المؤلفون: Yang, Jing, Shao, Lushen, Jin, Xiang, Zhou, Lijun

المصدر: International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2022, Vol. 18, Issue 11, pp. 4926-4947.

URL الوصول: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2021-0758

المؤلفون: Kamal Aldi Bin Syamsul, Putri Icut Pridani, Maharani Anita

المصدر: Journal of Economics and Management, Vol 46, Iss 1, Pp 474-507 (2024)

مصطلحات موضوعية: innovative work behavior, transformational leadership, middle management, non-metallic minerals sector, m10, m50, m54, l69, Management. Industrial management, HD28-70, Economic theory. Demography, HB1-3840

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2719-9975

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/e50f1aa1c3f74c65aeb9edfc4d4f2867

المؤلفون: Matuszek Józef, Kaczmar-Kolny Ewa, Byrdy Łukasz

المصدر: Foundations of Management, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 101-114 (2023)

مصطلحات موضوعية: cost calculation, costing sheets, organization of production, manufacturing costs, l69, m41, Management. Industrial management, HD28-70, Business, HF5001-6182

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2300-5661

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/fb5b8d8351f84cb3a17cde309a948f35

المؤلفون: Hendayana, Yayan, El-Kafafi, Siham, Waskito, Meindro, Faeni, Dewi Puspaningtyas

المصدر: Integrated Journal of Business and Economics; Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Integrated Journal of Business and Economics; 129-144 ; Integrated Journal of Business and Economics (IJBE); Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Integrated Journal of Business and Economics; 129-144 ; 2549-3280 ; 2549-5933 ; 10.33019/ijbe.v8i2

مصطلحات موضوعية: Management, Business Networking, Innovation, Firm Competitiveness, Handicraft Industry, M39, O39, L19, L69

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: https://ojs.ijbe-research.com/index.php/IJBE/article/view/924/pdf; https://ojs.ijbe-research.com/index.php/IJBE/article/view/924

الاتاحة: https://ojs.ijbe-research.com/index.php/IJBE/article/view/924
https://doi.org/10.33019/ijbe.v8i2.924

المؤلفون: Pandey Gaurav Kumar, Patel Praveen Bhai, Kumar Abhishek, Niranjan Ramendra Singh, Katiyar Vikas, Chandra A K

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 28, Iss 1, Pp 50-55 (2022)

مصطلحات موضوعية: wedm, mrr, sr, ti-6al-4v, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/0d1c4ba2c87b4505b8b0a6e9dc8f3358

المؤلفون: Galkin Andrii, Zaytsev Vitaliy, Shyshkin Viktor, Obolentseva Larysa, Popova Yuliia

المصدر: Foundations of Management, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 145-158 (2021)

مصطلحات موضوعية: end-consumers, logistics, zone, service, nonlinearity factor, slope factor, m31, m39, c93, d19, l69, Management. Industrial management, HD28-70, Business, HF5001-6182

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2300-5661

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/72f7c849ef1b46ab9ac63e8f1cfaa04e

المؤلفون: Sidun Iurii, Vollis Oleksiy, Hidei Volodymyr, Bidos Volodymyr

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 27, Iss 3, Pp 191-195 (2021)

مصطلحات موضوعية: slurry surfacing mix, bitumen emulsion, ortho-phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, oxidized bitumen, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/2e5073de59fc4b7fa402068ec8e56d51

المؤلفون: Sullivan de Estrada, Kate, author, Moussavi, Babak, author

المصدر: Forging New Partnerships, Breaching New Frontiers : India's Diplomacy during the UPA Rule 2004-14, 2022.

الاتاحة: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192868060.003.0012

المؤلفون: Hasan Mohd Faizan, Bharti Prem Kumar, Rahim Mohd Reyaz Ur

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 27, Iss 2, Pp 112-118 (2021)

مصطلحات موضوعية: wire offset, surface morphology, sem, wire edm, rsm, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/728cab74a6104e469952de834a28e909

المؤلفون: Radek Norbert, Tokar Dorota, Kalinowski Artur, Pietraszek Jacek

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 27, Iss 2, Pp 119-123 (2021)

مصطلحات موضوعية: dlc, laser texturing, coatings, tribological properties, graphite, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/eeac8400a03f4084aaa96549564622b2

المؤلفون: Lipiński Tomasz

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 27, Iss 2, Pp 108-111 (2021)

مصطلحات موضوعية: steel, stainless steel, corrosion, corrosion rate, profile roughness, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/62b9e057498f43f5816c3b73e351e792

المؤلفون: Othman Rapidah, Kamal Afiqah Samsul, Jabarullah N.H.

