichman, N. (2016). Overlooked and Undervalued: Women in Private Law Practice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12, 373–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121705; Sullivan, C. (2015). ‘Bad Mum Guilt’: the representation of ‘work-life balance’ in UK women’s magazines. Community, Work & Family, 18, 284-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2014.970128; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/80004

  20. 20