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 27, Iss 2, Pp 124-129 (2021)

مصطلحات موضوعية: production of graphite, graphitic carbon material, quality of graphite, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/72b955af46dc48989ae21ca91693d1ca

المؤلفون: Lowell, Percival, 1855-1916

مصطلحات موضوعية: Trans-Neptunian objects, Planets, Ultra-Neptunian, Solar system, Pluto (Dwarf planet), QB703 .T73 L69 1915

Relation: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009026348

الاتاحة: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009026348

المؤلفون: Llases, Luis

مصطلحات موضوعية: L69, Bitcoin, Criptomoneda, Concentración, Minería, Cryptocurrency, Concentration, Mining, Economía industrial

وصف الملف: application/pdf

Relation: Llases, Luis. «Breve análisis de la concentración de la potencia de minado en Bitcoin». Papeles de Europa 34, n.o 1 (14 de marzo de 2022): 29-39. https://doi.org/10.5209/pade.73881.; https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/7318

الاتاحة: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/7318
https://doi.org/10.5209/pade.73881

المؤلفون: Khalilzadeh, Mohammad, Kebriyaii, Omid, Šaparauskas, Jonas, Lepkova, Natalija

المساهمون: Ekonomická fakulta

مصطلحات موضوعية: stakeholder engagement, strategy selection, SWOT analysis, Fuzzy Delphi method, Fuzzy SWARA-WASPAS, oil and gas project, L69, C61, C63

وصف الملف: text; application/pdf

Relation: Aarseth, W., Ahola, T., Aaltonen, K., Økland, A., & Andersen, B. (2017). Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006; Abidin, N. Z. (2010). Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers. Habitat International, 34(4), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.011; APM. (2012). Body of Knowledge (6th ed.). Princes Risborough: Association for Project Management (APM).; Agarwal, S., Kant, R., & Shankar, R. (2020). Evaluating solutions to overcome humanitarian supply chain management barriers: A hybrid fuzzy SWARA – Fuzzy WASPAS approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101838.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101838; Atkin, B., & Skitmore, R. M. (2008). Editorial: stakeholder management in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 549–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802142405; Ayyildiz, E., & Taskin Gumus, A. (2020). A novel spherical fuzzy AHP-integrated spherical WASPAS methodology for petrol station location selection problem: a real case study for İstanbul. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12), 36109–36120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09640-0; Azubuike, S. I., Songi, O., Irowarisima, M., & Chinda, J. K. (2018). Identifying policy and legal issues for shale gas development in Algeria: A SWOT analysis. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.10.005; Bahadorestani, A., Naderpajouh, N., & Sadiq, R. (2020). Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118402; Barghi, B., & Shadrokh sikari, S. (2020). Qualitative and quantitative project risk assessment using a hybrid PMBOK model developed under uncertainty conditions. Heliyon, 6(1), e03097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03097; Burgelman, R. A., Christensen, C. M., & Wheelwright, S. C. (2008). Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.; Bowie, N. E., & Werhane, P. H. (2004). Management Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.; Chinweze, C., Echetebu, C., & Onyeri, I. (2015). Stakeholders engagement in the Oil and Gas Industry in Nigeria. In IAIA15 Conference Proceedings: Impact Assessment in the Digital Era, 35th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment (pp. 1–6). Florence, Italy.; Cleland, D. I. (1999). Project Management: Strategic Design and Implementation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.; Collinge, W. (2020). Stakeholder Engagement in Construction: Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethical Behaviors, and Practices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3), 04020003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001769; Dahooie, J. H., Zavadskas, E. K., Abolhasani, M., Vanaki, A., & Turskis, Z. (2018). A novel approach for evaluation of projects using an Interval–Valued Fuzzy Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method: A case study of oil and gas well drilling projects. Symmetry, 10(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10020045; Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.006; Davis, K. (2016). A method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder groups. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.009; Davis, K. (2017). An empirical investigation into different stakeholder groups perception of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 604–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.004; de Oliveira, G. F., & Rabechini Jr, R. (2019). Stakeholder management influence on trust in a project: A quantitative study. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.11.001; Derakhshan, R., Turner, R., & Mancini, M. (2019). Project governance and stakeholders: a literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.007; De Vita, G., Lagoke, O., & Adesola, S. (2016). Nigerian oil and gas industry local content development: A stakeholder analysis. Public Policy and Administration, 31(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715581635; Eldanfour, I., Elseraiti, A., & Abushaiba, I. (2014). The attributes of stakeholders regarding accounting for oil and gas upstream activities in Libya. The Macrotheme Review, 3(6), 58–65.; Erkul, M., Yitmen, I., & Celik, T. (2019). Dynamics of stakeholder engagement in mega transport infrastructure projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(7), 1465–1495. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2018-0175; Eskerod, P., & Huemann, M. (2013). Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: What standards say. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291017; Eskerod, P., Huemann, M., & Savage, G. (2015). Project Stakeholder Management – Past and Present. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21555; Eskerod, P., & Larsen, T. (2017). Advancing project stakeholder analysis by the concept ‘shadow of context’. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.003; Eyiah-Botwe, E., Aigbavboa, C., & Thwala, W. D. (2016). Mega Construction Projects: using stakeholder management for enhanced sustainable construction. American Journal of Engineering Research, 5(5), 80–86.; Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.; Habibi, A., Jahantigh, F. F., & Sarafrazi, A. (2015). Fuzzy Delphi Technique for Forecasting and Screening Items. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 5(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7307.2015.00036.5; Hajizadeh, Y. (2019). Machine learning in oil and gas; a SWOT analysis approach. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 176, 661–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.01.113; Ismail, S. A., Heeks, R., Nicholson, B., & Aman, A. (2018). Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships: an institutional logics perspective. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1320962; Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924; Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1988). Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishers.; Kazemi, A., Katebi, A., & Kazemi, M. H. (2018). Identifying causes of delay in oil and gas construction projects using Fuzzy Delphi method. International Scientific-Practical Magazine, 5, 207–214.; Kerzner, H. R. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.; Khan, M. I. (2018). Evaluating the strategies of compressed natural gas industry using an integrated SWOT and MCDM approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1035–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.231; Khatir, M. V., & Akbarzadeh, Z. (2019). Elucidation of structural relationships of SWOT: A mixed method approach based on FMADM for formulating science and technology strategies. Technology in Society, 56, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.09.004; Kimiagari, S., Keivanpour, S., Al-Azad, S., & Mohiuddin, M. (2015). Using the Fuzzy Delphi Method to Apply a Model of Knowledge Transfer through International Strategic Alliances in Up-Stream Oil and Gas Sectors. Contemporary Management Research, 11(4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.13183; Kumaraswamy, M., Wong, K. K. W., & Chung, J. (2017). Focusing megaproject strategies on sustainable best value of stakeholders. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(4), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2017-0003; Lehtinen, J., & Aaltonen, K. (2020). Organizing external stakeholder engagement in inter-organizational projects: opening the black box. International Journal of Project Management, 38(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.12.001; Li, T. H., Ng, S. T., & Skitmore, M. (2013). Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: A fuzzy approach. Automation in Construction, 29, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.007; Li, Y., Lu, Y., & Peng, Y. (2011). Hierarchical structuring success factors of project stakeholder management in the construction organization. African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), 9705–9713. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM.9000317; Locatelli, G., Mancini, M., & Romano, E. (2014). Systems Engineering to improve the governance in complex project environments. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1395–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.007; Loosemore, M. (2010). Using multimedia to effectively engage stakeholders in risk management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(2), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011036608; Mavi, R., Goh, M., & Zarbakhshnia, N. (2017). Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91(5–8), 2401–2418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9880-x; Mbelwa, L. (2018). Investigation of stakeholder management in the oil and gas industry in Tanzania. Business Management Review, 21(1), 34–59. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/4729; McGrath, S. K., & Whitty, S. J. (2017). Stakeholder defined. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(4), 721–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-12-2016-0097; Merrow, E. W. (2012). Oil and gas industry megaprojects: Our recent track record. Oil and Gas Facilities, 1(2), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.2118/153695-PA; Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105; Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007; Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, R. J. (2017). Addressing stakeholder complexity and major pitfalls in large cultural building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.009; Mysore, K., Kirytopoulos, K., Ahn, S., & Ma, T. (2020). Adversarial factors in multi-stakeholders’ engagement of global-IT projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(2), 445–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-01-2019-0014; Nguyen, T. H. D., Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., & Wood, A. (2019). Stakeholder influence strategies in construction projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2018-0093; Olander, S., & Landin, A. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(4), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002; Oppong, G. D., Chan, A. P., & Dansoh, A. (2017). A review of stakeholder management performance attributes in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1037–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.015; Post, J. E., Lee, E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Business Books.; Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1987.6498856; PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.; Silvério, L., Trabasso, L. T., & Pessôa, M. V. P. (2019). A roadmap for a leanness company to emerge as a true lean organization. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 28(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X19888259; Tavana, M., Pirdashti, M., Kennedy, D. T., Belaud, J. P., & Behzadian, M. (2012). A hybrid Delphi-SWOT paradigm for oil and gas pipeline strategic planning in Caspian Sea basin. Energy Policy, 40, 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.020; Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., & Kosareva, N. (2015). A hybrid model based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS for construction site selection. International Journal of Computers, Communications and Control, 10(6), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2078; Tzeng, G. H., & Teng, J. Y. (1993). Transportation investment project selection with fuzzy multiobjectives. Transportation Planning and Technology, 17(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069308717504; Xingang, Z., Jiaoli, K., & Bei, L. (2013). Focus on the development of shale gas in China – Based on SWOT analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.044; Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., Drew, D. S., & Ho, M. (2010). Critical Success Factors for Stakeholder Management: Construction Practitioners’ Perspectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(7), 778–786. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000180; Yazdi, A. K., Komijan, A. R., Wanke, P. F., & Sardar, S. (2020). Oil Project Selection in Iran: A Hybrid MADM Approach in an Uncertain Environment. Applied Soft Computing, 88, 106066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106066; Yu, J., & Leung, M. Y. (2018). Structural stakeholder model in public engagement for construction development projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6), 04018046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001462; Yu, T., Liang, X., Shen, G. Q., Shi, Q., & Wang, G. (2019). An optimization model for managing stakeholder conflicts in urban redevelopment projects in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.071; Ekonomie a Management; Economics and Management; true; https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/161025

الاتاحة: https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/161025
https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-4-004

المؤلفون: Lipiński Tomasz

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 21, Iss 21, Pp 20-23 (2018)

مصطلحات موضوعية: steel, structural steel, non-metallic inclusions, oxide impurities, fatigue strength, bending fatigue, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/7d280dc10dab416285e8d579e64e5a49

المؤلفون: Karataş M. Ziya, Rizaoğlu Tamer

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 21, Iss 21, Pp 12-19 (2018)

مصطلحات موضوعية: geomaterial, natural rock, exterior coating, acrylic, isolation, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/acc59e3335fc43529f8606496dd13287

المؤلفون: Strzelczak Katarzyna

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 19, Iss 19, Pp 26-29 (2018)

مصطلحات موضوعية: dental bur, diamond coating, dental tools, quality control, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/1a17484e5097462c981dbf7646796375

المؤلفون: Lisiecka Barbara

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 19, Iss 19, Pp 6-9 (2018)

مصطلحات موضوعية: tungsten carbide burs, wc–co, dental burs, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/d863ed614b714feeba6f4604963f48a6

المؤلفون: Romankiewicz Remigiusz, Romankiewicz Ferdynand

المصدر: Production Engineering Archives, Vol 19, Iss 19, Pp 30-36 (2018)

مصطلحات موضوعية: silumin, microstructure, micro additive, modification, l69, m11, Machine design and drawing, TJ227-240, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, TA213-215

وصف الملف: electronic resource

Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2353-7779

URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/f9b8a867874d4dcc9854d9a5c120d5dc